From knightjanos at gmail.com Sun Mar 1 09:40:29 2009 From: knightjanos at gmail.com (Janos Abel) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:40:29 +0000 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Kicking the factory addiction In-Reply-To: <009a01c99a18$c2c4f4b0$484ede10$@net> References: <009a01c99a18$c2c4f4b0$484ede10$@net> Message-ID: <7051643f0903010840id84a0eay44db4ca0ecd33c86@mail.gmail.com> Please do not paste entire articles off the web into your post. Just post your comments (recommended) and the link to the article, like below 2009/3/1 mary rose > What I find amazing in articles like this is the complete lack of > comprehension of the lessening of need for human labor amongst > technological > advances, along with the fact that on a finite planet resources are > limited. > There seems to be only regard for the human condition and none for the life > support system upon which the human family depends. Why is this? How can we > keep on ignoring these things that are so vital to our continued existence? > > > -----{snipped} Original Message----- > > Kicking the factory addiction > ... > > http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090227.wrcover28/BNStor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Sun Mar 1 09:55:06 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Humpty Dumpty Finance Message-ID: <000e01c99a8e$7cfc8fd0$76f5af70$@net> The answer on this appears to be for people to move into local community currencies, and conduct banking only with the community banks and Credit Union banks. As posted in an article sent out last week, these banks are still solvent and very solidly based. So, why bother with the big banks, do we really need them? Let them fall. Those who hold shares in them will probably lose their money one way or another. And, for the most part, are these shareholders not members of the elite banking class? mary rose -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 10:19 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Humpty Dumpty Finance (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Humpty Dumpty Finance http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-k-richards/humpty-dumpty-finance_b_17066 4.html February 27, 2009 | 05:12 PM (EST) The current financial mess is fixable, and even fixable quickly; but in order to gather political support for implementation of the right fix it is important to understand, and explain to the public, why the fixes applied since Lehman went bankrupt in September have not worked. The essential point to understand is that the 'modern' securities-based system of Wall St. finance was fatally wounded when Lehman Brothers went under, although this demise has not been accepted by many academics or Wall St. bankers. Like Humpty Dumpty, this system can not be put back together again. Geithner & Co.'s attempts to resurrect it, the latest misguided effort being TALF, will fail, and cause further delay in restoration of normally functioning private credit markets. We need to recapitalize the banks with massive amounts of new private capital, so they have the capacity to hold many more of the loans they make on their own balance sheets, and bank lending can supply the funding gap opened up by the demise of the securities-based credit system.. Flaws in the System To begin, it is important to recognize how Wall St. has transformed the bank-based credit system, which existed in the 1930's and prevailed until the mid-1990's, into the 'modern' securities-based credit system we have today. Non-bank sources currently supply more than half the credit needs of businesses and consumers. This transformation in the way credit is supplied has made it difficult for the Federal Reserve to reignite credit growth through massive expansion of the Federal Reserve balance sheet, which was the supposed 1930's style antidote. The old-style banking system, in which banks kept the loans they made on their balance sheets, would have responded quickly to Bernancke's interest rate cuts and aggressive injections of excess reserves. But banks today no longer keep most of the credits they underwrite on their own balance sheets, nor do they keep them in the form of individual loans. Instead, banks gather credits together to form asset-based or mortgage-based bonds which they then distribute or sell to pension funds, insurance companies, banks, hedge funds, and other investors worldwide. (Banks do keep some of these newly created asset-backed bonds on their own balance sheets.) It is also important to recognize the critical and pivotal role that credit rating agencies and the writers of credit default insurance played in the functioning of this 'modern' credit system. Many of the asset- backed bonds kept by the banks were rated AAA by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch. Importantly, the AAA rating was granted by the agencies because it was supported by the added protection provided by credit default insurance ("credit default swaps", or "CDS"), the largest provider being American International Group (AIG), which was the largest insurance company in the world. Based on the impressive strength of AIG's AAA rated balance sheet and the AAA rating granted to the bonds by the rating agencies, it was widely believed that there was almost no risk that the AAA rated bonds would default. Under Basel II bank regulations, banks were required to set aside little, if any, capital reserves against holdings of AAA credits. Thus, under the umbrella of the AAA rating, banks could add earning assets and leverage to their balance sheets without the added burden of allocating more regulatory capital. This same dynamic made the AAA asset-backed bonds attractive to many insurance companies and other regulated entities, including foreign banks. This ability to hold AAA rated bonds without setting aside additional capital led to a highly levered global financial system. This 'modern' model of writing loans and distributing them has a serious, fatal flaw. It undermines the integrity of promises. It is the classic 'agency problem' identified and studied by countless economists, where the self-centered motivations of the agents conflict with the security interests of the principals. When lenders are separated from borrowers, intermediaries (such as mortgage brokers, home appraisers, loan packagers, rating agencies, or bond salesmen, as well as the top leadership of major banks), can be enticed by lucrative commission revenues to pursue sloppy or even fraudulent lending practices that, in the past, had been constrained by the old-fashioned model, where banks kept the loans they wrote on their balance sheets, and where banks were kept in check by close monitoring by the FDIC. The Crash Without confidence in the writers of credit default insurance and the rating agencies, the model of 'modern finance' can not function. In September, when Lehman Brothers went under and AIG was back-stopped by the government, confidence in the rating agencies and their AAA ratings collapsed. Credit default insurance prices went through the roof and the prices of the heretofore AAA bonds dropped by a corresponding amount. Hardly any sizable organizations were willing to continue writing credit default insurance. The sharp decline in ABS bond prices and the jump in quotes for CDS immediately cut the value of bank assets and shrank, by the same amount, bank capital positions as calculated for regulatory purposes. This happened despite the fact that the banks had sold the bonds only in rare cases. Suddenly, many banks become undercapitalized, which froze the credit markets. Writers of credit default swaps had to post massive additional amounts of 'good' collateral, i.e. government bonds or cash. In order to raise this cash, writers of CDS sold anything and everything. The result was a stock, bond, and commodity market crash. Under current accounting practices, called 'mark to market', accountants and bank regulators insist on using the observable prices available in public and private markets to determine bank capital positions. But these 'marks' are only available in what are now very thinly-traded markets for asset backed bonds and credit default swaps. In hindsight, it is clear that writers of credit default insurance on individual securities under-reserved and under-priced their product. They failed to take into account systemic risk--that in financial markets, the risk of default of any one bond or counterparty is increased by the defaults of others. Simply put, in financial markets risks are correlated, not uncorrelated. It is also clear that only the government is big enough to underwrite systemic risk. The government can do this either as the 'lender of last resort', which it fully understands, or, given today's 'modern' securities-based credit system, it must act as the 'credit insurer of last resort.' This is, in effect, what the government is doing when it offers 'guarantees' to various capital markets, such as commercial paper and mortgages. ABS Pricing and the Debate Over Bank Solvency There is no doubt that banks have many bad loans and securities on their balance sheets. But the size of the losses is in dispute because the structure of the asset backed bonds is complex, and because the value can reasonably be assessed in more than one way. Markets for the heretofore AAA bonds and the corresponding credit default swaps are thin, with wide spreads between bid and asking prices. Nevertheless, transactions occur, and they occur at levels that banks contend are unrealistically low. Based on the 'marks' currently extant, many banks are grossly undercapitalized, and in several cases, if banks were required to sell their bonds at current prices, they would be insolvent. The banks claim that reasonable estimates of discounted cash flow make it ridiculous to sell bonds at such low recent prices or to use these prices to determine bank capital requirements. They further contend that the potential returns on these asset-backed bonds are greater than the potential returns on new loans, so why sell them? Accountants and many bank regulators insist that the quotes are the best available and should be used to calculate bank capital levels and solvency. Others make the valid point that it is in the interest of banks to lie about the true value of their assets. But the banks have a valid counter argument when they claim that recent low price levels reflect a sizable 'uncertainty discount'. Because the bonds (or the various bond tranches) are comprised of a multitude of individual credits or mortgages, a potential buyer of the bonds has no way of assessing value without drilling down into the details. This research is intensive, expensive and time consuming. Only a few investors do it. And even then, value must be judged in light of assumed economic conditions, by region or generally, now and over the next few years. Because of this extraordinary complexity it is not unreasonable to accept that the banks, which have been holding these assets for some time and have large staffs, may have a much better idea of the discounted present value than nearly all potential bond buyers or CDS writers. Another factor to consider when attempting to price these bonds is that some bond 'marks' reflect forced liquidation because of margin calls or regulatory pressures, or desperate attempts to obtain scarce and prohibitively costly credit default insurance. Nobody disputes that banks will suffer large losses. Loss estimates range from $1 trillion to more than $3 trillion depending on whether one uses estimates of discounted cash flow or relies on the 'marks' of the thinly traded markets. The essential point to come to grips with is that, because of their complexity, it is virtually impossible to establish an indisputable value of these asset- backed bonds anytime soon, and possibly not before the contractual maturity of the instruments in question. It simply cannot be done. Nevertheless, it is widely recognized that, if the credit markets are to regain their normal working condition, the so-called 'toxic', hard-to-value asset-backed bonds must be removed from bank balance sheets, or 'ring fenced' by some form of government guarantee. With economic recovery dependent on the reemergence of normalized credit conditions, there is an obvious urgency to making this happen. How Not to Fix the Credit System Bank nationalization, the Swedish model of the early 1990's, is not the answer. There are three reasons why nationalization should be avoided. First, Sweden had only 5 banks and there were few if any derivatives and credit default swaps outstanding. We have 10,000 banks and lots of credit default swaps outstanding. Second, because the value of the 'toxic assets' is disputable, it is not clear that the banks are at present insolvent and must be taken over by the government. Other ways of dealing with the problem exist that avoid the well-recognized problems of government ownership. And third, under a government takeover, many outstanding derivative contracts--what Warren Buffett has memorably termed "financial weapons of mass destruction"--might have to be commuted. This would trigger events similar to those that followed the Lehman bankruptcy and have catastrophic implications for the financial and industrial entities around the globe, and could lead to a cascade of bankruptcies. The public/private scheme, announced February 10th as part of the Capital Assistance Program, is another less-than-optimal option. It is basically TARP 1 warmed over and obfuscated. Like TARP 1, it is designed to enable banks to remove the 'toxic' assets from their balance sheets at prices above those quoted in the current thin markets. Private investors would buy asset-backed bonds from the banks, on a leveraged basis, perhaps 10 to 1, with borrowed money lent to them by the government on a non-recourse basis at near government rates. Even though this public/private scheme could help recapitalize the banks by paying above recently quoted prices, it is misleading (to say the least) to claim that the elevated values for the 'toxic' assets will be established by the 'private market.' Let's remember that it is government credit that will underpin the leveraged transactions. More important, the scheme is unfair to taxpayers because they would be the ones supplying the credit and would, therefore, be on the hook for the losses. The government could just as well buy the assets, or guarantee them, at the same elevated prices that the leveraged private investors might be comfortably paying. Any prospective profit that the private investors hope to make would then accrue to the taxpayers. Why concoct a subterfuge that subsidizes prospective profits for Wall St. fat cats? Who are the authorities trying to fool? Finally, any program that attempts to avoid mortgage defaults, or requires a re-write of mortgage payment terms has serious problems, both legal and financial, and is likely to be counterproductive in re-establishing confidence. Although re-writing debt contracts is standard practice in bankruptcy, it creates uncertainties when it is done outside standard bankruptcy proceedings.. In the case of mortgage-backed bonds, re-writes of payment terms can trigger rating downgrades and lower mortgage-backed bond prices. This will negatively impact bank balance sheets and necessitate increased collateral obligations for writers of credit default swaps, such as AIG. In other words, an attempt to directly help homeowners by cutting payment terms may increase the losses recorded by AIG, which the government has committed to make good, and make it more costly for banks to recapitalize. It will also make investors more wary of making new mortgages, and necessitate an expanded role for government owned FNM and FRE. The recent well-intentioned attempts to prevent foreclosures by reducing payments are also patently unfair to taxpayer homeowners who keep current on their own mortgage payments but will be required to pay subsidies to others who are delinquent on their payments. The Way Forward The best way to reestablish confidence in the financial system is the following: Part #1. The 'uncertainty discount' in asset backed bond pricing should be dealt with by fixing a floor under the asset side of bank balance sheets. But this should be done without buying the toxic assets from the banks (the TARP plans). Instead, it can be done by a government guarantee, or re-insurance, that limits the losses any bank can incur from further decreases in asset backed bond prices. In effect, the government would act as 'credit default insurer of last resort', or as the re-insurer of systemic, or aggregate risk. The government, with its unlimited balance sheet, is uniquely positioned to capture 100% of the market for systemic credit-default insurance. Under this scheme, a bank would be required to 'buy' credit default insurance from the government in exchange for preferred stock which would be convertible into 10% to 15% of common equity after the recapitalization outlined in Part #2 below. The basic model is similar to that used for Citibank last year. In that agreement, CITI takes the first 10% of a $300 billion package of 'toxic' assets, and 10% of any losses below that first $30 billion. The taxpayers foot the bill for all other losses. This was a good idea, and it turned around the stock market in mid-November. But the insurance scheme was not made systemic and it did not incorporate the growing risk of losses from an extensive, severe economic contraction. In addition, it was not accompanied by a recapitalization of the bank. In other words, its scope was too limited, too timid. Part #2. Once the government underwrites systemic credit default insurance, the asset position of the bank is stabilized. The upper limit of losses becomes firmly established. This makes it possible to raise private capital in large amounts, although it will entail dilution of current common stock shareholders. Bank stock prices have fallen to levels that already assume massive dilution, if not nationalization. In any event, concerns about the extent of the dilution should not stand in the way of recapitalizing the banks, which is essential to restore confidence. The banks should be required to recapitalize by raising, in the private markets, enough common equity capital to satisfy FDIC regulators. The positions of the bondholders and preferred stock holders should not be crammed down or diluted, even though, in a strict capitalistic sense, the bond and preferred holders may deserve a haircut. But given the opaque, hard-to-value nature of many of the bank assets, it is not clear that the bond and preferred stock holders deserve it. In any case, cram-downs are not necessary to perform the recapitalization. They can be disruptive to the credit-default insurance market, and disruptive to holders of the preferreds--fiduciaries such as pension funds and insurance companies. In summary, the Part #1 government systemic reinsurance 'ring fences' the bad assets, or the bad part of the bank, and the new equity capital raised in Part #2 creates a 'new bank.' This all takes place within the legal and physical infrastructure of the legacy bank. There is no need to create and staff a new government bank or 'RTC' to hold and to manage the bad assets. There is no need for large up-front government expenditures to buy the asset-backed bonds from the banks. There is no need to underwrite hedge funds to buy toxic assets. The convertible preferreds issued to pay for the government insurance give taxpayers a stake in the recovery of bank prosperity. Concern about the risk of large losses on the systemic insurance should be calmed by the fact that pricing of the insurance will be bench-marked near current quotes. Taxpayers will be on the hook, in any case, for even greater government expenditures if action to 'ring fence' the toxic assets is not taken, and normal credit conditions are not restored. Changes in top management and directors are probably required in many or even most cases. The existing leadership mismanaged the banks, and the common equity holders must pay the price via dilution. One final and important note: despite support from academics and Wall St. bankers, it must be accepted that the era of 'modern' securities-based credit markets is over. (Humpty Dumpty cannot be put back together again.) Confidence in the rating agencies and the credit default swap counterparties was shattered by the Lehman bankruptcy. This destroyed the private market model of 'modern finance', and it cannot be resurrected in its old form. Buyers of asset-backed bonds have been badly burned, and like the cat that sat on the hot stove top, they will not return. The recent attempt by the government to reactivate the asset backed bond market (TALF), which employs government guarantees and government financing,, and relies on the discredited opinions of the rating agencies. is an ill-conceived imitation of the private market model of 'modern finance'. Normal credit conditions can only be restored by returning to the former, 'old fashion' model where banks keep the loans they make. Bank capital positions must be built up sufficiently to enable them to keep many more loans on their own balance sheets. This implies that the size of the bank recapitalization, outlined above, must be very large. From dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk Sun Mar 1 12:43:13 2009 From: dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk (robert searle) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:43:13 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [GJM] NOTIFICATION OF YOUR RECOVERED SCAMMED FUND AS 2008/2009 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <469685.96933.qm@web27401.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> ???? An interesting little scam! ? ???? R.Searle --- On Sun, 1/3/09, Federal Bureau of Investigation wrote: From: Federal Bureau of Investigation Subject: NOTIFICATION OF YOUR RECOVERED SCAMMED FUND AS 2008/2009 To: Date: Sunday, 1 March, 2009, 11:00 AM ROBERT MUELLER III EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FBI FROM THE DESKTOP OF THE CHAIRMAN ECONOMIC FINANCIAL OF CRIMES COMMISSION UNDER FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FBI.WASHINGTON DC. Pleasant day, How are you? I believe by the time you will be through with this email, your mind will be at rest as you are going to start a new life at no cost. Most families have lost lives, homes, properties and there great wealth due to the high rate of fraud and scams that has been all over the world in general, but since the setup of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission alongside with the FBI Washington DC for the purpose,these crimes has been reduced and we are fighting heavily to put this to an end. Right now, [$900,000,000]Nine hundred million United State Dollars has been recovered from these fraudsters through our Intelligent network, and most suspects are still under our custody for proper investigations and trials. Your email address has been found in our list of those that has been defrauded through some of these media, Online access to your personal account, Account/bank transfer,dating, net of kin, job offer, come and work, immigration, charity donation and others. The bank transfer,and other means of sending money that has been sent so far to some country like Nigeria, London, Australia, Russia, China, United Kingdom, Europ, Ghana,Togo,Spain,South Africa and United States etc are being received here in our country by these scammers in the name of having transaction that you don't know about.You have approved to recieve back any sum of money that was scamed from you by any means. An instruction has been giving that in no account should any money be paid to an individual through any means without a proper investigation. We have our agents in the bank all round the World with proper security to checkmate these scammers and any bank that goes contrary to our instruction will stand the risk of losing its certificate of accreditation.If this is true about you, do not border much because it is time for you to regain what you have lost .This wonderful compansetion program was introduced by the new chairman of Economic Financial Of Crimes Commission (EFCC) incolaboration with the FBI Washington DC. All you need to do is to contact the head of verification department with this information below for further clarification and screening after which part of this money will be sent to you through any means which will be convenience for you as stated. FULL NAME: COUNTRY: ADDRESS: SEX: AGE: MARITAL STATUS: OCCUPATION: AMOUNT SCAMED FROM YOU: PHONE NUMBER: OFFICE OF VERIFICATION ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION MR. Kelly Lyre Contact person EMAIL:federal.federal.investigation009 at officer.com, finvestigation00 at yahoo.com OFFICE PHONE: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Sun Mar 1 20:30:13 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:30:13 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Israeli Secret Service Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers - A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION Message-ID: <004701c99ae7$3648bfb0$a2da3f10$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 11:11 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Israeli Secret Service Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers - A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/9575-israeli-secret-service-mossad-link-f ound-to-one-of-key-9-11-hijackers-a-new-israeli-connection.html Israeli Secret Service Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers - A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION Sunday, 01 March 2009 00:49 A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION to the tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001 has recently been unveiled. Buried in a New York Times story on Feb. 19 was the eye-opening revelation that a Lebanese Muslim Arab who has been taken into custody by the Lebanon-which has accused him of being a spy for some 25 years for Israeli intelligence -just happens to be a cousin of one of the Muslims alleged to have been one of the 9-11 hijackers. Although Ali al-Jarrah was-publicly-an outspoken proponent of the Palestinian cause, it now turns out that he was actually working as a paid asset of the Mossad for more than two decades, betraying his own nation and conducting spying operations against Palestinian groups and the pro-Palestinian party Hezbollah. The New York Times, reporting on the al-Jarrah affair, revealed this: "It is not the family's first brush with notoriety. One of Mr. Jarrah's cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 hijackers who carried out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001." The Times added that the men were 20 years apart in age and "do not appear to have known each other well." The gratuitous Times suggestion that the two cousins "do not appear to have known each other well" is intriguing, inasmuch as it is an admission that they did, in fact, know one another. And that could be very telling, for there are those who are now suggesting that the older cousin may indeed have recruited his younger cousin as an asset for Israeli intelligence. The circumspect stance taken by the Times is no surprise, considering the fact that the Times is quite aware of the fact that there have been many sources-including American Free Press-which have alleged that the 9-11 conspiracy was infiltrated, if not controlled outright, by Israeli intelligence from the beginning. If the younger al-Jarrah was indeed an Israeli asset inside the 9-11 conspiracy, this would not be the first time that a Muslim Arab was involved, acting as a Mossad agent, in an attack on the World Trade Center. As far back as August 3, 1993, investigative reporter Robert I. Friedman revealed in New York's Village Voice that Ahmad Ajaj, a 27-year-old West Bank Palestinian held in federal custody for conspiracy in the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, may have been a Mossad mole, according to Friedman's sources. Ajaj was arrested at Kennedy Airport on Sept. 1, 1992, after he arrived on a Pakistani International flight from Peshawar carrying a forged Swedish passport and bombmaking manuals. He was taken into custody, and subsequently pleaded guilty to entering the country illegally. Ajaj's traveling companion was Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, an Iraqi who law enforcement sources say was a "key player" in the first World Trade Center bombing. And it should be noted that it was Ajaj who was the source of the famed "al Qaeda terrorist manual" that was widely touted by the FBI in the wake of the second World Trade Center attack in 2001. In addition, Ajaj's colleague-Ramzi Yousef-is the nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohamad, whom the U.S. government has said was the "mastermind" of the 9-11 attacks. In this regard, it is also important to point out that, for many years even prior to the first attack on the World Trade Center, there were many figures in Islamic circles who believed that Mohamad and Yousef were actually undercover assets for Israel. Although the FBI identified Ajaj as a senior intifada terrorist, with links to Hamas (the Palestinian Islamic fundamentalist organization), Kol Ha'ir, a respected Hebrewlanguage weekly published in Jerusalem, said Ajaj was never involved in intifada activities or with Hamas or even the Palestine Liberation Organization. Instead, according to Kol Ha'ir, Ajaj was actually a petty crook arrested in 1988 for counterfeiting U.S. dollars out of a base in East Jerusalem. Ajaj was convicted of the counterfeiting charges and then sentenced to two-anda- half years in prison. According to Friedman, writing in The Village Voice: "It was during his prison stay that Mossad, Israel's CIA, apparently recruited him, say Israeli intelligence sources. By the time he was released after having served just one year, he had seemingly undergone a radical transformation." Friedman reported that Ajaj had suddenly become a devout Muslim and an outspoken hard-line nationalist. Then, Ajaj was arrested for smuggling weapons into the West Bank, supposedly for Fatah al-Islam, a faction of the PLO. But Friedman says this was actually a sham. Friedman's sources in Israeli intelligence say that the arrest and Ajaj's subsequent deportation were "staged by Mossad to establish his credentials as an intifada activist. Mossad allegedly 'tasked' Ajaj to infiltrate radical Palestinian groups operating outside Israel and to report back to Tel Aviv. Israeli intelligence sources say that it is not unusual for Mossad to recruit from the ranks of common criminals." After Ajaj's "deportation" from Israel, he showed up in Pakistan, where he turned up in the company of the anti-Soviet mujahideen rebels in Afghanistan. (Incidentally, Andrew Allen, a wealthy San Francisco character who likes to take on assignments for the CIA to prevent boredom, admitted under oath "running" supplies into Afghanistan. He was also instrumental in destroying Librty Lobby and its newspaper, The Spotlight.) This could indicate that Ajaj was working for the Mossad, for-according to Covert Action Information Bulletin (September 1987)-the funding and supply lines for the mujahideen were not only the "the second largest covert operation" in the CIA's history, but they were also, according to former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky (writing in The Other Side of Deception), under the direct supervision of the Mossad. Ostrovsky wrote: It was a complex pipeline, since a large portion of the mujahideen's weapons were American-made and were supplied to the Muslim Brotherhood directly from Israel, using as carriers the Bedouin nomads who roamed the demilitarized zones in the Sinai. After Ajaj's ventures with the mujahideen, he popped up in New York and purported to befriend members of a small so-called "radical" clique surrounding the blind Sheikh Abdel-Rahman, who was accused of being the mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing. On Feb. 26, 1993, the actual day of the World Trade Center bombing, Ajaj was "safe" in federal prison serving a six-month sentence for entering the country on a forged passport. Later, he was indicted for conspiracy in the WTC bombing. According to Robert Friedman, "If Ajaj was recruited by Mossad, it is not known whether he continued to work for the Israeli spy agency after he was deported. One possibility, of course, is that upon leaving Israel and meeting radical Muslims close to the blind Egyptian sheikh, his loyalties shifted." However, Friedman also reported another frightening possibility: "Another scenario is that he had advance knowledge of the World Trade Center bombing, which he shared with Mossad, and that Mossad, for whatever reason, kept the secret to itself. If true, U.S. intelligence sources speculate that Mossad might have decided to keep the information closely guarded so as not to compromise its undercover agent." From dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Mar 2 04:36:01 2009 From: dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk (robert searle) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:36:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [GJM] Renewable Energy, Wind, and Solar come out on top Message-ID: <141611.40441.qm@web27405.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Renewable Energy: Wind and solar come out on top A Stanford University study, released in December last year, ranks renewable energy and vehicle options from best to worst. The study, headed by Mark Z. Jacobson, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford, helps policy makers determine the best emerging technologies to support. The European Commission, says substantial investment in development of alternative energy sources is needed in order to meet greenhouse gas emissions targets. But policymakers must make tough choices when deciding which energy sources and emerging technologies to support. According the Jacobson's study, wind came out on top, along with concentrated solar, while nuclear and carbon capture proved less promising. In terms of vehicles, battery electric vehicles rose above hydrogen fuel cells, with both coming up above biofuel alternatives. "The energy alternatives that are good are not the ones that people have been talking about the most," Jacobson said. "We should be spending to promote energy technologies that cause significant reductions in carbon emissions and air-pollution mortality, not technologies that have either marginal benefits or no benefits at all". Most experts, including Jacobson, would agree that any future investments should be a "package deal" that incorporates investments in a number of technologies including wind, tidal, solar, wave and geothermal power. Energy and vehicle options, from best to worst: Best to worst electric power sources: 1. Wind power 2. concentrated solar power (CSP) 3. geothermal power 4. tidal power 5. solar photovoltaics (PV) 6. wave power 7. hydroelectric power 8. a tie between nuclear power and coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). Best to worst vehicle options: 1. Wind-BEVs (battery electric vehicles) 2. wind-HFCVs (hydrogen fuel cell vehicles) 3.CSP-BEVs 4. geothermal-BEVs 5. tidal-BEVs 6. solar PV-BEVs 7. Wave-BEVs 8.hydroelectric-BEVs 9. a tie between nuclear-BEVs and coal-CCS-BEVs 11. corn-E85 12.cellulosic-E85 favouritesstumbleupondiggredditdelicioustwitterfacebookmyspaceslashdotgoogle var addthis_pub = "greenpages"; ALSO THIS WEEK: Renewable Energy rankings Healthy Kidz Online Confused road to sustainability Opinion from the Field: Emissions Trading Scheme Calling all lonely green hearts Five ways to be lazy and help the planet Copyright ?2009 Green Pages, Inc. All rights reserved. e: info at thegreenpages.com.au About us??|??Contact us??|??Blog??|??Tools??|??Link Partners -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk Mon Mar 2 05:33:21 2009 From: dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk (robert searle) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:33:21 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [GJM] [socialcredit] Social Credit Study Course in Ten Lessons In-Reply-To: <76e6e1510902281505l1c9bf34cjff75ace514b0e3de@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <567170.80068.qm@web27405.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> --- On Sat, 28/2/09, Arian F. Nevin wrote: From: Arian F. Nevin Subject: [socialcredit] Social Credit Study Course in Ten Lessons To: socialcredit at elistas.com Date: Saturday, 28 February, 2009, 11:05 PM Martin Hattersley is putting together an excellent Social Credit Study Course. The first lesson is available here: http://nationaleconomy.net/resources.html The other lessons will be released over the next couple weeks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium You're subscribed to this list with the email dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Sun Mar 1 13:10:38 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:10:38 +0000 Subject: [GJM] NEW UK CANNABIS LAW is completely unworkable Message-ID: <49AAEBBE.4030905@gn.apc.org> *The wide varieties of canabis available today means that a blanket policy regarding the seriousness of it's legality or otherwise* *is repugnant, **against common right and reason,* *and impossible to perform, *(for example, raising posession from a "class C" to a "class B" crime..) *http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/07/drugspolicy.drugsandalcohol the Common Universal Law will control such an act, and judge it to be VOID ! * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Mon Mar 2 06:32:59 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:32:59 +0000 Subject: [GJM] astroturf marketing, by GOP megabucks elite backers, Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires... Message-ID: <49ABE00B.1070807@gn.apc.org> ** Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires http://www.alternet.org/workplace/129523/right-wing_%27tea_party%27_movement _was_planned_months_ago_by_gop_billionaires/?page=entire By Jeffrey Feldman, Frameshop. Posted March 1, 2009. Bloggers reveal how the latest so-called "populist" revolt against the federal government was a pre-planned PR stunt. Populist revolt against the U.S. government is all the rage in the Republican Party, these days. As they tell the story, the public is so outraged by the recovery and reinvestment efforts of the Obama administration that Americans everywhere are turning out to overthrow the tyrannical king of the federal government by re-enacting the Boston Tea Party. Funny thing, though: it turns out this whole "populist" movement was a planned PR stunt funded by big-money right-wing backers of the GOP who specialize in faking grassroots movements to drum up opposition to Barack Obama. Everything about this so called "Tea Party" movement was pre-planned--from the supposedly "spontaneous rant" of CNBC stock market reporter, Rick Santelli, to the presumed ground-level organizing of protests all over the country. Fake, fake, fake--like a product launch staged covertly to look like a spontaneous trend. Playboy bloggers Mark Ames and Yasha Levine pulled together all the pieces of this puzzle in an incredible expose (Exposing The Rightwing PR Machine): What hasn?t been reported until now is evidence linking Santelli?s ?tea party? rant with some very familiar names in the Republican rightwing machine, from PR operatives who specialize in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns (called ?astroturfing?) to bigwig politicians and notorious billionaire funders. As veteran Russia reporters, both of us spent years watching the Kremlin use fake grassroots movements to influence and control the political landscape. To us, the uncanny speed and direction the movement took and the players involved in promoting it had a strangely forced quality to it. If it seemed scripted, that's because it was. What we discovered is that Santelli?s ?rant? was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a ?Chicago Tea Party? was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibilllionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society. It helps, in other words, to have field experience ferreting out Soviet propaganda to understand how Rick Santelli suddenly became the figurehead of a right-wing "grassroots" revolt against the United States government. It is worth reading the entire post. The next time you hear that the Tea Party Republican revolt is "grassroots," "spontaneous," and "populist," just swap out those PR keywords for the more accurate terms: "planned," "scripted," "billionaire bigwigs." All of this makes sense, of course. Santelli's philippic had all the hallmarks of a rehearsed piece of political theater--the pre-planned message launched of a viral marketing campaign. Not that any of this comes as a surprise, but...my goodness. Even though the curtain has been pulled back on this astroturf marketing by GOP megabucks elite backers, it is important to keep in mind what the larger stakes are and how to respond. Scripted or not--this Tea Party revolt needs to be treated as politically real. People engaged in this agitation will not acknowledge ever that it is scripted, because these folks sincerely think they are engaged in some kind of revolution against their own government. They really want the country to evaluate whether or not an elected President and Congress are the same as a tyrannical king and whether a tax by fiat from the 18c is the same as a legislature approved public investment program from the 21c. Those folks just want to make noise--lots of noise--to throw the debate off its tracks. The big story to defend and advance, in other words, is a president advancing real solutions aimed at helping millions of Americans in serious economic trouble. The agitation against it, whether it is scripted or not, is designed to stop those solutions from being discussed seriously, from unfolding, and then to weaken the president making them happen. That is a basic confrontation between pragmatic action and ideological politics--between investment in people and inaction in the name of dogma. In the end, then, we need to make themselves aware of the massive resources the right is spending to block any effort by the American people to work together to repair the damage to our economy and restore our national confidence. And after we have made ourselves aware of how far the opposition is willing to go, we need to get back to work making sure the debate states focused on the real issue at hand here: millions and millions families who need help right now, and the greatness of a nation that stands together in times of need to overcome seemingly impossible obstacles. *PLEASE SEND A MESSAGE WITH REMOVE IN THE SUBJECT LINE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE 'ECOTORT' LIST. THANK YOU * :-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 2 22:00:37 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:00:37 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires Message-ID: <000001c99bbd$01641430$042c3c90$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:03 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires http://www.alternet.org/workplace/129523/right-wing_%27tea_party%27_movement _was_planned_months_ago_by_gop_billionaires/?page=entire By Jeffrey Feldman, Frameshop. Posted March 1, 2009. Bloggers reveal how the latest so-called "populist" revolt against the federal government was a pre-planned PR stunt. Populist revolt against the U.S. government is all the rage in the Republican Party, these days. As they tell the story, the public is so outraged by the recovery and reinvestment efforts of the Obama administration that Americans everywhere are turning out to overthrow the tyrannical king of the federal government by re-enacting the Boston Tea Party. Funny thing, though: it turns out this whole "populist" movement was a planned PR stunt funded by big-money right-wing backers of the GOP who specialize in faking grassroots movements to drum up opposition to Barack Obama. Everything about this so called "Tea Party" movement was pre-planned--from the supposedly "spontaneous rant" of CNBC stock market reporter, Rick Santelli, to the presumed ground-level organizing of protests all over the country. Fake, fake, fake--like a product launch staged covertly to look like a spontaneous trend. Playboy bloggers Mark Ames and Yasha Levine pulled together all the pieces of this puzzle in an incredible expose (Exposing The Rightwing PR Machine): What hasn't been reported until now is evidence linking Santelli's "tea party" rant with some very familiar names in the Republican rightwing machine, from PR operatives who specialize in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns (called "astroturfing") to bigwig politicians and notorious billionaire funders. As veteran Russia reporters, both of us spent years watching the Kremlin use fake grassroots movements to influence and control the political landscape. To us, the uncanny speed and direction the movement took and the players involved in promoting it had a strangely forced quality to it. If it seemed scripted, that's because it was. What we discovered is that Santelli's "rant" was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a "Chicago Tea Party" was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibilllionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society. It helps, in other words, to have field experience ferreting out Soviet propaganda to understand how Rick Santelli suddenly became the figurehead of a right-wing "grassroots" revolt against the United States government. It is worth reading the entire post. The next time you hear that the Tea Party Republican revolt is "grassroots," "spontaneous," and "populist," just swap out those PR keywords for the more accurate terms: "planned," "scripted," "billionaire bigwigs." All of this makes sense, of course. Santelli's philippic had all the hallmarks of a rehearsed piece of political theater--the pre-planned message launched of a viral marketing campaign. Not that any of this comes as a surprise, but...my goodness. Even though the curtain has been pulled back on this astroturf marketing by GOP megabucks elite backers, it is important to keep in mind what the larger stakes are and how to respond. Scripted or not--this Tea Party revolt needs to be treated as politically real. People engaged in this agitation will not acknowledge ever that it is scripted, because these folks sincerely think they are engaged in some kind of revolution against their own government. They really want the country to evaluate whether or not an elected President and Congress are the same as a tyrannical king and whether a tax by fiat from the 18c is the same as a legislature approved public investment program from the 21c. Those folks just want to make noise--lots of noise--to throw the debate off its tracks. The big story to defend and advance, in other words, is a president advancing real solutions aimed at helping millions of Americans in serious economic trouble. The agitation against it, whether it is scripted or not, is designed to stop those solutions from being discussed seriously, from unfolding, and then to weaken the president making them happen. That is a basic confrontation between pragmatic action and ideological politics--between investment in people and inaction in the name of dogma. In the end, then, we need to make themselves aware of the massive resources the right is spending to block any effort by the American people to work together to repair the damage to our economy and restore our national confidence. And after we have made ourselves aware of how far the opposition is willing to go, we need to get back to work making sure the debate states focused on the real issue at hand here: millions and millions families who need help right now, and the greatness of a nation that stands together in times of need to overcome seemingly impossible obstacles. From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 3 10:04:11 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:04:11 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires Message-ID: <003a01c99c22$16421360$42c63a20$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:03 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Right-Wing 'Tea Party' Movement Was Planned Months Ago by GOP Billionaires http://www.alternet.org/workplace/129523/right-wing_%27tea_party%27_movement _was_planned_months_ago_by_gop_billionaires/?page=entire By Jeffrey Feldman, Frameshop. Posted March 1, 2009. Bloggers reveal how the latest so-called "populist" revolt against the federal government was a pre-planned PR stunt. Populist revolt against the U.S. government is all the rage in the Republican Party, these days. As they tell the story, the public is so outraged by the recovery and reinvestment efforts of the Obama administration that Americans everywhere are turning out to overthrow the tyrannical king of the federal government by re-enacting the Boston Tea Party. Funny thing, though: it turns out this whole "populist" movement was a planned PR stunt funded by big-money right-wing backers of the GOP who specialize in faking grassroots movements to drum up opposition to Barack Obama. Everything about this so called "Tea Party" movement was pre-planned--from the supposedly "spontaneous rant" of CNBC stock market reporter, Rick Santelli, to the presumed ground-level organizing of protests all over the country. Fake, fake, fake--like a product launch staged covertly to look like a spontaneous trend. Playboy bloggers Mark Ames and Yasha Levine pulled together all the pieces of this puzzle in an incredible expose (Exposing The Rightwing PR Machine): What hasn't been reported until now is evidence linking Santelli's "tea party" rant with some very familiar names in the Republican rightwing machine, from PR operatives who specialize in imitation-grassroots PR campaigns (called "astroturfing") to bigwig politicians and notorious billionaire funders. As veteran Russia reporters, both of us spent years watching the Kremlin use fake grassroots movements to influence and control the political landscape. To us, the uncanny speed and direction the movement took and the players involved in promoting it had a strangely forced quality to it. If it seemed scripted, that's because it was. What we discovered is that Santelli's "rant" was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a "Chicago Tea Party" was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibilllionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society. It helps, in other words, to have field experience ferreting out Soviet propaganda to understand how Rick Santelli suddenly became the figurehead of a right-wing "grassroots" revolt against the United States government. It is worth reading the entire post. The next time you hear that the Tea Party Republican revolt is "grassroots," "spontaneous," and "populist," just swap out those PR keywords for the more accurate terms: "planned," "scripted," "billionaire bigwigs." All of this makes sense, of course. Santelli's philippic had all the hallmarks of a rehearsed piece of political theater--the pre-planned message launched of a viral marketing campaign. Not that any of this comes as a surprise, but...my goodness. Even though the curtain has been pulled back on this astroturf marketing by GOP megabucks elite backers, it is important to keep in mind what the larger stakes are and how to respond. Scripted or not--this Tea Party revolt needs to be treated as politically real. People engaged in this agitation will not acknowledge ever that it is scripted, because these folks sincerely think they are engaged in some kind of revolution against their own government. They really want the country to evaluate whether or not an elected President and Congress are the same as a tyrannical king and whether a tax by fiat from the 18c is the same as a legislature approved public investment program from the 21c. Those folks just want to make noise--lots of noise--to throw the debate off its tracks. The big story to defend and advance, in other words, is a president advancing real solutions aimed at helping millions of Americans in serious economic trouble. The agitation against it, whether it is scripted or not, is designed to stop those solutions from being discussed seriously, from unfolding, and then to weaken the president making them happen. That is a basic confrontation between pragmatic action and ideological politics--between investment in people and inaction in the name of dogma. In the end, then, we need to make themselves aware of the massive resources the right is spending to block any effort by the American people to work together to repair the damage to our economy and restore our national confidence. And after we have made ourselves aware of how far the opposition is willing to go, we need to get back to work making sure the debate states focused on the real issue at hand here: millions and millions families who need help right now, and the greatness of a nation that stands together in times of need to overcome seemingly impossible obstacles. From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 3 10:17:41 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:17:41 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [SPAM]Revealing News: Limits on Wall St. Bonuses, Army Pushing Electronic Warfare, Corrupt Judges, More Message-ID: <003b01c99c23$f87a68d0$e96f3a70$@net> In addition to taking Fred?s advice on investing in the stock markets, the Credit Unions and Community Banks are still very stable. One might consider shifting one?s account from a larger bank into one that is properly managed and not in jeopardy. From: PEERS: WantToKnow.info Email List [mailto:emaillist at peerservice.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:23 AM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: [SPAM]Revealing News: Limits on Wall St. Bonuses, Army Pushing Electronic Warfare, Corrupt Judges, More To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list (one email every few days) or to reply to this message, see end of email This message is available online at http://www.wanttoknow.info/009/090303_bonus_limits_electronic_warfare_corrupt_judges Dear friends, Below are one-paragraph excerpts of important news articles you may have missed. These news articles include revealing information on new limits on Wall Steet executive bonuses proposed by Congress, the US Army emphasis on developing electronic warfare capabilities, corrupt judges jailing children for cash, and more. Each excerpt is taken verbatim from the major media website listed at the link provided. If any link fails to function, click here . Key sentences are highlighted for those with limited time. By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word , we can and will build a brighter future. With best wishes, Tod Fletcher and Fred Burks for PEERS and the WantToKnow.info Team Important Note: As stock prices continue to fall, consider that the stock market is in a sense legalized gambling. Consider also that the stock exchange only serves large corporations, so all money invested supports big business with no direct benefit to those most in need. This is why I (Fred) took all of my investments out of the stock market seven years ago. Because I shifted everything to secure microcredit investments, which directly help those most in need, my investments have increased in value every year, even as the market crashes. I invite you to consider switching over to microcredit. For an excellent guide on this, click here . Stimulus Plan Places New Limits on Wall St. Bonuses February 14, 2009, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/business/economy/14pay.html Buried deep inside the ... economic stimulus bill ... is some bitter medicine for companies that have received financial bailout funds. Over staunch objections from the Obama administration, Senate Democrats inserted a provision that would impose restrictions on executive bonuses at financial institutions that are much tougher than those proposed 10 days ago by the Treasury Department. The provisions would prohibit cash bonuses and almost all other incentive compensation for the five most-senior officers and the 20 highest-paid executives at large companies that receive money under TARP. The restriction with the most bite would bar top executives from receiving bonuses that exceed one-third of their annual pay. The provision, written by Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., highlighted the growing wrath ... over the lavish compensation that top Wall Street firms and big banks awarded to senior executives at the same time that many of the companies, teetering on the brink of insolvency, received taxpayer-paid bailouts. "The decisions of certain Wall Street executives to enrich themselves at the expense of taxpayers have seriously undermined public confidence," Dodd said Friday. "These tough new rules will help ensure that taxpayer dollars no longer effectively subsidize lavish Wall Street bonuses." Top economic advisers to President Obama adamantly opposed the pay restrictions, according to congressional officials. Note: For powerfully revealing reports on the realities of the Wall Street bailout, click here . The Death of 'Rational Man' February 8, 2009, Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/06/AR2009020602742.html What allowed some people to see the financial crash coming while so many others missed its gathering force? I put that question recently to Nouriel Roubini, who has come to be known as "Dr. Doom" because of his insistent warnings starting in 2006 that we were heading into a global firestorm. Roubini gave two kinds of answers. The first involves standard number-crunching of the sort that economists routinely do -- and that Roubini just did better and sooner. It's his second answer that's more interesting, because it goes to the heart of what we should take away from this crisis: Roubini decided to discard the assumption of market rationality that underlies most economics and to embrace the psychological insights of what's known as "behavioral economics." Everyone else had those same numbers. Why did Roubini act? The answer is that he decided to trust his gut, which told him there was trouble ahead, rather than Wall Street's "wisdom of the crowd," which -- as reflected in stock prices -- said everything was rosy. He concluded that the markets were not pricing in the degree of risk that was actually present in housing. "The rational man theory of economics has not worked," Roubini said last month at a session of the World Economic Forum at Davos. That's why he and other prominent economists are paying more attention to behavioral economics, which starts from the premise that economic decisions, like other aspects of human behavior, are influenced by irrational psychological factors. Note: To visit Nouriel Roubini's highly informative blog, click here . For lots more on the financial crisis and bailout, click here . Army manual raises emphasis on electronic warfare February 25, 2009, Washington Post/Associated Press http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/25/AR2009022502250.html For the first time since the end of the Cold War, the Army is updating its plans for electronic warfare, calling for more use of high-powered microwaves, lasers and infrared beams to attack enemy targets and control angry crowds. The 112-page manual, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press ... doesn't offer specifics on new equipment or gadgetry but lays out in broad terms the Army's fear that without new equipment and training, U.S. forces may be at a deadly disadvantage. Army patrols currently rely on specially trained Air Force and Navy members whose electronic expertise helps sniff out improvised explosive devices, which have killed more than 1,700 U.S. troops since the war began. The Army sees the need for a new system more finely tuned to its purposes. The new doctrine directs the Army, which has put a premium on fighting insurgents in Iraq's most populous cities, to use technology that can distinguish enemy threats from common technologies such as radios or cell phones used by civilians or friendly forces. It also calls on the Army to develop and deploy directed-energy weapons, which would produce a concentrated beam of electromagnetic energy or atomic or subatomic particles to blind, disrupt or destroy targets. Such technology could be used in a variety of attack modes against enemy equipment, facilities or personnel. Note: How can anyone claim that our troops, with all of their already sophisticated weapons, may be "at a deadly disadvantage"? For many key reports on the realities of modern warfare, click here . 'Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11' by Kathryn S. Olmsted February 28, 2009, Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/booksmags/chi-0228-real-enemiesfeb28,0,884402.story In August 2006, almost five years after the catastrophic attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a poll by Scripps Howard and Ohio University found that 36 percent of respondents thought it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that officials of the federal government "either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them." The poll also found that those who regularly use the Internet but do not habitually consult mainstream media "are significantly more likely to believe in 9/11 conspiracies." Kathryn S. Olmsted, in her exquisitely researched and annotated new book Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11, points out that although such views "may seem to belong to the fringe," they are held by millions of Americans and a majority of those between the ages of 18 and 29. In fact, Olmsted asserts that the tendency to see conspiracies everywhere "long ago spread from the margins into the main body of American political culture," and that the quelling of political dissent is an exacerbating factor. She has set out to track the history and patterning of conspiratorial beliefs as they relate to politics and public policy. Her thesis ? that conspiracy theories thrive in part because the government has misled the public or acted illegally and covertly, and been caught at it frequently enough to make them credible ? is a disconcerting one. But the historical detail she marshals (which demonstrates a tendency for fusion of far-left and far-right political views) is persuasive in its cumulative power. Note: For more on the important Scripps/Howard poll showing that high percentages of American citizens suspect US government complicity in the 9/11 attacks, click here. For a 15-minute clip of a powerfully revealing documentary on this, 9/11: Press for Truth, click here . Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash February 11, 2009, MSNBC/Associated Press http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29142654 For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre [PA] operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses. The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench. In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers. ?I?ve never encountered, and I don?t think that we will in our lifetimes, a case where literally thousands of kids? lives were just tossed aside in order for a couple of judges to make some money,? said Marsha Levick, an attorney with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center , which is representing hundreds of youths sentenced in Wilkes-Barre. Prosecutors say Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juvenile offenders in lockups run by PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC. The judges were charged on Jan. 26 and removed from the bench by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shortly afterward. The high court ... is looking into whether hundreds or even thousands of sentences should be overturned. Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it. Note: For many insights into government corruption from reliable sources, click here . Not so great expectations February 18, 2009, The Herald-Tribune (Sarasota, Florida's leading newspaper) http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090218/BLOG32/902180273 The co-authors of the most extraordinary UFO report ever ignored by the media aren?t expecting much [coverage]. Robert Powell and Glenn Schulze, who produced ?Stephenville Lights: A Comprehensive Radar and Witness Study Regarding the Events of January 8, 2008? last summer for the Mutual UFO Network, continue to troll the bureaucracies for more data. Their analysis of radar returns from five civilian sites in the Stephenville, Tex., vicinity put the military into a jam after eyewitnesses reported a mammoth UFO being chased by F-16s. Responding to FOIA requests, authorities have a) surrendered only redacted flight logs of the 457th Fighter Squadron jets in the air that night, b) claim they have no military radar records of that incident, and c) offer no explanation for why their planes exited their military operating area on what they?ve described as routine training missions. Powell doubts a serious search was made for his request. ?For the trickle-down flow of information to work,? he says, ?you have to have a push on top of that executive order. If there?s no pressure on them to do their jobs, they don?t have to pay attention.? In Littleton, Colo., Schulze has moved on. Sort of. He?s working on radar records for three additional UFO incidents, one of them involving yet another sighting over Stephenville on 10/23/08. Multiple witnesses, nighttime sighting, F-16s nearby, etc. Schulze calls it Stephenville II. Note: For more on the intriguing Stephenville sightings, click here. For many reports from reliable, verifiable sources on UFO sightings, click here . Electric motor polarizes opinion February 28, 2009, Toronto Star http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/594471 Thane Heins ... has invented a technology that he says will put out more energy than it consumes. His invention, he boldly claims, offers a way to make electric cars that can travel hundreds of kilometres from the energy in a small, inexpensive battery. The Star first profiled Heins and his controversial invention a year ago. In a nutshell, he had figured out a way to eliminate the electromagnetic friction that typically limits the performance of an electrical generator ? an effect known as ?Back EMF.? Not only that, but he also learned how to redirect that magnetic energy so that, instead of causing resistance, it gave an electrical motor connected to the generator a significant boost. The result, as far as Heins was concerned, violated Lenz?s law or what?s often called the law of diminishing returns. For many, that equates to a perpetual motion machine, an impossible claim in the conventional field of physics. Within no time the story spread globally across the Internet, became chatter on blogs, and triggered a flood of email to this reporter?s inbox ? some praising Heins for his determination, others calling the Star irresponsible for giving credibility to his claim. The story, love it or hate it, was the second-most read article on TheStar.com in 2008. Much has happened over the past 12 months. Through his Ottawa-based company Potential Difference Inc., Heins has been in serious talks with a designer of small wind turbines in Montreal, a senior engineer from a large utility in Turkey, and a small manufacturer of electrical equipment in Toronto. Note: Read how an esteemed MIT professor was baffled by this invention in the original Star article available here. For lots more on promising new energy inventions and technologies from major media sources, click here . Key Articles From Years Past People 'still willing to torture' December 19, 2008, BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7791278.stm Decades after a notorious experiment, scientists have found test subjects are still willing to inflict pain on others - if told to by an authority figure. US researchers repeated the famous "Milgram test", with volunteers told to deliver electrical shocks to another volunteer - played by an actor. Even after faked screams of pain, 70% were prepared to increase the voltage, the American Psychologist study found. Both may help explain why apparently ordinary people can commit atrocities. Dr Jerry Burger, of Santa Clara University, used a [format similar to Milgram's], although he did not allow the volunteers to carry on beyond 150 volts after they had shown their willingness to do so, suggesting that the distress caused to the original volunteers had been too great. Again, however, the vast majority of the 29 men and 41 women taking part were willing to push the button knowing it would cause pain to another human. Even when another actor entered the room and questioned what was happening, most were still prepared to continue. He told Reuters: "What we found is validation of the same argument - if you put people in certain situations, they will act in surprising and maybe often even disturbing ways." He said that it was not that there was "something wrong" with the volunteers, but that when placed under pressure, people will often do "unsettling" things. Even though it was difficult to translate laboratory work to the real world, he said, it might partly explain why, in times of conflict, people could take part in genocide. Note: For more on the famous Milgram experiment, click here . For powerfully inspiring information on how we can change this and build a better world, click here . Basic Instincts: The Science of Evil January 3, 2007, ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=2765416 "Primetime" wanted to know if ordinary people today would still follow orders, even if they believed their actions were causing someone else pain. Would as many follow the seemingly dangerous and painful orders as in the original experiment [conducted by Stanley Milgram at Yale in 1963]? After contacting respected psychologist Jerry Burger at Santa Clara University in California, ABC News was able to replicate Milgram's study in a modified way. Burger said, "People have often asked the question, 'Would we find these kinds of results today?' and some people try to dismiss the Milgram findings by saying, 'That's something that happened back in the '60s. People aren't like that anymore.'" In ABC News' version of the Milgram experiment, we tested 18 men, and found that 65 percent of them agreed to administer increasingly painful electric shocks when ordered by an authority figure. 22 women signed up for our experiment. Even though most people said that women would be less likely to inflict pain on the learner, a surprising 73 percent yielded to the orders of the experimenter. Out of the 30 people we tested with an additional accomplice acting as a moral guide, 63 percent still inflicted electric shocks, even though the accomplice refused to go on. Our subjects had an unusually high level of education. 22.9 percent had some college, 40 percent had bachelor's degrees and 20 percent had master's degrees. Note: For more on the famous Milgram experiment, click here . For powerfully inspiring information on how we can change this and build a better world, click here . Tapes Show Enron Arranged Plant Shutdown February 4, 2005, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/04/national/04energy.html In the midst of the California energy troubles in early 2001, when power plants were under a federal order to deliver a full output of electricity, the Enron Corporation arranged to take a plant off-line on the same day that California was hit by rolling blackouts, according to audiotapes of company traders. The tapes and memorandums were made public by a small public utility north of Seattle that is fighting Enron over a power contract. They also showed that Enron, as early as 1998, was creating artificial energy shortages and running up prices in Canada in advance of California's larger experiment with deregulation. The tapes provide new details of market manipulation during the California energy crisis that produced blackouts and billions of dollars of surcharges to homes and businesses on the West Coast in 2000 and 2001. In one January 2001 telephone tape of an Enron trader the public utility identified as Bill Williams and a Las Vegas energy official identified only as Rich, an agreement was made to shut down a power plant providing energy to California. The shutdown was set for an afternoon of peak energy demand. The next day, Jan. 17, 2001, as the plant was taken out of service, the State of California called a power emergency, and rolling blackouts hit up to a half-million consumers, according to daily logs of the western power grid. Officials with the Snohomish County Public Utility District in Washington State, which released the tapes, said they believed Enron officials had taken similar measures with other power plants. This tape, they said, was proof of what was going on. Note: For many key reports from reliable sources on corporate corruption, click here . U.S. Forces Out Head of Chemical Arms Agency April 23, 2002, New York Times http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F01E0D91E3FF930A15757C0A9649C8B63 The United States succeeded today in ousting the director of the global agency charged with ridding the world of chemical weapons after an intense diplomatic campaign that made a number of countries uncomfortable. Jos? M. Bustani, a Brazilian diplomat who was unanimously re-elected last year as the director general of the 145-nation Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, was voted out of office today after refusing repeated demands by the United States that he step down. ''I clearly made some people in Washington very uncomfortable because I was too independent,'' Mr. Bustani said afterward. ''They want somebody more obedient.'' Diplomats said ... it had opened the door further for other international bodies to come under attack. The United States, which is responsible for 22 percent of the agency's budget, had threatened to cut off funding until Mr. Bustani left. ''I think a lot of people swallowed this because they thought it was better for Bustani to be removed than have the U.S. pull out and see the organization collapse,'' said one European diplomat at the meeting. The firing of Mr. Bustani follows the removal last week of Robert Watson, a British-born climatologist who had been outspoken on the threat of global warming, as the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He was removed after pressure from Washington and at least one American oil company. Note: If Bustani had not been removed, it is very likely that the accusations of WMD in Iraq would never have stood, and the war would not have happened. For a powerful two-page essay by a highly decorated U.S. general alleging that war is a racket orchestrated to line the pockets of the corporations, click here . Special Note: For those interested in remote viewing and UFOs , you may know that Ingo Swann was one of the best and most famous of all remote viewers. Though he published about a dozen books , his publishers refused to publish his tell-all autobiography Penetration. So he self-published the book, which then became extremely hard to find. Originally less than $20, Penetration is now selling on amazon.com for prices that range from $318 to $1,500. As we recently managed to get a digital copy, and as the book is filled with fascinating inside information from this man who worked for years at Stanford, we've posted a copy of the entire book, which you can now find here . Consider also joining the Exopolitics World Network on facebook by clicking here. Final Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational for an abundance of uplifting material. See our archive of revealing news articles at http://www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this important work. To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order: http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS network : http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart http://www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups http://www.inspiringcommunity.org - Building a Global Community for All http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all http://insightcourse.net - The Insight Course: Best of the Internet all in one free course Educational websites promoting transformation through information and inspiration To reply to this message, visit http://www.WantToKnow.info/contactus.php To subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one email every few days): http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe _____ Change email address / Leave mailing list Hosting by YourMailingListProvider -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 3 22:54:13 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:54:13 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] The Price of Tomatoes: Keeping Slavery Alive in Florida Message-ID: <002601c99c8d$a8c5b1e0$fa5115a0$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:08 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] The Price of Tomatoes: Keeping Slavery Alive in Florida (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) The Price of Tomatoes: Keeping Slavery Alive in Florida If you have eaten a tomato this winter, chances are very good that it was picked by a person who lives in virtual slavery. Published on Monday, March 2, 2009 by Gourmet http://www.gourmet.com/magazine/2000s/2009/03/politics-of-the-plate-the-pric e-of-tomatoes by Barry Estabrook Driving from Naples, Florida, the nation's second-wealthiest metropolitan area, to Immokalee takes less than an hour on a straight road. You pass houses that sell for an average of $1.4 million, shopping malls anchored by Tiffany's and Saks Fifth Avenue, manicured golf courses. Eventually, gated communities with names like Monaco Beach Club and Imperial Golf Estates give way to modest ranches, and the highway shrivels from six lanes to two. Through the scruffy palmettos, you glimpse flat, sandy tomato fields shimmering in the broiling sun. Rounding a long curve, you enter Immokalee. The heart of town is a nine-block grid of dusty, potholed streets lined by boarded-up bars and bodegas, peeling shacks, and sagging, mildew-streaked house trailers. Mongrel dogs snooze in the shade, scrawny chickens peck in yards. Just off the main drag, vultures squabble over roadkill. Immokalee's population is 70 percent Latino. Per capita income is only $8,500 a year. One third of the families in this city of nearly 25,000 live below the poverty line. Over one third of the children drop out before graduating from high school. Immokalee is the tomato capital of the United States. Between December and May, as much as 90 percent of the fresh domestic tomatoes we eat come from south Florida, and Immokalee is home to one of the area's largest communities of farmworkers. According to Douglas Molloy, the chief assistant U.S. attorney based in Fort Myers, Immokalee has another claim to fame: It is "ground zero for modern slavery." [Working at breakneck speed, you might be able to pick a ton of tomatoes on a good day, netting about $50 at 45 cents per 32-pound basket. But a lot can go wrong.]Working at breakneck speed, you might be able to pick a ton of tomatoes on a good day, netting about $50 at 45 cents per 32-pound basket. But a lot can go wrong. The beige stucco house at 209 South Seventh Street is remarkable only because it is in better repair than most Immokalee dwellings. For two and a half years, beginning in April 2005, Mariano Lucas Domingo, along with several other men, was held as a slave at that address. At first, the deal must have seemed reasonable. Lucas, a Guatemalan in his thirties, had slipped across the border to make money to send home for the care of an ailing parent. He expected to earn about $200 a week in the fields. Cesar Navarrete, then a 23-year-old illegal immigrant from Mexico, agreed to provide room and board at his family's home on South Seventh Street and extend credit to cover the periods when there were no tomatoes to pick. Lucas's "room" turned out to be the back of a box truck in the junk-strewn yard, shared with two or three other workers. It lacked running water and a toilet, so occupants urinated and defecated in a corner. For that, Navarrete docked Lucas's pay by $20 a week. According to court papers, he also charged Lucas for two meager meals a day: eggs, beans, rice, tortillas, and, occasionally, some sort of meat. Cold showers from a garden hose in the backyard were $5 each. Everything had a price. Lucas was soon $300 in debt. After a month of ten-hour workdays, he figured he should have paid that debt off. But when Lucas-slightly built and standing less than five and a half feet tall-inquired about the balance, Navarrete threatened to beat him should he ever try to leave. Instead of providing an accounting, Navarrete took Lucas's paychecks, cashed them, and randomly doled out pocket money, $20 some weeks, other weeks $50. Over the years, Navarrete and members of his extended family deprived Lucas of $55,000. Taking a day off was not an option. If Lucas became ill or was too exhausted to work, he was kicked in the head, beaten, and locked in the back of the truck. Other members of Navarrete's dozen-man crew were slashed with knives, tied to posts, and shackled in chains. On November 18, 2007, Lucas was again locked inside the truck. As dawn broke, he noticed a faint light shining through a hole in the roof. Jumping up, he secured a hand hold and punched himself through. He was free. What happened at Navarrete's home would have been horrific enough if it were an isolated case. Unfortunately, involuntary servitude-slavery-is alive and well in Florida. Since 1997, law-enforcement officials have freed more than 1,000 men and women in seven different cases. And those are only the instances that resulted in convictions. Frightened, undocumented, mistrustful of the police, and speaking little or no English, most slaves refuse to testify, which means their captors cannot be tried. "Unlike victims of other crimes, slaves don't report themselves," said Molloy, who was one of the prosecutors on the Navarrete case. "They hide from us in plain sight." And for what? Supermarket produce sections overflow with bins of perfect red-orange tomatoes even during the coldest months-never mind that they are all but tasteless. Large packers, which ship nearly $500 million worth of tomatoes annually to major restaurants and grocery retailers nationwide, own or lease the land upon which the workers toil. But the harvesting is often done by independent contractors called crew bosses, who bear responsibility for hiring and overseeing pickers. Said Reggie Brown, executive vice president of the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, "We abhor slavery and do everything we can to prevent it. We want to make sure that we always foster a work environment free from hazard, intimidation, harassment, and violence." Growers, he said, cooperated with law-enforcement officers in the Navarette case. But when asked if it is reasonable to assume that an American who has eaten a fresh tomato from a grocery store or food-service company during the winter has eaten fruit picked by the hand of a slave, Molloy said, "It is not an assumption. It is a fact." Gerardo Reyes, a former picker who is now an employee of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW), a 4,000-member organization that provides the only voice for the field hands, agrees. Far from being an anomaly, Reyes told me, slavery is a symptom of a vast system of labor abuses. Involuntary servitude represents just one rung on a grim ladder of exploitation. Reyes said that the victims of this system come to Florida for one reason-to send money to their families back home. "But when they get here, it's all they can do to keep themselves alive with rent, transportation, food. Poverty and misery are the perfect recipe for slavery." Tomato harvesting involves rummaging through staked vines until you have filled a bushel basket to the brim with hard, green fruits. You hoist the basket over your shoulder, trot across the field, and heave it overhead to a worker in an open trailer the size of the bed of a gravel truck. For every 32-pound basket you pick, you receive a token typically worth about 45 cents-almost the same rate you would have gotten 30 years ago. Working at breakneck speed, you might be able to pick a ton of tomatoes on a good day, netting about $50. But a lot can go wrong. If it rains, you can't pick. If the dew is heavy, you sit and wait until it evaporates. If trucks aren't available to transport the harvest, you're out of luck. You receive neither overtime nor benefits. If you are injured (a common occurrence, given the pace of the job), you have to pay for your own medical care. Leaning against the railing of an unpainted wooden stoop in front of a putty-colored trailer, a tired Juan Dominguez told an all-too-familiar story. He had left for the fields that morning at six o'clock and returned at three. But he worked for only two of those nine hours because the seedlings he was to plant had been delivered late. His total earnings: $13.76. I asked him for a look inside his home. He shrugged and gestured for me to come in. In one ten-foot-square space there were five mattresses, three directly on the floor, two suspended above on sheets of flimsy plywood. The room was littered with T-shirts, jeans, running shoes, cheap suitcases. The kitchen consisted of a table, four plastic chairs, an apartment-size stove, a sink with a dripping faucet, and a rusty refrigerator whose door wouldn't close. Bare lightbulbs hung from fixtures, and a couple of fans put up a noisy, futile effort against the stale heat and humidity. In a region where temperatures regularly climb into the nineties, there were no air conditioners. One tiny, dank bathroom served ten men. The rent was $2,000 a month-as much as you would pay for a clean little condo near Naples. Most tomato workers, however, have no choice but to live like Dominguez. Lacking vehicles, they must reside within walking distance of the football-field-size parking lot in front of La Fiesta, a combination grocery store, taqueria, and check-cashing office. During the predawn hours, the lot hosts a daily hiring fair. I arrived a little before 5 a.m. The parking lot was filled with more than a dozen former school buses. Outside each bus stood a silent scrum of 40 or 50 would-be pickers. The driver, or crew boss, selected one worker at a time, choosing young, fit-looking men first. Once full, the bus pulled away. Later that day, I encountered some of the men and women who had not been picked when I put in a shift at the Guadalupe Center of Immokalee's soup kitchen. Tricia Yeggy, the director of the kitchen, explained that it runs on two simple rules: People can eat as much as they want, and no one is turned away hungry. This means serving between 250 and 300 people a day, 44 per sitting, beginning at eleven o'clock. Cheerful retirees volunteer as servers, and the "guests" are unabashedly appreciative. The day's selection-turkey and rice soup with squash, corn, and a vigorous sprinkle of cumin-was both hearty and tasty. You could almost forget the irony: Workers who pick the food we eat can't afford to feed themselves. The CIW has been working to ease the migrants' plight since 1993, when a few field hands began meeting sporadically in a church hall. Lucas Benitez, one of the coalition's main spokespeople, came to the group in its early years. Back then, the challenge was taking small steps, often for individual workers. To make the point, Benitez unfolded a crumpled shirt covered in dried blood. "This is Edgar's shirt," he said. One day in 1996, a 16-year-old Guatemalan boy named Edgar briefly stopped working in the field for a drink of water. His crew boss bludgeoned him. Edgar fled and arrived at the coalition's door, bleeding. In response to the CIW's call for action, over 500 workers assembled and marched to the boss's house. The next morning, no one would get on his bus. "That was the last report of a worker being beaten by his boss in the field," said Benitez. The shirt is kept as a reminder that by banding together, progress is possible. Even though the CIW has been responsible for bringing police attention to a half dozen slavery prosecutions, Benitez feels that slavery will persist until overall conditions for field workers improve. The group has made progress on that front by securing better pay. Between the early 1980s and the mid-1990s, the rate for a basket of tomatoes remained 40 cents-meaning that workers' real wages dropped as inflation rose. Work stoppages, demonstrations, and a hunger strike helped raise it to 45 cents on average, but the packers complained that competition for customers prevented them from paying more. One grower refused to enter a dialogue with CIW hunger strikers because, in his words, "a tractor doesn't tell the farmer how to run the farm." The CIW decided to try an end run around the growers by going directly to the biggest customers and asking them to pay one cent more per pound directly to the workers. Small change to supermarket chains and fast-food corporations, but it would add about twenty dollars to the fifty a picker makes on a good day, the difference between barely scraping by and earning a livable wage. The Campaign for Fair Food, as it is called, first took aim at Yum! Brands, owner of Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, KFC, Long John Silver's, and A&W. After four years of pressure, Yum! agreed to the one-cent raise in 2005 and, importantly, pledged to make sure that no worker who picked its tomatoes was being exploited. McDonald's came aboard in 2007, and in 2008 Burger King, Whole Foods Market, and Subway followed, with more expected to join up this year. But the program faces a major obstacle. Claiming that the farmers are not party to the arrangement, the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, an agricultural cooperative that represents some 90 percent of the state's producers, has refused to be a conduit for the raise, citing legal concerns. When the Navarrete case came to light, there were no howls of outrage from growers. Or from Florida government circles. When Cesar Navarrete, who pleaded guilty, was sentenced to 12 years in prison this past December, Terence McElroy of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services offered his perspective on the crime: "Any legitimate grower certainly does not engage in that activity. But you're talking about maybe a case a year." Charlie Frost, the Collier County Sheriff's Office detective who investigated and arrested Navarrete, disagrees. With one case wrapped up, he and prosecutor Molloy turned to several other active slavery cases. Sitting in his Naples office and pointing his index finger east, toward the fields of Immokalee, he said, "It's happening out there right now." Lucas, who received a temporary visa for his testimony, is now back in the fields, still chasing the dream of making a little money to send back home. Buying Slave-Free Fruits In the warm months, the best solution is to follow that old mantra: buy seasonal, local, and small-scale. But what about in winter? So far, Whole Foods is the only grocery chain that has signed on to the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) Campaign for Fair Food, which means that it has promised not to deal with growers who tolerate serious worker abuses and, when buying tomatoes, to a pay a price that supports a living wage. When shopping elsewhere, you can take advantage of the fact that fruits and vegetables must be labeled with their country of origin. Most of the fresh tomatoes in supermarkets during winter months come from Florida, where labor conditions are dismal for field workers, or from Mexico, where they are worse, according to a CIW spokesman. One option during these months is to buy locally produced hydroponic greenhouse tomatoes, including cluster tomatoes still attached to the vine. Greenhouse tomatoes are also imported from Mexico, however, so check signage or consult the little stickers often seen on the fruits themselves to determine their source. You can also visit the CIW's information-packed website (ciw-online.org) if you are interested in becoming part of the coalition's efforts. From maryrose333 at att.net Wed Mar 4 03:58:14 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 02:58:14 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] WHAT NEXT? James Howard Kunstler Message-ID: <002b01c99cb8$2140f330$63c2d990$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] WHAT NEXT? James Howard Kunstler (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) WHAT NEXT? James Howard Kunstler Monday, 02 March 2009 http://carolynbaker.net/site/content/view/1004/1/ [The next collapse? Farming. The decline continues to keep coming back to the issue of food security.--CB] The Peak Oil story was never about running out of oil. It was about the collapse of complex systems in a world economy faced by the prospect of no further oil-fueled growth. It was something of a shock to many that the first complex system to fail would be banking, but the process is obvious: no more growth means no more ability to pay interest on credit... end of story, as Tony Soprano used to say. There was a popular theory among Peak Oilers the last decade that the world would enter a "bumpy plateau" period when the global economy would get beaten down by peak oil, would then revive as "demand destruction" drove down oil prices, and would be beaten down again as oil prices shot up in response -- with serial repetitions of the cycle, each beat-down taking economies lower -- the only imaginable outcome being some sort of quiet homeostasis. This scenario did not play out as expected. It was predicated on a mistaken assumption that all systems would retain some kind of operational resilience while ratcheting down. Anyway, the banking system was mortally wounded in the first go-round and the behemoth is dying hard. The last desperate act of the banking system in the face of Peak Oil's no-more-growth equation was to engineer species of tradable securities that could produce wealth out of thin air rather than productive activity. This was the alphabet soup of algorithm-derived frauds with vague and confounding names such as credit default swaps (CDSs), collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), structured investment vehicles (SIVs), and, of course, the basic filler, mortgage backed securities. The banking system is now choking to death on these delicacies. The trouble is that the EMT squad brought in to rescue the banking system -- that is, governments -- can't remove these obstructions from the patient's craw. They don't want to drown in a mighty upchuck of the alphabet soup. The collapse of complex systems is actually predicated on the idea that the systems would mutually reinforce each other's failures. This is now plain to see as the collapse of banking (that is, of both lending and debt service), has led to the collapse of commerce and manufacturing. The next systems to go will probably be farming, transportation, and the oil markets themselves (which constitute the system for allocating and distributing world energy resources). As these things seize up, the final system to go will be governance, at least at the highest levels. If we're really lucky, human affairs will eventually reorganize at a lower scale of activity, governance, civility, and economy. Every week, the failure to recognize the nature of our predicament thrusts us further into the uncharted territory of hardship. The task of government right now is not to prop up doomed systems at their current scales of failure, but to prepare the public to rebuild our systems at smaller scales. The net effect of the failures in banking is that a lot of people have less money than they expected they would have a year ago. This is bad enough, given our habits and practices of modern life. But what happens when farming collapses? The prospect for that is closer than most of us might realize. The way we produce our food has been organized at a scale that has ruinous consequences, not least its addiction to capital. Now that banking is in collapse, capital will be extremely scarce. Nobody in the cities reads farm news, or listens to farm reports on the radio. Guess what, though: we are entering the planting season. It will be interesting to learn how many farmers "out there" in the Cheez Doodle belt are not able to secure loans for this year's crop. My guess is that the disorder in agriculture will be pretty severe this year, especially since some of the world's most productive places -- California, northern China, Argentina, the Australian grain belt -- are caught in extremes of drought on top of capital shortages. If the US government is going to try to make remedial policy for anything, it better start with agriculture, to promote local, smaller-scaled farming using methods that are much less dependent on oil byproducts and capital injections. This will, of course, require a re-allocation of lands suitable for growing food. Our real estate market mechanisms could conceivably enable this to happen, but not without a coherent consensus that it is imperative to do so. If agri-business as currently practiced doesn't founder on capital shortages, it will surely collapse on disruptions in the oil markets. President Obama at least made a start in the right direction by proposing to eliminate further subsidies to farmers above the $250,000 level. But the situation is really more acute. Surely the US Department of Agriculture already knows about it, but the public may not be interested until the shelves in the Piggly-Wiggly are bare -- and then, of course, they'll go apeshit. The recent huge drop in oil prices has left the public once again convinced that the world is drowning in oil -- if only the scoundrelly oil companies were forced to deliver it at reasonable prices. The public has been consistently deluded about this for decades. What's missing so far is for the president of the US to lay out the reality of the situation in a dedicated TV address. I know a lot of you think that Jimmy Carter already tried this and failed to make an impression (and ruined his presidency in the process). I guarantee you that Mr. Obama will have to do this sometime in the next few years whether he likes or not, and he'd be well-advised to get it done sooner rather than later. And by this I don't mean just vague allusions to "energy independence" or "renewables" in speeches devoted to many other issues. I mean telling the public the plain truth that we'll never offset oil depletion and the intelligent response is to do everything possible to transition to walkable towns and public transit, not to sustain the unsustainable. The alternatives -- i.e. what we're trying now -- is to further delude ourselves into thinking that we can run WalMart and the suburbs by some other means than oil. Despite all our investments in these things, we won't be able to run them by other means, and the news about this had better get out before enormous disappointment turns into titanic rage. If Americans think they've been grifted by Goldman Sachs and Bernie Madoff, wait until they find out what a swindle the so-called "American Dream" of suburban life turns out to be. On this blizzardy Monday in the power centers of America, attention is fixed on the never-ending fiasco of AIG -- a company whose main product turned out to be credit default swaps, and is now choking on them. Kibitzers on the sidelines of finance are forecasting a king-hell bear market suckers' rally in the stock markets followed by a belly flop to Dow 4000 or lower. I myself called for Dow 4000 two years ago -- and was obviously a bit off on my timing. All this is surely trouble enough. But while your attention is focused on Rick Santelli in the Chicago trader's pit, or Larry Kudlow desperately seeking "mustard seeds" of new growth in financials, try to let one eye stray to the horizon where these other complex systems are working out their next moves. Farming. The oil markets. These are the coming theaters of alarm and distress. From maryrose333 at att.net Wed Mar 4 04:51:38 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 03:51:38 -0800 Subject: [GJM] URGENT READ: FW: [globalnetnews-summary] America's Fiscal Collapse Message-ID: <003701c99cbf$96ff4c50$c4fde4f0$@net> What I am beginning to clearly understand is how the Fed is directing things via the media through the continual "good guy" - "bad guy" Democrat-Republican spat we are witnessing, as the barrage of insults from one party to the other grabs our attention and obfuscates the facts while the real dirty work goes on under cover of this deliberate attempt to keep we-the-people confused about what is really happening. Mass media, instead of being the enlightening force we would like it to be, is very cleverly being used as the cover under which the transfer of funds from the pockets of we-the-people to the bankers pockets is being carried out, with Obama doing just enough "good stuff" to keep us distracted and thus deflected from pulling the covers back and taking a good look. Here, however, Michel Chossudovsky gives us a better look as did James Howard Kuntsler in the previous post. We need to keep reminding ourselves that the Republican view vs the Democratic view is really only camouflage as both parties are controlled by The Fed. We must be careful not to get caught up in the rhetoric of "either/or" when it is both. The agenda of the Neo-cons and the Religious Right is still in play, but while it was combined in the Bush regime, it is cleverly separated between the two parties in this present 4-year go around to make us feel we have a choice when we, in fact, do not. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12517 -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:54 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] America's Fiscal Collapse (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) "The mainstream media suggests that the banks are being nationalized as a result of TARP, In fact, it is exactly the opposite: the State is being taken over by the banks, the State is being privatized. The establishment of a Worldwide unipolar financial system is part of the broader project of the Wall Street financial elites to establish the contours of a world government. "They act as creditors of the US State. They evaluate the creditworthiness of the US government, they rank the public debt through Moody's and Standard and Poor. They control the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board and the US Congress. They oversee and dictate fiscal and monetary policy, ensuring that the state acts in their interest. "People across the land, nationally and internationally must mobilize. This struggle to democratise the financial and fiscal apparatus must be broad-based and democratic encompassing all sectors of society at all levels, in all countries. What is ultimately required is to disarm the financial establishment" http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12517 From ecotort at gn.apc.org Tue Mar 3 04:23:08 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:23:08 +0000 Subject: [GJM] Tell the truth about the War on Terror Message-ID: <49AD131C.3050507@gn.apc.org> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Tell the truth about the War on Terror Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:03:41 -0800 From: Brett Solomon - Avaaz.org To: ecotort at gn.apc.org Dear friends, *Let's find out the truth!* Sign the petition for an independent investigation into Bush?s War on Terror. *Sign the petition here* This week, the US Senate is taking its tentative first steps towards establishing *an independent commission into Bush?s War on Terror* -- an open investigation into torture, detention, wiretapping and illegal transfers to secret prisons across the globe. *This is a major development*, but as expected there are very nervous and powerful interests who want to bury it. A Commission of Inquiry is essential to unravel the full extent of eight years of cover-ups, *to hold those responsible to account * and to prevent such injustice from happening again. It would send a powerful message that the US wants to *repair the damage done to human rights by the Bush years,* while strengthening the fight against terrorism. But without a massive global and US show of support, champion US Senators may not rally the numbers needed to have this commission established. *Sign the petition -- which will be presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee before they make their decision this week -- and help get an inquiry with real teeth over the line:* http://www.avaaz.org/en/end_the_war_on_terror *After 8 damaging years, this campaign for justice has a lot to unearth.* The hearing this week will begin a process throughout 2009, and as this petition grows, our voices will be submitted to decision makers at every opportunity. *But it all starts with a thorough and unflinching Commission of Inquiry* - not just to end impunity, but to make sure that the abductions, deaths and disappearances of Guantanamo are never repeated. Worryingly, the so-called War on Terror is not yet over. Last week the *Obama?s Department of Justice argued*, as they had under Bush, that detainees at the US facility in Bagram, Afghanistan *have no legal right to challenge their detention.* Conversely, in a major turnaround it was separately announced that the only remaining ?enemy combatant? on US soil is finally to be tried by a US civilian court. These conflicting decisions reveal an Administration still making up its mind. Now is the time *to draw a line in the sand* with a bi-partisan Commission that puts the past behind us and empowers an Administration committed to human rights, definitively rejecting torture, refusing to arbitrarily detain and championing the rule of law in its fight against terrorism and in all its global dealings. http://www.avaaz.org/en/end_the_war_on_terror As long as the wrongdoing of the Bush years is kept secret and those practices unaccounted for or allowed to continue, mistrust and violence between nations will flourish. Let's plant a seed of hope, understanding a shared commitment by reading this dark page in history before we turn it. With hope, Brett, Alice, Pascal, Ricken, Paula, Ben, Graziela, Luis, Paul, Iain, Milena, Veronique - and the entire Avaaz team More information on the Commission of Inquiry: http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-02-25-voa58.cfm What Amnesty says about a Commission: Investigation, prosecution, remedy http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/151/2008/en Some options for the Administration http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/weekinreview/22shane.html More about the Senate Judiciary Committee http://judiciary.senate.gov/ ------------ *ABOUT AVAAZ* Avaaz.org is an independent, not-for-profit global campaigning organization that works to ensure that the views and values of the world's people inform global decision-making. (Avaaz means "voice" in many languages.) Avaaz receives no money from governments or corporations, and is staffed by a global team based in Ottawa, London, Rio de Janeiro, New York, Buenos Aires, and Geneva. Call us at: +1 888 922 8229 or +55 21 2509 0368 Click *here* to learn more about our largest campaigns. *Don't forget to check out our Facebook and Myspace and Bebo pages!* You are getting this message because you signed "WORLD TO APEC: HOPE IS NOT ENOUGH! " on 2007-09-07 using the email address ecotort at gn.apc.org. To ensure that Avaaz messages reach your inbox, please add avaaz at avaaz.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, https://secure.avaaz.org/act/index.php?r=profile&user=ad1ae7ea8a36840708398978af5efddb?=en, or simply *go here to unsubscribe *. To contact Avaaz, please *do not reply to this email.* Instead, write to info at avaaz.org. You can also call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US) or +55 21 2509 0368 (Brazil) If you have technical problems, please go to http://www.avaaz.org __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3900 (20090302) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ceasig at gmail.com Wed Mar 4 00:12:54 2009 From: ceasig at gmail.com (Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion & Governance) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:42:54 +0530 Subject: [GJM] Kicking the factory addiction / Indeed for securing ecologically sustainable renewable resource based consumption Message-ID: <31f677a30903032312g6daa7c87j333e266e026bfd88@mail.gmail.com> Dear Mary. Let us discuss practical measure for getting rid of the addictions of factory goods.Recession generated by deregulated usurious finance system is ecologically benevolent . It is a gift of God. People across the world need to take lessons for halting the expansion of ecologically hostile consumption, production and transport, leisure . I am talking to Musical groups in London for creating carbon-nentral mode of musical renditions of the appeals for ecological safety. Mohammad Yahya is one of them. Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:22 AM, mary rose wrote: > What I find amazing in articles like this is the complete lack of > comprehension of the lessening of need for human labor amongst > technological > advances, along with the fact that on a finite planet resources are > limited. > There seems to be only regard for the human condition and none for the life > support system upon which the human family depends. Why is this? How can we > keep on ignoring these things that are so vital to our continued existence? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net > [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of > TradingPostPaul > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 6:10 PM > To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net > Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Kicking the factory addiction > > > (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to > http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) > > Kicking the factory addiction > February 27, 2009 at 9:11 PM EST > > http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090227.wrcover28/BNStor > > y/Business > > BEIJING - Zhang Lan is the picture of Chinese success. She grew up in the > countryside, the daughter of university professors sent down to the farm > during the Cultural Revolution to learn how the peasants lived. > > When she grew up, she moved briefly to Canada, washing dishes and waiting > tables in a Toronto restaurant. > > Today she runs a chain of elegant nouvelle-Sichuan restaurants that employs > 6,000 people. Her office has a big-screen TV, an Apple laptop and suite of > designer furniture. Sleek assistants drift in and out with messages and > cups of tea. > > Just back from New Zealand, where she took a ride on China's America's Cup > yacht, Ms. Zhang plans to get a boat of her own. She is learning to fly a > helicopter, too. And for company, she plans to buy herself a pet crocodile. > One of those little ones you keep in an aquarium, her visitor asks? > "No," she replies, "I want a big one," and spreads her arms wide. > > The drive and savvy of people like Ms. Zhang have helped carry China to > giddy heights, transforming it from a land of Mao suits and bicycles to > billionaires and bullet trains in the space of her adult lifetime. > > But as the global crisis starts to hit the world's third-largest economy, > its economic miracle is suddenly under a cloud. > > Demand for made-in-China watches, hammers, Christmas lights and DVD players > is drying up as Western consumers rein in their spending. Thousands of > manufacturers have shut their doors, including half the country's toy > factories. More than 20 million people have already been thrown out of > work, spurring a mass reverse migration from the coastal export zones to > the poor countryside. > > Putting these people back to work is posing a challenge that goes far > beyond just getting the factories up and running again. > > The global crisis is exposing deep flaws in China's development model. As > overseas shoppers have closed their wallets, China is learning the downside > of a dependence on making cheap stuff for the rest of the world. Years of > pumping up its industrial strength by throwing money into superhighways and > supersized factories have left it too muscle-bound for its own good. > > Now, like an athlete giving up on steroids, China is striving to wean > itself off the high-octane cocktail of investment and exports and lean more > on consumption, innovation and services. To thrive in the age of crisis and > beyond, it needs a new model - one that produces fewer cement plants or > toy factories and more gung-ho business people like Zhang Lan. > > "The financial crisis is an opportunity to change the economic growth > model," says Chang Xin, an economist at the Chinese Academy of Social > Sciences. "How to make that opportunity into a reality is a big challenge > for China." > > China's current model springs from the reforms launched by Deng Xiaoping in > 1978, opening China to the world and unleashing the power of the market. > Deng consciously copied the success of neighbours such as Hong Kong, Taiwan > and Singapore. They achieved spectacular growth in the 1960s and 1970s by > exporting manufactured goods such as toys, clothing and, later, high-end > electronics to the malls of the developed world. They also used their big > pool of savings, the product of a famously high Asian savings rate, to > invest heavily in roads, bridges, ports and strategic industries. > > It was called the East Asian model of development and, for three decades, > it seemed to work as well, if not better, for China than for the "little > dragons" of Asia. China's gross domestic product per head grew tenfold > and its overall GDP 12-fold. Hundreds of millions of Chinese rose out of > absolute poverty. China became the workshop of the world, filling fleets of > container ships with the products of its teeming coastal factories. > > At the same time, capital investment by government and companies soared > too, reaching more than 40 per cent of GDP, a far higher rate than the > other East Asian dynamos in their era of maximum growth. Fixed-asset > investment - in things such as land, building and machinery - has grown > by a pell-mell annual rate of 20 per cent and more. > > One result: China has no less than 80 car makers and thousands of steel > mills. In the steel town of Fengrun about two hours from Beijing, for > example, no less than 100 mills belch smoke into the sooty winter sky. > > For decades, those car makers and smokestacks served a steadily growing > overseas clientele. Until they went into reverse last fall, China's exports > had been growing at a frantic pace for years. > > Now, that heavy reliance on trade and investment is proving to be a weak > spot. There is nothing wrong with investing, especially when companies are > making fat profits and the economy is growing by double digits, as China's > has until now. The problem in China is that much of the money is > misdirected or simply wasted. State-run banks usually lend to state-run > companies, or those with political connections. Much of the money pours > into cement or chemicals or big export producers, which are favoured with > government-subsidized land and energy. By contrast, smaller, more > innovative companies have a hard time raising money in a country with an > immature stock market. > > Hence, the country's surplus of car makers and steel mills. How will they > survive now that demand is falling for steel to make appliances for export > and build new housing at home in China? > > "Basically, you could get money for free in China as long as you built a > factory," said Michael Pettis, a Peking University economist. "The > Chinese financial system is geared up to create an unsustainable explosion > of capacity. Just as the U.S. was the world centre of overconsumption, > China was the world centre of overproduction. Both have to adjust." > > In other words, China needs to become more like the rich economies of North > America and Europe. That may stick in Beijing's throat at a time when those > economies are suffering through their worst crisis in decades. Their model > of development is looking pretty flawed too. > > Western consumption clearly has its drawbacks. But Beijing's focus on > government-directed industrial expansion overlooked the need to create a > consumer class. And there's another problem: Heavy industry employs fewer > workers than service industries. So in recent years, even as the economy > boomed, employment growth has slowed and the income of the population has > grown at only about half the rate of GDP. > > "The end result of this pattern is that the Chinese economy has created > this huge production capacity but has created a very limited consumption > base," Yasheng Huang, a China watcher at the Massachusetts Institute of > Technology, said in an e-mail interview. "This means that China is very > vulnerable to the economic slowdowns in the U.S. and other rich > countries." > > China's consumption level is the lowest for any major economy. Both Chinese > households and Chinese companies are fanatical savers. That means the > economy can't rely on domestic demand when exports go soft. > > Services, meanwhile, account for just 40 per cent of GDP, compared to 54 > per cent in other middle-income countries and 70 per cent in high-income > countries. There are more and more entrepreneurial companies like Ms. > Zhang's restaurant chain group, but still not nearly enough. Only four > million people work in China's banking and insurance industries, for > example, a trifling number in a population of 1.3 billion. > > Worse, service industries are often dominated by government-backed or > government-owned firms with a stranglehold on the market. In mobile phones, > one of China's most dynamic markets over the past decade, the dominant > player is state-owned China Mobile. > > Though Chinese products crowd store shelves around the world, China has > produced no global brand such as Japan's Sony or South Korea's Samsung. And > though Chinese firms are trying hard to move up the value chain, their > record for innovation is poor. China has yet to produce a globe-girdling > multinational such as India's Tata Group, though computer maker Lenovo is > trying hard. > > Many Chinese companies are still simply assemblers of other people's > products - bikes from Taiwan or computers from Texas, put together by > hand on a Chinese factory floor with parts imported from elsewhere. China > spends 1.5 per cent of GDP on research and development, compared with 3 per > cent or more in some developed economies. > > China's leaders are well aware of the flaws in their economic model. The > country's No. 2 leader, Premier Wen Jiabao, pronounced in 2007 that > "there are structural problems in China's economy which cause unsteady, > unbalanced, unco-ordinated and unsustainable development." > > Only this week, the People's Bank of China, the country's central bank, > remarked that "China has a problem of high savings and low > consumption." > > It noted that the share of investment in GDP has risen to 43.5 per cent in > 2008 from 36.6 per cent in 1992, and the share of consumption has dropped > to 48.6 per cent in 2008 from 62.4 per cent in 1992, well below the world > average. This was "not conducive to the healthy and stable development of > the economy." > > Too true. Yet it remains to be seen whether Beijing will move quickly or > decisively enough to correct the problem. To make it more tempting for > Chinese to spend instead of save, Beijing has taken steps to improve its > astoundingly weak social safety net. > > Last month, for example, the government rolled out a new universal health > care program, reasoning that people who have some insurance against illness > will not have to save as much to pay for their care. It has also improved > rural property rights to encourage country people to open their wallets and > raised minimum factory wages to coax manufacturers to move up the value > chain. > > Still, the World Bank says that, so far, "there has been little > rebalancing away from industry and investment towards services and > consumption." > > It recommends a series of measures: freeing the yuan - the Chinese > currency - to rise in value, making Chinese exports less affordable to > foreigners and shifting the balance away from export-led growth; shifting > more government spending from investment to social welfare and education; > liberalizing the banking system and stock markets so that smaller, more > efficient firms can raise money and get loans more easily; dismantling > monopolies and oligopolies that prevent competition in the services sector. > > Taking these steps will be hard, especially in the midst of global > recession. Rather than shifting away from exports, the government has quite > naturally been doing everything in its power to help exporters from going > under by, for instance, restoring tax rebates they used to enjoy. And far > from slashing investment, it has promised to spend an impressive four > trillion yuan ($740-billion) to stimulate the economy, much of it going on > new roads, bridges and other infrastructure. > > But, then, China has managed to reinvent itself before. Ms. Zhang, the > restaurant chain owner, reminds her visitor that when she was growing up, > China was "the sick man of the world." Her scholar parents were made to > feed the pigs on the farm. It was forbidden to do business with foreigners > or to run even so much as a private tea cart. > > Today she is looking at buying six Swiss castles as part of a planned > international expansion of her chain. Asked if she isn't afraid of the > global economic storm, she says without bravado, "I don't know what it is > to be scared." > > If China managed to switch from the xenophobic Maoism of her youth to the > modified capitalism of today, she is certain it can survive the current > storm and move forward. Who would dare to say she is dreaming? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net > > http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net > -- Endeavoring for ecological safety ,social inclusion and distributive justice for the renewable resource based livelihoods and habitats, Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion and Governance (CEASIG) , an initiative of Labour League Foundation, Sewa and Sufi Trust , Delhi aims for socially inclusive and ecologically safe future for all through organizing and communicating fcarbon neutral neighborhood discussions/ consultations, building capacities in ecological audit, ecologically safe networking ,advocacy, interfaith dialogue & other related domains for multiplying personal, community , governmental and corporate actions for ecologically safe education, ecological audit ,and, ecologically safe and socially inclusive governance best practices -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hermann at picknowl.com.au Wed Mar 4 04:20:40 2009 From: hermann at picknowl.com.au (John Hermann) Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:50:40 +1030 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] WHAT NEXT? James Howard Kunstler In-Reply-To: <002b01c99cb8$2140f330$63c2d990$@net> References: <002b01c99cb8$2140f330$63c2d990$@net> Message-ID: <200903041120.n24BKdLx028504@mail14.tpg.com.au> >WHAT NEXT? James Howard Kunstler >Monday, 02 March 2009 >http://carolynbaker.net/site/content/view/1004/1/ >[The next collapse? Farming. The decline continues to keep coming back to >the issue of food security.--CB] > >The Peak Oil story was never about running out of oil. It was about the >collapse of complex systems in a world economy faced by the prospect of no >further oil-fueled growth. It was something of a shock to many that the >first complex system to fail would be banking, but the process is obvious: >no more growth means no more ability to pay interest on credit... end of >story, as Tony Soprano used to say. Unfortunately the story is a fairy tale. Economic growth and interest payments are largely independent of each other. Almost all interest received as income by banks is recycled - by spending - back into the money supply. John Hermann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk Thu Mar 5 03:21:12 2009 From: dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk (robert searle) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:21:12 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [GJM] [socialcredit] FW: Playing the Banking Game. CRG E-Newsletter Message-ID: <998986.76139.qm@web27404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> --- On Wed, 4/3/09, helge nome wrote: From: helge nome Subject: [socialcredit] FW: Playing the Banking Game. CRG E-Newsletter To: "Dave Ryder" , "Earl Solberg" , "Edwin Erickson" , "Ellen Brown" , "Gordon Barrett" , "Grahame West" , "Jim Doody" , "Jim Schroeder" , "John Rawson" , "Larry Heather" , "Laverne Ahlstrom" , "Len Skowronski" , "Martin Hattersley" , "Michaeljournal SC" , "Michel Chossudovsky" , "Murray Fuhrer" , "Tore Nordahl" , "Trevor Grover" , "Wilf Tricker" , "Bob Taft" , "Socialcreditlist" , "Randulf Hansen" Date: Wednesday, 4 March, 2009, 5:18 PM #yiv790319299 .hmmessage P { margin:0px;padding:0px;} #yiv790319299 { font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;} Here is a good one. Alberta has its own bank too, ATBFinancial, owned by the people. Helge Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:56:38 -0500 From: crgeditor at yahoo.com To: helgenome at hotmail.com Subject: Playing the Banking Game. CRG E-Newsletter Playing the Banking Game How Cash Starved States can Create their Own Credit By Ellen Brown URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12522 Global Research, March 3, 2009 webofdebt.com ? ?He that will not apply new remedies must expect new evils; for time is the greatest innovator.? Francis Bacon On February 19, 2009, California narrowly escaped bankruptcy, when Governor Arnold Schwarzenneger put on his Terminator hat and held the state senate in lockdown mode until they signed a very controversial budget.1 If the vote had failed, the state was going to be reduced to paying its employees in I.O.U.s. California avoided bankruptcy for the time being, but 46 of 50 states are insolvent and could be filing Chapter 9 bankruptcy proceedings in the next two years.2 One of the four states that is not insolvent is an unlikely candidate for the distinction ? North Dakota. As Michigan management consultant Charles Fleetham observed last month in an article distributed to his local media: ?North Dakota is a sparsely populated state of less than 700,000, known for cold weather, isolated farmers and a hit movie ? Fargo. Yet, for some reason it defies the real estate clich? of location, location, location. Since 2000, the state's GNP has grown 56%, personal income has grown 43%, and wages have grown 34%. This year the state has a budget surplus of $1.2 billion!? What does the State of North Dakota have that other states don't? The answer seems to be: its own bank. In fact, North Dakota has the only state-owned bank in the nation. The state legislature established the Bank of North Dakota in 1919. Fleetham writes that the bank was set up to free farmers and small businessmen from the clutches of out-of-state bankers and railroad men. By law, the state must deposit all its funds in the bank, and the state guarantees its deposits. Three elected officials oversee the bank: the governor, the attorney general, and the commissioner of agriculture. The bank's stated mission is to deliver sound financial services that promote agriculture, commerce and industry in North Dakota. The bank operates as a bankers' bank, partnering with private banks to loan money to farmers, real estate developers, schools and small businesses. It loans money to students (over 184,000 outstanding loans), and it purchases municipal bonds from public institutions. Still, you may ask, how does that solve the solvency problem? Isn't the state still limited to spending only the money it has? The answer is no. Certified, card-carrying bankers are allowed to do something nobody else can do: they can create ?credit? with accounting entries on their books. A License to Create Money Under the ?fractional reserve? lending system, banks are allowed to extend credit (create money as loans) in a sum equal to many times their deposit base. Congressman Jerry Voorhis, writing in 1973, explained it like this: ?[F]or every $1 or $1.50 which people ? or the government ? deposit in a bank, the banking system can create out of thin air and by the stroke of a pen some $10 of checkbook money or demand deposits. It can lend all that $10 into circulation at interest just so long as it has the $1 or a little more in reserve to back it up.?3 That banks actually create money with accounting entries was confirmed in a revealing booklet published by the Chicago Federal Reserve titled Modern Money Mechanics.2 The booklet was periodically revised until 1992, when it had reached 50 pages long. On page 49 of the 1992 edition, it states: ?With a uniform 10 percent reserve requirement, a $1 increase in reserves would support $10 of additional transaction accounts [loans created as deposits in borrowers' accounts].?4 The 10 percent reserve requirement is now largely obsolete, in part because banks have figured out how to get around it with such devices as ?overnight sweeps.? What chiefly limits bank lending today is the 8 percent capital requirement imposed by the Bank for International Settlements, the head of the private global central banking system in Basel, Switzerland. With an 8 percent capital requirement, a state with its own bank could fan its revenues into 12.5 times their face value in loans (100 ? 8 = 12.5). And since the state would actually own the bank, it would not have to worry about shareholders or profits. It could lend to creditworthy borrowers at very low interest, perhaps limited only to a service charge covering its costs; and it could lend to itself or to its municipal governments at as low as zero percent interest. If these loans were rolled over indefinitely, the effect would be the same as creating new, debt-free money. Dangerously inflationary? Not if the money were used to create new goods and services. Price inflation results only when ?demand? (money) exceeds ?supply? (goods and services). When they increase together, prices remain stable. Today we are in a dangerous deflationary spiral, as lending has dried up and asset values have plummeted. The monopoly on the creation of money and credit by a private banking fraternity has resulted in a malfunctioning credit system and monetary collapse. Credit markets have been frozen by the wildly speculative derivatives gambles of a few big Wall Street banks, bets that not only destroyed those banks' balance sheets but are infecting the whole private banking system with toxic debris. To get out of this deflationary debt trap requires an injection of new, debt-free money into the economy, something that can best be done through a system of public banks dedicated to serving the public interest, administering credit as a public utility. Some experts insist that we must tighten our belts and start saving again, in order to rebuild the ?capital? necessary for functioning markets; but our markets actually functioned quite well so long as the credit system was working. We have the same real assets (raw materials, oil, technical knowledge, productive capacity, labor force, etc.) that we had before the crisis began. Our workers and factories are sitting idle because the private credit system has failed. A system of public credit could put them back to work again. The notion that ?money? is something that has to be ?saved? before it can be ?borrowed? misconstrues the nature of money and credit. Credit is merely a legal agreement, a ?monetization? of future proceeds, a promise to pay later from the fruits of the advance. Banks have created credit on their books for hundreds of years, and this system would have worked quite well had it not been for the enormous tribute siphoned off to private coffers in the form of interest. A public banking system could overcome that problem by returning the interest to the public purse. This is the sort of banking system that was pioneered in the colony of Pennsylvania, where it worked brilliantly well. Restoring Michigan to Solvency Among other advantages to a state of owning its own bank are the substantial sums it could save in interest. As Fleetham notes of his own ailing state of Michigan: ?According to recent financial reports (available online), the State of Michigan, the City of Detroit, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, the Wayne County Airport, the Detroit Public Schools, the University of Michigan, and Michigan State University pay over $800 million a year in interest on long term debt. If you add interest paid by Michigan cities, school districts, and public utilities, the cost to our taxpayers easily tops a billion a year. What does Wall Street do with our billion plus dollars? They decorate their offices like kings.? Interestingly, the projected state budget deficit for 2009 is also $1 billion. If Michigan did not have to pay over a billion dollars in interest to Wall Street, the budget could be balanced and the state could be restored to solvency. A state-owned bank could not only provide interest-free credit for the state but could actually generate revenues for it. Fleetham notes that in 2007, the Bank of North Dakota earned a net profit of $51 million on a loan volume of $2 billion. He comments: ?Last year, Michigan citizens paid over $5 billion dollars in personal income tax. With a state bank like North Dakota's we could reduce this burden, fund new businesses, and restore our crumbling water and sewer systems. And we don't have to feel sorry about Wall Street losing our business. They didn't ?earn' the money they lent us. They created it in computers and charged us interest to boot. Let's follow North Dakota's lead and get free from Wall Street's web.? Taking the Initiative in California California could do this as well. Robert Ellis is a Tucson talk show host who once worked on Wall Street and has been involved in setting up several banks and financial institutions. In January of this year, he proposed in a letter to Governor Schwarzenegger that California could resolve its financial woes by setting up a bank on the model of the Bank of North Dakota. Ellis wrote to the governor: ?I admire your tenacity in dealing with California's financial problems. Your idea of using IOU's was ingenious but there is a better way. The State of California can charter its own bank and issue its own checks to all state employees . . . . It can also pay all its vendors, contracts and contractors through the bank . . . . Additionally, once the bank is operational, you can fund your own state projects and you determine the interest rate paid as opposed to being at the mercy of the banks you currently deal with or the interest rates the investment bankers make you pay to issue bonds. By doing this, you will put the state in control of its own destiny and make it the benefactor of its own money. ?. . . What I am proposing is not new. It has been done by one other state in the nation [North Dakota]. Why should you continue to pay the banks for services and interest on loans when you can receive that interest for the benefit of the state of California? Wouldn't it be better if you could fund your own infrastructure projects without having to get the approval of independent banks or investment bankers? Additionally, you set the interest rate on your own projects. You can even set it at zero if you deem the project worthy enough.? Ellis offered his services in setting up the bank, which he thought could be chartered in a few short months. The Governor has not replied, but some pressure from constituents might encourage a response. Failing that, there is the initiative and referendum process pioneered in California. It allows state laws to be proposed directly by the public, and the state's Constitution to be amended either by public petition (the ?initiative?) or by the legislature submitting a proposed constitutional amendment to the electorate (the ?referendum?). The initiative is done by writing a proposed constitutional amendment or statute as a petition, which is submitted to the California Attorney General along with a submission fee, which was a modest $200 in 2004. The petition must be signed by registered voters amounting to 8% (for a constitutional amendment) or 5% (for a statute) of the number of people who voted in the most recent election for governor.5 As Gandhi said, ?When the people lead, the leaders will follow.? We the people can beat the Wall Street bankers at their own game, by moving our legislators to set up publicly-owned banks that create credit using the same banking principles that are accepted as standard and usual in the trade by bankers themselves. Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and ?the money trust.? She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from ?the money trust.? Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature's Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com. Notes Anne Davies, ?Lockdown Vote Saves California from Bankruptcy,? theage.com.au (February 21, 2009). ? John Mitchell, ?46 of 50 States Could File Bankruptcy in 2009-2010,? Freedom Arizona (January 30, 2009). ? Jerry Voorhis, The Strange Case of Richard Milhous Nixon (1973), excerpted at http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/ArchiveARCHIVE/ECONOMICSPOLITICS/FEDERAL%20RESERVE/Jerry%20VoorhisFedReserve.html. ? Modern Money Mechanics: A Workbook on Bank Reserves and Deposit Expansion (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Public Information Service, 1992, available at http://www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf ). ? ??California Ballot Proposition,? Wikipedia. Please support Global Research Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers. Your endorsement is greatly appreciated Subscribe to the Global Research e-newsletter Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article. To become a Member of Global Research The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor at yahoo.com www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner. For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com ? Copyright Ellen Brown, webofdebt.com, 2009 The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12522 ? Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia ? Copyright 2005-2007 Forward email This email was sent to helgenome at hotmail.com by crgeditor at yahoo.com. Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe? | Privacy Policy. Email Marketing by GlobalResearch.ca | v | Montreal | Canada Windows Live Messenger makes it easier to stay in touch ? learn how! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium You're subscribed to this list with the email dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 09:43:12 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:43:12 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Fox News hosts falsely asserted that doctors could be jailedfor refusing to perform abortions under Obama administration Message-ID: <006601c99db1$7c136d70$743a4850$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:34 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Fox News hosts falsely asserted that doctors could be jailedfor refusing to perform abortions under Obama administration (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Fox News hosts falsely asserted that doctors could be jailed for refusing to perform abortions under Obama administration Wed, Mar 4, 2009 7:58pm ET http://mediamatters.org/items/200903040031?f=h_latest Summary: In separate reports, Fox News' Bret Baier and Megyn Kelly misrepresented the reported plans of the Obama administration to rescind a December 2008 Bush administration regulation to falsely assert that the Obama administration's decision could result in doctors' being prosecuted or discriminated against for refusing to perform abortions. In fact, federal law -- which the Obama administration cannot "repeal[]" -- prohibits public officials from requiring recipients of public funds to perform abortions or sterilizations in violation of their religious or moral beliefs. On the March 3 edition of Fox News' Special Report and the March 4 edition of America's Newsroom, hosts Bret Baier and Megyn Kelly, respectively, misrepresented the reported plans of the Obama administration to rescind a December 2008 Bush administration regulation to falsely assert that the Obama administration's decision could result in doctors' being prosecuted or discriminated against for refusing to perform abortions. In fact, federal law bans discrimination against doctors for refusing to perform abortions; proponents and opponents of the Bush regulation reportedly agree that because of the way it is written, the regulation could allow doctors and health care workers to refuse to provide other services or medical treatments that they feel violates their beliefs. On the March 3 edition of Special Report, Baier reported that a "top Republican senator [Tom Coburn (OK)] says he and his fellow doctors would rather go to jail than perform abortions. President Obama is considering repealing a regulation that kept doctors from having to make that choice in the past." Similarly, on the March 4 edition America's Newsroom, Kelly reported: "President Bush made it a lot easier for doctors to refuse procedures inconsistent with their religious beliefs, like abortion or sterilization. Now President Obama is set to change that. Our upcoming guest is a senator, and a doctor, who says he will go to jail before he's forced to something against his beliefs." In fact, Obama is not "considering repealing" regulations forbidding discrimination against medical professionals who refuse to perform abortions on moral or religious grounds; nor will Obama "force[]" doctors to make a choice between performing abortions or sterilizations and going to jail. Federal law -- which the Obama administration cannot "repeal[]" -- prohibits public officials from requiring recipients of public funds to perform abortions or sterilizations in violation of their religious or moral beliefs. Similarly, federal law prohibits entities receiving public funds from discriminating against personnel who refuse to perform those procedures for those reasons. From Title 42, ? 300a-7 of the U.S. Code: (b) Prohibition of public officials and public authorities from imposition of certain requirements contrary to religious beliefs or moral convictions The receipt of any grant, contract, loan, or loan guarantee under the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Community Mental Health Centers Act [42 U.S.C. 2689 et seq.], or the Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Construction Act [42 U.S.C. 6000 et seq.] by any individual or entity does not authorize any court or any public official or other public authority to require -- (1) such individual to perform or assist in the performance of any sterilization procedure or abortion if his performance or assistance in the performance of such procedure or abortion would be contrary to his religious beliefs or moral convictions; or (2) such entity to -- (A) make its facilities available for the performance of any sterilization procedure or abortion if the performance of such procedure or abortion in such facilities is prohibited by the entity on the basis of religious beliefs or moral convictions, or (B) provide any personnel for the performance or assistance in the performance of any sterilization procedure or abortion if the performance or assistance in the performance of such procedures or abortion by such personnel would be contrary to the religious beliefs or moral convictions of such personnel. (c) Discrimination prohibition (1) No entity which receives a grant, contract, loan, or loan guarantee under the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Community Mental Health Centers Act [42 U.S.C. 2689 et seq.], or the Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Construction Act [42 U.S.C. 6000 et seq.] after June 18, 1973, may -- (A) discriminate in the employment, promotion, or termination of employment of any physician or other health care personnel, or (B) discriminate in the extension of staff or other privileges to any physician or other health care personnel, because he performed or assisted in the performance of a lawful sterilization procedure or abortion, because he refused to perform or assist in the performance of such a procedure or abortion on the grounds that his performance or assistance in the performance of the procedure or abortion would be contrary to his religious beliefs or moral convictions, or because of his religious beliefs or moral convictions respecting sterilization procedures or abortions. A February 27 Scientific American blog post on the Obama administration's "intention to rescind" the Bush-era regulation reported: Federal law bars discriminating against healthcare workers who refuse to provide abortions or abortion referrals to patients, but the Bush reg change requires federally funded facilities to certify that they're complying with it -- and both proponents and critics of the new rule agree that the way it's worded could be broadly interpreted to allow workers to also block access to other medical treatments, such as contraception and artificial insemination. In addition, a February 27 article on NPR.org reported: [O]pponents say the regulation was written so broadly that it could allow workers to decline to participate in many other types of sensitive medical procedures -- from blood transfusions to end-of-life care. And in parts of the country with few medical providers, those refusals could put patients at risk, those critics contend. "That rule was so broad that even the cashier at Walgreens could refuse to provide medication for somebody if the cashier decided they have a religious objection," said Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO). >From the March 3 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier: BAIER: One top Republican senator says he and his fellow doctors would rather go to jail than perform abortions. President Obama is considering repealing a regulation that kept doctors from having to make that choice in the past. Correspondent Shannon Bream is live with details. Hi, Shannon. BREAM: Hi, Bret. Well, over the past 30 years, a number of laws have been passed that protect the rights of medical workers if they decline to perform procedures they've got a moral objection to, like abortion. Well, those protections got an added boost when the Bush administration issued a federal regulation beefing up the laws and providing for enforcement. This was shortly before President Bush left office. Now, the Obama administration is making moves to have that federal regulation revoked. Republican Senator Tom Coburn, a pro-life obstetrician, says he and many of his colleagues would be willing to go to jail rather than do anything that violates their moral convictions. COBURN [video clip]: I will do nothing against my conscience in the practice of medicine, regardless of what any law is at any time, and I can tell you there's a lot of physicians that feel exactly that way across the country. BREAM: A senior Obama administration official says the Bush regulation is too vague and could prevent some medical professionals from offering a full range of services to their patients, quote: "This policy of potentially allowing providers to refuse to provide contraception or family planning runs counter to the Obama administration's goal of reducing abortions and unwanted pregnancies. It could also lead into other areas of medical care." The regulation in question falls under the Department of Health and Human Services. Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius, who has a long history of supporting abortion rights, has been nominated to head up that department. There's been significant outcry from a number of conservative groups who worry about the governor's record on abortion and about her potentially having some oversight of the repeal of this regulation. There will be a 30-day public comment period once the administration officially announces its intention to rescind the regulation before it can actually be revoked -- Bret. BAIER: Shannon, thanks. >From the March 4 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom: KELLY: While President Bush made it a lot easier for doctors to refuse procedures inconsistent with their religious beliefs, like abortion or sterilization, now President Obama is set to change that. Our upcoming guest is a senator, and a doctor, who says he will go to jail before he's forced to do something against his beliefs. >From the February 27 Scientific American blog post: Reproductive rights groups are cheering President Obama's intention to rescind a "midnight regulation" issued in the waning days of the Bush administration that blocks federal funding of healthcare facilities that don't allow their employees to bow out of medical procedures, such as abortion, to which they have moral objections. Advocacy groups last month sued the government over the so-called "right to conscience" rule, charging that it's unlawful. The administration will publish a notice in the Federal Register next week announcing that it's planning to change the rule, the Associated Press reports. "We've been concerned that the way the Bush rule is written it could make it harder for women to get the care they need," an unidentified Department of Health and Human Services official told the Washington Post. "It is worded so vaguely that some have argued it could limit family planning counseling and even potentially blood transfusions and end-of-life care." Federal law bars discriminating against healthcare workers who refuse to provide abortions or abortion referrals to patients, but the Bush reg change requires federally funded facilities to certify that they're complying with it -- and both proponents and critics of the new rule agree that the way it's worded could be broadly interpreted to allow workers to also block access to other medical treatments, such as contraception and artificial insemination. The Center for Reproductive Rights praised the move. "Any time, any worker at a healthcare facility can prevent a woman seeking reproductive services from getting care, information and even, a referral -- and the government sanctions such conduct -- it's time for a regulatory 'do-over,'" said said [sic] Nancy Northup, the group's president. "The Bush administration claimed that this policy protects healthcare providers against discrimination, but in truth, it leaves patients unprotected and seriously violates their rights and medical needs." Obama on Jan. 23 reversed Bush's controversial "Global Gag rule," which cut off federal funding for international-aid groups that perform or provide information about abortions. The regulation, also known as the Mexico City Policy, had been in effect on and off since 1984. From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 13:38:24 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:38:24 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate Message-ID: <001601c99dd2$583bb210$08b31630$@net> This is the end of the Industrial Revolution. We now need an evolution which brings us in alignment with Earth and Human values instead of those of bottom line profit-seekers who have continually shifted external costs forward. We are now the generation that has to foot the bill for this prior irresponsibility and it's time to pull the plug and begin a new cycle based in values which create a sustainable living future for all. Either we do this or we are out of here as the human family. TINA (there is no alternative) -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:55 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate By Alex Taylor III Tuesday, Mar. 03, 2009 Under pressure to demonstrate their viability in order to qualify for more government loans, General Motors and Chrysler couldn't produce any additional evidence on Tuesday. If they were taking physical exams, they both would have flunked. As February sales were reported, GM owned up to selling 53% fewer cars and trucks than a year ago, while Chrysler admitted that its total fell 44%. Slow sales means slow production, which is where automakers get their revenue, so the results put a real dent in cash flow. At the beginning of the month, GM and Chrysler both had more than five months' supply of unsold cars. (Read about the CEOs behind Detroit's Big Three.) Both companies are running low on the money they need to operate. GM ended the year with $14 billion, about what it needs to keep the lights on. Chrysler was forecasting that it would start March with just $2.4 billion. Without a boost from the government, GM and Chrysler could each be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation by the time the crocuses bloom. Adding injury to insult, Standard and Poor's reiterated its sell opinion on shares of GM, which are commanding a mere $2.04 a share - about the price of a subway ride in New York City. Observing that the industry is gripped by an "automotive depression," S&P's Efraim Levy added, "We do not foresee an uptick in industry demand before Q4 '09 at the earliest." Chrysler was spared a similar indignity because it is privately held. The two companies are seeking $21.6 billion in emergency loans on top of the $17.4 billion they have already received. But both are missing two pieces they must have by March 31 to convince the government that they are viable: approval from bondholders to restructure their debt and approval from the United Auto Workers to restructure their health-care agreement. Complicating the problem, the bondholders and the UAW are keeping a close eye on each other to make sure that neither side gets a better deal. With the Obama Administration taking heat for enormous deficits in the budget it is proposing, this automotive impasse can only increase the pressure on the Treasury Department to forget about further loans, pull the plug on the two companies and force them into bankruptcy. In bankruptcy court, a judge could impose terms on both the bondholders and the autoworkers. In addition, the judge could renegotiate contracts with suppliers and ignore state franchise laws that protect dealers from termination. The automakers complain bitterly that bankruptcy would destroy their corporate reputations, turn off customers and be ruinously expensive as well. But as the March deadline gets closer and matters remain unresolved, it increasingly looks like a straightforward if brutal solution. It isn't as if the auto companies have a huge reservoir of public affection from which to draw. Outside of some Congress members from Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, there haven't been many voices speaking out with any variation of "Save Detroit." From ecotort at gn.apc.org Thu Mar 5 14:20:32 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:20:32 +0000 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate In-Reply-To: <001601c99dd2$583bb210$08b31630$@net> References: <001601c99dd2$583bb210$08b31630$@net> Message-ID: <49B04220.7000302@gn.apc.org> try looking at http://www.ecotort.gn.apc.org there is a simple practical way forward, based on natural law and common sense which the gjm "moderator" refuses consistently to post mary rose wrote: > This is the end of the Industrial Revolution. We now need an evolution > which brings us in alignment with Earth and Human values instead of those of > bottom line profit-seekers who have continually shifted external costs > forward. We are now the generation that has to foot the bill for this prior > irresponsibility and it's time to pull the plug and begin a new cycle based > in values which create a sustainable living future for all. > > Either we do this or we are out of here as the human family. TINA (there is > no alternative) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net > [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of > TradingPostPaul > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:55 AM > To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net > Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow > Desperate > > > As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate > By Alex Taylor III Tuesday, Mar. 03, 2009 > > Under pressure to demonstrate their viability in order to qualify for more > government loans, General Motors and Chrysler couldn't produce any > additional evidence on Tuesday. If they were taking physical exams, they > both would have flunked. > > As February sales were reported, GM owned up to selling 53% fewer cars and > trucks than a year ago, while Chrysler admitted that its total fell 44%. > Slow sales means slow production, which is where automakers get their > revenue, so the results put a real dent in cash flow. At the beginning of > the month, GM and Chrysler both had more than five months' supply of unsold > cars. (Read about the CEOs behind Detroit's Big Three.) > > Both companies are running low on the money they need to operate. GM ended > the year with $14 billion, about what it needs to keep the lights on. > Chrysler was forecasting that it would start March with just $2.4 billion. > Without a boost from the government, GM and Chrysler could each be forced > into bankruptcy or liquidation by the time the crocuses bloom. > > Adding injury to insult, Standard and Poor's reiterated its sell opinion on > shares of GM, which are commanding a mere $2.04 a share - about the price > of a subway ride in New York City. Observing that the industry is gripped > by an "automotive depression," S&P's Efraim Levy added, "We do not foresee > an uptick in industry demand before Q4 '09 at the earliest." Chrysler was > spared a similar indignity because it is privately held. > > The two companies are seeking $21.6 billion in emergency loans on top of > the $17.4 billion they have already received. But both are missing two > pieces they must have by March 31 to convince the government that they are > viable: approval from bondholders to restructure their debt and approval > from the United Auto Workers to restructure their health-care agreement. > Complicating the problem, the bondholders and the UAW are keeping a close > eye on each other to make sure that neither side gets a better deal. > > With the Obama Administration taking heat for enormous deficits in the > budget it is proposing, this automotive impasse can only increase the > pressure on the Treasury Department to forget about further loans, pull the > plug on the two companies and force them into bankruptcy. > > In bankruptcy court, a judge could impose terms on both the bondholders and > the autoworkers. In addition, the judge could renegotiate contracts with > suppliers and ignore state franchise laws that protect dealers from > termination. > > The automakers complain bitterly that bankruptcy would destroy their > corporate reputations, turn off customers and be ruinously expensive as > well. But as the March deadline gets closer and matters remain unresolved, > it increasingly looks like a straightforward if brutal solution. > > It isn't as if the auto companies have a huge reservoir of public affection > from which to draw. Outside of some Congress members from Michigan, Ohio > and Indiana, there haven't been many voices speaking out with any variation > of "Save Detroit." > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net > http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3911 (20090305) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 16:34:19 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:34:19 -0800 Subject: [GJM] The severity of the Crisis (was: As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate) In-Reply-To: <20B668F74BD84A7CBB0D1633BA6C7941@Aperdat> References: <001601c99dd2$583bb210$08b31630$@net> <20B668F74BD84A7CBB0D1633BA6C7941@Aperdat> Message-ID: <000001c99dea$eb9ddf70$c2d99e50$@net> From: Mary Nelson [mailto:m_nelson at aperdat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:25 PM To: 'mary rose' Subject: RE: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate Isn't it uplifting to realize that those "shifted external costs forward" are just blips in cyberspace and will just go "poof"! Like the "corporate reputations". MaryNelson Mary it would be, except those "external costs" are environmental costs that were never taken into consideration as the planet was raped and pillaged by those who created the global monetocracy system called capitalism. And this says nothing of the human suffering caused as people in countries like Mexico and areas further south have been marginalized and driven from their land, much of which is no longer able to support life, so eroded have large areas become due to the practice of cattle-raising for profit. As the rain- and old growth forests have been cut worldwide to raise either grain for cattle or to graze them, incalculable damage has been done to our life support system with topsoil loss and desertification increasing worldwide. Damage that is perhaps irreparable at least in terms of human time. The planet will in time repair itself -- what is questionable is whether or not the human family can manage to make it through the downturn with enough people surviving this catastrophic situation to seed a new civilization. While cattle-raising is not the only act of consequence, it is primary being number four in world-wide revenue production. Number one is the travel business, two is oil, and three is the insurance business. What I am sensing is that people simply do not comprehend the gravity of the ecological crisis. The economic crisis pales in comparison, yet it is this event that is getting the most attention. But then, money has become our god, and that we must bow down to this system has become our primary belief. -----Original Message----- From: mary rose [mailto:maryrose333 at att.net] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:38 PM To: 'Discussion Forum for Global Justice'; Fixgov at yahoogroups.com Subject: FW: [globalnetnews-summary] As Car Sales Collapse, GM and Chrysler Grow Desperate This is the end of the Industrial Revolution. We now need an evolution which brings us in alignment with Earth and Human values instead of those of bottom line profit-seekers who have continually shifted external costs forward. We are now the generation that has to foot the bill for this prior irresponsibility and it's time to pull the plug and begin a new cycle based in values which create a sustainable living future for all. Either we do this or we are out of here as the human family. TINA (there is no alternative) From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 17:22:36 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:22:36 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted Message-ID: <002401c99df1$a96a1270$fc3e3750$@net> If this is indeed true, the question is: "What will Obama do about it?" Or perhaps more to the point is the real question as to what will those who control the global monetocracy system -- the real string pullers -- do about it, as it becomes blatantly obvious that they were the ones who set up the situation in the first place. Obviously there were enough people opposed to what the GMS was doing that Martial Law was never declared before the Bush regime ended although there were serious attempts to do so. Remember the nuclear missiles that somehow got derailed and never made it to their destination in Iran? Yet the game is not over yet as incidents are continually being instigated which could set off a conflagration with serious enough consequences to require Martial Law to be implemented here in the U.S. I have long felt that such a situation would be inspired by actions along the U.S. Mexican Border as those who want Martial Law to take place continually set the stage for this event by instigating actions which inflame parties on both sides. This has been done before in countries like Bosnia - Sergovia where for generations people who had formerly been enemies lived peacefully with one another, then seemingly for no reason began to fight, angered by what one might call "small brush fires" popping up all over the place. These brush fires set, of course, by third parties who had much to gain as they sent troops into "save the day" and make money by selling weapons to both sides in the fracas while, also acting as the "peace force" appointed by God to be the world's Saviour. This is a very old game and a very sick one, yet there are those who will buy into it, especially if they are paid enough to do so. I am thankful that the paid mercenaries of Blackwater failed to gain an encampment here on the Border; yet, I do know they have a facility closeby in San Diego from which they continue to operate. m r -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:06 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/04-9 by Naomi Wolf Published on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 by Huffington Post If history gets this recent era right, future textbooks will have to show that the US narrowly averted a carefully planned but thorough and unmistakable conspiracy to subvert the rule of law and the process of democracy from 2001-2008. For three years, since writing End of America, I have been arguing that the Bush team sought irretrievably to subvert our liberty. Fortunately, this appalling and conceivably irrevocable subversion of the tenets of freedom was narrowly averted by citizens at every level -- from the grassroots to the courts -- resisting in time. But the release this week by the Justice Department of the "secret memos" sought valiantly by the ACLU confirms that Bush's legal architects were building up the framework for something even scarier than our most anguished projections. You can see the documents themselves online -- but, as usual, there is a gap between the cautious journalistic interpretation of the event and the dense legalese in which they are written, and no one yet has really explained to citizens who are not attorneys what these memos claimed to give Bush the right to do. This is my initial reading of these documents: Most dramatically, one memo asserts that Bush can deploy the military within the United States -- all of the military if he so wishes -- overriding Posse Comitatus, which has kept us safe from military policing for over a century. As many heard me warn in October and November of last year, when the first troops were sent to US streets, history shows that once the military is deployed domestically to "keep order" in a civil society, it is over. This memo is especially galling, since last fall's red alert from us was met with alarm by citizens but by ridicule by mainstream media outlets. Turns out we were right. This `deployment' memo proves that Bush indeed, as we feared, wanted the power to deploy military for domestic policing purposes, a mission that Northcom spokesmen denied -- apparently falsely -- when a few critics from non-mainstream platforms raised the alarm last November about the deployment of the First Brigade from Iraq to the US. This memo shows that Bush sought the power to deploy any number of U.S. military into the U.S. itself for any reason he chose; direct them to rip through your home without a warrant, even if you have not been charged with anything; seize material and documents; and even gave Bush the power to use deadly force against you -- yes, you, innocent US citizen -- "in self-defense." In your homes and streets -- not on a faraway battlefield. Major David Antoon confirmed that this power -- to send US military to control, arrest and even shoot US civilians in self-defense -- was in Bush's hands last fall when I asked Antoon about it. Turns out this memo shows Bush indeed wanted to have that power. Another memo would give the power to Bush -- at his discretion -- to close down or censor newspapers, radio and the Internet - override the First Amendment in the interest of "national security." So if he had deployed, say, ten brigades -- 37,000 warriors -- in key cities (he deployed three before the election and 20,000 are due to be deployed domestically by 2012 unless we stop it), you would not be able to hear about it through the news media if he invoked this power to suspend free speech. And if you protested -- if you dared -- well, his actions would have been -- thanks to John Yoo and others, who will go down in history along with the criminal Nuremberg lawyers as one of Satan's willing attorneys -- perfectly legal. Yet another memo gives Bush not only the right to call any US citizen an "enemy combatant" and hold him or her indefinitely - a danger we knew about, and one that we have tried hard to alert citizens to, a warning that has seemingly penetrated collective consciousness. The newly released memo demonstrates that was the very surface of the powers over US citizens Bush claimed. For three years when I have cautioned citizens about this power Bush invoked to seize US citizens as "enemy combatants" I reassured them that he did not yet have the power to torture US citizens, "only" drive them mad through prolonged isolation in a navy brig. Well, this memo asserts Bush's right to do whatever he wants to innocent US citizens in this kind of custody, and rejects the notion that Congress would have any role in how US citizens are held or treated -- say, by the hypothetically deployed military - on US soil. It seems also to claim the right to hold innocent US citizens in domestic military custody while Bush has the right to do anything he wants to them. Anything he wants. Remember this is an administration in which Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney have now been proven by Jameel Jaffer's revelations in Administration of Torture to have known about and okay'd not just waterboarding as a policy but ok'd the discretion for interrogators to use tactics such as electrodes attached to genitals, sexual assault, threats against family members, suffocation, the beating of prisoners' legs to "pulp," and in some cases the covering up of their murders. This memo gives Bush the authority to do those things if he wants to innocent US citizens. Still another memo gives Bush the right to ignore any international treaties -- to take over any country, say, or render and citizen anywhere, and do whatever he wants to the citizens of any country against any law, without consent of Congress. The Washington Post called these memos "legal errors." We need to stare them in the face and understand them: they are evidence that the groundwork was laid out that gave the president the legal power effectively subvert the Republic. We need to understand the full darkness of what we narrowly escaped -- for now, our work is hardly begun. We need to build these lessons into our history and to use the terror they represent to dismantle the last of Bush's evil legacy -- a legacy that could have been activated by any US president in the future, including Obama or McCain -- and see these memos for what they are: the revealed architecture of an intended edifice of what amounts to treason again our republic and against all of us, regardless of belief, station of life, or political party. From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 17:27:29 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:27:29 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Scandal at Treasury: Official Quits Amidst Fraud Scandal Message-ID: <002501c99df2$58d60fc0$0a822f40$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:00 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Scandal at Treasury: Official Quits Amidst Fraud Scandal Thursday, March 5, 2009 by ABC News Scandal at Treasury: Official Quits Amidst Fraud Scandal http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/03/05-0 by Brian Ross, Justin Rood, and Joseph Rhee The man at the center of a fraud scandal at the Treasury Department has been allowed to quietly quit and retire from his job as a government regulator, despite allegations that he allowed a bank to falsify financial records and amidst outcries from investigators who say the case shows how cozy government regulators have become with the banks and savings and loans they are supposed to be checking on. [Former bank regulator Darrel Dochow evades ABC News' questions about the Treasury Department Inspector General's investigation into allegations he allowed IndyMac to cook its books when he worked at the Office of Thrift Supervision. (ABC News)]Former bank regulator Darrel Dochow evades ABC News' questions about the Treasury Department Inspector General's investigation into allegations he allowed IndyMac to cook its books when he worked at the Office of Thrift Supervision. (ABC News) Darrel Dochow, the West Coast regional director at the Office of Thrift Supervision who investigators say allowed IndyMac to backdate its deposits to hide its ill health, quit last Friday. Prior to his leaving, Dochow was removed from his position but remained on the government payroll while the Inspector General's Office investigates the allegations against him. Treasury Department Inspector General Eric Thorson announced in November his office would probe how Dochow allowed the IndyMac bank to essentially cook its books, making it appear in government filings that the bank had more deposits than it really did. But Thorson's aides now say IndyMac wasn't the only institution to get such cozy assistance from the official who should have been the cop on the beat. Investigators say Dochow, who reportedly earned $230,000 a year, allowed IndyMac to register an $18 million capital injection it received in May in a report describing the bank's financial condition in the end of March. "They [IndyMac] were able to maintain their well-capitalized threshold and continue to use broker deposits to make loans," said Marla Freedman, an assistant Inspector General at Treasury. "Basically, while the institution was having financial difficulty, it kept the public from knowing earlier than it otherwise should have or would have." In at least one instance, investigators say, banking regulators actually approached the bank with the suggestion of falsifying deposit dates to satisfy banking rules  even if it disguised the bank's health to the public. The federal government took over IndyMac in July, after the bank's stock price plummeted to just pennies a share when it was revealed the bank had financial troubles due to defaulted mortgages and subprime loans, costing taxpayers over $9 billion. Critics Point to Cozy Relationship Between Banks and Regulators In order to backdate the filings, IndyMac sought and received permission from Dochow, according to Freedman. "That struck us as very unusual," said Freedman. "Typically transactions are to be recorded in the period in which they occur, not afterwards. So it was very unusual." One former regulator says Dochow's actions illustrate the cozy relationship between banks and government regulators. "He did nothing to protect taxpayers in losses," former federal bank regulator William Black told ABC News. "Instead of correcting it [Dochow] made it worse by increasing the accounting fraud." Meanwhile, IndyMac customers who lost their savings are demanding answers and are further infuriated after learning Dochow was also the regulator in 1989 who oversaw the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan, a scandal that sent its CEO Charles Keating to prison. "He's the person that claimed that he looked into Charles Keating's eyes and knew that Charles Keating was a good guy and therefore ignored all of the professional staff that told him that Keating was a fraud, and he produced the worst failure of the Savings and Loan Crisis at $3.4 billion. Now he's managed more than triple that," said Black, now an economics professor at the University of Missouri in Kansas City, Missouri. Following the Lincoln scandal, Dochow was demoted and placed into a relatively obscure office, but later, inexplicably was brought back into the Office of Thrift Supervision. Dochow declined to answer questions from ABC News. IndyMac Customers Furious After Ronnie Lopez was killed in Iraq, his mother Elaine invested the life insurance proceeds at IndyMac. She lost $37,000 of it. While Dochow could end up losing his job, neither he nor his colleagues are expected to go to prison. "This is criminal with the small 'c'," said Black. "No one within the regulatory ranks may go to jail, but they have done the worst possible disservice to the taxpayers of America." From maryrose333 at att.net Thu Mar 5 17:54:47 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:54:47 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: News from Peak Moment TV - March 2009 Message-ID: <005401c99df6$2923af90$7b6b0eb0$@net> FYI. Thanks to Janaia and Robyn for the incredible work they do in ethical reporting. From: Janaia & Robyn, Peak Moment TV [mailto:Janaia__Robyn_Peak_Moment_TV at mail.vresp.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:33 PM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: News from Peak Moment TV - March 2009 Hello Mary, An optimistic spirit buoyed America as 2009 dawned with the historic ascendancy of an African-American to the presidency. Beneath that shining light, however, the shadow of energy-driven economic and geopolitical troubles continues deepening. This week we were stunnned while listening to an audio interview with Michael Panzner, author of When Giants Fall: An Economic Roadmap for the End of the American Era . As I wrote in my blog, "Panzner sketches a bigger picture colored with a succinct, packed set of wide-ranging observations of what?s swirling around us at this historic moment...My hope is that knowing what?s possible or likely to unfold will help us all prepare and adapt." In "Twilight of an Age" Peak Moment guest John Michael Greer agrees that decline is here, cycling back around like declines of other civilizations. Author of The Long Descent, he puts his finger on our culture's prevailing myths of "Endless Progress" and "Catastrophe", myths cycling around from western religious roots. I appreciate his calm and well-reasoned blog The Archdruid Report, where he often weaves in intriguing angles and fresh perspectives. We may look back at the Crash of 2008 as a major inflection point in history. Like any revolutionary "Turning," the tiniest actions can ripple into big effects [think of the Boston Tea Party.] Hearteningly, we're seeing an upsurge of people springing into action -- helping family, neighbors and community to weather the downturn. One movement garnering a lot of enthusiasm is called Transition Towns. In "The Transition Movement Coming to America", Transition US co-founder Jennifer Gray shares highlights based on The Transition Handbook by UK founder Rob Hopkins, including a flexible twelve-step process to "bring the Head, Heart and Hands of communities together to make the transition to life beyond oil." Post Carbon Institute's Relocalization Network has just been folded into Transition US, whose site has links to Trainings in Transition nationwide. To connect with transitioners in your area, also visit their partner site TransitionUS.ning.com, a social networking community that's gathering a lot of enthusiastic members. Give some stimulus to Peak Moment in our Bailout Sale with selected DVDs at half price through April 1 (no fooling!). We're holding the introductory price on Communities Preparing for Energy and Climate Change whose five presentations were put together with transitioners and relocalizers in mind. We are grateful for your support, comments, program ideas, and contacts for our travels. In this winter season may you reconnect with what really matters~ Janaia and Robyn Bailout Sale with selected DVDs at Half Price thru April 1 David Korten's inspiring The Great Turning, Richard Heinberg's stunning Peak Oil, Van Jones' vibrant vision of Green for All, and Guy Dauncey's The Great Energy Revolution. Plus the first-ever Relocalization Networking conference, Come Home to Eat,and Whatcha Gonna Drive. Still at introductory prices Five presentations about Communities Preparing for Energy and Climate Change summarize the problem of diminishing energy sources, and intelligent responses. Richard Heinberg (Peak Everything), Julian Darley (Communities Preparing), Daniel Lerch (Post Carbon Cities), Michael Brownlee (Relocalization), and Janaia (Peak Moment TV video clips). Perfect to share and discuss with your friends and community. * Bill Wilson's heartful big-picture Permaculture Perspective: Living in Authenticity During Energy Descent inspires wherever he goes. ? Preparing Traditional Nourishment, a 5-dvd cooking class with Shan Kendall, is based on nutrient-dense foods from traditional cultures worldwide, including fermented foods, bone stocks, healthy "sodas" and more. On the Home Front In this seasonal in-going time, we're reflecting on priorities and personal limits. We've rescheduled our cross-country taping trip to 2010, giving us time to find funding and finish preparing the mobile studio. Taping closer to home this coming season, we're aiming for more practical, how-to programs (upcoming: Creating a Home Graywater System). On our homestead we're bolstering our infrastructure with an additional water storage system here in wildfire country as we enter our third year of drought. Like the acorns we gathered last fall, we're looking for a handful of $5-or $10-a-month contributors for our project base. You can contribute online or contact us for direct deposits. We're grateful for comments from viewers -- from our conversation with Jennifer Gray: "Janaia, how beautiful it is to experience the power and beauty of womankind in many of your interviews...it is delightful to see how women like you and your guests bring a special gentle light to the whole range of earth nurturing and life-preserving ideas and practices. It is almost like a flourishing of a holistic feminism, inspiring to all of us humans." Thanks for befriending Peak Moment TV ? Janaia and Robyn Peak Moment TV is produced by Robyn Mallgren and Janaia Donaldson Yuba Gals Independent Media, 15504 Lone Bobcat Way, Nevada City, CA 95959 530-265-4244 _____ We send this occasional newsletter to folks interested in Peak Moment TV. Our list is strictly private; we don't sell or exchange information. To unsubscribe from Peak Moment newsletters, please click Reply with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe _____ Peak Moment Television 15504 Lone Bobcat Way Nevada City, California 95959 US Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy. Non-Profits Email Free with VerticalResponse! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 12:24:45 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:24:45 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: Mexico condemns US 'corruption' Message-ID: <008c01c99e91$38e10f90$aaa32eb0$@net> From: Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:23 PM Subject: Mexico condemns US 'corruption' http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/03/20093519328243356.html Mexico condemns US 'corruption' Calderon's crackdown on the cartels has Sparked a wave of violence [AFP] The Mexican president has blamed US "corruption" for hampering his nation's efforts to combat violent drug cartels. Felipe Calderon also told the AFP news agency that the main cause of Mexico's drug gang problems was "having the world's biggest consumer [of drugs] next to us". "Drug trafficking in the United States is fuelled by the phenomenon of corruption on the part of the American authorities," he said on Wednesday. The Mexican president launched a massive assault on drug cartels after entering office in late 2006 but the cartels have responded with campaigns of violence and intimidation that left 6,000 dead in 2008 alone and around 1,000 in 2009 so far. Calderon acknowledged some Mexican officials had helped the cartels but said the US should ask itself how many of its own officials were implicated. "It is not an exclusively Mexican problem, it is a common problem between Mexico and the United States," he said. "I want to know how many American officials have been prosecuted for this [corruption]." Border concerns Mexico has deployed thousands of troops in A bid to quell drugs violence [Reuters] Calderon, who has deployed more than 36,000 troops to the troubled Mexico-US border regions to crack down on violence, also said that the US must halt the flow of weapons into Mexico, where the police and security services are often outgunned. But he said recent talks with Barack Obama, the US president, had provided "a clearer, more decisive response, one which matches the magnitude of the problem which we face," he said. Mexican border cities, such as Ciudad Juarez have suffered the brunt of the violence Prompting concerns in Washington that the killings and attacks could cross over into the US. On Wednesday at least 20 people were killed during a prison riot in the city sparked by violence between rival gangs. Mexican authorities have said they plan to have around 7,500 troops deployed in Ciudad Juarez by the end of this week in a bid to quell the violence, along with 2,000 in the rest of Chihuahua state. Calderon's comments come as Admiral Mike Mullen, head of the US military, is due to visit Mexico this week as the US is to step up military and other assistance to Mexico in its battle against the cartels. In February the US department of justice said US and Mexican authorities had arrested 750 people over 21 months in an anti-drug sweep, including 52 members of Mexico's Sinaloa drug cartel. -- -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 12:44:18 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:44:18 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: Incredible Western Paintings - Don't miss this outstanding view of the Old West. Message-ID: <00a501c99e93$f1190660$d34b1320$@net> This is magnificent, don't miss it. From: BOB TAFT [mailto:rbtaft at rtconnect.net] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:55 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Fw: Western Paintings Everyone could use a bit of culture now and then. Best regards, Bob Taft The Taft Ranch Upton, Wyoming (307) 465-2206 http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=74897 " There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves". Will Rogers From: MichiMac Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:30 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Western Paintings I hope you enjoy this as much as I did. Close your door, turn off all the distractions, like the phone, T. V., radio, or what ever worldly noise that surrounds you and let yourself be absorbed into the images and the music. This is a great stress reliever. Sit back, relax and enjoy!!!! A gift from a friend: Click here: Western Paintings There should be an admission fee just to view these classics. The artist had to live the life in order to paint these. _____ Windows LiveT Groups: Create an online spot for your favorite groups to meet. Check it out. _____ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.8/1987 - Release Date: 03/06/09 07:20:00 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 13:04:01 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:04:01 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Billions for AIG to Protect the Speculative Profits of Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley Message-ID: <00b801c99e96$b4bb0c10$1e312430$@net> From: BOB TAFT [mailto:rbtaft at rtconnect.net] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:20 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Fw: [globalnetnews-summary] Billions for AIG to Protect the Speculative Profits of Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley This should be considered as treasonous as the fraudulent futures trading of one's national currency. Every time I see mention of K Street I am reminded of the old whore house district in Rock Springs, Wyoming. Must be some similarity. Best regards, Bob Taft The Taft Ranch Upton, Wyoming (307) 465-2206 http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=74897 " There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves". Will Rogers From: Phyllis Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:40 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Fw: [globalnetnews-summary] Billions for AIG to Protect the Speculative Profits of Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley ----- Original Message ----- From: TradingPostPaul To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:28 PM Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Billions for AIG to Protect the Speculative Profits of Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) March 5, 2009 | 09:48 AM (EST) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/raymond-j-learsy/billions-for-aig-to-prote_b_1 72102.html Billions for AIG to Protect the Speculative Profits of Goldman Sachs/Morgan Stanley The dysfunction of our financial institutions is almost beyond belief. In November of 2008 with the nation's economy unraveling, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs (one of the top five U.S. municipal bond underwriters) were infuriating politicians and public finance officials by recommending the purchase of credit-default swaps (CDS) thereby betting against debts of eleven states, including New Jersey, California, Wisconsin, Florida, and Ohio among others. Many of these were municipal bonds that they had originally underwritten. Thereby, through an act of blatant opportunism they were adding to the destabilization of the financial markets already at the edge. CDS are in effect insurance policies. Insurance policies are normally taken out to cover loss against the occurrence of an event such as fire, or flood, or accident, and so on. But CDS, rather than being called "insurance," became, in the parlance of the Street, "derivatives," making them much more elegant to deal with and for the rest of us much more difficult to understand. They were, in this case, simply insurance bets on the bankruptcy or inability of municipalities throughout the country to meet their debt obligations. A bit like taking out insurance against fire on the house next door and having a lottery on the proceeds should it burn down. Now to buy "insurance" one would naturally go to an insurance company to cover the risk. And the insurance company would sell you an insurance policy and would set an amount on their balance sheet that would represent a reserve against the potential loss/payout. An insurance company likely to write a policy covering this would be AIG. After all, AIG had become the king of CDS. In all likelihood this was the case for the likes of Goldman and Morgan-Stanley. Except it gets worse. You see, in the mumbo-jumbo of the term "credit-default swaps," the word "insurance" is not mentioned. And according to the good souls at AIG, if you don't use the word insurance, you don't have to set aside any reserves in case of loss. And if you don't set aside any reserves, you can issue all the CDS the market can bear (understood to be in the range of $400 billion at AIG), cash in the policy premiums as a humongous supplement to your usual insurance business, allowing for zillions in paychecks and bonuses. And of course, if it all comes crashing down you can put up the "systemic risk" flag and your Wall Street friends in Washington will charge to the rescue with taxpayer dollars. (What did Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein say to Treasury Secretary and ex-Goldman CEO Hank Paulson when he was party to the discussions on the first AIG bailout, or as Bloomberg reported yesterday, is this also part of the government's refusal "to disclose names of the borrowers and the loans"?. During his testimony this week, Fed Chairman Bernanke felt compelled to say, and I quote: "AIG exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system; there was no oversight of the financial products division. This was a hedge fund basically that was attached to a large and stable insurance company, made huge numbers of irresponsible bets, took huge losses" One knows the folks at Goldman are no fools. Were they going to put good money down for CDS that their counterparty (AIG) might not be able to honor because it made no reserve provisions? Or was the temptation of another big pay day just too tempting not to risk Other People's Money to play the game? To date we have poured $160 billion into AIG -- this while others see the value of their homes cut in half, the better part of their 401(k)s wiped out, their government services significantly reduced, and other lending institutions diligently try to work out past due credits, taking significant mark-downs and extending due dates to keep industries and corporations alive. This, as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are being covered 100 cents on the dollar on their speculative positions of intrinsically flawed CDS derivatives on which they gorged themselves to the bursting point. It is past time that a distinction be made between that part of AIG's business that was a "large and stable insurance company," and that part that was a "hedge fund," or better put, a casino. So the big question becomes, why should AIG's CDS be paid down 100 cents on the dollar when the rest of the country is taking at or near 50% haircut on the value of its assets? But then again the rest of the country doesn't have those well-oiled K Street lobbyists pursuing their special interests in Washington. They just vote and pay. _____ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.8/1986 - Release Date: 03/05/09 19:32:00 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 13:05:31 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:05:31 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: SPEAK OUT FOR CHIMPS! WATCH OUR NEW UNDERCOVER VIDEO, THEN TAKE ACTION TODAY. Message-ID: <00bd01c99e96$eaa20720$bfe61560$@net> From: newsletters at motherjones.com [mailto:newsletters at motherjones.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 6:07 AM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: SPEAK OUT FOR CHIMPS! WATCH OUR NEW UNDERCOVER VIDEO, THEN TAKE ACTION TODAY. The following is a sponsored message: Speak out for chimps! Watch our new undercover video, then take action today. Trouble with links or images? Want to share this message? Use this link: https://community.hsus.org/humane/notice-description.tcl?newsletter_id=31165 350 Chimps deserve better, and you can help. March 5, 2009 Speak out and help chimpanzees in research get the sanctuary they deserve. Watch our video and take action. Dear Friend, Last night, ABC News: Nightline broke the story of more than 300 chimpanzees languishing at one of the world's largest primate research facilities. The report featured video footage gathered by The Humane Society of the United States during a nine-month undercover investigation at the New Iberia Research Center in Louisiana -- and showed the routine and possibly unlawful treatment of hundreds of chimpanzees and monkeys. Each animal's suffering detailed in the report was wrenching, but the story of 26 elder chimps currently warehoused at the facility was particularly poignant. Watch our undercover video and see for yourself. These 26 chimps were taken from their mothers in the wild, and have since lived a life behind bars. The oldest, Karen, was captured in 1958, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was still president. Please help end invasive research on these chimps and give them the sanctuary they deserve. Urge your U.S. Representative to support the Great Ape Protection Act. The Great Ape Protection Act was re-introduced in the House of Representatives today, on the heels of our undercover investigation. This legislation would phase out invasive research on the more than 1,000 chimpanzees remaining in U.S. laboratories, and lay the groundwork for permanent retirement of the approximately 500 chimpanzees owned by the federal government, including Karen and other chimps at the New Iberia Research Center. TAKE ACTION Please make a brief phone call to your U.S. Representative. Click here to look up the office phone number. When you call, you'll likely speak to a staff member who can take your message. Remember to be polite and professional, and leave your name and where you live so it's clear that you are a constituent. When you call, you can say: "Hello, my name is [your name]. I'm a constituent in [your town]. Last night, ABC News: Nightline aired a report of chimpanzees at the New Iberia Research Center in Louisiana. I'm calling to ask [Representative's name] to please co-sponsor the Towns-Reichert Great Ape Protection Act, to stop this cruelty and to save taxpayers millions of dollars. Thank you." We expect that Congress will receive a huge outpour of calls on this issue. If you aren't able to get through, please keep trying. After you make your call, send a follow up message and tell your friends and family how they can help, too. Thank you for speaking out for chimps held in research. They deserve better than a life of torment and misery. Together, we can make a difference for these amazing creatures. Sincerely, Wayne Pacelle President & CEO The Humane Society of the United States Copyright C 2009 The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) | All Rights Reserved. The Humane Society of the United States | 2100 L Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037 humanesociety at hsus.org | 202-452-1100 | www.humanesociety.org This message was sent to maryrose333 at att.net. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop receiving Mother Jones Headlines, click to unsubscribe . To stop ALL email from Mother Jones eMail List, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 13:09:23 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:09:23 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: GOOD NEWS!! Citizens Win Huge Supreme Court Victory over Big Pharma and the FDA Message-ID: <00c201c99e97$76403720$62c0a560$@net> From: Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:51 PM Subject: GOOD NEWS!! Citizens Win Huge Supreme Court Victory over Big Pharma and the FDA Citizens Win Huge Supreme Court Victory over Big Pharma and the FDA Thursday, March 05, 2009 Byron Richards, CCN _____ EMAIL PRINT RSS SHARE In a stunning and unexpected 6-3 ruling the right-leaning Supreme Court went against the wishes of the last president, took the wind out of the sails of health care reform of the current president, sent irresponsible Big Pharma a major wake up call, and bluntly told the arrogant FDA that they are indeed not above the rule of law. It is a major victory for every American citizen. Central to the issue is a power a struggle between the federal government and states, which in this situation meant the federal government authority to pre-empt your state rights to sue if you are injured by a drug. The FDA, acting on behalf of the Bush administration and on the side of Big Pharma, has helped tie up thousands of drug injury lawsuits across the country. The FDA, who is supposed to be protecting consumers from drug injury and ensuring a correct risk/safety picture for any person taking a drug, was instead trying to shirk their responsibility and simply claim that Americans had no right to sue. This convoluted attempt by the FDA to undermine consumer safety was one of the main themes in my 2006 book, Fight for Your Health: Exposing the FDA's Betrayal of America. The Bush Administration had intentionally appointed anti-safety people in high positions within the FDA, starting with its Chief Counsel, Daniel Troy (and continued as a legal philosophy after Troy was forced out for his Big Pharma connections). Troy set in motion the legal problem the Supreme Court just decided. During the final years of the Bush administration cancer industry insider Andrew von Eschenbach, MD, was appointed to run the FDA, and Wall Street insider, Scott Gottlieb, MD, was second in command. These individuals sought to fully implement the FDA label as senior to any rights of citizens. Their intention was to make sure that new biotech drugs would be protected from lawsuits, as the FDA wanted to speed new and even more dangerous drugs onto the market so as to foster the development of the biotech industry. In essence, the FDA management wanted to turn the American public into one large clinical experiment, with no right of recourse when injured. This was occurring against a backdrop wherein the FDA couldn't even name all the drugs currently on the market, had failed to demand required aftermarket follow up safety testing on drugs, and had intentionally withheld safety information on existing drugs from the public. The current situation with drugs is that almost no drug, even blockbusters and those in use for decades, have an accurate risk/benefit profile. Americans who use medications are already taking risks of unknown magnitude, which is a main reason over 100,000 Americans are killed every year and over 3 million are injured so seriously they need hospital care (ironically, over half those injuries occur while already in the hospital). The FDA knows full well that when a drug is approved for the market the full extent of the side effects won't be known for years. History shows us time and again that Big Pharma actively hides risk data from the FDA and pays for "science" that distorts reality. This irresponsible behavior goes along with closed-door negotiations with the FDA, and has resulted in numerous drug disasters like Vioxx. FDA managers oftentimes go against the wishes of their own safety scientists and then move on to six figure salaries in the industry they regulate. Doctors are not apprised of the actual risks and consumers are in the dark. Currently, there are 450,000 additional new cases of heart failure every year in Americans over 65, a fact that parallels the increased use of heart-weakening statins in this older group. It is only a matter of time before the shoe drops on the 20-billion-dollar-a-year statin industry. The FDA insistence that a drug label, based on what is known at the time of approval, should supersede citizen's states rights to sue if they were injured, has almost nothing to do with consumer safety. Rather, it is a federal power grab that is in the best financial interests of Big Pharma and Big Biotech, industries that do not have consumer safety as their top priority. By the way, don't think President Obama is on the side of the citizens. In the health care section of the stimulus bill, there is specific pre-emption language. If the federal government is in charge of health care it will be named in future lawsuits when patients are injured from the care it doles out or doesn't allow. The current Supreme Court ruling will undermine any system of federal health care wherein the drugs being used are injuring people. Experts believe this system is so badly broken, due to gross FDA management incompetence, that it will take 10 years of studies and many billions of dollars just to understand the actual risks of the drugs Americans are already taking. In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens put Big Pharma on notice. The defendant in this case, Wyeth, had argued that it could not comply with both federal and state law. Stevens told them they had a fundamental misunderstanding of regulation and were trying to hide behind the FDA, going on to say that it is a central premise of federal drug regulation that the manufacturer bears responsibility for the content of its label at all times. That is not the news Big Pharma wanted to hear. Stevens went on to write that there was no merit in the argument that the FDA's labeling decisions could supersede state law, saying that this argument was "an untenable interpretation of congressional intent and an overbroad view of an agency's power to pre-empt state law." He pointed out that the FDA tried to push this on the public without any opportunity for comment from the public or from states, all done against a backdrop wherein the FDA is not able to keep up with safety issues in the first place, meaning that the FDA position lacked "thoroughness, consistency and persuasiveness." Stevens stated that under such lacking standards the Bush position "is entitled to no weight." This is a major victory for all Americans and for states. While the case itself is on the topic of Big Pharma and the FDA, the ruling is sweeping in nature and will extend far beyond prescription drugs. States have just been handed a major legal ruling against the ever-growing incursion of federal power. ### In celebration, receive a FREE copy of the book "Fight for Your Health " with ANY Wellness Resources order placed through Sunday, March 8! In your shopping cart be sure to click on "Add Free Book". -- -- www.rejenx.com/SelectYourMembership.aspx ID 4282 - Holy Tea Cleanse www.prosperitea.com Whole Wellness Club (click upper right corner) - LIBERTY in Our Lifetime! www.PlanetaryRepublic.com www.CampaignForLiberty.com - Nancy and Earle...Planetnews 949-200-7335 land 800-889-7372 toll-free -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 13:12:23 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:12:23 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: Armor-plated vehicles rise as U.S.-Mexico border violence escalates AND MORE Message-ID: <00c701c99e97$e0027ec0$a0077c40$@net> Methinks those buying these expensive armored cars are the drug dealers attempting to protect themselves. Few others can afford the price tag. From: Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:44 PM Subject: Armor-plated vehicles rise as U.S.-Mexico border violence escalates AND MORE Armor-plated vehicles rise as U.S.-Mexico border violence escalates Customers ask not only armor plating but tires that will run when flat and bulletproof glass, which bursts into a spider web pattern but won't break, even when shot with an AR-15 assault rifle, a weapon of choice among drug smugglers. Customers ask not only armor plating but tires that will run when flat and bulletproof glass, which bursts into a spider web pattern but won't break, even when shot with an AR-15 assault rifle, a weapon of choice among drug smugglers. By Eric Gay, AP E-mail | Save | Print | Subscribe to stories like this As drug-cartel violence escalates, U.S. companies like Texas Armoring Corp. said there's an increase in the number of cars they're asked to outfit with armor plating and bulletproof glass. Enlarge image Enlarge By Eric Gay, AP As drug-cartel violence escalates, U.S. Companies like Texas Armoring Corp. Said there's an increase in the number of cars they're asked to outfit with armor plating and bulletproof glass. Armor-plated vehicles rise as U.S.-Mexico border violence escalates SAN ANTONIO (AP) - The drug violence in Mexico has gotten so bad that booming numbers of Mexican and American professionals are having their cars fitted with armor plates, bulletproof glass and James Bond-style gadgets such as electrified door handles and push-button smokescreens. Until recently, it was mostly movie stars, business moguls and politicians who took such precautions. But now, industry officials say, the customers include factory owners, doctors, newspaper publishers and others who have business on both sides of the border and fear killings, kidnappings and carjackings by drug dealers or people in their debt. MEXICO: Forces bolstered in drug wars The customers "don't have to be very big," said Mark Burton, CEO of International Armoring Corp. Of Ogden, Utah. "This becomes almost a necessity." One San Antonio company said it expects a 50% increase in business this year. FIND MORE STORIES IN: United States | Utah | United States Commerce Department | SUVs | Valencia | Batman | Honda Motor Co | Cancun | Tijuana | Toyotas | Ogden | Ciudad Juarez | Ford F-150 | Chevrolet Suburban | James Bond-style The modifications typically cost $80,000 to $100,000, and they are being done not just on limousines, but on Toyotas, Hondas, pickups and SUVs. "I feel we need to be in a cocoon that is impenetrable," said a businessman who runs factories in Texas and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, and has gotten two Chevrolet Suburbans armored since October 2007. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he fears for his family's safety after one of his sons was the victim of a kidnapping attempt. The war between Mexican authorities and the country's cocaine, marijuana and methamphetamine cartels has killed 1,000 people so far this year. Last year, Juarez alone had more than 1,100 slayings. The cartels have killed police, military officers and civilians from Cancun to Tijuana as they battle for control of drug-trafficking corridors. Customers get not only armor plating but tires that will run when flat and bulletproof glass, which bursts into a spider web pattern but won't break, even when shot with an AR-15 assault rifle, a weapon of choice among drug smugglers. Other customers buy a package that will turn a Ford F-150 pickup or SUV into something out of a Batman movie: A button releases a cloud of white smoke for escaping a pursuing car. If the assailant makes it through that, the driver can release spikes to flatten the pursuer's tires. And finally, if the attacker makes it to the car, electrified door handles can give him a non-lethal jolt. Jorge Valencia, who has been working in the security business in Mexico for most of the past two decades, said his company bought its first armor-plated car in the mid-1990s, but it was mostly for politicians, and mostly out of an abundance of caution. Nowadays, the danger is far greater, he said, noting that many kidnappings are happening in public places. "The main streets in Ciudad Juarez have assassinations in the middle of the day," said Valencia, who did not want his company's name to be used for fear of putting his clients in jeopardy. Companies that install bulletproofing - or "blindaje" in Spanish - have been doing a booming business in Mexico, too. But some businessmen, like the Juarez factory owner, who lives in the United States, are convinced the armoring is better in the U.S. Under a 2004 regulation, U.S. Companies need an export license from the Commerce Department to ship a car that has been armored out of the country. The rule is aimed at preventing drug dealers and other criminals from acquiring such vehicles. Before the rule, Trent Kimball, CEO of San Antonio-based Texas Armoring Corp., put armor plating on vehicles for a customer who claimed to be a rancher. Kimball later found himself testifying at the customer's drug-trafficking trial. Texas Armoring, which started in the 1970s armoring limousines and other vehicles for world leaders, did about 100 cars last year and expects to complete 150 this year, Kimball said. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Border Violence Threatens Mexico's Outsourcing Industry http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/030209-border-violence-threatens-mexic os-outsourcing.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Mexico sends troops to border city in bid to control drug violence http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0304/p99s01-duts.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Mexico border violence could disrupt Spring Break plans for UW-Platteville students. http://www.uwpexponent.org/2009/03/05/mexico-border-violence-could-disrupt-s pring-break-plans-for-uw-platteville-students/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- Violence Spills Across U.S.-Mexico Border http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/846 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Fri Mar 6 13:16:36 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:16:36 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted Message-ID: <00cc01c99e98$76d75190$6485f4b0$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:06 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Yoo and The Subversion of Liberty Narrowly Averted http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/04-9 by Naomi Wolf Published on Wednesday, March 4, 2009 by Huffington Post If history gets this recent era right, future textbooks will have to show that the US narrowly averted a carefully planned but thorough and unmistakable conspiracy to subvert the rule of law and the process of democracy from 2001-2008. For three years, since writing End of America, I have been arguing that the Bush team sought irretrievably to subvert our liberty. Fortunately, this appalling and conceivably irrevocable subversion of the tenets of freedom was narrowly averted by citizens at every level -- from the grassroots to the courts -- resisting in time. But the release this week by the Justice Department of the "secret memos" sought valiantly by the ACLU confirms that Bush's legal architects were building up the framework for something even scarier than our most anguished projections. You can see the documents themselves online -- but, as usual, there is a gap between the cautious journalistic interpretation of the event and the dense legalese in which they are written, and no one yet has really explained to citizens who are not attorneys what these memos claimed to give Bush the right to do. This is my initial reading of these documents: Most dramatically, one memo asserts that Bush can deploy the military within the United States -- all of the military if he so wishes -- overriding Posse Comitatus, which has kept us safe from military policing for over a century. As many heard me warn in October and November of last year, when the first troops were sent to US streets, history shows that once the military is deployed domestically to "keep order" in a civil society, it is over. This memo is especially galling, since last fall's red alert from us was met with alarm by citizens but by ridicule by mainstream media outlets. Turns out we were right. This `deployment' memo proves that Bush indeed, as we feared, wanted the power to deploy military for domestic policing purposes, a mission that Northcom spokesmen denied -- apparently falsely -- when a few critics from non-mainstream platforms raised the alarm last November about the deployment of the First Brigade from Iraq to the US. This memo shows that Bush sought the power to deploy any number of U.S. military into the U.S. itself for any reason he chose; direct them to rip through your home without a warrant, even if you have not been charged with anything; seize material and documents; and even gave Bush the power to use deadly force against you -- yes, you, innocent US citizen -- "in self-defense." In your homes and streets -- not on a faraway battlefield. Major David Antoon confirmed that this power -- to send US military to control, arrest and even shoot US civilians in self-defense -- was in Bush's hands last fall when I asked Antoon about it. Turns out this memo shows Bush indeed wanted to have that power. Another memo would give the power to Bush -- at his discretion -- to close down or censor newspapers, radio and the Internet - override the First Amendment in the interest of "national security." So if he had deployed, say, ten brigades -- 37,000 warriors -- in key cities (he deployed three before the election and 20,000 are due to be deployed domestically by 2012 unless we stop it), you would not be able to hear about it through the news media if he invoked this power to suspend free speech. And if you protested -- if you dared -- well, his actions would have been -- thanks to John Yoo and others, who will go down in history along with the criminal Nuremberg lawyers as one of Satan's willing attorneys -- perfectly legal. Yet another memo gives Bush not only the right to call any US citizen an "enemy combatant" and hold him or her indefinitely - a danger we knew about, and one that we have tried hard to alert citizens to, a warning that has seemingly penetrated collective consciousness. The newly released memo demonstrates that was the very surface of the powers over US citizens Bush claimed. For three years when I have cautioned citizens about this power Bush invoked to seize US citizens as "enemy combatants" I reassured them that he did not yet have the power to torture US citizens, "only" drive them mad through prolonged isolation in a navy brig. Well, this memo asserts Bush's right to do whatever he wants to innocent US citizens in this kind of custody, and rejects the notion that Congress would have any role in how US citizens are held or treated -- say, by the hypothetically deployed military - on US soil. It seems also to claim the right to hold innocent US citizens in domestic military custody while Bush has the right to do anything he wants to them. Anything he wants. Remember this is an administration in which Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney have now been proven by Jameel Jaffer's revelations in Administration of Torture to have known about and okay'd not just waterboarding as a policy but ok'd the discretion for interrogators to use tactics such as electrodes attached to genitals, sexual assault, threats against family members, suffocation, the beating of prisoners' legs to "pulp," and in some cases the covering up of their murders. This memo gives Bush the authority to do those things if he wants to innocent US citizens. Still another memo gives Bush the right to ignore any international treaties -- to take over any country, say, or render and citizen anywhere, and do whatever he wants to the citizens of any country against any law, without consent of Congress. The Washington Post called these memos "legal errors." We need to stare them in the face and understand them: they are evidence that the groundwork was laid out that gave the president the legal power effectively subvert the Republic. We need to understand the full darkness of what we narrowly escaped -- for now, our work is hardly begun. We need to build these lessons into our history and to use the terror they represent to dismantle the last of Bush's evil legacy -- a legacy that could have been activated by any US president in the future, including Obama or McCain -- and see these memos for what they are: the revealed architecture of an intended edifice of what amounts to treason again our republic and against all of us, regardless of belief, station of life, or political party. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 11:00:30 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:00:30 -0800 Subject: [GJM] URGENT - URGENT FW: Breaking News! Pandemc Alert! "Accident" contaminates vaccines with Avian Flu - please open! Message-ID: <00ab01c99f4e$9dd7c980$d9875c80$@net> From: Natural Solutions Foundation [mailto:healthfreedomusa at mail.democracyinaction.org] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:11 PM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: Breaking News! Pandemc Alert! "Accident" contaminates vaccines with Avian Flu - please open! Natural Solutions Foundation Health Freedom Action eAlert March 6, 2009 This a an urgent communication to our opt-in Action eAlert system. Please open this link for the full eblast: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2220 >From the eAlert - Action Item: Protect your right to refuse medical experimentation http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=26 830 ___________________________________________________________ The General's Communiqu? Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) Big Pharma Company "Accidentally" Contaminates Vaccines With LIVE AVIAN FLU VIRUS in 18 Countries Dr. Rima and I are still in Germany where the talk of health freedom advocates is this horrifying late-breaking story, though you may already be aware of it. Although it is being widely reported around the world, the US MMD (media of mass deception) appears to have a blackout placed on this story. World media are reporting that Baxter Pharmaceuticals has admitted that it "accidentally" contaminated various vaccine batches with Avian Flu viruses. These batches were shipped to 18 countries. Clearly, either 1. stupidity and incompetence or 2. intentional contamianation of flu vaccine lots was at work... [This ebalst continues on www.HealthFreedomUSA.org - we have been trying to send this eblast out for two days, but it continues to be blocked, so we are sending this "no html" version with the full ebast posted on our Health Freedom Blog.] To read this very important eblast please click here: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2220 General Stubblebine Dr. Laibow Counsel Fucetola You've received this alert because you opted onto our elist. If you do not want to receive these alerts, please email us at dr.laibow at gmail.com with "Remove" in subject line. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 11:14:49 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:14:49 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] 1/3 Of America Is Crazy: They Think Their Jobs Are Safe Message-ID: <00b001c99f50$9b348400$d19d8c00$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:56 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] 1/3 Of America Is Crazy: They Think Their Jobs Are Safe http://www.alternet.org/workplace/130154/1_3_of_america_is_crazy%3A_they_thi nk_their_jobs_are_safe/?page=entire 1/3 Of America Is Crazy: They Think Their Jobs Are Safe http://www.alternet.org/workplace/130154/1_3_of_america_is_crazy%3A_they_thi nk_their_jobs_are_safe/?page=entire By Jill Andresky Fraser, Tomdispatch.com. Posted March 5, 2009. Thinking about this optimistic third of Americans, it's hard not to reach one basic conclusion: They're nuts. According to a recently released AP-GfK poll, 32% of Americans are crazy. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 11:23:24 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:23:24 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Employers resorting to bigger layoffs to survive recession and there's no relief in sight Message-ID: <00c601c99f51$d0ca5c60$725f1520$@net> If this and the last message I forwarded re: the job market don't motivate you to begin raising your own food whether in pots in your house where it is winter, or in pots on your patio, in your own yard, in vacant lots or wherever a seed might be sown, then you are IMHO in complete denial of how deep this crisis is and where it is going. Maybe you are crazy. And, if your community has not set up a local currency then you damn well better get on the ball NOW! We-the-people can weather this storm if we take precautions and organize effectively. Don't look to the government to take care of you -- it can't -- the magnitude of the problem is too great. m r -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:34 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Employers resorting to bigger layoffs to survive recession and there's no relief in sight Employers resorting to bigger layoffs to survive recession and there's no relief in sight http://www.startribune.com/business/40775167.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqy P4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUX By JEANNINE AVERSA , Associated Press Last update: March 6, 2009 - 12:44 AM WASHINGTON - Cost-cutting employers are resorting to even bigger layoffs as they scramble to survive the recession, feeding insecurities among those who still have jobs and those who desperately want them. The Labor Department on Friday is slated to release a report expected to show that February was an especially cruel month for America's workers. Employers likely slashed a net total of 648,000 jobs last month, according to economists' forecasts. If they are right, it would mark the worst month of job losses since the recession started in December 2007. It also would represent the single biggest month of job reductions since October 1949, when the country was just pulling out of a painful recession, although the labor force has grown significantly since then. "The pace of layoffs is fast and furious," said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Financial Services Group. "We're still in the teeth of this recession and the bite has not let up at all." With employers slashing payrolls, the nation's unemployment rate is expected to jump to 7.9 percent, from 7.6 percent in January. If that happens, it would mark the highest jobless rate since reaching 8 percent in January 1984, a time when the unemployment rate was still slowly moving down after having topped 10 percent during the early 1980s recession. Employers are shrinking their work forces at alarming clip and are turning to other ways to slash costs - including trimming workers' hours, freezing wages or cutting pay - because the recession has eaten into their sales and profits. Customers at home and abroad are cutting back as other countries cope with their own economic problems. A new wave of layoffs hit this week. General Dynamics Corp. said Thursday it will lay off 1,200 workers due partly to plummeting sales of business and personal jets that forced it to cut production. Defense contractor Northrop Grumman Corp., and Tyco Electronics Ltd., which makes electronic components, undersea telecommunications systems and wireless equipment, also are trimming payrolls. "This is basically cleaning house for a lot of firms," said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia. "They are using the first quarter to cut back employment and figure out what they want." Disappearing jobs and evaporating wealth from tanking home values, 401(k)s and other investments have forced consumers to retrench, driving companies to lay off workers. It's a vicious cycle in which all the economy's negative problems feed on each other, worsening the downward spiral. "The economy is in a tailspin. Businesses are jettisoning jobs at an unprecedented pace," said Richard Yamarone, economist at Argus Research. Some 3.6 million jobs have disappeared so far in a deepening recession, which is shaping up as the biggest job killer in the post-World War II period. The country is getting bloodied by fallout from the housing, credit and financial crises_ the worst since the 1930s. And there's no easy fix for a quick turnaround, economists said. President Barack Obama is counting on a multipronged assault to lift the country out of recession: a $787 billion stimulus package of increased federal spending and tax cuts; a revamped, multibillion-dollar bailout program for the nation's troubled banks; and a $75 billion effort to stem home foreclosures. Even in the best-case scenario that the relief efforts work and the recession ends later in 2009, the unemployment rate is expected to keep climbing, hitting 9 percent or higher this year. In fact, the Federal Reserve thinks the unemployment rate will stay elevated into 2011. Economists say the job market may not get back to normal - meaning a 5 percent unemployment rate - until 2013. Businesses won't be inclined to ramp up hiring until they are sure any economic recovery has staying power. The economy contracted at a staggering 6.2 percent in the final three months of 2008, the worst showing in a quarter-century, and it will probably continue to shrink during the first six months of this year. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress earlier this week that recent economic barometers "show little sign of improvement" and suggest that "labor market conditions may have worsened further in recent weeks." From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 11:28:07 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:28:07 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Habitat for Humanity shops thrive Message-ID: <00c701c99f52$78fcd520$6af67f60$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:48 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Habitat for Humanity shops thrive (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2008824529_habitatstores07 .html Habitat for Humanity shops thrive By SUSAN GALLAGHER The Associated Press HELENA, Mont. - Jim Ferguson shops at Helena's Habitat for Humanity store to find inexpensive items that will improve the house he rents and hopes to buy. On one recent trip, Ferguson paid 50 cents for a secondhand glass lampshade. He figured a retailer would have sold it, new, for $8. "There are little goodies here at tremendous prices," he said in the home-improvement store occupying a 19th-century railroad warehouse with stone walls. Donated sinks, countertops, wood trim, ceramic tile, windows and hard hats are part of the new and used inventory at this store, one of about 550 operated by Habitat for Humanity affiliates throughout the U.S. Supporting mission Sales help support the organization's mission of building modest houses that families in need then buy at favorable terms. A Habitat for Humanity Home Improvement Outlet opened last year at 21 S. Nevada St., in the Sodo neighborhood of Seattle. There are 10 others in Washington state. People looking to save money during the recession are boosting sales at the stores. On the flip side, some stores are struggling to keep shelves stocked as demand rises and donations slip. Fewer homeowners are doing the kind of improvement projects that generate donations, and declines in home building have reduced the supply of materials left over from construction jobs. "The person who was taking out their $4,500 or $5,000 cherry cabinet set, (donating it) and replacing it with a $10,000 set is not doing that now," said Terry Assad, manager of Habitat stores in Charlotte, N.C. "People are hanging on to stuff." "Some softness" in donations Kevin Campbell, director of building industry relations for Habitat for Humanity International in Apex, N.C., said there have been reports of "some softness" in donations, but "I don't think anybody's panicking that they'll have customers and nothing to sell them." Sometimes businesses that close send their remaining inventory to Habitat stores. Then there are businesses that routinely donate merchandise to get it off their sales floors, items a Habitat store typically will price 50 percent below retail. "They close something out, they quit selling a certain model," said John Alexander, Habitat executive in Waco, Texas, where 15 percent of the Habitat budget comes from a store built on a former used-car lot. Among other things, shoppers find concrete pavers and blocks that a local producer provides by the pallet. An appeal for goods to help stock Helena's ReStore, a name used by many of the outlets around the country, recently appeared in the Sunday bulletin at a church here. "Look around your home to see what you might donate," parishioners were advised. "Things are sold as fast as they come in," said Melony Bruhn, executive director of Helena Area Habitat for Humanity. The ReStore's stock of interior doors is particularly low, as are supplies of lumber, fasteners and cabinets. Voluntary reporting by about 70 percent of the Habitat affiliates in the United States indicates that store sales rose 25 percent from 2007 to 2008, and that annual sales exceed $200 million, more than $80 million of it available for building houses, said Campbell, the Habitat liaison with the building industry. Stores' expenses include personnel, often just one paid employee at a small outlet but larger staffs at stores the size of supermarkets. Retirees who volunteer, college students engaged in community service and people under court orders to do community work help the stores operate with skinny payrolls. Advertising push In the Denver area, Habitat has begun advertising for donations "to get the word out that we need them, that this is a great place to make a donation and instead of putting material into the landfill you are putting it to use," said Heather Lafferty, executive director for Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver. Sales are strong, but declining donations are particularly noticeable in appliances. "In the past we may have had 100 ovens and now we're down to four or five," Lafferty said. The Habitat affiliate operates a Habitat Home Improvement Outlet in suburban Wheat Ridge as well as in Denver, and dispatches people to remodeling projects where they salvage pipes, windows and other things to sell in the stores. "We see long-term positive growth in ReStores," Campbell said. "There's a lot of potential out there that hasn't been tapped," and he believes it's not just among bargain hunters. "Green awareness is much stronger," Campbell said. "People are thinking more of reuse than buying new." For-profit recyclers of fixtures and building materials have long been popular with renovators in urban areas and have been featured on "This Old House," the PBS home-improvement show. In Helena, Ferguson bought the 50-cent lampshade at a checkout counter with a house-shaped box for coin donations to Habitat and a wall sign that warns, "Please measure before you buy!" The retired truck driver said his purchases have included mirrors, flooring and covers for electrical outlets. "I come in here two or three times a month just to see what they've got new," Ferguson said. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 11:33:58 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:33:58 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] China crisis as economy crumbles Message-ID: <00c801c99f53$4a3a5a90$deaf0fb0$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:42 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] China crisis as economy crumbles (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/china-crisis-as-economy-crumble s-1638516.html China crisis as economy crumbles An 8 per cent growth rate sounds impressive, but the Beijing leadership fears social unrest in the countryside as it struggles to create jobs By Clifford Coonan in Beijing Friday, 6 March 2009 With China facing its worst financial crisis in a century, Premier Wen Jiabao assured comrades that the economy would still grow by 8 per cent this year, the level that the Communist Party believes is necessary to hold down the jobless rate and stave off wider social unrest. "We are facing unprecedented difficulties and challenges," Mr Wen told nearly 3,000 delegates assembled in the Great Hall of the People. "In projecting the economic growth target of about 8 per cent, we have taken into consideration both our need and ability to sustain growth." Until growth slowed to 9 per cent last year, China had enjoyed double-digit expansion for the previous five years. The government's prediction for this year was more optimistic than that of the International Monetary Fund, which has forecast growth of just 6.7 per cent for China. But Communist Party officials said 8 per cent growth was the make-or-break threshold for keeping the population satisfied and making sure that China does not fall victim to widespread rural unrest. Related articles * Clifford Coonan: Beijing looks close to home for answer to global meltdown "Maintaining a certain growth rate for the economy is essential for expanding employment for both urban and rural residents, increasing people's incomes and ensuring social stability," Mr Wen said in a two-hour address. China's economy is the third-largest after Japan and the US and will play a pivotal role in helping drag the global economy out of its downturn. But, to the chagrin of the markets which had been hoping for another shot in the arm, Mr Wen failed to announce any extension to the four trillion yuan (?414bn) stimulus package unveiled in November. He did provide extra details fleshing out that stimulus package ? the biggest in the world. The central government would increase spending on healthcare and other social welfare programmes, and bring in measures to spur domestic demand and get consumers spending, including subsidies for farmers to buy fridges and cars. It would also take further steps to offset the rising number of unemployed, victims of a slump in the export market. Collapsing overseas demand for Chinese toys, shoes and electronics have caused the closure of 670,000 small and medium-sized companies. Officials estimate about 20 million migrant workers have already lost their jobs owing to the closure of export-dependent factories and many are now returning to their rural homes. In the year that the Communist Party celebrates the 60th anniversary of the 1949 revolution, the fear is that people will start to question its power. Chinese authorities have been training police forces to deal with potential labour unrest. President Hu Jintao has called on the army to remain loyal in the face of growing discontent at the first downturn many Chinese people have experienced. Last month, a clash between police and about 1,000 protesting workers from a textile factory in Zigong City, Sichuan province, left six demonstrators injured, according to the rights group Chinese Human Rights Defenders. Mr Wen warned that the government would continue to prevent what it calls "mass incidents", its euphemism for riots, protests and demonstrations. "We will improve the early warning system for social stability to actively prevent and properly handle all types of mass incidents," he said. The manner in which China is keeping a tight lid on social unrest was highlighted yesterday when a group of about 100 petitioners from Shanghai went to a Beijing police station to air their grievances but were quickly detained or dispersed. Petitioning is an ancient system dating from the imperial age, where Chinese people who felt they were being abused by the system turned to the Emperor for help, travelling to Beijing to petition for the assistance of the supreme authority. It used to be that petitioners were heard during the National People's Congress, but fear of social unrest means those days are gone. Any petitioners seen near Tiananmen Square are rounded up and often jailed in "petitioners' hotels", a euphemism for detention centres. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 12:35:48 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:35:48 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] The Revolution Has Already Occurred Message-ID: <00f801c99f5b$ee2719b0$ca754d10$@net> Are you as yet linked in to a social networking group on the Internet? If not you should be because it is the fastest way to connect with the huge Blessed Unrest movement taking place that is transforming the world. As the article below suggests it is more "anarchist" than socialistic as people are realizing new ways of connecting and doing business via "social networking," and doing so without government restraint. People everywhere are discovering and implementing more effective ways of doing things on a one to one basis across the artificial "nation-state" borders without the interference of elite dictatorial powers getting in the way. Facebook.com, BTW, is an excellent place in which to connect with like-minded others and create both new friendships and entities. There are 175 million subscribers since 2004. I am utilizing it to build a base with which to begin FutureDawning.org. And am launching one holon this week: INTEGRAL WOMEN which will also have a group within it: Heart-Centered Men in Partnership with Integral Women, so as to bring us together within a framework designed to create healthier and more balanced relationships. INTEGRAL WOMEN and our PARTNERS will then aid in getting the FutureDawning.org campus up and running with its 11 alternative campuses, Think Tank and Admin Center. Other campuses (called Portals and Pathways) will be: 1) Sustainable Living, 2) Human Consciousness, etc., are designed to unite the sustainable living movement with the human consciousness movement, and the women's movement while at the same time addressing social systems transformation so as to make them more "life-enhancing". Transforming our social systems in order to form ones that work for us instead of against us plays a major role in transforming society as a whole in that we create new and healthier environments for ourselves. This follows up on Dr. Bruce Lipton's research in the field of Epigenetics that tells us it is our environment that largely shapes who we are, and consequently defines how we act. Please join Facebook and link to mary rose if you want to be part of this movement. Membership to FutureDawning.org is by invitation only and you can let me know via Facebook if you would like me to extend you an invitation. Once a member, you may then invite others with whom you would like to associate in order to create group with which to create a transformational project. Other Portals and Pathways will focus on new energy creation, monetary reform, waste remediation, reforestation, transforming the manner in which we eat, creating new healing modalities, etc. FUTUREDAWNING.org is intended as a "self-organizing" virtual campus where no "teaching" will take place -- this is about becoming "Co-learners" using hands-on-experiential learning. It is based in quantum physics and in creating "organic" structures which align with the greater message of the Universe: Love and Peace. Please read the article listed below relative to this, which also suggests a "need for": -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] The Revolution Has Already Occurred Published on Friday, March 6, 2009 by The Nation The Revolution Has Already Occurred http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090323/solnit?rel=hp_currently by Rebecca Solnit Note from The Nation editors: Socialism's all the rage. "We Are All Socialists Now,"Newsweek declares. As the right wing tells it, we're already living in the U.S.S.A. But what do self-identified socialists (and their progressive friends) have to say about the global economic crisis? We hope that Barbara Ehrenreich and Bill Fletcher Jr.'s "Reimagining Socialism: Rising to the Occasion will kick off a spirited dialogue. Four replies are featured in this issue, with more to come at TheNation.com. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 12:41:15 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:41:15 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] The Second Great Depression Message-ID: <00f901c99f5c$b05b9790$1112c6b0$@net> Well, IMHO, this article asks a very important question: Do we want to continue on warring in order to keep the economy moving, or do we want to design a new monetary system that is life-enhancing? The choice is ours to make. And, if we don't make the latter choice, then again, IMHO we are all really crazy. m r -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:11 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] The Second Great Depression (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) The Second Great Depression http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090316/howl?rel=hp_currently By Nicholas von Hoffman March 3, 2009 The pause morphed into the correction, which got transmogrified into the drop in business, which shifted into the crash. The crash became the slump, which changed into the downturn and/or the slide, or the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression. Scarier yet, President Barack Obama is now warning us that unless his rescue plan goes through, "our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe." What say you to that, sports fans? Many are starting to say it looks as though we are heading into--or are already in--another Great Depression But what might a depression be? Although the word has been used in connection with bad economic conditions since the late eighteenth century, there is no agreed-upon definition comparable to what economists have for the word "recession." There is agreement on one thing: a depression is a helluva lot worse then a recession. It means not just hard times, but very, very hard times lasting a very, very long time. Two, three, four, eight years. You might say a depression is an extended national catastrophe. How will we know if and when we are in one? The usual comparisons to where the country is economically are with the Reagan recession of 1982, not with the Hoover Depression of 1929. We will know if we are in a full-blown depression when people begin using the word matter-of-factly. Or we'll know it if Warren Buffet tells us we are. For a genuine, doctor-certified economic depression we have no Prozac or Wellbutrin or Zoloft or Celexa. At last America has come against a condition for which there is no pill. We have nothing we can ingest and then lie back and wait until our 401(k)s return to normal. From the way the president, the secretary of the treasury and the economists who weigh in on the topic talk, it seems that medical science knows more about curing cancer than economic science, if it is one, knows about dealing with the disaster now on our hands. Those who believe we have fallen from recession to depression have yet to settle on a name. It could be the Second Great Depression (SGD) or Great Depression II (GDII) as per WW II, not that we need a Roman numeral to convince us that we are in trouble. If we are in Great Depression II, what phase of it might we be in? Depending how you count, Great Depression I lasted between nine and twelve years. The market crashed in 1929 and then with some temporary ups continued down for the next several years. The banks and the financial system began falling to pieces in 1931. Things got worse until March 1933, when President Roosevelt closed all the banks and gave them a stress test before letting the solvent ones reopen. Even before the banking system conked out in 1932, business had gone to hell, taking millions of jobs with it. In the first quarter of 2009 business is way down, dividends are being cut, profits off and expansion is nonexistent, but things are not as bad as in 1933-34 when the homeless were all over, World War I vets were peddling apples on the sidewalks and families truly did not know when they would see their next meal. We are nowhere near that state. There was no war going on in the early 1930s, which, depending upon your analysis, could be a plus or a minus. If government spending is an effective way to stimulate the economy, President Obama can be grateful he has not one but two wars to spend money on. He may soon have a third in Mexico to help stimulate things. Whether America, which has not been able to defeat the Taliban, Al Qaeda or the rulers of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan, will have better luck against the Sinaloa drug cartel is an open question. But if war really contributes to the economic health of the society--do we really want to count on a longer war? * Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 68 cents a week! * If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation. About Nicholas von Hoffman Nicholas von Hoffman is the author of A Devil's Dictionary of Business, now in paperback. He is a Pulitzer Prize losing author of thirteen books, including Citizen Cohn, and a columnist for the New York Observer. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 17:40:44 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:40:44 -0800 Subject: [GJM] URGENT! FW: FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank Message-ID: <014a01c99f86$87267b90$957372b0$@net> Begin raising your own food now. Get on the Internet and learn how to set up a root cellar to store root vegetables, e.g., potatoes, carrots, turnips, beets, as well as apples. I've heard that old refrigerators buried in the ground with the door removed and covered with netting to keep critters out is a good idea, but haven't had time to check it out as yet. Steel drums cut in half, buried and netted are also said to be good. Ensure that your community has a local currency program set up. Stockpile necessities especially baby items and medications for anyone who has to have them. Make sure you have a first aid kit and take any courses you can that could save a life. Doctors may be in short supply especially in wilderness areas. Be sure you have batteries, flashlights, lanterns, extra gasoline and propane on hand. Keep lots of canned foods on hand, as well as grains, e.g., rice, cornmeal, and beans. Put grains in the freezer to keep them fresh and the bugs out. Get canning supplies if possible. Buy or make your own solar cooker. Eat as many fresh raw foods as possible. And batten down the hatches, these seas are going to get mighty rough. From: BOB TAFT [mailto:rbtaft at rtconnect.net] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:35 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Fw: FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank It cost so much to bail out Wall Street that Main Street must sink or swim on its own? If the FDIC folds there should be massive demonstrations across the country. Start treating politicians and bankers as they treat us. As someone in Treasury or such a level has already promoted the idea of raising the FDIC coverage to $250k, the idea of cancelling it all is absurd EXCEPT that this is right out of FDIC itself. Considering its source, this must be taken seriously. Officials at this level are not prone to joking about such things. Best regards, Bob Taft From: MichiMac Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:35 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank ----- Original Message ----- FDIC warns US bank deposit insurance fund could tank Thu Mar 5, 1:20 pm ET WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US government is warning banks that its deposit insurance fund could go broke this year as bank failures mount. The head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Sheila Bair, in a letter to bank chief executives dated March 2, defended the FDIC's plan to raise fees on banks and assess an emergency fee to shore up the fund and maintain investor confidence. Bair acknowledged the new fees, announced Friday, would put additional pressure on banks at time of financial crisis and a deepening recession, but insisted they were critical to keep the insurance fund solvent and protect. "Without these assessments, the deposit insurance fund could become insolvent this year," Bair wrote. The FDIC chief said in the letter that the rapidly deteriorating economic conditions raised the prospects of "a large number" of bank failures through 2010.. "Without substantial amounts of additional assessment revenue in the near future, current projections indicate that the fund balance will approach zero or even become negative," she wrote. The FDIC last Friday announced it would impose a temporary emergency fee on lenders and raise its regular assessments to shore up the rapidly depleting deposit insurance fund that insures individual customer deposits up to 250,000 dollars. A week ago the FDIC reported a sharp depletion of the deposit insurance fund in the fourth quarter due to actual and anticipated bank failures, to 19 billion dollars from 34.6 billion in the third quarter. The FDIC said it had set aside an additional 22 billion dollars for estimated losses on failures anticipated in 2009. _____ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1988 - Release Date: 03/06/09 19:17:00 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 17:48:50 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 16:48:50 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: Goodbye farmers markets, CSAs, and roadside stands Message-ID: <014f01c99f87$a8c05c70$fa411550$@net> WE CANNOT LET THIS HAPPEN. FOOD SOVEREIGNTY IS THE CORNERSTONE OF FREEDOM. STOP CODEX NOW! From: Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:06 PM Subject: Goodbye farmers markets, CSAs, and roadside stands Goodbye farmers markets, CSAs, and roadside stands http://www.opednews.com/articles/Goodbye-farmers-markets-C-by-Linn-Cohen-Col e-090303-287.html -- -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Sun Mar 8 01:46:45 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:46:45 -0800 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Retirement funds in danger for millions of Americans Message-ID: <01a501c99fca$6c0ad830$44208890$@net> It is imperative that we establish sustainable living communities as soon as possible to provide lifeboats for those who have now, and others who are, in continued danger of losing their retirement funds. In a sustainable living community, everyone is cared for by the community through the use of local currencies and by raising enough food for everyone in community gardens. Each community needs to compile a roster of those who have extra rooms available that can be utilized by those losing their homes. Tent cities may have to be set up in some areas where rooms are scarce. Sanitary and shower facilities need to be provided. The city of Santa Barbara in California is currently housing people in tents and is planning a more permanent type of facility. Voluntary child care is necessary so that parents can work either in the gardens or at other tasks in the community. When I was homeless in the last recession, I remember there were times when as many as 300 applicants were applying for one job. Let's all remember that the next one needing help could be you, and that through no fault of their own millions are going to be bereft and forced to live on the streets. Don't think it can't happen to you. Recall that I had a six-figure income, and I had six months reserves in the bank, but I just couldn't make it through. If you don't have an extra bedroom, but have a car in your garage, for goodness sakes, back the car out in the driveway and create a sleeping quarters plus put up a line on which people can hang their clothes. Help people maintain their dignity. -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:45 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Retirement funds in danger for millions of Americans (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) Retirement funds in danger for millions of Americans By Mike Bryan 6 March 2009 http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/mar2009/reti-m06.shtml For millions of Americans, the deepening recession has meant a dramatic drop in funds put aside for their retirement. While many have seen the value of these accounts slashed in half, the pensions of others have been rendered virtually worthless as their employers file for bankruptcy. For others, a layoff in the family spells disaster, and saving for retirement is out of the question. Many older workers have been forced to cash out their 401(k)s to cover mortgages and pay credit card debt and other expenses, with the amount withdrawn sharply reduced from their original investment. For other, particularly young, workers, the prospect of putting aside anything out of their weekly paychecks is out of the question. While there are many 401(k) plan variations, until recently an employer has commonly matched 50 percent of an employee's contributions up to 6 percent of the employee's income. These funds can be set aside tax free, and are most commonly invested in an assortment of mutual funds. Now, more and more companies have stopped making matching contributions to these funds. Coming on top of wage cuts, this amounts to yet another reduction in real wages for millions of workers. In an article posted on CFO.com entitled "Stopping 401(k) Matches: The New No-brainer," Alan Vorchheimer of Buck Consultants is quoted as saying, "this is just so easy.... Almost every company is being forced to consider it.... Let's be candid: the CFOs of a lot of these companies are going to their benefits people and saying, 'Hey, can we get rid of our match?' " According to a list compiled by the Pension Rights Center, a rapidly increasing number of companies are answering "yes" to that question. While not comprehensive, from June through December of 2008 the list contained the names of 29 companies. In the first few months of this year the list of those cutting matching contributions has grown to more than 110. Among the most recognizable names are General Motors, Chrysler, Ford, Motorola, FedEx, UPS, Starbucks, NCR, Sears, US Steel, AMD, Reader's Digest, Macy's, Diebold, the New York Daily News, Libbey, and Hewlett-Packard. This corporate assault on 401(k)s, and the dwindling value of these accounts with the collapse of the stock market, show how the shift over the last few decades from defined benefit plans, often referred to as pensions, to 401(k)s now threatens the retirement of millions of workers. In a brief on "The Financial Crisis and Private Defined Benefit Plans," the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College explains why this is the case, and why the majority of companies have moved away from defined benefit plans: "In 401(k)s, individuals bear the risk. If the stock market collapses, they take an immediate hit to their retirement assets. And those about to retire-who on average held about two thirds of their assets in equities-will be forced to retire on less. In defined benefit plans, however, participants are promised benefits based on years of service and earnings (typically the last five years), and these benefits must be paid regardless of what happens to the assets in the employer's pension plan. In short, participants in defined benefit plans are sheltered from the effect of the financial crisis on retirement assets." According to a recent study by Fidelity Investments, American workers lost an average of 27 percent of their 401(k) retirement savings in 2008, and they can expect to lose even more this year. Defined benefit plans, on the other hand, place additional responsibility on plan sponsors, and are also much more expensive to operate-which is why companies have been moving employees out of defined benefit plans into 401(k)s, otherwise known as defined contribution plans. In 1980, of those private sector workers with pension coverage, 60 percent had defined benefit plans only, 23 percent had both defined benefit plans and 401(k)s, and 17 percent had 401(k)s only. By 2006, these percentages had dramatically reversed: 8 percent had defined benefit plans only, 22 percent had both defined benefit plans and 401(k)s, and 70 percent had 401(k)s only. Fewer private sector workers are covered by some type of employer- provided retirement plan than are public sector workers. In 2006, of workers age 25 to 64, only 45 percent of private sector workers had pension coverage while almost 80 percent of state and local workers had coverage. Public sector pensions are primarily defined benefit plans. Between October 9, 2007, and October 9, 2008, equity assets in retirement plans dropped by about $4 trillion in value, according to the CRR study. State and local government defined benefit plans dropped by about $1 trillion, private employer defined benefit plans dropped by about $900 billion, private employer defined contribution plans dropped about $1.1 trillion, Individual Retirement Accounts dropped about $800 billion, and federal government thrift plans dropped about $100 billion. These dramatic shortfalls create particular problems for private employer defined benefit plans. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 contains guidelines by which a plan sponsor must eliminate any shortfall between promised benefits and assets. The CRR study estimates that "firms are going to have to increase contributions by about $90 billion in 2009." Mercer, a global consulting firm, places the underfunding of corporate pension plans at $409 billion. "This challenge raises the question of firms laying off workers, freezing their pensions, or going bankrupt," states the CRR study. These shortfalls-amidst the worst economic crisis since the 1930s-make it a near certainty that the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) will be forced to take over the pension responsibilities of an increasing number of bankrupt businesses. Created in 1974 by Congress, the PBGC is funded through premiums paid by the companies whose defined benefit plans it insures and through its investments. Since 2001, the PBGC has taken over nine of the ten largest terminated pension plans in its history, including those of United Airlines, Bethlehem Steel, and Kaiser Aluminum. With $63 billion in assets and obligations to spend $74 billion on pension benefits in the coming years, the PBGC already has an $11 billion deficit. Taking over the pension plan of General Motors alone would more than double that deficit-although the PBGC would also receive assets from GM's pension fund. Workers whose pension plans have been taken over by PBGC are highly unlikely to receive the entire benefit they expected. The current maximum benefit is $54,000 per year for a person retiring at age 65. There is no cost-of-living adjustment. All of these scenarios, furthermore, are predicated on the PBGC avoiding outright collapse. Adding to the precarious future of retirement is the fact that it is a rarity for workers to remain at one employer for their entire working life. Since the median job tenure is less than four years, most workers earn limited amounts in either a defined benefit or a defined contribution plan with any one employer. When workers leave a company and opt to receive single sum distributions of their retirement savings from these plans, fewer than half of those under age 50 save the entire distribution for retirement, as do fewer than half receiving distributions of less than $20,000. According to a recent Bank of America Retirement Savings Survey, 18 percent of people are pulling retirement assets from their accounts prematurely-in spite of the tax consequences. With the deepening recession, more and more workers will undoubtedly tap into any such funds they have to pay for immediate pressing needs, further endangering their retirement future. From maryrose333 at att.net Sun Mar 8 12:56:26 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:56:26 -0700 Subject: [GJM] IMPORTANT FW: [globalnetnews-summary] The California Water Wars: Not a Conflict Between Fish and People Message-ID: <004601c9a01f$97ee58a0$c7cb09e0$@net> This is another example of why we need to create a new monetary system that is not based on creating jobs for people that are dependent upon the raping of the environment in order for people to live. And why it's necessary for us to eat lower on the food chain for the foreseeable future. Almost all of the world's fisheries are overfished today and the taking of ever younger and smaller members of the species leaves not enough fish available to restock the supply as demand continually outstrips the ability to replenish. This event is also taking place in an environment that is continually stripped of the natural occurring resources needed to sustain reproduction at what we might term "peak efficiency". Quite probably one of the major causes here is attributable to an over carrying-capacity load in an ecosystem -- a factor little considered in planning and maintaining habitats. Each ecosystem has a maximum carrying capacity it can handle before breakdown occurs just as a bus has a maximum number of passengers it can carry before break down occurs. And whether or not the ecosystem itself is operating at peak efficiency or not is a major contributing factor in determining what the carrying-capacity of the system or region is. One of the most ignored factors in consideration of ecosystem carrying capacity is that the human family, for the most part, is a "taker" from what must be considered our life support system, and our contribution to its maintenance and restoration can only be described as negligible. Perhaps we have paid too much attention to developing our spiritual side and getting into a mythological heaven, and not enough to maintaining our earthling side through contributing to GAIA's health and well-being. Of note is that as this article points out, human habitats should never have been built in certain areas -- Los Angeles being one of them. For further information on this, The Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner is an excellent source. A PBS summary may be found here: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~martins/hydro/case_studies/cadillac_desert.htm Everything taken into consideration, the way we eat is one of the major contributing factors to both economic and ecological collapse. The day of reckoning is here and now and WE must address it here and now -- not in terms of jobs, money, banking, and corporate interests, but in terms of whether or not WE are going to leave a habitable planet for our descendants. -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:51 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] The California Water Wars: Not a Conflict Between Fish and People The California Water Wars: Not a Conflict Between Fish and People Friday 06 March 2009 by: Dan Bacher, t r u t h o u t | Perspective http://www.truthout.org/030609EA Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the California Department of Water Resources and corporate agribusiness have continually tried to frame the battle over restoring the California Delta and Central Valley rivers as one of "fish versus people." This false dichotomy was exemplified by an article published in the Sacramento Bee, "Delta Cutbacks Put Valley Farm Town on Edge," by Susan Ferris on Monday, March 2. Read rest of article here: http://www.truthout.org/030609EA From mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com Mon Mar 9 03:37:47 2009 From: mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com (Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:07:47 +0530 (IST) Subject: [GJM] Islamic Finance System gets backing from Vatican Message-ID: <54719.35102.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com> http://www.bdafrica.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13297&Itemid=5812 Islamic finance gets backing from Vatican Written by A Correspondent?? March 9, 2009: A raging global financial crisis has won Islamic finance backing from an unexpected source ? the Vatican. In an article in its weekly newspaper, the Vatican says ethical principles upon which Islamic finance is based offers the best chance of getting banks closer to their clients and ?to the true spirit that should mark every financial service.? The Catholic Church?s mouthpiece said Sukuk (Islamic finance) could be used to?? fund the ?car industry or the next Olympic Games in London.? The newspaper had previously criticized the free market model for having ?grown too much and badly in the past two decades.? The Vatican?s stand is that ?the great religions have always had a common attention to the human dimension of the economy?.News of the Vatican?s came just as the World Islamic Economic Forum wrapped up its meeting in Indonesia with a call for Islamic finance and banking to be developed as an alternative to the Wall Street model of doing business. The gathering of more than 1,550 delegates from 38 countries urged the Islamic Development Bank to take the lead in promoting Islamic finance. Malaysian prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the Islamic financial system?s ability to remain largely unscathed by the difficulties affecting the conventional international financial system is testament to its integrity and validity, and he expects to see Islamic finance play a more prominent role in the international financial system. This story is available in full in the Business Daily e-paper. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com Mon Mar 9 03:37:48 2009 From: mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com (Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:07:48 +0530 (IST) Subject: [GJM] Islamic Finance System gets backing from Vatican Message-ID: <168666.96080.qm@web94912.mail.in2.yahoo.com> http://www.bdafrica.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13297&Itemid=5812 Islamic finance gets backing from Vatican Written by A Correspondent?? March 9, 2009: A raging global financial crisis has won Islamic finance backing from an unexpected source ? the Vatican. In an article in its weekly newspaper, the Vatican says ethical principles upon which Islamic finance is based offers the best chance of getting banks closer to their clients and ?to the true spirit that should mark every financial service.? The Catholic Church?s mouthpiece said Sukuk (Islamic finance) could be used to?? fund the ?car industry or the next Olympic Games in London.? The newspaper had previously criticized the free market model for having ?grown too much and badly in the past two decades.? The Vatican?s stand is that ?the great religions have always had a common attention to the human dimension of the economy?.News of the Vatican?s came just as the World Islamic Economic Forum wrapped up its meeting in Indonesia with a call for Islamic finance and banking to be developed as an alternative to the Wall Street model of doing business. The gathering of more than 1,550 delegates from 38 countries urged the Islamic Development Bank to take the lead in promoting Islamic finance. Malaysian prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the Islamic financial system?s ability to remain largely unscathed by the difficulties affecting the conventional international financial system is testament to its integrity and validity, and he expects to see Islamic finance play a more prominent role in the international financial system. This story is available in full in the Business Daily e-paper. Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 9 13:34:26 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:34:26 -0700 Subject: [GJM] OpEdNews > Gorbachev and the Buddha--A Middle Way for Humanity Message-ID: <001001c9a0ee$25a4aea0$70ee0be0$@net> Dear Friends, What I would like to remind everyone is that Buddhism is based in quantum physics, thus we have a balanced system which is verifiable in scientific terms. The Dalai Lama, himself, is engaged in scientific research on human consciousness and is associated with the Mind/Body Institute in order to further understand the connection between science and spirituality. What we are talking about is creating an organic or natural path in alignment with the greater message of the Universe, which is that everything is integral to everything else. There are no beginnings or endings -- there is only the Oneness. What we do to others we do to ourselves. The Middle Way is the balanced - integrated path - it is one in which both hemispheres of the brain are integrated and one in which the brain and the heart are integrated - it is the "holographic" configuration of which we have previously spoken. It does not pit the right against the left, nor the Democrats against the Republicans, nor the male against the female, nor the East against the West. It seeks to integrate and unite, not divide. Buddhism is not a religion per say - it is but a symbol of balance that points to understanding the way in which the natural universe is configured. It is the peaceful path. Please read the following article from a whole brain perspective. http://www.opednews.com/articles/Gorbachev-and-the-Buddha--by-Grant-Lawrence -090307-23.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 9 14:38:41 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:38:41 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: [SPAM]Revealing News: Derivatives a $700 Trillion Danger, Pension Funds at Risk, Oil Storage Shortage, More Message-ID: <006901c9a0f7$0bc70b50$235521f0$@net> From: PEERS: WantToKnow.info Email List [mailto:emaillist at peerservice.org] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:02 PM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: [SPAM]Revealing News: Derivatives a $700 Trillion Danger, Pension Funds at Risk, Oil Storage Shortage, More To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list (one email every few days) or to reply to this message, see end of email This message is available online at http://www.WantToKnow.info/009/090310_derivatives_danger_pension_risk_oil_storage Dear friends, Below are one-paragraph excerpts of important news articles you may have missed. These news articles include revealing information on the danger of defaults in the $700 trillion derivatives market, the risk to pension funds due to spiraling bond obligations, the shortage of storage space for oil, and more. Each excerpt is taken verbatim from the major media website listed at the link provided. If any link fails to function, click here . Key sentences are highlighted for those with limited time. By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread the word , we can and will build a brighter future. With best wishes, Tod Fletcher and Fred Burks for PEERS and the WantToKnow.info Team Note: Your financial support to continue this empowering work is extremely valuable to us. Please consider making a contribution by visiting www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk. And for those who haven't heard, Citigroup's stock fell to under $1.00 at one point on Friday, from a high of $57 just over two years ago. Buckle your seatbelts for a wild ride. The $700 trillion elephant March 6, 2009, MarketWatch (Wall Street Journal Digital Network) http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/The-700-trillion-elephant-room/story.asp There's a $700 trillion elephant in the room and it's time we found out how much it really weighs on the economy. Derivative contracts total about three-quarters of a quadrillion dollars in "notional" amounts, according to the Bank for International Settlements. These contracts are tallied in notional values because no one really can say how much they are worth. But valuing them correctly is exactly what we should be doing because these comprise the viral disease that has infected the financial markets and the economies of the world. Try as we might to salvage the residential real estate market, it's at best worth $23 trillion in the U.S. We're struggling to save the stock market, but that's valued at less than $15 trillion. And we hope to keep the entire U.S. economy from collapsing, yet gross domestic product stands at $14.2 trillion. Compare any of these to the derivatives market and you can easily see that we are just closing the windows as a tsunami crashes to shore. The total value of all the stock markets in the world amounts to less than $50 trillion, according to the World Federation of Exchanges. To be sure, the derivatives market is international. But much of the trouble we're in began with contracts "derived" from the values associated with U.S. residential real estate market. These contracts were engineered based on the various assumptions tied to those values. Few know what derivatives are worth. I spoke with one derivatives trader who manages billions of dollars and she said she couldn't even value her portfolio because "no one knows anymore who is on the other side of the trade." Note: Banks and financial firms deemed "too big to fail" are being bailed out worldwide at taxpayers' expense. But what will happen if losses in the derivatives market skyrocket? No government in the world has the resources to save financial corporations from a collapse in their derivatives trading. For lots more on the realities of the Wall Street bailout, click here. Wars, Endless Wars March 3, 2009, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/opinion/03herbert.html The U.S. economy is in free fall, the banking system is in a state of complete collapse and Americans all across the country are downsizing their standards of living. The nation as we?ve known it is fading before our very eyes, but we?re still pouring billions of dollars into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with missions we are still unable to define. Even as the U.S. begins plans to reduce troop commitments in Iraq, it is sending thousands of additional troops into Afghanistan. The strategic purpose of this escalation, as Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledged, is not at all clear. We invaded Afghanistan more than seven years ago. We don?t even have an escalation strategy, much less an exit strategy. An honest assessment of the situation ... would lead inexorably to such terms as fiasco and quagmire. Instead of cutting our losses, we appear to be doubling down. As for Iraq, President Obama announced last week that substantial troop withdrawals will take place over the next year and a half and that U.S. combat operations would cease by the end of August 2010. But, he said, a large contingent of American troops, perhaps as many as 50,000, would still remain in Iraq for a ?period of transition.? That?s a large number of troops, and the cost of keeping them there will be huge. I can easily imagine a scenario in which Afghanistan and Iraq both heat up and the U.S., caught in an extended economic disaster at home, undermines its fragile recovery efforts in the same way that societies have undermined themselves since the dawn of time ? with endless warfare. Note: The strategic purpose of keeping the wars going is well known by the bankers and power elite. A top U.S. general revealed it all in a powerful book, of which we have a two-page summary available here . For revealing reports from reliable sources on the realities of the Iraq and Afghan wars, click here . Hidden Pension Fiasco May Foment Another $1 Trillion Bailout March 3, 2009, Bloomberg News http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive &sid=alwTE0Z5.1EA Public pension funds across the U.S. are hiding the size of a crisis that?s been looming for years. Retirement plans play accounting games with numbers, giving the illusion that the funds are healthy. The paper alchemy gives governors and legislators the easy choice to contribute too little or nothing to the funds, year after year. The misleading numbers posted by retirement fund administrators help mask this reality: Public pensions in the U.S. had total liabilities of $2.9 trillion as of Dec. 16, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Their total assets are about 30 percent less than that, at $2 trillion. With stock market losses this year, public pensions in the U.S. are now underfunded by more than $1 trillion. That lack of funds explains why dozens of retirement plans in the U.S. have issued more than $50 billion in pension obligation bonds during the past 25 years -- more than half of them since 1997 -- public records show. The quick fix for pension funds becomes a future albatross for taxpayers. The public gets nothing from pension bonds -- other than a chance to at least temporarily avoid paying for higher pension fund contributions. Pension bonds portend the possibility of steep tax increases. By law, states must guarantee public pension fund debts. ?What appears to be a riskless strategy is actually very risky,? says David Zion, director of accounting research for New York-based Credit Suisse Holdings USA Inc. ?If the returns on the pension bond-financed assets don?t exceed the cost of servicing the debt, the taxpayers bear the brunt.? Note: For lots more on the realities of the Wall Street bailout, click here. Oil producers running out of storage space March 3, 2009, MSNBC/Associated Press http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29495753 Supertankers that once raced around the world to satisfy an unquenchable thirst for oil are now parked offshore, fully loaded, anchors down, their crews killing time. In the United States, vast storage farms for oil are almost out of room. As demand for crude has plummeted, the world suddenly finds itself awash in oil that has nowhere to go. It?s been less than a year since oil prices hit record highs. But now producers and traders are struggling with the new reality: The world wants less oil, not more. And turning off the spigot is about as easy as turning around one of those tankers. So oil companies and investors are stashing crude, waiting for demand to rise and the bear market to end so they can turn a profit later. Meanwhile, oil-producing countries such as Iran have pumped millions of barrels of their own crude into idle tankers, effectively taking crude off the market to halt declining prices that are devastating their economies. Traders have always played a game of store and sell, bringing oil to market when it can fetch the best price. They say this time is different because of how fast the bottom fell out of the oil market. ?Nobody expected this,? said Antoine Halff, an analyst with Newedge. ?The majority of people out there thought the market would keep rising to $200, even $250, a barrel. They were tripping over each other to pick a higher forecast.? Now the strategy is storage. Anyone who can buy cheap oil and store it might be able to sell it at a premium later, when the global economy ramps up again. Prison Spending Outpaces All but Medicaid March 3, 2009, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/us/03prison.html One in every 31 adults, or 7.3 million Americans, is in prison, on parole or probation, at a cost to the states of $47 billion in 2008, according to a new study. Criminal correction spending is outpacing budget growth in education, transportation and public assistance, based on state and federal data. Only Medicaid spending grew faster than state corrections spending, which quadrupled in the past two decades, according to [a new report] by the Pew Center on the States, the first breakdown of spending in confinement and supervision in the past seven years. The increases in the number of people in some form of correctional control occurred as crime rates declined by about 25 percent in the past two decades. As states face huge budget shortfalls, prisons, which hold 1.5 million adults, are driving the spending increases. Pew researchers say that as states trim services like education and health care, prison budgets are growing. Those priorities are misguided, the study says. ?States are looking to make cuts that will have long-term harmful effects,? said Sue Urahn, managing director of the Pew Center on the States. ?Corrections is one area they can cut and still have good or better outcomes than what they are doing now.? About $9 out of $10 spent on corrections goes to prison financing (that includes money spent to house 780,000 people in local jails). One in 11 African-Americans, or 9.2 percent, are under correctional control, compared with one in 27 Latinos (3.7 percent) and one in 45 whites (2.2 percent). Note: Crime is down 25%, yet prison spending is 400% of what it was 20 years ago. Is there anything strange here? The prison-industrial complex is mighty big and in many ways mighty corrupt. Secret Bush Anti-Terror Memos Revealed March 2, 2009, CBS News/Associated Press http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/02/national/main4839662.shtml The Obama administration threw open the curtain on years of Bush-era secrets Monday, revealing anti-terror memos that claimed exceptional search-and-seizure powers and divulging that the CIA destroyed nearly 100 videotapes of interrogations and other treatment of terror suspects. The Justice Department released nine legal opinions showing that, following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Bush administration determined that certain constitutional rights would not apply during the coming fight. Within two weeks, government lawyers were already discussing ways to wiretap U.S. conversations without warrants. An October 2001 memo by the Justice Department's John Yoo authorized the use of the U.S. military within the United States in combating terrorists. Yoo defined the 9/11 attacks as "war" and therefore concluded the President could employ the military domestically in a "military action" rather than a police action. Under Posse Comitatus Act, the American armed forces are forbidden from operating domestically. A March 2003 memo gave the President broad powers to transfer captured al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners to third countries. It also stipulated that the torture provisions of the Geneva Convention did not apply, because these prisoners were "non state" enemy combatants and therefore not entitled to Geneva protections. The Obama administration also acknowledged in court documents Monday that the CIA destroyed 92 videos involving terror suspects, including interrogations - far more than had been known. Note: For key reports from major media sources on the hidden realities of the war on terror, click here . Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus February 27, 2009, Toronto Sun (One of Canada's top newspapers) http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses. And an official of the World Health Organization?s European operation said the body is closely monitoring the investigation into the events that took place at Baxter International?s research facility in Orth-Donau, Austria. The contaminated product, a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and unlabelled H5N1 viruses, was supplied to an Austrian research company. The Austrian firm, Avir Green Hills Biotechnology, then sent portions of it to sub-contractors in the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany. The contamination incident, which is being investigated by the four European countries, came to light when the subcontractor in the Czech Republic inoculated ferrets with the product and they died. Ferrets shouldn?t die from exposure to human H3N2 flu viruses. Public health authorities concerned about what has been described as a ?serious error? on Baxter?s part have assumed the death of the ferrets meant the H5N1 virus in the product was live. But the company, Baxter International Inc., has been parsimonious about the amount of information it has released about the event. On Friday, the company?s director of global bioscience communications confirmed what scientists have suspected. ?It was live,? Christopher Bona said in an email. Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences. Note: How on earth did the avian flu virus ever get into vaccines? Could it be that this was planned? For a powerful book by a Harvard-trained dentist suggesting there may be a hidden force behind the spread of deadly infectious diseases, click here . For more revealing reports on bird flu which support this theory, click here . "Miracle" water a low-cost alternative cleaner to harsh chemicals February 27, 2009, Seattle Times/Los Angeles Times http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/living/2008791573_magicwater27.html It's a kitchen degreaser. It's a window cleaner. It kills athlete's foot. Oh, and you can drink it. The elixir is real. U.S. regulators have approved it. And it's starting to replace the toxic chemicals Americans use at home and on the job. The stuff is a simple mixture of table salt and tap water whose ions have been scrambled with an electric current. Researchers have dubbed it electrolyzed water. Some hotel workers are calling it "el liquido milagroso," the miracle liquid. That's as good a name as any for a substance that scientists said is powerful enough to kill anthrax spores without harming people or the environment. Used as a sanitizer for decades in Russia and Japan, it's slowly winning acceptance in the United States. For more than 200 years, scientists have tinkered with electrolysis, the use of an electric current to bring about a chemical reaction. That's how we got metal electroplating and large-scale production of chlorine, used to bleach and sanitize. It turns out that zapping saltwater with low-voltage electricity creates a couple of powerful, nontoxic cleaning agents. Sodium ions are converted into sodium hydroxide, an alkaline liquid that cleans and degreases like detergent, but without the scrubbing bubbles. Chloride ions become hypochlorous acid, a potent disinfectant known as acid water. "It's 10 times more effective than bleach in killing bacteria," said Yen-Con Hung, a professor of food science at the University of Georgia, Griffin, who has been researching electrolyzed water for more than a decade. "And it's safe." Note: For more on this fascinating product, click here . Key Articles From Years Past Gobekli Tepe: The World?s First Temple? November, 2008, Smithsonian Magazine http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/gobekli-tepe.html Six miles from Urfa, an ancient city in southeastern Turkey, Klaus Schmidt has made one of the most startling archaeological discoveries of our time: massive carved stones about 11,000 years old, crafted and arranged by prehistoric people who had not yet developed metal tools or even pottery. The megaliths predate Stonehenge by some 6,000 years. The place is called Gobekli Tepe, and Schmidt, a German archaeologist who has been working here more than a decade, is convinced it's the site of the world's oldest temple. In the [excavation] pits, standing stones, or pillars, are arranged in circles. Beyond, on the hillside, are four other rings of partially excavated pillars. Each ring has a roughly similar layout: in the center are two large stone T-shaped pillars encircled by slightly smaller stones facing inward. The tallest pillars tower 16 feet and, Schmidt says, weigh between seven and ten tons. Some are blank, while others are elaborately carved: foxes, lions, scorpions and vultures abound, twisting and crawling on the pillars' broad sides. Schmidt points to the great stone rings, one of them 65 feet across. "This is the first human-built holy place," he says. Prehistoric people would have gazed upon herds of gazelle and other wild animals; gently flowing rivers, which attracted migrating geese and ducks; fruit and nut trees; and rippling fields of wild barley and wild wheat varieties such as emmer and einkorn. "This area was like a paradise," says Schmidt, a member of the German Archaeological Institute. He believes this was a place of worship on an unprecedented scale?humanity's first "cathedral on a hill." Note: For more on this fascinating find, see the Daily Mail article available here. DNA Molecules Display Telepathic Abilities January 25, 2008, Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,325349,00.html DNA molecules can display what almost seems like telepathy, research now reveals. Double helixes of DNA can recognize matching molecules from a distance and then gather together, all seemingly without help from any other molecules, scientists find. Previously, under the classic understanding of DNA, scientists had no reason to suspect that double helixes of the molecule could sort themselves by type, let alone seek each other out. Scientists investigated double-stranded DNA tagged with fluorescent compounds. These molecules were placed in salt water that contained no proteins or other material that could interfere with the experiment or help the DNA molecules communicate. Curiously, DNA with identical sequences of bases were roughly twice as likely to gather together as DNA molecules with different sequences. Although it looks as if spooky action or telepathic recognition is going on, DNA operates under the laws of physics, not the supernatural. The bases that make up a strand of DNA each cause the corkscrew to bend one way or the other. Double-stranded DNA with identical sequences each result in corkscrews "whose ridges and grooves match up," said researcher Sergey Leikin, a physical biochemist. Identical DNA double helixes have matching curves, meaning they repel each other the least, Leikin explained. The scientists conjecture such "telepathy" might help DNA molecules line up properly before they get shuffled around. This could help avoid errors in how DNA combines, errors that underpin cancer, aging and other health problems. Scientists baffled by speed of Sun 'storm' May 30, 2005, The Telegraph (One of the U.K.'s leading newspapers) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1491074/Scientists-baffled-by-speed-of-Sun-storm.html The sun has dazed and confused scientists by triggering the biggest "proton storm" to bombard the Earth for half a century, challenging many ideas about how to forecast space weather to protect astronauts and satellites. Ejections of material that are often linked to solar flares can also damage ground-based communications systems and power grids. Normally, it takes two or more hours for a dangerous shower of positively charged protons to reach maximum intensity at Earth after a solar flare and between one and four days for ejected solar material to arrive. But the particles from one vast flare earlier this year peaked about 15 minutes after the first signs. "The timing is incredibly fast," said Prof Peter Cargill of Imperial College London. The burst of radiation on Jan 20 accompanied a huge solar flare - the biggest explosions in the solar system. The solar flare tripped radiation monitors worldwide and scrambled detectors on spacecraft, marking "the largest solar radiation signal on the ground in nearly 50 years", said Dr Richard Mewaldt of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, a co-investigator on Nasa's Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft. "But we were really surprised when we saw how fast the particles reached their peak intensity and arrived at Earth. That's important because it's too fast to respond with much warning to astronauts or spacecraft that might be outside Earth's protective magnetosphere." Special note: For some fascinating information suggesting that we may be in for serious solar disturbances in the year 2012, click here. And for some good news on Obama's blueprint for America, click here. Final Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational for an abundance of uplifting material. See our archive of revealing news articles at http://www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this important work. To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order: http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS network : http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart http://www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups http://www.inspiringcommunity.org - Building a Global Community for All http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all http://insightcourse.net - The Insight Course: Best of the Internet all in one free course Educational websites promoting transformation through information and inspiration To reply to this message, visit http://www.WantToKnow.info/contactus.php To subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one email every few days): http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe _____ Change email address / Leave mailing list Hosting by YourMailingListProvider -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 9 14:42:15 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:42:15 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials Message-ID: <006e01c9a0f7$8b7d70f0$a27852d0$@net> -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:41 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) http://911reports.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/environmental-anomalies-at-the-wo rld-trade-center-evidence-for-energetic-materials-by-kevin-r-ryan-james-r-go urley-and-steven-e-jones/ http://tinyurl.com/cktcer [graphs in original] Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials by Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones - Environmentalist Received: 17 February 2008 Accepted: 14 July 2008 Published online: 4 August 2008 Abstract Investigators monitoring air quality at the World Trade Center, after the September 11th attacks, found extremely high levels of volatile organic chemicals as well as unusual species that had never been seen before in structure fires. Data collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency indicate striking spikes in levels of benzene, styrene, and several other products of combustion. These spikes occurred on specific dates in October and November 2001, and February 2002. Additionally, data collected by researchers at the University of California Davis showed similar spikes in the levels of sulfur and silicon compounds, and certain metals, in aerosols. To better explain these data, as well as the unusual detection of 1,3- diphenylpropane, the presence of energetic nanocomposites in the pile at Ground Zero is hypothesized. 1 Introduction For months after the destruction at the World Trade Center (WTC) on 11th September, 2001, the fires at Ground Zero (GZ) could not be put out, despite the following facts. Several inches of dust covered the entire area after the destruction of the WTC buildings. Millions of gallons of water were sprayed onto the debris pile. Several rainfall events occurred at GZ, some heavy; and A chemical fire suppressant called Pyrocool was pumped into the piles (Lipton and Revkin 2001). The characteristics of these un-extinguishable fires have not been adequately explained as the results of a normal structure fire, even one accelerated by jet fuel. Conversely, such fires are better explained given the presence of chemical energetic materials, which provide their own fuel and oxidant and are not deterred by water, dust, or chemical suppressants. Apart from the extensive but failed efforts to extinguish the fires, there are several other physical indicators of the presence of energetic chemical reactions in the rubble at GZ. These include the following. Photographs and witness testimony evidencing molten metal and explosions accompanied by white dust clouds (Jones 2006; Meyerowitz 2006; PBS 2002). Extremely high temperatures in the fires at the WTC (Jones et al. 2008a). Unusual spikes in volatile organic chemical (VOC) emissions, suggesting abrupt, violent fires on specific dates. Unusual species in the environmental monitoring data, also corresponding to specific dates. Explosions followed by white dust clouds, and molten metal at GZ, are of particular interest in this analysis. A white dust cloud is one of the products of the thermite reaction. The white dust in this case is aluminum oxide, released from the extremely exothermic reaction between aluminum and iron oxide. The other product of the thermite reaction is molten iron. These facts, coupled with evidence for extremely high temperatures at the WTC, suggest that investigators should examine the potential for such pyrotechnic materials at the WTC. The environmental data described below give more compelling evidence to support such an inquiry. 2 EPA data on VOC emissions from GZ Through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, access to environmental monitoring data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) WTC response was obtained (EPA 2004). The data set shows that spikes in the levels of airborne VOCs occurred on specific dates at GZ (Austin Tobin Plaza, WTC 1 or WTC 2), with levels of the related contaminants rising sharply and then falling dramatically back to baseline levels, usually within 1 day or less. An example is shown in Fig. 1, for detections of benzene. Benzene is a major product of the combustion of plastics and other organic materials. In a typical structure fire, when plastics are abundant, benzene levels have been seen at levels as high as 26 ppb (MOEE 1997). Apart from fires, benzene is seen in high-traffic areas of urban settings, with mean levels of *4 ppb (Crebellia et al. 2001). Serious health consequences are known to occur when breathing benzene at 100 ppb, and it is known to cause diseases such as leukemia (HHS 2007). Note that, for the first few weeks after 9/11, the levels of benzene detected at GZ were relatively low, although perhaps higher than historical levels from structure fires. But the maximum value detected in November 2001 was 180,000 ppb, and the average daily detection for October and November 2001 was 18,000 ppb. The five peaks in benzene detection occurred on 5th October, 11th October, 3rd November, 8th November, and 16th November. Similarly, the data for styrene are presented in Fig. 2. [graphs in original] The spikes in detected levels of styrene are more prominent. Styrene is normally seen as a product of the combustion of plastics, notably polystyrene. Interestingly, the dates of the five highest levels of styrene detection occurred on the same dates as those of highest detection of benzene. A similar pattern in detection was noted in the data for several other analytes monitored by EPA in the air above the rubble piles at GZ. For example, toluene, ethylbenzene, and propylene follow the same pattern of spiked detection levels as seen above. These FOIA-obtained data indicate that all five of these VOCs were detected far above the levels published by EPA in their reports for the general public (Fig. 3, EPA 2002). The occurrence of such extreme, sharp spikes in VOCs in air at GZ indicate something other than the behavior of a typical structure fire. Oxygen influx as a result of shifting of materials within the pile might have created an increase in combustion of material in localized areas. But these spikes in VOCs, at levels thousands of times higher than seen in other structure fires, suggest extremely violent but short-lived fire events. Probably the most striking spike in toxic air emissions, found in EPA monitoring data, occurred on 9th February, 2002. Note (Table 1) that this was nearly 5 months after 9/11, and after nearly all the debris had been cleared from GZ. In fact, the levels of some species, like toluene and styrene, were some of the highest observed at the site. But the levels of benzene and propylene detected on that day were far above previous measurements, at 610,000 and 990,000 ppb, respectively. Other VOCs were measured at their peak levels on this date, including 1,3-butadiene at 400,000 ppb. [graphs in original] Article continues in PDF form here; http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/fulltext.pdf Possibly related posts: (automatically generated) Links at website * Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST * Wyden caps PNW benzene. * Cancer-causing Benzene Is Still Elevated In Certain Drinks * Dirty Gas This entry was written by Erik Larson, posted on September 17, 2008 at 2:41 am, filed under 9/11 and tagged 9/11, truth, world trade center, steven jones, epa, environmental protection agency, thermate, kevin ryan, james gourley. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. < Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction by Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, and James R. Gourley - Open Civil Engineering Journal From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 9 23:49:06 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:49:06 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: PLEASE DON'T RIOT ... By David Icke Message-ID: <000b01c9a143$f0211330$d0633990$@net> This is a very, very good article by David Icke. Please read it and take it seriously. In rioting, they win we lose. The power of our mind is the most powerful thing there is, so please join one of the coherence groups and meditate with them for peace. Your thoughts are energy waves that go out through the Universe and are powerful enough to create change especially when done in large enough groups. Keeping the peace is the reason I get so upset about the accusations against immigrants whether legal or illegal. In keeping the peace, I don't mean getting run over by those who seek to do this. What keeping the peace means is keeping one's cool and helping others In the community to keep their cool. We need to avoid incidents that can suddenly turn into riots which bring out the police. It's about acquiring and using social intelligence. It's OK to rock the boat, in fact, it's a necessity, but just do it in positive ways. Start raising your own food, seek out naturapathic doctors whenever possible and opt out of the Big Pharma run medical institution. Get a bicycle and keep your car off the road as much as possible. Don't travel unless it's absolutely necessary. Get a sewing machine and learn to make your own clothes, knit sweaters, gloves, etc. Stop living to eat and begin eating to live. Stop being a consumer. With love and appreciation for all that we do together. m r From: Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:40 AM Subject: PLEASE DON'T RIOT ... By David Icke PLEASE DON'T RIOT ... .... IT'S JUST WHAT 'THEY' WANT 'What you fight, you become.' - David Icke By David Icke As I travel around America it is clear that this country is on the brink of an economic catastrophe the like of which it has never seen. And, of course, it is not alone. A similar story can be told around the world. The foreclosure figures are fantastic as families and others lose their homes through no fault of their own on a scale that, according to current projections, is destined to become a tidal wave. The credit explosion was orchestrated through Illuminati agents and Satanists like Alan Greenspan, who represents the interests of the Illuminati's Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and other far more exclusive and sinister secret societies. Greenspan was the long-time head of the privately-owned 'US central bank', the Federal Reserve. Once his policies had manipulated as much personal and commercial debt as possible the plug was pulled on the system to trigger what is designed to be global economic meltdown. Greenspan, who led 'the Fed' under Reagan, Father Bush, Clinton and Boy Bush, operates at a deeper level within the Illuminati network than most of their public figures, and I was told by a former Satanist, an unofficial offspring of the Rothschild family, how he remembered Greenspan at sacrifice rituals he attended: 'I can recall the Rockefellers and the Bushes attending rituals, but never having the supremacy to lead them. I still regard them as lackeys and not real brokers of occult power. Except for Alan Greenspan, most of these fellows were camp followers in the occult, primarily for the economic power and prestige. Greenspan, I recall, was a person of tremendous spiritual, occult power and could make the Bushes and the younger Rockefellers cower with just a glance.' This, then, is the man who was controlling the United States economy from 1987 to 2006 and who, as planned, oversaw the insane economic policies that led to the current global collapse. Go to another level of understanding and you can see that Greenspan and other Illuminati place-men throughout the world knew exactly what they were doing and what the outcome was planned to be. Zionist Greenspan got out just before the true scale and consequences of his manipulation came to light. It has been left to others, including his Zionist successor at the 'Fed', Ben Shalom Bernanke, to offer the 'solutions' to the problems that Greenspan and his like created. All of these 'solution' people are controlled by the same force that was, and is, behind Greenspan. This is why Obama has named blatant insiders to his 'economic team' who were fundamentally culpable in the very collapse they have been appointed to 'address'. The Zionists Tim Geitner, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker etc., who are all stalwarts of the same Bilderberg Group-Council on Foreign Relations-Trilateral Commission network as Greenspan, have no intention of finding a 'solution' that will benefit the people of America or anywhere else. Neither does Obama's Budget Director, the Zionist Peter R. Orszag. It was Orszag who advised the Russian finance ministry at the time when Zionist oligarchs were raping the Russian economy and stealing its resources and he was a financial advisor to the Icelandic central bank just before the Iceland banking system crashed. Great 'choice', Barack. During the Clinton administration, Orszag worked with Obama's White House Chief of Staff, the ultra-Zionist Rahm Emanuel, on imposing the NAFTA 'free trade' agreement that has cost incredible numbers of American jobs - exactly as planned. Emanuel served in the Israeli army and is the son of a terrorist with the notorious Irgun, one the terror groups which bombed Israel into existence after World War Two. It was Emanuel who said after Obama's election: 'You never let a serious crisis go to waste'. Emanuel, a cold and vicious piece of work, is directly controlling Obama and the White House in league with senior White House advisor, the Zionist David Axelrod, who ran the puppet 'president's' election campaign and oversees the writing of the speeches that he reads from the teleprompter screens. Emanuel: Obama's puppeteer Axelrod: Obama's voice on the teleprompter screens At least most of 'Obama's' economic place-men are fundamentally connected to the Zionist Robert E. Rubin, the Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton, who oversaw financial deregulation that led ultimately to the current crisis. Rubin recently resigned from Citigroup after encouraging the policies that led the company to the brink of collapse. In January 2009, Rubin was named by Marketwatch as one of the '10 most unethical people in business' and his proteges and close associates are now running the US economy under Obama. Another massive blow to economic confidence came when the Zionist hedge fund crook, Bernard Madoff, revealed that he'd 'lost' $50 billion of his clients' money. He says he acted alone. No bloody chance. Other financial disasters which have collapsed the markets include American International Group (A.I.G.), the insurance giant headed by the Zionist, Maurice Greenberg. It has just announced losses of $61.7 billion for the final three months of 2008 - the biggest quarterly loss in corporate history. Greenberg is extremely close to the Zionist Henry Kissinger, one of the Illuminati's most vociferous global manipulators of the last 50 years. Kissinger was appointed chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987. Zionist Kissinger with Zionist Greenberg. Anyone see a common theme building here?? Are all these people just breathtakingly incompetent? No, no, no. Their role for the cabal is to destroy the economy and America in general by, among many other things, triggering the financial crisis and then wasting staggering amounts of borrowed money - trillions of dollars - to ensure that there is no way back. A US TV ad apparently said that if you spent a million dollars a day every day from the alleged birth of 'Christ' to today you would still not spend as much as Obama is spending in borrowed money in his 'stimulus' package - let alone the other fantastic sums on top of that to 'bail' the banks. They have worked super-fast, using fear and the Obama hype as their weapons, to throw more petrol on the fire in the full knowledge that this will make matters worse, not better. Bush's 'bail out' of the banks has disappeared from the radar with nothing to show for it and now Bush Mark 11, Mr Change, is fronting up the spending of another three trillion. The biggest recipient of bail-out money has been Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G, which has been given $180 billion in borrowed money that the American taxpayers, and their children, are now responsible for repaying. Rubin's Citigroup is in for $50 billion of borrowed 'government' money. The idea is not only to collapse the American economy, but to throw so much money at the problem (the banks mostly) as quickly as possible so that the response options of the government are zero by the time the economy really crashes on the scale that is planned. The same is being orchestrated around the world, as we see in Britain where the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is also hurling borrowed money at the banking system only for the situation to go on getting worse. Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer, in charge of the country's finances, right through the Blair years when he pursued policies that mirrored those of Greenspan. Now the man who was a major cause of the banking crisis in the UK is asking us to believe that he is the 'saviour' of the financial system. That's like a guy smashing someone around the head with a baseball bat and then claiming to be a hero for driving the fellah to hospital. But these people have no shame. The global economic collapse is designed to trigger a stream of 'benefits' to the Illuminati agenda. One, as I have said from the start, is to use this as an excuse to impose a global economic dictatorship controlled by a world central bank. But there are many other 'solutions' and connected 'benefits' that are planned to be exploited and we need to be streetwise to them. The one I want to emphasise here is the need to stay calm and react peacefully to what is happening. This is not easy when there is so much stress and fear around with regard to the economic present and 'future', but we need to do it all the same or we will walk straight into a massive trap that has been set for us. Let's get this straight: They want you to riot in response to the unfolding economic catastrophe and we are already seeing people falling for this. Riots in France over economic conditions Why would the authorities want people to riot? Readers of my books over the years will see the answer immediately. They want an excuse to bring in a fully-fledged Police State all over the world and people who riot in their desperation (instigated invariably by agent-provocateurs) are just the excuse they are looking for. Be very, very aware of anyone who starts rioting, or encourages others to do so, amid peaceful demonstrations. Who are they and why are they doing this when it is handing all the aces to the system to impose a Police State? They are either stupid or agents of that State. Regular readers of my newsletters will recall the one about the UK traffic warden who was suddenly given new cards authorising him to do the work of the police and to enter property without permission. His job was supposed to be just handing out tickets for illegal parking and so on. His boss would not discuss why these new cards were being issued, but a police officer friend explained all to him. The officer said the government was preparing well ahead of time for a coming 'war', during which they were expecting mass protests and rioting in the streets. The police and the military were going to be so focussed on dealing with this that other uniformed professions, like traffic wardens, private security guards, CCTV operators and many others, were going to be brought forward to do the work normally done by the police. Soon after the traffic warden approached me, the government announced that his profession was being re-designated 'civil enforcement officers', thus disconnecting them from their sole role of dealing with traffic. A few months later the government announced plans for a new group called 'accredited persons' - private security guards, CCTV operators and many others who would be given authority to do some of the work currently confined to the police. The officer told the traffic warden about a 'war', and that is planned for sure at some point. But the excuse of the war could also have been a cover-story for those people who were needed to work on the preparations, but were not to know the real reason behind it. That real reason, as we can now see, could include economic rioting after the financial collapse that the Shadow People have long known was coming because they were going to cause it - although, I stress again, a war is also being engineered involving the 'West', China and Russia. I have been stressing this point about the plan to stir up civil unrest and rioting whenever I can and now the insiders are beginning to put that thought into the public mind. 'There could be riots' is designed to communicate the theme subliminally of 'go out and riot'. It is the simple power of suggestion masquerading as 'concern'. And who should do just that than Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Illuminati Trilateral Commission and one of the chief mentors and controllers of Barack Obama. I won't call him 'President' Obama any longer until he produces a birth certificate to prove he is eligible for the post. Brzezinski told MSNBC: '... there's going to be growing conflict between the classes and if people are unemployed and really hurting, hell, there could be even riots!' No, Mr. Brzezinski, you know there are going to be riots because the network you represent is going to do everything it can to make them happen. More and more we are seeing this theme appearing from representatives of the State. The U.S. Army War College has made the same warnings in a document called Known Unknowns: Unconventional 'Strategic Shocks' in Defense Strategy Development. It said the military must be prepared for a 'violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States', in the light of 'unforeseen economic collapse'. Unforeseen?? You must be joking. The document talks of 'purposeful domestic resistance', 'pervasive public health emergencies' or 'loss of functioning political and legal order'. It goes on: 'Widespread civil violence ... would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security. An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.' As the traffic warden, now 'civil enforcement officer', found out, this is precisely what they are planning in the UK and the same will be the case in every country because they are all controlled by a world-wide web orchestrating a global agenda. The War College document said that the Department of Defense would be the 'enabling hub' for the 'continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance'. Put that through the Orwellian Translation Unit and you get 'the military will control the country'. This has all been planned for a long, long time as I and others have been warning all these years, and the 'hostile groups' the document talks about will be anyone who is challenging the political/military dictatorship in any way, even verbally. In the light of this, you won't be surprised to know that the US military is currently seeking to spend another $6 million on 'riot equipment'. Dennis C. Blair, Obama's Director of National Intelligence and Trilateral Commission member, has also said that the economic crisis could create civil unrest in the United States and around the world. He said the crisis was 'regime-threatening' if it continued over one or two years and this manufactured crisis is designed to be much bigger and longer than that. In the simple language that he seems to find so hard to summon, Blair says that there is a greater chance of war during economic turmoil and there's no doubt they have just that planned in the wake of what is happening now. Other establishment figures who have warned of unrest and rioting include the heads of the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary Fund, both Illuminati organisations to their core, and anyone who heads them will be, by definition, gofers for the cabal. In the UK, yet again confirming the validity of the traffic warden story, the head of the police branch dealing in public order has warned of a possible 'Summer of Rage' over rising unemployment and the economic crash. Superintendent David Hartshorn of London's Metropolitan Police said that 'known activists' were planning to exploit the situation to mount mass protests and he pointed to the G20 Summit in London in April as a likely target, along with banks. The London Sunday Express has also reported that UK police and 'security' services are preparing to deal with rioting and 'the chilling prospect of soldiers being drafted on to the streets has not been discounted ...' Riots in Greece Mass protests around the world are no longer simply predictions because they are already happening and, with the global economy yet to collapse on anything like the scale it is intended to, we have seen nothing yet. Some 120,000 people demonstrated in Dublin over the handling of the economic crisis in Ireland, a million protestors have been on the streets in France, UK oil refinery and power station workers launched a series of strikes in protest at the use of foreign workers, and the riots across Greece late last year were partly economic in nature. Albert Pike I can encapsulate what is going on here with part of a letter alleged to have been sent in 1871 by Albert Pike, a Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America, to Giuseppe Mazzini, the Illuminati 'revolutionary' in Italy. In this letter, Pike is said to have detailed the background to three world wars the Illuminati was planning to bring about their global dictatorship. The first two happened as he predicted and this is what he said about the third: 'The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion ... .... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.' Click here for more background ... Many dismiss the letter as a myth, but in the context I am using it that doesn't matter. What it says is what is planned - an economic and social catastrophe in which the people turn on themselves in their engineered desperation and all morality is submerged in a mass battle for perceived survival. The term 'nihilism', used in the Pike letter, has this dictionary definition: * Rejection of all distinctions in moral or religious value and a willingness to repudiate all previous theories of morality or religious belief. * The belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions is necessary for future improvement. That pretty much sums it up, really, and this is why they want people to riot all over the world to destroy the existing order, which, yes, the Illuminati created, but they now seek to replace that with the next stage of their tyranny - total global control. This means that national governments and nation states must be destroyed to allow a world government to assume its dictatorship. Look at that definition of 'nihilism' again in the light of this: 'The belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions is necessary for future improvement.' 'Rioter' and police dealing with the 'rioter' - all wearing the same police-issue boots. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. Already waiting in the wings are the agent provocateurs and the useful idiots primed to start the riots and civil unrest that the idiots believe to be challenging the existing order. But the existing order was created by the same network of Illuminati families that are seeking to create the 'new order', the New World Order, which is planned to emerge from the turmoil and chaos they are now engineering. To achieve this, as always, they need our cooperation and let no-one be in any doubt that those who choose to riot and loot in response to what is happening, and encourage others to riot and loot, are walking straight into the trap that has been laid for them. The government and military agent provocateurs will know that, the useful idiots will not, but it is time they did. I have met few more concrete-minded or naive people than those that are termed the extreme end of the political 'Left'. They have been played like a violin for hundreds of years to change the world in the image of the Illuminati blueprint in violent revolutions to bring down the established order. Now they are being gathered again to complete the journey to global tyranny and provide the violence and chaos that is designed to open the way to a world government, world army, world central bank, world electronic currency and a microchipped population connected to the global positioning satellite system, or GPS, among many other technologies of surveillance and control. The riots and looting they want to see, the chaos, will be met with the installation of a Police State with curfews, jail without trial, the military on the streets, and the activation of the concentration camps for 'dissidents' that we have long warned about. They are officially called 'military installations', run by FEMA, the deeply-sinister Federal Emergency Management Agency, and it is no coincidence, of course, that a bill numbered H.R. 645 is passing through Washington 'to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations'. No, concentration camps, and other countries will have them prepared also. Look at what that War College document said: 'Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.' Might? It's a certainty because that's the plan and all the laws are in place to allow them to do it. They have been passed by governments around the world as 'anti-terror' legislation, but they use the terms 'terror' and 'terrorist' in such a non-specific way that all these laws can be applied to the entire population of the country that the 'laws' were supposed to protect according to their advocates. It was all a gigantic con, as some of us tired of pointing out. It had nothing to do with terrorists who are alleged to plant bombs and so on. All these laws have been put into place with the specific goal of controlling the mass of the people through a Police State when they triggered an economic collapse, together with new wars. Add to all this a stream of presidential executive orders signed by successive presidents without oversight by either the House of Representatives or the Senate. These are unconstitutional and make the president a virtual dictator. Click here to see the powers that the State can activate, thanks to these orders, when martial law is declared. This is why Obama's Zionist Svengali, the White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, is seeking to have gun ownership curtailed - to make the military takeover easier. Meantime, more people are seeking to be armed and requests for concealed weapon permits in Florida alone are up 42 per cent in 45 days with the consequences of the economic turmoil in mind. The military on the streets of Iraq. How long before the same is seen on the streets of America and elsewhere? The only way to stop all this is not to react as they want us to, with violence and hostility to both the State and each other. How many violent revolutions have led to just another tyranny, official or unofficial, to replace the one that fell? It has to be so because what is destroyed by violence will be replaced by the same energy. As I have said in my books, what you fight, you become. John Lennon put it perfectly when he sang: You say you want a revolution Well, you know We all want to change the world You tell me that it's evolution Well, you know We all want to change the world But when you talk about destruction Don't you know that you can count me out ... .... You say you got a real solution Well, you know We'd all love to see the plan You ask me for a contribution Well, you know We're doing what we can But when you want money for people with minds that hate All I can tell is brother you have to wait Revolution (1968) ... click here to watch ... Martin Luther King also put it brilliantly when he said of rioting: 'The limitation of riots, moral questions aside, is that they cannot win and their participants know it. Hence, rioting is not revolutionary but reactionary because it invites defeat. It involves an emotional catharsis, but it must be followed by a sense of futility.' Those are the words of a revolutionary who succeeded through peaceful non-cooperation. Yes, they killed him, but what he created through non-violence and determination went forth to end segregation. Physical life does not matter when compared with what is right, for we are all eternal Conciousness having an illusory experience and the greatest illusion is death. I would much rather die 'early' doing what I knew to be right than to eek out a few more illusory years as a slave to a tyranny. But there is no need even for that to bring an end to this nonsense. There are billions of people being enslaved and a comparative handful doing the enslaving. Er, I think I see a way out of this. We need to come together in mutual support, love, kindness and empathy. We need to put aside the manufactured fault-lines that divide us - religion, politics, race, culture and income bracket. That is not to say people have to reject their beliefs, just don't let them be weapons of division. We are all in this together and we need to meet the challenge together, not steal from each other, loot or riot, or look the other way because something happening to someone else is 'not my problem'. They are not seeking to enslave Muslims, Jews, black people, or white middle class Americans and so on. They are seeking to do it to all of us and they are picking off different groups one by one, just like the Nazis did in Germany. Remember these famous words because they are so applicable now: First they came for the Jews and I was not a Jew so I did nothing. Then they came for the communists and I was not a communist so I did nothing. Then they came for the trade unionists and I was not a trade unionist so I did nothing. Then they came for me and there was no-one left to speak out for me. Let us unite behind that which affects everyone - the loss of our most basic freedoms. And if this is being planned now, what kind of world are our children and grandchildren going to live in? Can you live with that thought while doing nothing or rioting as the authorities want? I can't. We need to start getting organised in communities and groups to support each other and stop cooperating with the system - not to fight it. The system can only exist with our cooperation and acquiesce. We are holding it together. They have their men and women of violence, called the military and 'Swat' teams, to deal with violent resistance. But their worst nightmare is our non-cooperation - the refusal to pay taxes; refusal to leave homes when banks foreclose on them; refusal to 'comply' with our own enslavement in any form. The system couldn't cope if this was done on a mass scale. And that's the point: to do this we need to do it en-masse and those not immediately affected need to support those who are. Instead of compliance, we need the non-comply-dance of people who beat to a different drum and will not comply with what is unfair, unjust, or targets their freedom and the freedom of others. This approach does not refuse to comply in a spirit of hostility, rage or violence, but with love, joy and laughter - and an unbreakable determination not to cooperate with their own enslavement. We need a mass refusal join the military, especially if they try to introduce the Draft; a refusal to do the compulsory 'community service' for young people that Obama's controllers want to introduce (as does the UK government); and a refusal to join, or accept the legitimacy of, Obama's planned civilian security force, which is nothing more than a scam to get the people to police the people on behalf of the Elite in the midst of the economic collapse and war. We need to start getting together local currency schemes that can operate outside the system and, yes, people should also have mass protests if they choose, so long as they are peaceful. But they need to be part of the campaign of non-violent, non-cooperation, not the focus of it. How many mass protests have there been over the years around the world and yet everything just goes on as before, be it war or globalisation. We need to stop posturing and then heading for the bar to feel good about ourselves and start doing what will actually make a difference. Mass protests can ease frustration - steam whistles as I call them - but what good do most of them do? Mass non-cooperation with the system is far more effective. The protests need to be targeted at non-cooperation, refusing to accept laws that ban assembly by massive numbers turning up; surrounding the homes of neighbours when the bank bailiffs come to put them on the street; and so filling the locations of government and finance with masses of people that the system cannot function. Workers who provide essential services to government, police and financial institutions etc., can refuse to do so until Orwellian laws and financial injustice are removed. In this way the perpetrators are affected, not the mass of the people, as with all-out strikes. And all of this needs to be good humoured and strictly peaceful. I would say this also to those in uniform. You may think you have power, but you are just pawns in the game like anyone else. You don't have the power, your uniform does, because that is an extension of the State. Those inside are just there to animate the uniform and do the bidding of those it represents. When you are useful to the cabal they'll praise you and when you are surplus to their requirements as part of the bigger agenda they'll show you the door. You have children and grandchildren, too, who will have to live in the world you are policing into existence by 'following orders' and believing the manipulative nonsense fed to you by governments and cabal 'training' fronts like the UK-based Common Purpose. Wake up from the trance and stop building a Police State for your own children and grandchildren - and everyone else. Think about the consequences for those you love of what you are doing - and stop doing it. More than anything, we all need to free our minds and become conscious. From that, everything else will come, including the intuition, inspiration and knowing that will guide us on how most effectively to deal with what we face. If there are many things you would like to do in a room, but the room is dark and you can't see, what is the fundamental first step to anything else happening? You have to turn on the light and then all the rest becomes possible. Without that you are thrashing around in the dark and falling over the furniture. That is what 'humans' are doing today and have been for so long. They have been manipulated to believe they are their bodies and their names when those are just the experiences of who they truly are - eternal Consciousness. As the great American comedian, Bill Hicks, said: '... all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There's no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.' The divisions between us are illusory to allow a certain kind of experience, but these illusions have been exploited mercilessly to divide and rule us. ENOUGH! When we awaken to the truth of who we are the world looks very different and so do the challenges that are put before us - or we put before ourselves. Move your point of observation and everything changes. Try it. Try ceasing to identify who you are with your body, your name and the reflection in the mirror. Try seeing those things as experiences and not who you are. Try observing your life and the world from the perception of the real you - eternal Conciousness, All That Is, Has Been and Ever Can Be in our illusion called 'time'. Eternal Conscious in awareness of itself doesn't riot; it is not violent and it doesn't loot. But nor does it ever do, or accept for itself and others, what is not fair, just, loving and kind. Crucially, Consciousness is without fear. When we operate on that level then we can truly claim to be Conscious and not trapped in the illusion called Mind. As Albert Einstein said: 'You cannot solve problems with the same level of consciousness that created them.' John Lennon also made this key point in Revolution about what needs to happen to really make a difference. We need to free our minds and become Conscious: You say you'll change the constitution Well, you know We all want to change your head You tell me it's the institution Well, you know You better free you mind instead But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow We are now fast heading for the eye of the storm that has been planned for so long to enslave the global population in a centralised tyranny. But we don't have to accept it or acquiesce to it, meekly looking on as the walls of control close in by the day. But that is what is happening and it has to stop. For everyone's sake, it has to stop. We can come together, we MUST come together, putting aside the fault-lines of race, religion, culture and income bracket. These are just illusory labels through which we are divided and therefore ruled. Believe in them if you wish, and enjoy them if they make you happy, but don't let them divide us any longer. We need to come together in mutual support at this time as those with sick minds and closed hearts are poised to throw everything at us to complete their agenda for total control. Whether their insanity prevails is not in their hands, but in ours. It is we who have the power if only we would choose to use it. We are One Consciousness deluded into thinking we are 'little me'. When we realise that we are all One - and act upon that with courage, love, kindness, peace and empathy for all who need support - the walls of oppression must fall. But sitting on your arse hoping it will all go away is no longer an option. It never was. _____ See DavidIcke.com for constantly updated information on the world as it really is. www.DavidIcke.com/Headlines -- -- www.rejenx.com/SelectYourMembership.aspx ID 4282 - Holy Tea Cleanse www.prosperitea.com Whole Wellness Club (click upper right corner) - LIBERTY in Our Lifetime! www.PlanetaryRepublic.com www.CampaignForLiberty.com - Nancy and Earle...Planetnews 949-200-7335 land 800-889-7372 toll-free -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 10 10:36:42 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:36:42 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing Message-ID: <000001c9a19e$6793bd50$36bb37f0$@net> I completely agree with the sentiments expressed here. One of the things we need to understand about the present economy is that the external costs, that is the costs to the environment, which have been for many years excluded from the retail price of products sold, are so extensive that were they included none of us would be able to afford the product, e.g., our home, our car, the beef we eat along with other meats, our appliances, etc. The only thing that our work has produced is wages (which many refer to as slave wages) that enable us to enjoy an artificial way of life that is completely unnatural. Yet, the very sad part of this is that we consider what we are doing normal. For a very long time now, but mainly from the beginning of the Industrial Age, we have taken from the Earth and let these external costs pile up unabated as we continued our party. Now these external costs are coming due in the form of ecological collapse and global climate change. And, we are running on empty. And it may well be that the only thing that is going to save us, as pointed out in this article is the economic collapse which will force us into living a sustainable lifestyle if we want to continue on here on Earth as the Human Family. -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:22 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing "The survivors will be those who have developed the necessary survival skills -- those who are able to grow and cook their own food, and educate their own children, and look after their own health. These people will not wake up every morning fretting about money, or spending most of their day being concerned about their coiffure or fashion. They will not spend huge chunks of their time shopping." Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing 03 March 2009 We are now beginning to hear predictions of even less growth, and the likely length of the depression increasing. It's a little unfortunate that the only people who can get a word into the newspapers or onto the television, are in fact prime candidates for being helped by the men in white coats. All they succeed in doing is causing confusion amongst those of us who are in the process of evolving into a more sensible human being. The old "modern" paradigm has lived its life -- bring on the new paradigm. The nearest parallel I can think of was when Imperial China was taken over by Maoist China. Could the people who were around in those times have predicted such dramatic change? Absolutely no way, but here is one of hundreds of similar examples -- things do change. The modern era has been dominated by business, and profit has become the sole reason for some people to live. They are so locked inside the box that they are not even aware that they are living inside a paradigm, and as a result are completely unable to imagine a different one. These are the people who are eventually destined to be classified as insane, just as those are today who continue to declare that the earth is flat. Sane people would not base the on-going survival of the human species on a foundation of business having infinite growth. There are many alternative foundations for life, and the most likely suggestions to succeed are those alternatives that are aligned with nature. In the new paradigm, deeper truths will be recognised. Our scientists and philosophers will be telling us that we are a part of nature, and not master of it -- we do not own the earth -- it owns us. Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing. In fact it can be turned into a very good thing. It gives us the opportunity to walk away from our present destructive way of life, and to actually DO something about the earth's environmental problems. We are being told that it's already too late, but as the saying goes, it's never too late. However, certainly now is the time. We do not own the earth, despite what we are told by various governments and real estate agents. We have been given an opportunity to manifest a body which can stay here for a while, but if we abuse that privilege then we are delaying our own personal and spiritual evolution. We must wake up to the fact that our lifestyles have become lazy, unhealthy and pointless, and as we suck the earth's energy instead of using our own, each one of us is unable to fulfill our true potential. We will soon start to wonder why we were born -- a question that most people surprisingly cannot answer. It would seem a childish notion to consider that we were born to become rich, or to collect amazing quantities of material things. So we see that most of the people who encourage and govern us, and manage the earth's resources, and whom we presently elect and worship are in fact no more than children. When we mature into an adult, we cease to need all of today's toys, and we begin to realise that life has much more meaning than adding a couple of percentage points to a P & L account. We desperately need new leaders, and as we have tried all forms of leadership only to discover that they failed, we had better discover a very different kind of leader. We will begin to lead ourselves. We will draw back all the responsibilities and power that we have delegated to these failed leaders. We will cease to be dependent on the state and big business for our survival. We will withdraw from the cities, as soon as we realise that they are the source of all evil and environmental destruction (probably because they are so far out of line from nature). City people have become ungrounded -- they have completely lost all connection with the spirit that manifested them. Their daily activities and thoughts are unhealthy, and definitely do not show any meaningful reason for their birth. They are exactly what the CIA calls them -- useless eaters. Most of the useless eaters will be unable to find a way of living once their faces are taken off the TV and out of the newspapers. They contribute nothing meaningful to society, and in fact are delaying the evolution of society. The survivors will be those who have developed the necessary survival skills -- those who are able to grow and cook their own food, and educate their own children, and look after their own health. These people will not wake up every morning fretting about money, or spending most of their day being concerned about their coiffure or fashion. They will not spend huge chunks of their time shopping. All of that is far behind us, if only we could realise it. The earth is moving on -- its vibration rate is becoming higher -- it is heating up, along with the rest of the universe, as another step in the evolution of our solar system. If we can get enough intelligent people to align themselves and their lives with nature, then we can use our wisdom to help us to survive -- or else we can continue to talk about the prospects of limited business growth this year. Doh! From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 10 14:10:54 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:10:54 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: Simple Living News - Issue #69 Message-ID: <001001c9a1bc$54677640$fd3662c0$@net> Please forward this to your lists as it offers many insights into moving into the simple sustainable lifestyle as the economic system falls apart. Author Duane Elgin was one of the first to identify the Simple Living Movement and support its growth through his books and articles. -----Original Message----- From: The Simple Living Network [mailto:news at simpleliving.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:32 AM To: news at simpleliving.net Subject: Simple Living News - Issue #69 The Simple Living Newsletter - A User Supported Service March-April 2009 - Issue #69 READ IT ON-LINE AT: www.simpleliving.net ___________________________________________________________ Dear Subscribers & Supporters, Below is the Table of Contents for the March-April 2009 edition of our user supported on-line Newsletter, available ONLY on our web site at: www.simpleliving.net Thanks for taking the time to visit our web site and read this edition at: www.simpleliving.net ___________________________________________________________ IN THIS ISSUE - TABLE OF CONTENTS Complete articles on-line: www.simpleliving.net + TOP DOWN VS. BOTTOM UP By Dave Wampler We are at a turning point. The recession is in full swing. For many, things are getting worse. On the other hand, the raw reality behind the bumper sticker, "Insatiable IS NOT Sustainable," provides a great moment that should be thoroughly embraced. For those of us practicing voluntary simplicity, opportunities have never been greater to share our collective wisdom with a public looking for answers. There is hope! + LIVING SIMPLY IN A LIVING UNIVERSE: A Personal, Civilizational, & Species Choice By Duane Elgin How seeing the universe as living vs. dead drives us to desire simplicity over materialism -- a discussion of ephemeralism, the simultaneous refinement of the material and non-material aspects of life. + THE WORLD HAS CHANGED: Alternatives For Simple Living By Michael Mortvedt The change of leadership in the White House bodes well for the voluntary simplicity movement. + THE ART OF LIVING: In Search Of Simplicity By John Haines Excerpt from "In Search Of Simplicity" -- learning to be content with where you are and what you have now. + RECESSION-PROOF: Voluntary Simplicity As The Key To Living Well Even In A Recession By Gordon Morrow Common-sense rules of voluntary simplicity that help create recession-proof lives. + NEW GUEST SPEAKER CONFERENCE CALLS Simple Living America offers a new member benefit in 2009: free monthly guest speaker conference calls. + GEMS OF THE DISCUSSION FORUMS By Ann Haebig Housing, the Workplace, Food, and More! + LIVING SIMPLY: Boomers Back To Basics By Regina Kessler Thoughts on retiring during a time of economic upheaval -- although financial security is essential for a comfortable retirement, income will not guarantee contentment. + CONSCIOUS FRUGALITY: The Non-Consumer Advocate By Katy Wolk-Stanley The concept of conscious frugality is about buying smart, buying used, buying local and sometimes just not buying at all. + DISCOVERING AN ABUNDANT LIFE: The Picket Line By David Gross A real-life story of purposefully living below the tax line: how less money can create more time. ___________________________________________________________ Complete articles on-line: www.simpleliving.net ___________________________________________________________ New Resources For Simple Living, Money, Investing, Financial Planning & Sustainability + AGENDA FOR A NEW ECONOMY: From Phantom Wealth To Real Wealth -- Why Wall Street Can't Be Fixed + AMERICA'S CHEAPEST FAMILY GETS YOU RIGHT ON THE MONEY: Your Guide To Living Better, Spending Less, & Cashing In On Your Dreams + DREAM. INVEST. LIVE. -- Pioneer The Investment Frontier So You Can Live Your Dream + THE LIVING UNIVERSE: Where Are We? Who Are We? Where Are We Going? -- Special Pre-Publication Offer! + MONEY & FAITH: The Search For Enough -- Includes Study Guides For Groups & Individuals + SAFE MONEY IN TOUGH TIMES: Everything You Need To Know To Survive The Financial Crisis + A STUDY GUIDE FOR GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS: For Use With Your Money Or Your Life (2nd or 3rd Editions) -- Revised & Updated! + THE STUDENT LOAN SCAM: The Most Oppressive Debt In U.S. History & How We Can Fight Back ___________________________________________________________ New Resources For Green Living, Cooking, Gardening & Country Living + 365 EASY ONE-DISH MEALS + ALCOHOL CAN BE A GAS: Fueling An Ethanol Revolution For The 21st Century + THE AMERICAN BOY'S HANDY BOOK: What To Do & How To Do It + CONFESSIONS OF AN ECO-SINNER: Tracking Down The Source Of My Stuff + DINING ON A DIME COOKBOOK: Includes 1000 Money Saving Recipes & Tips + INA MAY'S GUIDE TO CHILDBIRTH + MADE FROM SCRATCH: Discovering The Pleasures Of A Handmade Life + THE NEW SELF-SUFFICIENT GARDNER: The Complete Illustrated Guide To Planning, Growing, Storing & Preserving Your Own Garden Produce + THE ORGANIC GARDENING BIBLE: Successful Gardening The Natural Way + ORGANIC GARDEN DESIGN SCHOOL: A Guide To Creating Your Own Beautiful, Easy-Care Garden + SPIRITUAL MIDWIFERY + STELLA NATURA 2009 CALENDAR: Inspiration & Practical Advice For Home Gardeners & Professional Growers ___________________________________________________________ Complete articles on-line: www.simpleliving.net ___________________________________________________________ THANK YOU CyberAngels! Thank you to all supporting users who have made financial contributions to The Simple Living Network. Without their generous support, this Newsletter would not be possible! ___________________________________________________________ Our Newsletter is subscription free and available only on- line. This synopsis is mailed ONLY to those who have opted- in to our e-mail list. We never rent, lend or sell our list. Instructions for Unsubscribe or Change your e-mail address are below. TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS GO TO: www.simpleliving.net/email *** PLEASE do not respond to this e-mail. It is used only for sending Newsletter notices. Replies are not read. To contact us, please visit our web site. The Simple Living Network, Inc. www.simpleliving.net Providing resources, tools, examples and contacts for conscious, simple, healthy and restorative living. ___________________________________________________________ The Simple Living Network, PO Box 233, Trout Lake, WA 98650 Copyright (c) 2009 The Simple Living Network. All Rights Reserved. From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 10 15:49:35 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:49:35 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: Science for Life - 3 Great shows back to back Message-ID: <001701c9a1ca$1d7bd410$58737c30$@net> From: Spiritcrossing [mailto:info at spiritcrossing.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:23 AM To: maryrose333 at att.net Subject: Science for Life - 3 Great shows back to back Trouble reading this email? Read it online here Hello Friends, We have watched the numbers of listeners grow week after week and I for one am humbled by the feedback we have received. Today I want to give you a heads up about the 3 Great shows that remain in March. Our live call in shows have been extremely popular, but remember all the shows are available 24/7 through our "On-Demand" feature. Wednesday this week we will introduce Gahl Sassoon, author of the new book " Cosmic Navigator ". Gahl brilliantly brings together the science of Astrology with the esoteric teachings of the Kabbalah. In all my years of reading I have not found a clearer more powerful tool for identifying and embracing our spiritual path. You want to be there for this show. Wednesday the 18th we have the privilege of bringing you Gregg Braden and his new book "Fractal Time: The4 Secret of 2012 " and a NEW World Age". The book will be released March 17th and you can pre-order today and be the first to enjoy Gregg's newest Best Seller. I know you will join us to talk with Gregg. Wednesday the 25th Carol Ritberger will join us for an hour of your calls to interact with Carol and her remarkable sight. As a teacher of Medical Intuition and multi-book best selling author (" Healing Happens With Your Help ") with Hay House, Carol has a world wide audience and reputation for her health readings as well as her gift as a teacher. 3 weeks left in March - 3 Great shows that will remain with you for a lifetime. www.ScienceforLife.net 9:00 AM Pacific, 12:00 Noon Eastern or 24/7 On Demand Love and light, This message was sent from Spiritcrossing to maryrose333 at att.net. It was sent from: Spirit 2000, SpiritCrossing P.O. Box 11736 , Murfreesboro, TN 37129-0035. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Email Marketing Software To be removed click here -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Tue Mar 10 16:20:45 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:20:45 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: [globalnetnews-summary] To Feel Lucky as Collapse Progresses / Tom Friedman's Awakening Message-ID: <001f01c9a1ce$78297e90$687c7bb0$@net> More and more people are finally "getting it". -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:58 AM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] To Feel Lucky as Collapse Progresses / Tom Friedman's Awakening (To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary) To Feel Lucky as Collapse Progresses / Tom Friedman's Awakening http://culturechange.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id =350&Itemid=1 by Jan Lundberg 09 March 2009 Culture Change Letter #240 - Slow collapse is what we need, if possible. As bad as this seems, "So far so good." The kind of fast collapse from a massive interruption in oil supplies is much harder to handle. The system is teetering on many levels, and there are uncertainties, but fall it will. Many people around the world are hurting, but not those who have a secure connection to a fruitful, healthy land base belonging to their community. In the U.S., where the Census no longer has a designation for "Farmer" for lack of numbers, the food charities are stressed from unprecedented demand, while foreclosures and firings mean homelessness for some. And in a minimum-community culture, there's nowhere to go -- in the 1930s' Great Depression a room could be had in a relative's farmhouse out in the country. What we need is somewhere to go in our minds: a vision of better living and liberation. It's time to take John Lennon's advice and "Imagine." Are we really so unlucky if the cars go away, and we get back to local community living? That's the direction we're heading in. When we hear so-called leaders' messages to the contrary, their business-as-usual programming threatens to delay the people from waking up from passivity. Somehow, as useless as the dinosaurs of never-ending growth are, it feels as if patience with their disappearance from dominance is harmless enough. A nonviolent revolution is the idea, even if people who will be starving by the hundreds of millions -- if there's valid concern for the effects of climate disruption and petrocollapse -- will not do so quietly. Meanwhile, instead of preparing for the real future, faith in employment and Big Brother means droves of citizens are flocking back to college -- to compete for jobs on the Titanic rather than get skills that are not necessarily taught in colleges. Does clinging to a crumbling structure or sinking ship make sense when it's more and more clear that getting what we need from the usual paycheck and latest investment bubble is becoming pass?? When the food supply is severely threatened by droughts? How many consumers have discovered that the food supply can dry up in a few days from an oil-market crisis having to do with the end of oil-powered world trade, now that we've hit peak oil? The food riots several months ago are destined to return more widely and magnified, toppling governments and corporations. It will be an overpopulation in panic -- not a pleasant thought, so it is buried along with reports like Culture Change's. The grid will go down. What man has built is idiotic if it can't last. To assume we need it is to sign up for thousands of years of nuclear waste, mercury poisoning from burning coal, as "renewable energy" has only a supplementary role when applied to the grid. The technotopia of renewables looks like it has been curtailed (f it was ever on track) due to the financial meltdown. The end of the techno-dream of clean energy for a huge consumer economy will also be due to the rusting, giant petroleum infrastructure. Get ready for small scale energy uses that are simply part of keeping ourselves warm and growing and cooking food, based on proven traditions without shopping at big box stores. Dealing with collapse proactively is getting all the more urgent, and that includes realizing that the talking heads have been hopelessly invested in a broken system that was painful and wrong from the get-go. Fortunately, one of them must have had a revelation or had the equivalent of some psychedelic trip: Tom Friedman of the New York Times has woken up. In last weekend's column "The Inflection Is Near?" he has come around to the basic position Culture Change has maintained for two decades. The column has brilliance, and he's talking to smarter people now. Unlike his economist colleague Paul Krugman, Friedman now sees limits to the Earth's capacity to give up resources and be polluted, and thus a new direction is indicated as of 2008. Several people have sent the column to me, including a long-time reader of Culture Change who has differed with me over the technofix: "Friedman?s beginning to sound like you!" Here it is, with my only quibble afterwards: The Inflection Is Near? By Thomas L. Friedman March 7, 2009 Sometimes the satirical newspaper The Onion is so right on, I can?t resist quoting from it. Consider this faux article from June 2005 about America?s addiction to Chinese exports: FENGHUA, China ? Chen Hsien, an employee of Fenghua Ningbo Plastic Works Ltd., a plastics factory that manufactures lightweight household items for Western markets, expressed his disbelief Monday over the ?sheer amount of [garbage] Americans will buy. Often, when we?re assigned a new order for, say, ?salad shooters,? I will say to myself, ?There?s no way that anyone will ever buy these.? ... One month later, we will receive an order for the same product, but three times the quantity. How can anyone have a need for such useless [garbage]? I hear that Americans can buy anything they want, and I believe it, judging from the things I?ve made for them,? Chen said. ?And I also hear that, when they no longer want an item, they simply throw it away. So wasteful and contemptible.? Let?s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it?s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall ? when Mother Nature and the market both said: ?No more.? We have created a system for growth that depended on our building more and more stores to sell more and more stuff made in more and more factories in China, powered by more and more coal that would cause more and more climate change but earn China more and more dollars to buy more and more U.S. T-bills so America would have more and more money to build more and more stores and sell more and more stuff that would employ more and more Chinese ... We can?t do this anymore. ?We created a way of raising standards of living that we can?t possibly pass on to our children,? said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks ? water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land ? and not by generating renewable flows. ?You can get this burst of wealth that we have created from this rapacious behavior,? added Romm. ?But it has to collapse, unless adults stand up and say, ?This is a Ponzi scheme. We have not generated real wealth, and we are destroying a livable climate ...? Real wealth is something you can pass on in a way that others can enjoy.? Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year ? more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world?s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit. ?Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we?re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,? argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: ?Mother Nature doesn?t do bailouts.? One of those who has been warning me of this for a long time is Paul Gilding, the Australian environmental business expert. He has a name for this moment ? when both Mother Nature and Father Greed have hit the wall at once ? ?The Great Disruption.? ?We are taking a system operating past its capacity and driving it faster and harder,? he wrote me. ?No matter how wonderful the system is, the laws of physics and biology still apply.? We must have growth, but we must grow in a different way. For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let?s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks. Gilding says he?s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea?s new national paradigm for development is called: ?Low carbon, green growth.? Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes ? and we?re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways. In the meantime, says Gilding, take notes: ?When we look back, 2008 will be a momentous year in human history. Our children and grandchildren will ask us, ?What was it like? What were you doing when it started to fall apart? What did you think? What did you do?? ? Often in the middle of something momentous, we can?t see its significance. But for me there is no doubt: 2008 will be the marker ? the year when ?The Great Disruption? began. Friedman sees more than an inflection or deviation from the economy's course; he is implying a culture change. He is experiencing his own inflection in awareness, and at this rate he will give up on the growth paradigm for good. He's on the verge of truly redefining growth, but he may not understand yet that "clean power" is not the salvation of the consumer economy. The Great Disruption he speaks of will continue to inflect Friedman and the rest of us until we see what kind of society(ties) survive collapse, and we start living -- instead of trying to make a killing or tolerating others who try (as "Father Greed") to do it. From maryrose333 at att.net Sat Mar 7 13:00:36 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:00:36 -0800 Subject: [GJM] IMPORTANT FW: Cool re CYCLED housing! Message-ID: <010c01c99f5f$6509f270$2f1dd750$@net> Robynne, thanks for sending this. Yes, it is cool and we need to think of more creative ideas re: housing. However, one of the things we absolutely must do is to STOP USING WOOD taken from our old growth and rainforests in order to build homes, furnishings, and other buildings including commercial units. 2009 - Living in Paper (Papercrete) offers one solution. www.livinginpaper.com/ Then we can use hemp to make all kinds of things for our homes, including a very strong particle board designed for many uses. I understand Lexus is now using hemp to make the dashboards of their cars. http://www.ecomall.com/biz/hemp.htm With straw bale used as an insulator in this metal grain storage unit, or used on the exterior and then stuccoed, it would be much cooler in summer and warmer in winter than if conventional insulation material was used. Even better if the insulation was composed of hemp straw. From: W. Robynne McWayne [mailto:wrmcwayne at hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:41 PM Subject: Cool re CYCLED housing! I might cut a few more windows, or would that ruin the "effect"? Then there's the heat in summer in Texas? _____ From: lhbouchard at hotmail.com Subject: FW: this is incredible!! (UNCLASSIFIED) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:02:08 -0800 > KITCHEN: > BEDROOM: > ENTRY: > BATHROOM: > This place seems very modern, perhaps like something you'd see in a > swanky highrise condo or townhome near the city, right? BUT. > HERE'S THE INCREDIBLE PART!!... > This 1 bedroom loft apartment was built inside a 1940's grain silo. > It was renovated into this upscale unit after it was purchased and > relocated to the grounds of the Gruene Homestead Inn in New Braunfels, > TX in 2007. > If that's not creative craftmanship, then I don't know what is! > I couldn't help but share this because it is so cool! _____ Windows LiveT Contacts: Organize your contact list. Check it out. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 15845 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 18723 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 17414 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 13222 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 13297 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 17736 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image007.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 16269 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image008.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 20833 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image009.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 20562 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image010.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 23362 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Sat Mar 7 15:02:03 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:02:03 +0000 Subject: [GJM] what is BO doing and why? Message-ID: <49B2EEDB.90003@gn.apc.org> *Op-Ed Columnist, New York Times, Miracles Take Time: BOB HERBERT.* ** *Published: March 6, 2009* Barack Obama has only been president for six weeks, but there is a surprising amount of ire, anger, even outrage that he hasn't yet solved the problems of the U.S. economy, that he hasn't saved us from the increasingly tragic devastation wrought by the clownish ideas of right-wing conservatives and the many long years of radical Republican misrule. This intense, impatient, often self-righteous, frequently wrongheaded and at times willfully destructive criticism has come in waves, and not just from the right. Mr. Obama is as legitimate a target for criticism as any president. But there is a weird hysterical quality to some of the recent attacks that suggests an underlying fear or barely suppressed rage. It's a quality that seems not just unhelpful but unhealthy. Mr. Obama is being hammered --- depending on the point of view of the critics --- for the continuing collapse of the stock market, for not moving fast enough to revive the suicidal financial industry, for trying to stem the flood tide of home foreclosures, for trying to bring health insurance coverage to some of the millions of Americans who don't have any, for running up huge budget deficits as he tries to fend off the worst economic emergency since World War II *From EcoTort:* ...I reckon it might be because he is being seen as linked with the ashkeNazis and therefore possibly as part of the crew who are responsible for the problems we face in the world today, (caused by fraudulent, criminal, banking practices?) it's probably not a conscious thought yet for most people, but I think something is brewing... Whatever can it be? Could it be a world domination plot?? if so, WHAT ARE THEY LIKELY TO BE PLOTTING??? If we can assume that "they" are not stupid... (after all, they seem to have most of the rest of us running around in circles...!) then we can assume that they are acting /in their own self interest.../ (as we all tend to do...) and that they need to be */healthy/*, and that therefore *it is in their own self interest to have a healthy environment to live in....* What I really cannot understand is WHY for the Love of God/, for hundreds of years, / "they" have been consistently financing wholesale CRIMINAL damage and destruction of our common environment WHICH THEY AND THEIR CHILDREN ALSO HAVE TO LIVE IN... ? ! and, EVEN NOW, why are "they" TOTALLY REFUSING to finance any of the many REALLY constructive solutions.... WHICH ARE READILY AVAILABLE IN THE WORLD TODAY...??? maybe: "they" are waiting for the right moment when we all actually WANT to care for our Planet and for eachother... or maybe: "they" are going to bankrupt the global transportation system next week... within 1 week people in cities are fighting for food within 2 weeks there are food stations with FREE CHIPS (ie, you don't get any foods unless you get CHIPPED>>!) who knows? what are the odds?? can "they" be trusted? can OB be trusted?? one thing is for sure we need to work together to look after our planet AND money is IRRELEVANT it Is virtual ! and of no REAL consequence *TIE* ALL MONEY TO *REAL *RESOURCES then it can be trusted as a means of exchange when it is cheaper to import carrots from another country than to grow them at home THERE IS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH THE "ECO"NOMY ! ! ! *GLOBAL PERMACULTURE RULES OK!* *WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY ! ! ! * ORIGINAL MESSAGE: whatnowgop wrote- .hmmessage P { PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px } BODY.hmmessage { FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana } Op-Ed Columnist > *New York Times > Miracles Take Time > BOB HERBERT* > ** > *Published: March 6, 2009* > > Barack Obama has only been president for six weeks, but there is a > surprising amount of ire, anger, even outrage that he hasn't yet > solved the problems of the U.S. economy, that he hasn't saved us from > the increasingly tragic devastation wrought by the clownish ideas of > right-wing conservatives and the many long years of radical Republican > misrule. > > This intense, impatient, often self-righteous, frequently wrongheaded > and at times willfully destructive criticism has come in waves, and > not just from the right. Mr. Obama is as legitimate a target for > criticism as any president. But there is a weird hysterical quality to > some of the recent attacks that suggests an underlying fear or barely > suppressed rage. It's a quality that seems not just unhelpful but > unhealthy. > > Mr. Obama is being hammered --- depending on the point of view of the > critics --- for the continuing collapse of the stock market, for not > moving fast enough to revive the suicidal financial industry, for > trying to stem the flood tide of home foreclosures, for trying to > bring health insurance coverage to some of the millions of Americans > who don't have any, for running up huge budget deficits as he tries to > fend off the worst economic emergency since World War II and for not > taking time out from all of the above to deal with --- get this --- > earmarks. > > Earmarks. > > More than 4.4 million jobs have been lost since this monster recession > officially got under way in December 2007, and we've got people > wigging out over earmarks. Folks, get a grip. Some earmarks are good, > some are not, but collectively they account for a tiny, tiny portion > of the national budget --- less than 1 percent. > > *Freaking out over earmarks is like watching a neighborhood that is > being consumed by flames and complaining that there is crabgrass on > some of the lawns.* > > In the midst of the craziness, conservatives are busy trying to blame > this epic economic catastrophe --- a conflagration of their own making > --- on the new president. Forget Ronald Reagan and George Herbert > Walker Bush and George Herbert Hoover Bush and the Heritage Foundation > and the Club for Growth and Phil Gramm and Newt Gingrich and all the > rest. The right-wingers would have you believe this is Obama's downturn. > > The bear market would no doubt have magically turned around by now, > and those failing geniuses at the helm of our flat-lined > megacorporations would no doubt be busy manufacturing new profits and > putting people back to work --- if only Mr. Obama had solved the > banking crisis, had lowered taxes on the rich, had refused to consider > running up those giant deficits (a difficult thing to do at the same > time that you are saving banks and lowering taxes), and had abandoned > any inclination that he might have had to reform health care and make > it a little easier for ordinary American kids to get a better education. > > As the columnist Charles Krauthammer was kind enough to inform us: > "The markets' recent precipitous decline is a reaction not just to the > absence of any plausible bank rescue plan, but also to the suspicion > that Obama sees the continuing financial crisis as usefully creating > the psychological conditions --- the sense of crisis bordering on > fear-itself panic --- for enacting his 'big-bang' agenda to federalize > and/or socialize health care, education and energy, the commanding > heights of post-industrial society." > > That's a more genteel version of the sentiment expressed a couple of > weeks ago by the perpetually hysterical Alan Keyes, a Republican who > was beaten by Mr. Obama in the Illinois Senate race in 2004. "Obama is > a radical communist," said Mr. Keyes, "and I think it is becoming > clear. That is what I told people in Illinois, and now everybody > realizes it's true." > > I don't know whether President Obama's ultimate rescue plan for the > financial industry will work. He is a thoughtful man running a > thoughtful administration and the plan, a staggeringly complex and > difficult work in progress, hasn't been revealed yet. > > What I know is that the renegade clowns who ruined this economy, the > Republican right in alliance with big business and a fair number of > feckless Democrats --- all working in opposition to the interests of > working families --- have no credible basis for waging war against > serious efforts to get us out of their mess. > > Maybe the markets are down because demand has dried up, because many > of the nation's biggest firms have imploded and because Americans are > losing their jobs and their homes by the millions. Maybe a dose of > reality is in order, as opposed to the childish desire for yet another > stock market bubble. > > Maybe the nuns in grammar school were right when they counseled that > patience is a virtue. The man has been president for six weeks. TOU UNSUBSCRIBE FROM ECOTORT, PLEASE SEND A MESSAGE WITH "REMOVE" IN THE SUBJECT LINE... THANK YOU :-) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Sat Mar 7 17:50:07 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:50:07 +0000 Subject: [GJM] [Fwd: The AshkeNazis] Message-ID: <49B3163F.7040500@gn.apc.org> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/7926780.stm > > The letters editor of the Daily Mail, London, seems to take a perverse > > pleasure in occasionally allowing publication of Forbidden Subjects. > > It's a drop in the ocean, but it lends plausibility to the notion of a > > 'free press.' > > On 6 March 2009, the following letter was published: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------?????------ > > Promised Land > > .....Any serious history book of the region states that the indigenous > > people of this land, whom we now call Palestinians, lived there for > > hundreds of years before the creation of the state of Israel. > > A more interesting fact, which is now coming to light, is that the > > Ashkenazi Jews have no historical ties with Palestine - and the Romans > > didn't expel the Jews from Palestine, contrary to claims. Rather, as > > Israeli historian Shlomo Sand has recently shown, Ashkenazis are > > converts to Judaism originally in Central Asia. > > If the Romans didn't expel the Jews, what happened to them? According > > to Sand, they converted in small numbers to Christianity and in large > > numbers to Islam after the Ara conquest of the seventh century. In > > other words, the Palestinians of today are the descendants of the > > Hebrews of Roman times..... > > -Prof. Samer Madanat, > > Berkeley University, San Francisco, U.S. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------?????------- > So then what exactly IS the so-called Israeli-Palestinian conflict. > It's not even a civil war of Jews fighting Jews. > It's really a collection of Germans (Ashkenazi = German converts to > Judaism) dispossessing and murdering the original Hebrew race who > mainly converted to Islam in the days of Mohammed ! > Human beings are so terribly amusing. ======================================== ======================================== It's not an exact science. (They say now that even mathematics is not an exact science.) But we need to start thinking about this as being the overall, general, approximate truth: - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------?---------------- The Israelis = a Germanic / Slavic race that converted to Judaism and has no racial or historical ties with Palestine. The Palestinians = largely the descendants of the original Hebrew race, descendants of Abraham, Solomon, David, who converted mainly to Islam in the seventh century AD. Zionism = a simple ploy by the invisible global ruling group to maintain control over the entire human population by arranging permanent inter-tribal wars, on entirely false pretexts. The bottom line: The Zionist doctrine that the original inhabitants of Palestine were given that land by God and have the right to reclaim it now is farcical, because the original Hebrews NEVER LEFT PALESTINE but converted to Islam and today the original Jews ARE THE PALESTINIANS. The ONLY purpose of Zionism was and is WAR, permanent war, sucking in the entire global population, so that we never see the invisible ruling group pulling all our strings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------?------------------ From ecotort at gn.apc.org Sun Mar 8 05:00:28 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:00:28 +0000 Subject: [GJM] Goodbye farmers markets and roadside stands Message-ID: <49B3A54C.2060908@gn.apc.org> Goodbye farmers markets, CSAs, and roadside stands The "food safety" bills in Congress were written by Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc. All are associated with the opposite of food safety. What is this all about then? In the simplest terms, organic food and a rebirth of farming were winning. Not in absolute numbers but in a deep and growing shift by the public toward understanding the connection between their food and their health, between good food and true social pleasures, between their own involvement in food and the improvement in their lives in general, between local food and a burgeoning local economy. Slow Food was right - limit your food to what comes from your region and from real farmers, and slow down to cook it and linger over it with friends and family, and the world begins to change for the better. And as we face an unprecedented economic crisis, and it is hard to be sure what has value, one thing that always does is food. Which is why the corporations are after absolute control over it. But what obstacles to a complete lock on food do they face? All the people in this country who are "banking" on organic farming and urban gardens and most of all, everyone's deepening pleasure in and increasing involvement with everything about food. Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands. Those are things we not only all want, but things we are actively getting involved in, and things we very much need. And where they are truly good, they are growing . The international financial corporations which have wreaked havoc around the world with astounding nonsensical "solutions" that are destructive of everyone but them, are brothers to the international agribusiness giants (Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc.) which are just as aggressively after their own form of "taking." Just seeds, animals, water, land. And freedom. Because human beings are by in large good and by in large incredibly resilient and clever, and left to their own devices - that is, free - they would handle this gargantuan financial stupidity the corporations brought us with NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT and all other globalized schemes (which they hope to eventually top off with CODEX). How? By being productive in real ways and locally. And farming is the solid ground under that. Farmers produce something of real value (something we used to take for granted), and from that base, businesses grow up. Local markets, local food processors, local seed companies, local tool and supply companies, local stores ... and an economy based on reality and something truly good for us, too, begins to grow. So, look again at what has been exciting us - Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands. - and realize that they are not only wonderfully healthy but fun and naturally community building. And more, they are a real economy and deeply democratic - and just at a time we need something that works economically, that supports our democratic rebirth, and that protects food itself and our easy access to it. And it is all those things that threaten the corporations ... which is why we now have these massive "fake food safety" bills in Congress. Everything is going under thanks to these fools, and they wish to be there like vultures to make sure that every drop of blood that can be sucked out of our resources and us, is theirs. To wit, they must get rid of such good and innocent things and yet truly powerful things as: Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands. And how will those who contaminate our country's food with pesticides, hormones, antibiotics and more, do that? Why, by setting standards for "food safety" that are so grotesquely and inappropriately and even cruelly applied to a local, independent farmers and ranchers that there is no way they can manage. Imagine your being faced with a 100 page IRS form and facing a million dollar a day penalty for screwing up. That would be in the ball park of the impossible complexity mixed with threat facing our farmers. Imagine having the government and corporations deciding every single thing you can do and must do in your kitchen and backing that up with the threat of 10 years in prison for screwing up - though you have never made anyone sick, and those corporations have. Imagine being surveilled 24 hours a day by GPS tracking devices that feed into ... a corporate data bank, one they have now moved out of the country so no one here can have legal access to see what is in it. Imagine the devil himself - or a whole boardrooms of them, dressed in suits - defining the only safe and healthy food in this country as dangerous and burdening hard working farmers with more work then anyone could bear, while his own, their own, food is so dangerous at this point that in the last 10 years alone, diabetes has gone up 90% . And how did they get this far with such a scheme to apply insane industrial standards to every farm in the country? Through fear of diseases and of outbreaks of food borne illnesses, both of which they cause themselves. How it works: Tyson helps Bill Clinton get into office. Bill Clinton immediately and significantly lowers contamination standards for poultry as a thank you. And it is such contaminated waste from transnational poultry factories which is now implicated as the source of bird flu . Then fortunes on made on that fear. And then poultry industry uses the crisis they created to push out small farmers and take greater control than ever. Their mantra? Biodiversity not only be damned but be eliminated. And get rid of those damn farmers who protect it while we're at it. The bills would require such a burdensome complexity of rules, inspections, licensing, fees, and penalties for each farmer who wishes to sell locally - a fruit stand, at a farmers market - no one could manage it . And THAT is the point. The whole dirty tricks point. The whole "be in tight control of everything needed for survival because it'll be worth a fortune" point. So, if you like farmers markets, local farmers, fresh milk, fresh eggs, vegetables stands, and freedom, let your friends know that it's all on the line right now with those "fake food safety" bills brought to us with well-planned evil and more of it to come, by Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc. Slow Food reminds us of just where we need to be (and notice how much would help any local economy): *TO BE REMOVED FROM THE 'ECOTORT' LIST * *PLEASE SEND A MESSAGE WITH 'REMOVE' IN THE SUBJECT LINE THANK YOU * * * A banker is a person who will lend you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but who wants it back when it starts to rain ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Mon Mar 9 13:20:13 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:20:13 +0000 Subject: [GJM] "Miracle" water a low-cost alternative cleaner to harsh chemicals Message-ID: <49B56BED.7090907@gn.apc.org> *"Miracle" water a low-cost alternative cleaner to harsh chemicals* *February 27, 2009, /Seattle Times/Los Angeles Times/* http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/living/2008791573_magicwater27.html It's a kitchen degreaser. It's a window cleaner. It kills athlete's foot. Oh, and you can drink it. The elixir is real. U.S. regulators have approved it. And it's starting to replace the toxic chemicals Americans use at home and on the job. The stuff is a simple mixture of table salt and tap water whose ions have been scrambled with an electric current. Researchers have dubbed it electrolyzed water. *Some hotel workers are calling it "el liquido milagroso," the miracle liquid. That's as good a name as any for a substance that scientists said is powerful enough to kill anthrax spores without harming people or the environment.* Used as a sanitizer for decades in Russia and Japan, it's slowly winning acceptance in the United States. For more than 200 years, scientists have tinkered with electrolysis, the use of an electric current to bring about a chemical reaction. That's how we got metal electroplating and large-scale production of chlorine, used to bleach and sanitize. It turns out that zapping saltwater with low-voltage electricity creates a couple of powerful, nontoxic cleaning agents. Sodium ions are converted into sodium hydroxide, an alkaline liquid that cleans and degreases like detergent, but without the scrubbing bubbles. Chloride ions become hypochlorous acid, a potent disinfectant known as acid water. *"It's 10 times more effective than bleach in killing bacteria,"* said Yen-Con Hung, a professor of food science at the University of Georgia, Griffin, who has been researching electrolyzed water for more than a decade. "And it's safe." *Note:* For more on this fascinating product, click here . -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Sun Mar 8 05:05:44 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:05:44 +0000 Subject: [GJM] GOOD NEWS!! Citizens Win Huge Supreme Court Victory over Big Pharma and the FDA Message-ID: <49B3A688.6080505@gn.apc.org> Citizens Win Huge Supreme Court Victory over Big Pharma and the FDA Thursday, March 05, 2009 Byron Richards, CCN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMAIL PRINT RSS SHARE In a stunning and unexpected 6-3 ruling the right-leaning Supreme Court went against the wishes of the last president, took the wind out of the sails of health care reform of the current president, sent irresponsible Big Pharma a major wake up call, and bluntly told the arrogant FDA that they are indeed not above the rule of law. It is a major victory for every American citizen. Central to the issue is a power a struggle between the federal government and states, which in this situation meant the federal government authority to pre-empt your state rights to sue if you are injured by a drug. The FDA, acting on behalf of the Bush administration and on the side of Big Pharma, has helped tie up thousands of drug injury lawsuits across the country. The FDA, who is supposed to be protecting consumers from drug injury and ensuring a correct risk/safety picture for any person taking a drug, was instead trying to shirk their responsibility and simply claim that Americans had no right to sue. This convoluted attempt by the FDA to undermine consumer safety was one of the main themes in my 2006 book, Fight for Your Health: Exposing the FDA's Betrayal of America . The Bush Administration had intentionally appointed anti-safety people in high positions within the FDA, starting with its Chief Counsel, Daniel Troy (and continued as a legal philosophy after Troy was forced out for his Big Pharma connections). Troy set in motion the legal problem the Supreme Court just decided. During the final years of the Bush administration cancer industry insider Andrew von Eschenbach, MD, was appointed to run the FDA, and Wall Street insider, Scott Gottlieb, MD, was second in command. These individuals sought to fully implement the FDA label as senior to any rights of citizens. Their intention was to make sure that new biotech drugs would be protected from lawsuits, as the FDA wanted to speed new and even more dangerous drugs onto the market so as to foster the development of the biotech industry. In essence, the FDA management wanted to turn the American public into one large clinical experiment, with no right of recourse when injured. This was occurring against a backdrop wherein the FDA couldn't even name all the drugs currently on the market, had failed to demand required aftermarket follow up safety testing on drugs, and had intentionally withheld safety information on existing drugs from the public. The current situation with drugs is that almost no drug, even blockbusters and those in use for decades, have an accurate risk/benefit profile. Americans who use medications are already taking risks of unknown magnitude, which is a main reason over 100,000 Americans are killed every year and over 3 million are injured so seriously they need hospital care (ironically, over half those injuries occur while already in the hospital). The FDA knows full well that when a drug is approved for the market the full extent of the side effects won't be known for years. History shows us time and again that Big Pharma actively hides risk data from the FDA and pays for "science" that distorts reality. This irresponsible behavior goes along with closed-door negotiations with the FDA, and has resulted in numerous drug disasters like Vioxx. FDA managers oftentimes go against the wishes of their own safety scientists and then move on to six figure salaries in the industry they regulate. Doctors are not apprised of the actual risks and consumers are in the dark. Currently, there are 450,000 additional new cases of heart failure every year in Americans over 65, a fact that parallels the increased use of heart-weakening statins in this older group. It is only a matter of time before the shoe drops on the 20-billion-dollar-a-year statin industry. The FDA insistence that a drug label, based on what is known at the time of approval, should supersede citizen's states rights to sue if they were injured, has almost nothing to do with consumer safety. Rather, it is a federal power grab that is in the best financial interests of Big Pharma and Big Biotech, industries that do not have consumer safety as their top priority. By the way, don't think President Obama is on the side of the citizens. In the health care section of the stimulus bill, there is specific pre-emption language. If the federal government is in charge of health care it will be named in future lawsuits when patients are injured from the care it doles out or doesn't allow. The current Supreme Court ruling will undermine any system of federal health care wherein the drugs being used are injuring people. Experts believe this system is so badly broken, due to gross FDA management incompetence, that it will take 10 years of studies and many billions of dollars just to understand the actual risks of the drugs Americans are already taking. In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens put Big Pharma on notice. The defendant in this case, Wyeth, had argued that it could not comply with both federal and state law. Stevens told them they had a fundamental misunderstanding of regulation and were trying to hide behind the FDA, going on to say that it is a central premise of federal drug regulation that the manufacturer bears responsibility for the content of its label at all times. That is not the news Big Pharma wanted to hear. Stevens went on to write that there was no merit in the argument that the FDA's labeling decisions could supersede state law, saying that this argument was "an untenable interpretation of congressional intent and an overbroad view of an agency's power to pre-empt state law." He pointed out that the FDA tried to push this on the public without any opportunity for comment from the public or from states, all done against a backdrop wherein the FDA is not able to keep up with safety issues in the first place, meaning that the FDA position lacked "thoroughness, consistency and persuasiveness." Stevens stated that under such lacking standards the Bush position "is entitled to no weight." This is a major victory for all Americans and for states. While the case itself is on the topic of Big Pharma and the FDA, the ruling is sweeping in nature and will extend far beyond prescription drugs. States have just been handed a major legal ruling against the ever-growing incursion of federal power. ### In celebration, receive a *FREE copy of the book "Fight for Your Health "* with ANY Wellness Resources order placed through Sunday, March 8! In your shopping cart be sure to click on "Add Free Book". -- -- www.rejenx.com/SelectYourMembership.aspx ID 4282 - Holy Tea Cleanse www.prosperitea.com Whole Wellness Club (click upper right corner) - LIBERTY in Our Lifetime! www.PlanetaryRepublic.com www.CampaignForLiberty.com - Nancy and Earle...Planetnews 949-200-7335 land 800-889-7372 toll-free __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3915 (20090306) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maryrose333 at att.net Mon Mar 9 22:45:38 2009 From: maryrose333 at att.net (mary rose) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:45:38 -0700 Subject: [GJM] FW: Say hello to the unemployable Message-ID: <000501c9a13b$11e6a380$35b3ea80$@net> I rather imagine that most of these people are making mega bucks either as Tatoo Artists themselves, or else they are in the drug trade doing the same, not having been able to find a decent paying job in other fields. Statistics show that 30% of all men under age 30 are currently living at home with their parents, unable to find a paying job that will permit them to live on their own. Which is quite possibly the reason that the people of the United States consume 40% of the world's illegal drug production with only 5% of the world's population. We have a tremendous pain problem and are in great need of healing. And, as Dr. Deepak Chopra was heard to say: "Religion certainly isn't helping - if it was we would all be well by now." m r From: BOB TAFT [mailto:rbtaft at rtconnect.net] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:35 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Fw: Say hello to the unemployable Have you ever...? Best regards, Bob Taft The Taft Ranch Upton, Wyoming (307) 465-2206 http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=74897 " There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves". Will Rogers From: Jack Peach Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:11 PM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:; Subject: Say hello to the unemployable Does the word "unbelievable" begin to do justice? Is it any wonder that it gets tougher to think we can get out of the mess we're in? Why can't I get a job? cid:1.3396191647 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:2.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com ?cid:3.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com? pe..jpg" SRC="aoladp://MA23319580-0004/ATT00003.jpe.jpg"> cid:4.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:5.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:6.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:7.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:8.3396191648 at web81708.mail..mud.yahoo.com cid:9.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:10.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:11.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:12.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:13.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud..yahoo.com cid:14.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:15.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:16.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:17.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com Isn't Subway hiring?? cid:18.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:19.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:20.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:21..3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:22.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com I'd hire her. .. . no bitching cid:23.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:24.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:25.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:26.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com cid:27.3396191648 at web81708.mail.mud.yahoo.com dee massage & reiki crystal healer & jewellery artisan www.relaxworx.com www.icraft.ca/zilberbliss www.zilberbliss.blogspot.com/ Your greatest strength is love. _____ _____ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1992 - Release Date: 03/09/09 19:20:00 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 23694 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 54158 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 42500 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 72150 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 57769 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 43956 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 52381 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 85247 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 46976 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 70700 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 108919 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 53158 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 93881 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 109471 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 94911 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 58634 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 82690 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 48445 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 47830 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 92901 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 125524 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 114542 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 62731 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 78646 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 83191 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 70871 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 97894 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ceasig at gmail.com Tue Mar 10 01:30:18 2009 From: ceasig at gmail.com (Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion & Governance) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:00:18 +0530 Subject: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury Message-ID: <31f677a30903100030t6cd7a593v6f450849fd146c0e@mail.gmail.com> Thanks a lot Mary for sharing the info about the Satanic cult that has dominated the US administration. It is unfortunate that people associated with Prophet Moses genealogically have forgotten the central command against usury. It is time that all Jewish and Christians brothers, sisters and elders get united against usury. Usury is at the core of the problem for the 'recession' that is ecologically benevolent. Halting the pace of expansion of ecologically hostile habitats fueled by atheistic neo-liberal globalization of Satanic economic ,political and cultural thinking appropriating usury was very much needed . Vatican's approval for Islamic banking is a historical event.Let us celberate ecologically benvolent recession with more and more of prayers for guidance to more and more men and women globally. Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:19 AM, mary rose wrote: > This is a very, very good article by David Icke. Please read it and take > it seriously. In rioting, they win we lose. The power of our mind is the > most powerful thing there is, so please join one of the coherence groups and > meditate with them for peace. Your thoughts are energy waves that go out > through the Universe and are powerful enough to create change especially > when done in large enough groups. Keeping the peace is the reason I get so > upset about the accusations against immigrants whether legal or illegal. In > keeping the peace, I don?t mean getting run over by those who seek to do > this. What keeping the peace means is keeping one?s cool and helping others > In the community to keep their cool. We need to avoid incidents that can > suddenly turn into riots which bring out the police. It?s about acquiring > and using social intelligence. It?s OK to rock the boat, in fact, it?s a > necessity, but just do it in positive ways. Start raising your own food, > seek out naturapathic doctors whenever possible and opt out of the Big > Pharma run medical institution. Get a bicycle and keep your car off the > road as much as possible. Don?t travel unless it?s absolutely necessary. > Get a sewing machine and learn to make your own clothes, knit sweaters, > gloves, etc. Stop living to eat and begin eating to live. Stop being a > consumer. > > > > With love and appreciation for all that we do together. m r > > *From:* Nance ~ [mailto:planetnews8 at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, March 08, 2009 12:40 AM > *Subject:* PLEASE DON'T RIOT ... By David Icke > > > > > > *PLEASE* DON'T RIOT ... > > ... IT'S JUST WHAT '*THEY'* WANT > > *'What you fight, you become.' - David Icke* > > *By David Icke* > > As I travel around America it is clear that this country is on the brink of > an economic catastrophe the like of which it has never seen. And, of course, > it is not alone. A similar story can be told around the world. > > The foreclosure figures are fantastic as families and others lose their > homes through no fault of their own on a scale that, according to current > projections, is destined to become a tidal wave. > > The credit explosion was orchestrated through Illuminati agents and > Satanists like Alan Greenspan, who represents the interests of the > Illuminati's Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral > Commission and other far more exclusive and sinister secret societies. > > Greenspan was the long-time head of the privately-owned 'US central bank', > the Federal Reserve. Once his policies had manipulated as much personal and > commercial debt as possible the plug was pulled on the system to trigger > what is designed to be global economic meltdown. > > Greenspan, who led 'the Fed' under Reagan, Father Bush, Clinton and Boy > Bush, operates at a deeper level within the Illuminati network than most of > their public figures, and I was told by a former Satanist, an unofficial > offspring of the Rothschild family, how he remembered Greenspan at sacrifice > rituals he attended: > > *'I can recall the Rockefellers and the Bushes attending rituals, but > never having the supremacy to lead them. I still regard them as lackeys and > not real brokers of occult power. Except for Alan Greenspan, most of these > fellows were camp followers in the occult, primarily for the economic power > and prestige. Greenspan, I recall, was a person of tremendous spiritual, > occult power and could make the Bushes and the younger Rockefellers cower > with just a glance.'* > > This, then, is the man who was controlling the United States economy from > 1987 to 2006 and who, as planned, oversaw the insane economic policies that > led to the current global collapse. Go to another level of understanding and > you can see that Greenspan and other Illuminati place-men throughout the > world knew exactly what they were doing and what the outcome was planned to > be. > > Zionist Greenspan got out just before the true scale and consequences of > his manipulation came to light. It has been left to others, including his > Zionist successor at the 'Fed', Ben Shalom Bernanke, to offer the > 'solutions' to the problems that Greenspan and his like created. All of > these 'solution' people are controlled by the same force that was, and is, > behind Greenspan. This is why Obama has named blatant insiders to his > 'economic team' who were fundamentally culpable in the very collapse they > have been appointed to 'address'. > > The Zionists Tim Geitner, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker etc., who are all > stalwarts of the same Bilderberg Group-Council on Foreign > Relations-Trilateral Commission network as Greenspan, have no intention of > finding a 'solution' that will benefit the people of America or anywhere > else. > > Neither does Obama's Budget Director, the Zionist Peter R. Orszag. It was > Orszag who advised the Russian finance ministry at the time when Zionist > oligarchs were raping the Russian economy and stealing its resources and he > was a financial advisor to the Icelandic central bank just before the > Iceland banking system crashed. Great 'choice', Barack. > > During the Clinton administration, Orszag worked with Obama's White House > Chief of Staff, the ultra-Zionist Rahm Emanuel, on imposing the NAFTA 'free > trade' agreement that has cost incredible numbers of American jobs - exactly > as planned. Emanuel served in the Israeli army and is the son of a terrorist > with the notorious Irgun, one the terror groups which bombed Israel into > existence after World War Two. It was Emanuel who said after Obama's > election: 'You never let a serious crisis go to waste'. > > Emanuel, a cold and vicious piece of work, is directly controlling Obama > and the White House in league with senior White House advisor, the Zionist > David Axelrod, who ran the puppet 'president's' election campaign and > oversees the writing of the speeches that he reads from the teleprompter > screens. > > *Emanuel: Obama's puppeteer* > > *Axelrod: Obama's voice on the teleprompter screens* > > At least most of 'Obama's' economic place-men are fundamentally connected > to the Zionist Robert E. Rubin, the Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton, > who oversaw financial deregulation that led ultimately to the current > crisis. Rubin recently resigned from Citigroup after encouraging the > policies that led the company to the brink of collapse. In January 2009, > Rubin was named by *Marketwatch* as one of the '10 most *un*ethical people > in business' and his proteges and close associates are now running the US > economy under Obama. > > Another massive blow to economic confidence came when the Zionist hedge > fund crook, Bernard Madoff, revealed that he'd 'lost' $50 billion of his > clients' money. He says he acted alone. No bloody chance. Other financial > disasters which have collapsed the markets include American International > Group (A.I.G.), the insurance giant headed by the Zionist, Maurice > Greenberg. It has just announced losses of $61.7 *billion* for the final *three > months* of 2008 - the biggest quarterly loss in corporate history. > > Greenberg is extremely close to the Zionist Henry Kissinger, one of the > Illuminati's most vociferous global manipulators of the last 50 years. > Kissinger was appointed chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in > 1987. > > *Zionist Kissinger with Zionist Greenberg. Anyone see a common theme > building here?? * > > Are all these people just breathtakingly incompetent? No, no, no. Their > role for the cabal is to destroy the economy and America in general by, > among many other things, triggering the financial crisis and then wasting > staggering amounts of borrowed money - *trillions* of dollars - to ensure > that there is no way back. > > A US TV ad apparently said that if you spent a million dollars a day *every > day* from the alleged birth of 'Christ' to today you would still not spend > as much as Obama is spending in borrowed money in his 'stimulus' package - > let alone the other fantastic sums on top of that to 'bail' the banks. > > They have worked super-fast, using fear and the Obama hype as their > weapons, to throw more petrol on the fire in the full knowledge that this > will make matters worse, not better. Bush's 'bail out' of the banks has > disappeared from the radar with nothing to show for it and now Bush Mark 11, > Mr Change, is fronting up the spending of another three trillion. > > The biggest recipient of bail-out money has been Maurice Greenberg's A.I.G, > which has been given $180 billion in borrowed money that the American > taxpayers, and their children, are now responsible for repaying. Rubin's > Citigroup is in for $50 billion of borrowed 'government' money. > > The idea is not only to collapse the American economy, but to throw so much > money at the problem (the banks mostly) as quickly as possible so that the > response options of the government are zero by the time the economy really > crashes on the scale that is planned. > > The same is being orchestrated around the world, as we see in Britain where > the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is also hurling borrowed money at the > banking system only for the situation to go on getting worse. Brown was > Chancellor of the Exchequer, in charge of the country's finances, right > through the Blair years when he pursued policies that mirrored those of > Greenspan. > > Now the man who was a major cause of the banking crisis in the UK is asking > us to believe that he is the 'saviour' of the financial system. That's like > a guy smashing someone around the head with a baseball bat and then claiming > to be a hero for driving the fellah to hospital. But these people have no > shame. > > The global economic collapse is designed to trigger a stream of 'benefits' > to the Illuminati agenda. One, as I have said from the start, is to use this > as an excuse to impose a global economic dictatorship controlled by a world > central bank. But there are many other 'solutions' and connected 'benefits' > that are planned to be exploited and we need to be streetwise to them. > > The one I want to emphasise here is the need to stay calm and react > peacefully to what is happening. This is not easy when there is so much > stress and fear around with regard to the economic present and 'future', but > we need to do it all the same or we will walk straight into a massive trap > that has been set for us. > > Let's get this straight: They *want* you to riot in response to the > unfolding economic catastrophe and we are already seeing people falling for > this. > > *Riots in France over economic conditions* > > Why would the authorities want people to riot? Readers of my books over the > years will see the answer immediately. They want an excuse to bring in a > fully-fledged Police State all over the world and people who riot in their > desperation (instigated invariably by agent-provocateurs) are just the > excuse they are looking for. > > *Be very, very aware of anyone who starts rioting, or encourages others to > do so, amid peaceful demonstrations. Who are they and why are they doing > this when it is handing all the aces to the system to impose a Police State? > They are either stupid or agents of that State.* > > Regular readers of my newsletters will recall the one about the UK traffic > warden who was suddenly given new cards authorising him to do the work of > the police and to enter property without permission. His job was supposed to > be just handing out tickets for illegal parking and so on. His boss would > not discuss why these new cards were being issued, but a police officer > friend explained all to him. > > The officer said the government was preparing well ahead of time for a > coming 'war', during which they were expecting mass protests and rioting in > the streets. The police and the *military* were going to be so focussed on > dealing with this that other uniformed professions, like traffic wardens, > private security guards, CCTV operators and many others, were going to be > brought forward to do the work normally done by the police. > > Soon after the traffic warden approached me, the government announced that > his profession was being re-designated 'civil enforcement officers', thus > disconnecting them from their sole role of dealing with traffic. A few > months later the government announced plans for a new group called > 'accredited persons' - private security guards, CCTV operators and many > others who would be given authority to do some of the work currently > confined to the police. > > The officer told the traffic warden about a 'war', and that is planned for > sure at some point. But the excuse of the war could also have been a > cover-story for those people who were needed to work on the preparations, > but were not to know the real reason behind it. That real reason, as we can > now see, could include economic rioting after the financial collapse that > the Shadow People have long known was coming because they were going to > cause it - although, I stress again, a war is also being engineered > involving the 'West', China and Russia. > > I have been stressing this point about the plan to stir up civil unrest and > rioting whenever I can and now the insiders are beginning to put that > thought into the public mind. 'There could be riots' is designed to > communicate the theme subliminally of 'go out and riot'. It is the simple > power of suggestion masquerading as 'concern'. > > And who should do just that than Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the > Illuminati Trilateral Commission and one of the chief mentors and > controllers of Barack Obama. I won't call him 'President' Obama any longer > until he produces a birth certificate to prove he is eligible for the post. > Brzezinski told MSNBC: > > *'... there's going to be growing conflict between the classes and if > people are unemployed and really hurting, hell, there could be even > riots!'* > > No, Mr. Brzezinski, you *know* there are going to be riots because the > network you represent is going to do everything it can to make them happen. > More and more we are seeing this theme appearing from representatives of the > State. The U.S. Army War College has made the same warnings in a document > called *Known Unknowns: Unconventional 'Strategic Shocks' in Defense > Strategy Development*. > > It said the military must be prepared for a 'violent, strategic dislocation > inside the United States', in the light of 'unforeseen *economic > collapse'. *Unforeseen?? You must be joking. The document talks of > 'purposeful domestic resistance', 'pervasive public health emergencies' or > 'loss of functioning political and legal order'. It goes on: > > *'Widespread civil violence ... would force the defense establishment to > reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human > security. An American government and defense establishment lulled into > complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly > divest some or most external security commitments in order to address > rapidly expanding human insecurity at home.* > > *Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military > force against hostile groups inside the United States.' * > > As the traffic warden, now 'civil enforcement officer', found out, this is > precisely what they are planning in the UK and the same will be the case in > every country because they are all controlled by a world-wide web > orchestrating a global agenda. The War College document said that the > Department of Defense would be the 'enabling hub' for the 'continuity of > political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or > disturbance'. > > Put that through the Orwellian Translation Unit and you get 'the military > will control the country'. This has all been planned for a long, long time > as I and others have been warning all these years, and the 'hostile groups' > the document talks about will be anyone who is challenging the > political/military dictatorship in any way, even verbally. > > In the light of this, you won't be surprised to know that the US military > is currently seeking to spend another $6 million on 'riot equipment'. > > Dennis C. Blair, Obama's Director of National Intelligence and Trilateral > Commission member, has also said that the economic crisis could create civil > unrest in the United States and around the world. He said the crisis was > 'regime-threatening' if it continued over one or two years and this > manufactured crisis is designed to be much bigger and longer than that. In > the simple language that he seems to find so hard to summon, Blair says that > there is a greater chance of war during economic turmoil and there's no > doubt they have just that planned in the wake of what is happening now. > > Other establishment figures who have warned of unrest and rioting include > the heads of the World Trade Organisation and the International Monetary > Fund, both Illuminati organisations to their core, and anyone who heads them > will be, by definition, gofers for the cabal. > > In the UK, yet again confirming the validity of the traffic warden story, > the head of the police branch dealing in public order has warned of a > possible 'Summer of Rage' over rising unemployment and the economic crash. > Superintendent David Hartshorn of London's Metropolitan Police said that > 'known activists' were planning to exploit the situation to mount mass > protests and he pointed to the G20 Summit in London in April as a likely > target, along with banks. > > The London *Sunday Express *has also reported that UK police and > 'security' services are preparing to deal with rioting and 'the chilling > prospect of soldiers being drafted on to the streets has not been discounted > ....' > > *Riots in Greece* > > Mass protests around the world are no longer simply predictions because > they are already happening and, with the global economy yet to collapse on > anything *like* the scale it is intended to, we have seen nothing yet. > Some 120,000 people demonstrated in Dublin over the handling of the economic > crisis in Ireland, a million protestors have been on the streets in France, > UK oil refinery and power station workers launched a series of strikes in > protest at the use of foreign workers, and the riots across Greece late last > year were partly economic in nature. > > *Albert Pike* > > I can encapsulate what is going on here with part of a letter alleged to > have been sent in 1871 by Albert Pike, a Sovereign Grand Commander of the > Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in America, to Giuseppe* *Mazzini, the > Illuminati 'revolutionary' in Italy. In this letter, Pike is said to have > detailed the background to three world wars the Illuminati was planning to > bring about their global dictatorship. The first two happened as he > predicted and this is what he said about the third: > > *'The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the > differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the > political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic World. The war must be > conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political > Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the > other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight > to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical > exhaustion ....* > > *... We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke > a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to > the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the > most bloody turmoil. * > > *Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the > world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of > civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose > deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, > anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, > will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure > doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This > manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will > follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and > exterminated at the same time.'* > > Click here for more background ... > > Many dismiss the letter as a myth, but in the context I am using it that > doesn't matter. What it says is what is planned - an economic and social > catastrophe in which the people turn on themselves in their engineered > desperation and all morality is submerged in a mass battle for perceived > survival. > > The term 'nihilism', used in the Pike letter, has this dictionary > definition: > > * Rejection of all distinctions in moral or religious value and a > willingness to repudiate all previous theories of morality or religious > belief. > > * The belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions > is necessary for future improvement. > > That pretty much sums it up, really, and this is why they want people to > riot all over the world to destroy the existing order, which, yes, the > Illuminati created, but they now seek to replace that with the next stage of > their tyranny - total global control. This means that national governments > and nation states must be destroyed to allow a world government to assume > its dictatorship. > > Look at that definition of 'nihilism' again in the light of this: 'The > belief that destruction of existing political or social institutions is > necessary for future improvement.' > > *'Rioter' and police dealing with the 'rioter' - all wearing the same > police-issue boots. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.* > > Already waiting in the wings are the agent provocateurs and the useful > idiots primed to start the riots and civil unrest that the idiots believe to > be challenging the existing order. But the existing order was created by the > same network of Illuminati families that are seeking to create the 'new > order', the New World Order, which is planned to emerge from the turmoil and > chaos they are now engineering. > > To achieve this, as always, they need our cooperation and let no-one be in > any doubt that those who choose to riot and loot in response to what is > happening, and encourage others to riot and loot, are walking straight into > the trap that has been laid for them. The government and military agent > provocateurs will know that, the useful idiots will not, but it is time they > did. > > I have met few more concrete-minded or naive people than those that are > termed the extreme end of the political 'Left'. They have been played like a > violin for hundreds of years to change the world in the image of the > Illuminati blueprint in violent revolutions to bring down the established > order. Now they are being gathered again to complete the journey to global > tyranny and provide the violence and chaos that is designed to open the way > to a world government, world army, world central bank, world electronic > currency and a microchipped population connected to the global positioning > * *satellite* *system, or GPS, among many other technologies of > surveillance and control. > > The riots and looting they want to see, the chaos, will be met with the > installation of a Police State with curfews, jail without trial, the > military on the streets, and the activation of the concentration camps for > 'dissidents' that we have long warned about. They are officially called > 'military installations', run by FEMA, the deeply-sinister Federal Emergency > Management Agency, and it is no coincidence, of course, that a bill numbered > H.R. 645 is passing through Washington 'to direct the Secretary of Homeland > Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations'. > No, *concentration camps*, and other countries will have them prepared > also. > > Look at what that War College document said: 'Under the most extreme > circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile > groups inside the United States.'* Might*? It's a certainty because that's > the plan and all the laws are in place to allow them to do it. They have > been passed by governments around the world as 'anti-terror' legislation, > but they use the terms 'terror' and 'terrorist' in such a non-specific way > that all these laws can be applied to the entire population of the country > that the 'laws' were supposed to protect according to their advocates. > > It was all a gigantic con, as some of us tired of pointing out. It had > nothing to do with terrorists who are alleged to plant bombs and so on. All > these laws have been put into place with the specific goal of controlling > the mass of the people through a Police State when they triggered an > economic collapse, together with new wars. > > Add to all this a stream of presidential executive orders signed by > successive presidents without oversight by either the House of > Representatives or the Senate. These are unconstitutional and make the > president a virtual dictator. Click hereto see the powers that the State can activate, thanks to these orders, when > martial law is declared. > > This is why Obama's Zionist Svengali, the White House Chief of Staff Rahm > Emanuel, is seeking to have gun ownership curtailed - to make the military > takeover easier. Meantime, more people are seeking to be armed and requests > for concealed weapon permits in Florida alone are up 42 per cent in 45 days > with the consequences of the economic turmoil in mind. > > *The military on the streets of Iraq. How long before the same is seen on > the streets of America and elsewhere*? > > The only way to stop all this is not to react as they want us to, with > violence and hostility to both the State and each other. How many violent > revolutions have led to just another tyranny, official or unofficial, to > replace the one that fell? It has to be so because what is destroyed by > violence will be replaced by the same energy. As I have said in my books, > what you fight, you become. > > John Lennon put it perfectly when he sang: > > *You say you want a revolution > Well, you know > We all want to change the world > You tell me that it's evolution > Well, you know > We all want to change the world > But when you talk about destruction > Don't you know that you can count me out ...* > > *... You say you got a real solution > Well, you know > We'd all love to see the plan > You ask me for a contribution > Well, you know > We're doing what we can > But when you want money > for people with minds that hate > All I can tell is brother you have to wait* > > *Revolution* (1968) ... click here to watch ... > > Martin Luther King also put it brilliantly when he said of rioting: > > *'The limitation of riots, moral questions aside, is that they cannot win > and their participants know it. Hence, rioting is not revolutionary but > reactionary because it invites defeat. It involves an emotional catharsis, > but it must be followed by a sense of futility.'* > > Those are the words of a revolutionary who succeeded through peaceful > non-cooperation. Yes, they killed him, but what he created through > non-violence and determination went forth to end segregation. Physical life > does not matter when compared with what is *right*, for we are all eternal > Conciousness having an illusory experience and the greatest illusion is > death. > > I would much rather die 'early' doing what I knew to be right than to eek > out a few more illusory years as a slave to a tyranny. > > But there is no need even for that to bring an end to this nonsense. There > are billions of people being enslaved and a comparative handful doing the > enslaving. Er, I think I see a way out of this. > > We need to come together in mutual support, love, kindness and empathy. We > need to put aside the manufactured fault-lines that divide us - religion, > politics, race, culture and income bracket. That is not to say people have > to reject their beliefs, just don't let them be weapons of division. > > We are all in this together and we need to meet the challenge together, not > steal from each other, loot or riot, or look the other way because something > happening to someone else is 'not my problem'. They are not seeking to > enslave Muslims, Jews, black people, or white middle class Americans and so > on. They are seeking to do it to *all *of us and they are picking off > different groups one by one, just like the Nazis did in Germany. Remember > these famous words because they are so applicable now: > > *First they came for the Jews and I was not a Jew so I did nothing. > Then they came for the communists and I was not a communist so I did > nothing. > Then they came for the trade unionists and I was not a trade unionist so I > did nothing. > Then they came for me and there was no-one left to speak out for me.* > > Let us unite behind that which affects *everyone* - the loss of our most > basic freedoms. And if this is being planned now, what kind of world are our > children and grandchildren going to live in? Can you live with that thought > while doing nothing or rioting as the authorities want? I can't. > > We need to start getting organised in communities and groups to support > each other and stop *cooperating* with the system - not to fight it. The > system can only exist with our cooperation and acquiesce. We are holding it > together. They have their men and women of violence, called the military and > 'Swat' teams, to deal with violent resistance. > > But their worst nightmare is our *non-cooperation* - the refusal to pay > taxes; refusal to leave homes when banks foreclose on them; refusal to > 'comply' with our own enslavement in any form. The system couldn't cope if > this was done on a mass scale. And that's the point: to do this we need to > do it en-masse and those not immediately affected need to support those who > are. > > Instead of compliance, we need the *non*-comply-*dance* of people who beat > to a different drum and will not comply with what is unfair, unjust, or > targets their freedom and the freedom of others. This approach does not > refuse to comply in a spirit of hostility, rage or violence, but with love, > joy and laughter - and an *unbreakable* determination not to cooperate > with their own enslavement. > > We need a mass refusal join the military, especially if they try to > introduce the Draft; a refusal to do the *compulsory* 'community service' > for young people that Obama's controllers want to introduce (as does the UK > government); and a refusal to join, or accept the legitimacy of, Obama's > planned civilian security force, which is nothing more than a scam to get > the people to police the people on behalf of the Elite in the midst of the > economic collapse and war. > > We need to start getting together local currency schemes that can operate > outside the system and, yes, people should also have mass protests if they > choose, so long as they are peaceful. But they need to be *part* of the > campaign of non-violent, non-cooperation, not the focus of it. > > How many mass protests have there been over the years around the world and > yet everything just goes on as before, be it war or globalisation. We need > to stop posturing and then heading for the bar to feel good about ourselves > and start doing what will actually make a difference. > > *Mass protests can ease frustration - steam whistles as I call them - but > what good do most of them do? Mass non-cooperation with the system is far > more effective. * > > The protests need to be targeted at non-cooperation, refusing to accept > laws that ban assembly by massive numbers turning up; surrounding the homes > of neighbours when the bank bailiffs come to put them on the street; and so > filling the locations of government and finance with masses of people that > the system cannot function. Workers who provide essential services to > government, police and financial institutions etc., can refuse to do so > until Orwellian laws and financial injustice are removed. In this way the > perpetrators are affected, not the mass of the people, as with all-out > strikes. > > And all of this needs to be good humoured and strictly *peaceful*. > > I would say this also to those in uniform. You may think you have power, > but you are just pawns in the game like anyone else. *You* don't have the > power, your *uniform* does, because that is an extension of the State. > Those inside are just there to animate the uniform and do the bidding of > those it represents. When you are useful to the cabal they'll praise you and > when you are surplus to their requirements as part of the bigger agenda > they'll show you the door. > > You have children and grandchildren, too, who will have to live in the > world you are policing into existence by 'following orders' and believing > the manipulative nonsense fed to you by governments and cabal 'training' > fronts like the UK-based Common Purpose. *Wake up* from the trance and > stop building a Police State for your *own* children and grandchildren - > and everyone else. Think about the consequences for those you love of what > you are doing - and *stop doing it*. > > More than anything, we all need to free our minds and become conscious. > >From that, everything else will come, including the intuition, inspiration > and *knowing* that will guide us on how most effectively to deal with what > we face. > > If there are many things you would like to do in a room, but the room is > dark and you can't see, what is the fundamental first step to *anything > else* happening? You have to turn on the light and then all the rest > becomes possible. Without that you are thrashing around in the dark and > falling over the furniture. > > That is what 'humans' are doing today and have been for so long. They have > been manipulated to believe they are their bodies and their names when those > are just the experiences of who they truly are - eternal Consciousness. As > the great American comedian, Bill Hicks, said: > > *'... all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, we are > all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There's no such > thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of > ourselves.'* > > The divisions between us are illusory to allow a certain kind of > experience, but these illusions have been exploited mercilessly to divide > and rule us. > > *ENOUGH!* > > When we awaken to the truth of who we are the world looks very different > and so do the challenges that are put before us - or we put before > ourselves. Move your point of observation and everything changes. Try it. > Try ceasing to identify who you are with your body, your name and the > reflection in the mirror. Try seeing those things as experiences and not who > you are. Try observing your life and the world from the perception of the > *real* you - eternal Conciousness, All That Is, Has Been and Ever Can Be > in our illusion called 'time'. > > Eternal Conscious in awareness of itself doesn't riot; it is not violent > and it doesn't loot. But nor does it ever do, or accept for itself and > others, what is not fair, just, loving and kind. Crucially, Consciousness is > without fear. When we operate on that level then we can truly claim to be > Conscious and not trapped in the illusion called Mind. As Albert Einstein > said: 'You cannot solve problems with the same level of consciousness that > created them.' > > John Lennon also made this key point in *Revolution* about what needs to > happen to really make a difference. We need to free our minds and become * > Conscious*: > > *You say you'll change the constitution > Well, you know > We all want to change your head > You tell me it's the institution > Well, you know > You better free you mind instead > But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao > You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow * > > We are now fast heading for the eye of the storm that has been planned for > so long to enslave the global population in a centralised tyranny. But we > don't have to accept it or acquiesce to it, meekly looking on as the walls > of control close in by the day. > > But that is what is happening and it *has to stop*. For *everyone's sake*, > it has to stop. > > We can come together, we *MUST* come together, putting aside the > fault-lines of race, religion, culture and income bracket. These are just > illusory labels through which we are divided and therefore ruled. Believe in > them if you wish, and enjoy them if they make you happy, but don't let them > divide us any longer. > > We need to come together in mutual support at this time as those with sick > minds and closed hearts are poised to throw everything at us to complete > their agenda for total control. Whether their insanity prevails is not in > *their* hands, but in *ours*. It is *we* who have the power if only we > would choose to use it. > > We are One Consciousness deluded into thinking we are 'little me'. When we > realise that we are all One - and act upon that with courage, love, > kindness, peace and empathy for all who need support - the walls of > oppression must fall. > > But sitting on your arse hoping it will all go away is no longer an option. > > > It never was. > ------------------------------ > > *See DavidIcke.com for constantly updated information on the world as it > really is.* > > www.DavidIcke.com/Headlines > > > > > -- > -- > www.rejenx.com/SelectYourMembership.aspx > ID 4282 > - > Holy Tea Cleanse > www.prosperitea.com > Whole Wellness Club > (click upper right corner) > - > LIBERTY in Our Lifetime! > www.PlanetaryRepublic.com > www.CampaignForLiberty.com > - > Nancy and Earle...Planetnews > 949-200-7335 land > 800-889-7372 toll-free > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net > > http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net > > -- Endeavoring for ecological safety ,social inclusion and distributive justice for the renewable resource based livelihoods and habitats, Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion and Governance (CEASIG) , an initiative of Labour League Foundation, Sewa and Sufi Trust , Delhi aims for socially inclusive and ecologically safe future for all through organizing and communicating fcarbon neutral neighborhood discussions/ consultations, building capacities in ecological audit, ecologically safe networking ,advocacy, interfaith dialogue & other related domains for multiplying personal, community , governmental and corporate actions for ecologically safe education, ecological audit ,and, ecologically safe and socially inclusive governance best practices -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Tue Mar 10 12:39:05 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:39:05 +0000 Subject: [GJM] Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations Message-ID: <49B6B3C9.50005@gn.apc.org> Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12596 http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=12671 HR 875 The food police, criminalizing organic farming and the backyard gardener, and violation of the 10th amendment. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12596 Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations (DVB-T) By Dr. Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam and Dr. Christine Aschermann and Dr. Markus Kern Global Research , March 7, 2009 /The following text written as an open letter to president Obama by three prominent German physicians provides details on the adverse health effects of digital broadcasting. / *OPEN LETTER *Bamberg, February 12, 2009 *To the President of the United States of America To the Citizens of the United States of America To the Members of the House of Representatives To the Members of the Senate Warning Against Adverse Health Effects from the Operation of Digital Broadcast Television Stations (DVB-T) *Dear President Obama: Dear Members of the House of Representatives: Dear Members of the Senate: Dear Citizens of the United States of America: In the US, digital broadcast television is scheduled to start operating on February 17, 2009. We write to you today because we wish to save you from the significant negative health consequences that have occurred here in Germany. In Germany, analog broadcast television stations have gradually been switching to digital broadcast signals since 2003. This switchover first took place in metropolitan areas. In those areas, however, the RF exposures in public places as well as at home continued to increase at the same time. As a result, the continuing declining health status of children, adolescents, and adults in urban areas could not be attributed to any single cause. On May 20, 2006, two digital broadcast television stations went on the air in the Hessian Rhoen area (Heidelstein, Kreuzberg), which until recently had enjoyed rather low mobile phone radiation exposure levels. Within a radius of more than 20 km, the following symptoms that occurred abruptly were reported: constant headaches, pressure in the head, drowsiness, sleep problems, inability to think clearly, forgetfulness, nervous tensions, irritability, tightness in the chest, rapid heartbeat, shortness of breath, depressive mood, total apathy, loss of empathy, burning skin, inner burning, leg weakness, pain in the limbs, stabbing pain in various organs, weight increase. Birds had fled the area. Cats had turned phlegmatic and hardly ever went into the garden. One child committed suicide; a second child tried doing it. Over time the same unbearable symptoms showed up in other locations---most recently in Bamberg and Aschaffenburg on November 25, 2008. Physicians accompanied affected people to areas where there was no DVB-T reception (valleys, behind mountain ranges) and witnessed how these people became symptom-free only after a short period of time. The respective agencies responsible in Germany were approached for help, but they declined to follow up on the strongly suggestive evidence in the actual locations. The behavior of the government agencies disregards the fundamental rights of affected people guaranteed in the German Constitution. In Germany, DVB-T (Digital Video Broadcasting Terrestrial) uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex Modulation. The fundamental principle of this type of modulation works by spreading the information across several thousand carrier frequencies directly adjacent to each other. A channel is 7.8 MHz wide. The amplitude also changes constantly. The WHO, the German Radiation Protection Commission, and the German Federal Ministry of the Environment rely on the Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz), (Health Physics 74 (4): 494-522; 1998) published by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). In this document, it says: p. 495: "These guidelines will be periodically revised and updated as advances are made in identifying the adverse health effects of time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields." p. 507: "Interpretation of several observed biological effects of AM electromagnetic fields is further complicated by the apparent existence of "windows" of response in both the power density and frequency domains. There are no accepted models that adequately explain this phenomenon, which challenges the traditional concept of a monotonic relationship between the field intensity and the severity of the resulting biological effects." Why are the German agencies in charge not willing to help identify the adverse health effects? Since immediately, after digital broadcast television stations had started transmitting, adverse health effects have occurred, the review of the Guidelines announced by the ICNIRP is imperative. Obviously, there are response windows contained within the broad frequency bands with their several thousand frequencies that change constantly and whose amplitude also changes constantly. The ICNIRP had already pointed out this possibility. In 1992, Dipl.-Ing. R?diger Matthes, member of ICNIRP and of the Geman Radiation Protection Agency (BfS), emphasized the preliminary status of the exposure limits in a hearing on the health risks of electromagnetic radiation: "...They (electromagnetic exposure levels) are several orders of magnitude higher than the natural background radiation levels of nontechnical sources...In parallel to this development, findings of scientific studies according to which long-term exposure to such fields may trigger adverse health effects keep accumulating....In this context, it is also important to recognize that there are large differences in exposure levels within a given population. A small child, for example, absorbs much more RF energy than an adult person...There are several findings on low-level exposures, which are considered scientifically validated because they have been reproduced often but which are rather difficult to interpret. The impact of mostly pulsed or ELF modulated RF radiation on cell metabolism, for example, counts among them. It has been observed that the efflux of certain ions (e.g. calcium) from a cell increases during exposure to such fields. The occurrence of this effect is described almost completely independent of the actual field strength. It can be found at extremely low absorption levels....With all the currently available scientific findings, there remain some crucial questions unanswered. ...There are gaps in the so-called body of evidence. That means that the biological effects, for example, have only been investigated for individual frequencies. Data (e.g. effect thresholds) on the various biological effects across the entire frequency spectrum are not available. The exposure limits, therefore, are based on an approach that greatly simplifies the very complex reality whose details are unfathomable. It should also be noted that concrete data on possible effects of long-term exposures are mostly lacking." Real life teaches us that it was wrong to simplify. In Germany, we see strong evidence of a direct temporal association between the start-up of terrestrial digital broadcast television and the occurrence of severe health symptoms. Dr.-Ing. W. Volkrodt, former R&D engineer at Siemens, recognized the danger of electromagnetic fields for humans, animals, and plants. He pinned his hopes on policymakers who would listen to reason when he wrote in 1987: "Future historians will refer to the RF dilemma during the period from around 1975 to 1990 as a short, time-limited 'technical incident.' Owing to the introduction of fiber optic technology, this incident could be remediated quickly and effectively." Satellites and cable provide the US population with television services. By contrast, the risk associated with terrestrial digital broadcast television transmitters is unacceptable. We, therefore, ask you, dear Mr. President, who has the wellbeing of his citizens at heart, to stop the scheduled introduction of this new technology in the United States of America and to save the people from the negative health consequences that have occurred in our country. Dr. med. Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Dr. med. Christine Aschermann Dr. med. Markus Kern http://d.scribd.com/docs/1a34bitqwcergnuko29s.txt Dr. med. Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam Founding Member of the Bamberg Appeal Dr. med. Christine Aschermann Neurologist-Psychotherapy Founding Member of the Freiburg Appeal Dr. med. Markus Kern Psychosomatic Medizin Founding Member of the Physicians Appeal Allg?u-Bodensee-Oberschwaben ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article. To become a Member of Global Research The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor at yahoo.com www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner. For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com ? Copyright Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam, Global Research, 2009 The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=12596 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ? Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia ? Copyright 2005-2007 *TO BE REMOVED FROM THE 'ECOTORT' LIST * *PLEASE SEND A MESSAGE WITH 'REMOVE' IN THE SUBJECT LINE THANK YOU * * * A banker is a person who will lend you his umbrella when the sun is shining, but wants it back when it starts to rain ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ecotort at gn.apc.org Wed Mar 11 04:44:16 2009 From: ecotort at gn.apc.org (EcoTort Theatre) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:44:16 +0000 Subject: [GJM] Positive Potential in the demise of our financial base.... Message-ID: <49B79600.1080707@gn.apc.org> One of the things we need to understand about the present economy is that the external costs, that is the costs to the environment, which have been for many years excluded from the retail price of products sold, are so extensive that were they included none of us would be able to afford the product, e.g., our home, our car, the beef we eat along with other meats, our appliances, etc. The only thing that our work has produced is wages (which many refer to as slave wages) that enable us to enjoy an artificial way of life that is completely unnatural. Yet, the very sad part of this is that we consider what we are doing normal. For a very long time now, but mainly from the beginning of the Industrial Age, we have taken from the Earth and let these external costs pile up unabated as we continued our party. Now these external costs are coming due in the form of ecological collapse and global climate change. And, we are running on empty. And it may well be that the only thing that is going to save us, as pointed out in this article is the economic collapse which will force us into living a sustainable lifestyle if we want to continue on here on Earth as the Human Family. -----Original Message----- From: globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net [mailto:globalnetnews-summary-owner at lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of TradingPostPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:22 PM To: globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing "The survivors will be those who have developed the necessary survival skills -- those who are able to grow and cook their own food, and educate their own children, and look after their own health. These people will not wake up every morning fretting about money, or spending most of their day being concerned about their coiffure or fashion. They will not spend huge chunks of their time shopping." Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing 03 March 2009 We are now beginning to hear predictions of even less growth, and the likely length of the depression increasing. It's a little unfortunate that the only people who can get a word into the newspapers or onto the television, are in fact prime candidates for being helped by the men in white coats. All they succeed in doing is causing confusion amongst those of us who are in the process of evolving into a more sensible human being. The old "modern" paradigm has lived its life -- bring on the new paradigm. The nearest parallel I can think of was when Imperial China was taken over by Maoist China. Could the people who were around in those times have predicted such dramatic change? Absolutely no way, but here is one of hundreds of similar examples -- things do change. The modern era has been dominated by business, and profit has become the sole reason for some people to live. They are so locked inside the box that they are not even aware that they are living inside a paradigm, and as a result are completely unable to imagine a different one. These are the people who are eventually destined to be classified as insane, just as those are today who continue to declare that the earth is flat. Sane people would not base the on-going survival of the human species on a foundation of business having infinite growth. There are many alternative foundations for life, and the most likely suggestions to succeed are those alternatives that are aligned with nature. In the new paradigm, deeper truths will be recognised. Our scientists and philosophers will be telling us that we are a part of nature, and not master of it -- we do not own the earth -- it owns us. Let's not look upon the demise of our financial base as a bad thing. In fact it can be turned into a very good thing. It gives us the opportunity to walk away from our present destructive way of life, and to actually DO something about the earth's environmental problems. We are being told that it's already too late, but as the saying goes, it's never too late. However, certainly now is the time. We do not own the earth, despite what we are told by various governments and real estate agents. We have been given an opportunity to manifest a body which can stay here for a while, but if we abuse that privilege then we are delaying our own personal and spiritual evolution. We must wake up to the fact that our lifestyles have become lazy, unhealthy and pointless, and as we suck the earth's energy instead of using our own, each one of us is unable to fulfill our true potential. We will soon start to wonder why we were born -- a question that most people surprisingly cannot answer. It would seem a childish notion to consider that we were born to become rich, or to collect amazing quantities of material things. So we see that most of the people who encourage and govern us, and manage the earth's resources, and whom we presently elect and worship are in fact no more than children. When we mature into an adult, we cease to need all of today's toys, and we begin to realise that life has much more meaning than adding a couple of percentage points to a P & L account. We desperately need new leaders, and as we have tried all forms of leadership only to discover that they failed, we had better discover a very different kind of leader. We will begin to lead ourselves. We will draw back all the responsibilities and power that we have delegated to these failed leaders. We will cease to be dependent on the state and big business for our survival. We will withdraw from the cities, as soon as we realise that they are the source of all evil and environmental destruction (probably because they are so far out of line from nature). City people have become ungrounded -- they have completely lost all connection with the spirit that manifested them. Their daily activities and thoughts are unhealthy, and definitely do not show any meaningful reason for their birth. They are exactly what the CIA calls them -- useless eaters. Most of the useless eaters will be unable to find a way of living once their faces are taken off the TV and out of the newspapers. They contribute nothing meaningful to society, and in fact are delaying the evolution of society. The survivors will be those who have developed the necessary survival skills -- those who are able to grow and cook their own food, and educate their own children, and look after their own health. These people will not wake up every morning fretting about money, or spending most of their day being concerned about their coiffure or fashion. They will not spend huge chunks of their time shopping. All of that is far behind us, if only we could realise it. The earth is moving on -- its vibration rate is becoming higher -- it is heating up, along with the rest of the universe, as another step in the evolution of our solar system. If we can get enough intelligent people to align themselves and their lives with nature, then we can use our wisdom to help us to survive -- or else we can continue to talk about the prospects of limited business growth this year. Doh! _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3923 (20090310) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From brock_moore at accountant.com Wed Mar 11 09:27:44 2009 From: brock_moore at accountant.com (Brock Moore) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:27:44 -0500 Subject: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury Message-ID: <20090311152744.1E840326778@ws1-8.us4.outblaze.com> The word "interest" is not synonymous with "usury." They are not synonymous in modern languages, nor were they synonymous in the ancient Semitic languages. So the scriptual prohibitions against usury, in both the Bible and Koran, are not prohibitions against interest. Interest can be usurious, as can other financial arrangements. But it is not necessarily usurious. This is from a scholar at an American Islamic website: http://www.submission.org/islam/interest-usury.html "The Quran forbids usury, not interest. Quite a few states in USA have laws against usury. Usury is defined as excessive interest. A Dictionary defines usury as 'an excessive or inordinate premium for the use of money borrowed', 'extortionate interest', or 'the practice of taking exorbitant or excessive interest.' The Arabic language also makes distinction between interest (Fa'eda) and usury (Reba). The Quran forbids Reba or usury." Which is perfectly consistent with the modern Jewish and Christian perspectives on the matter: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/jones.usury "John Calvin's letter on usury of 1545 made it clear that when Christ said 'lend hoping for nothing in return,' He meant that we should help the poor freely. Following the rule of equity, we should judge people by their circumstances, not by legal definitions. Humanist that he was, Calvin knew there were two Hebrew words translated as 'usury.' One, neshek, meant 'to bite'; the other, tarbit, meant 'to take legitimate increase.' Based on these distinctions, Calvin argued that only 'biting' loans were forbidden. Thus, one could lend at interest to business people who would make a profit using the money. To the working poor one could lend without interest, but expect the loan to be repaid. To the impoverished one should give without expecting repayment." Brock Moore ----- Original Message ----- From: "Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion & Governance" To: "Discussion Forum for Global Justice" Subject: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:00:18 +0530 Thanks a lot Mary for sharing the info about the Satanic cult that has dominated the US administration. It is unfortunate that people associated with Prophet Moses genealogically have forgotten the central command against usury. It is time that all Jewish and Christians brothers, sisters and elders get united against usury. Usury is at the core of the problem for the 'recession' that is ecologically benevolent. Halting the pace of expansion of ecologically hostile habitats fueled by atheistic neo-liberal globalization of Satanic economic ,political and cultural thinking appropriating usury was very much needed . Vatican's approval for Islamic banking is a historical event.Let us celberate ecologically benvolent recession with more and more of prayers for guidance to more and more men and women globally. Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cojock at hotmail.com Wed Mar 11 15:25:40 2009 From: cojock at hotmail.com (chris cook) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:25:40 +0000 Subject: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury In-Reply-To: <20090311152744.1E840326778@ws1-8.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20090311152744.1E840326778@ws1-8.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: Brock This article in the FT by Tarek el Diwany is relevant. http://www.islamic-finance.com/item142_f.htm As he says... "Overarching these issues of moral hazard and legal semantics, looms the more fundamental question of whether Islamic finance can be practised within an interest-based monetary framework." My understanding of the prohibition under Islam ie riba is that no payment may be made for the use of money. When money comes into existence as an interest-bearing debt - as is the case in our current system (other than for notes and coin) - then the conflict is obvious, as Tarek infers. Payment for the use of a productive asset, on the other hand, is perfectly legitimate. The definitions of usury you quote are, as far as I can see, self serving and suit the convenience of those who propagate them. The underlying issue is that of sharing of risk and reward. The contract of interest-bearing debt - of a fixed rate of return irrespective of the borrower's ability to pay - is and always has been problematic for all religions because of the inevitable and deleterious effects on the debtor of interest compounding over time. Best Regards Chris Cook From: brock_moore at accountant.com To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:27:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury The word "interest" is not synonymous with "usury." They are not synonymous in modern languages, nor were they synonymous in the ancient Semitic languages. So the scriptual prohibitions against usury, in both the Bible and Koran, are not prohibitions against interest. Interest can be usurious, as can other financial arrangements. But it is not necessarily usurious. This is from a scholar at an American Islamic website: http://www.submission.org/islam/interest-usury.html "The Quran forbids usury, not interest. Quite a few states in USA have laws against usury. Usury is defined as excessive interest. A Dictionary defines usury as 'an excessive or inordinate premium for the use of money borrowed', 'extortionate interest', or 'the practice of taking exorbitant or excessive interest.' The Arabic language also makes distinction between interest (Fa'eda) and usury (Reba). The Quran forbids Reba or usury." Which is perfectly consistent with the modern Jewish and Christian perspectives on the matter: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/jones.usury "John Calvin's letter on usury of 1545 made it clear that when Christ said 'lend hoping for nothing in return,' He meant that we should help the poor freely. Following the rule of equity, we should judge people by their circumstances, not by legal definitions. Humanist that he was, Calvin knew there were two Hebrew words translated as 'usury.' One, neshek, meant 'to bite'; the other, tarbit, meant 'to take legitimate increase.' Based on these distinctions, Calvin argued that only 'biting' loans were forbidden. Thus, one could lend at interest to business people who would make a profit using the money. To the working poor one could lend without interest, but expect the loan to be repaid. To the impoverished one should give without expecting repayment." Brock Moore ----- Original Message ----- From: "Centre For Ecological Audit, Social Inclusion & Governance" To: "Discussion Forum for Global Justice" Subject: [GJM] Appeal for Jewish brothers, elders and youth for eliminating usury Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:00:18 +0530 Thanks a lot Mary for sharing the info about the Satanic cult that has dominated the US administration. It is unfortunate that people associated with Prophet Moses genealogically have forgotten the central command against usury. It is time that all Jewish and Christians brothers, sisters and elders get united against usury. Usury is at the core of the problem for the 'recession' that is ecologically benevolent. Halting the pace of expansion of ecologically hostile habitats fueled by atheistic neo-liberal globalization of Satanic economic ,political and cultural thinking appropriating usury was very much needed . Vatican's approval for Islamic banking is a historical event.Let us celberate ecologically benvolent recession with more and more of prayers for guidance to more and more men and women globally. Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com! _________________________________________________________________ 25GB of FREE Online Stora