[GJM] Fw: Fw: Comment from Dr. Rima Laibow on: Ways we are exterminating ourselves as a collective conscious/unconscious
mary rose
maryrose333 at att.net
Tue May 20 12:49:57 MDT 2008
Dear Dr. Rima, I am fwd your request herewith to the list. Please continue to participate
when you have time. Co-learner's reaches close to 250 people each day when the FixGov
and Global Justice movement lists are included with the bcc: list. And from these people
information is further disseminated.to and through family and friends. Since many of our
members, being professionals on the speaking circuit and/or having large circles of influence,
as you must also, and networked together through our presence here, we are making an
impact. Especially when we consider that the largest impact is made not through vocalization,
but simply through the power of the subtle energy vibrations we send throughout the Universe
by the power of our thoughts.
again, with love and gratitude for all that you do, and all that we may do together. mary rose
Please read Dr. Rima's request below.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Rima Laibow
To: mary rose
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Comment from Dr. Rima Laibow on: Ways we are exterminating ourselves as a collective conscious/unconscious
You are very welcome.
I hope that you will ask your readers to join our Health Freedom eAlerts list and become involved in taking action and getting others to get involved on a viral propagation basis.
And thank you for all that YOU do!
Yours,
Dr. Rima
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM, mary rose <maryrose333 at att.net> wrote:
Welcome to the Co-Learner's list, Dr. Laibow and thank you for your comments. Your message brings some very important information to our attention. with love and in gratitude for all that you do.
For those unfamiliar with Dr. Laibow, her bio is here: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=300 Thanks to Stephani Sutton for introducing Dr. Laibow to the Co-learners group. .
mary rose
----- Original Message -----
From: Dr. Rima Laibow
To: mary rose
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: Ways we are exterminating ourselves as a collective conscious/unconscious
I read your posts with appreciation and, of course, appropriate dismay. One of the horrific dangers which you need to include in your list is Genetically Modified foods, aptly called "FrankenFoods". The United States government, following the Executive Order signed in 1992 by then-President George H. W. Bush, holds that although genetically modified foods and other organisms are unique enough to patent, they are "substantially equivalent" to unmodified foods and should not be labeled as different from those unmodified foods. In fact, it is illegal, that's correct, illegal, to label genetically modified foods as such.
This insane policy, given the emerging dangers of these foods and other organisms, leads to a gigantic human experiment without any informed consent possible since 80% of all food in the US is genetically modified and without species-specific labeling there can be no traceability. Without traceability there can be no epidemiology and with epidemiology there can be no liability.
The US Delegate to Codex Alimentarius, with her Monsanto adviser sitting beside her as a member of the Delegation, revealed at a 2007 Codex meeting on labeling Genetically Modified foods, that the US knows consumers will overwhelmingly reject genetically modified food if they know that food IS genetically modified. Since the US, which refuses to examine any safety data concerning these foods holds that they are identical and that consumers would be making an error if they did not eat them since they are administratively equivalent to other foods, IT WOULD BE FALSE AND MISLEADING TO TELL CONSUMERS THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR FOOD!
This position, by the way, is patently illegal in the US and has been forbidden by case law in the important Supreme Court decision in Thompson vs. Western States, among other places.
This food is associated with fetal loss, cancer, serious and potentially lethal allergic reactions, diminished immune function, kidney and GI abnormalities, sterility, auto immune disease, failure to thrive, etc.
Other countries fear and distrust genetically modified foods and products such as cotton. GM cotton may, in fact, be causally linked with the horrific new disease, Morgellon's Disease, in which the gap between the living and the non-living has been broached with horrifying results.
Another global terror is Codex Alimentarius, the UN Commission which is systematically degrading the world's food supply to increase illness and profit (at the same time) for the benefit of the Bigs: Big Pharma, Big Chema, Big Agribiz, Big Biotechna and Big Medica.
Driven by the United States for the benefit of its constituents, the Bigs, this global body has, among other things, mandated a level of under nutrition which guarantees the global development of what the World Health Organization calls "the preventable Non Communicable Diseases of Under Nutrition: Cancer, cardiovascular disease and stroke, diabetes and obesity.
As it happens, the 5 most important financial producers of the world's most productive industry, Big Pharma, happen to be Cancer, cardiovascular disease and stroke, diabetes and obesity.
It is no coincidence that the global degradation of the world's food supply through astoundingly high levels of dangerous pesticides (including reintroduction of seven of the 9 previously forbidden POPs which the Stockholm Convention banned forever), prohibiting high dosage nutrients as if they were dangerous industrial chemicals and permitting dangerous industrial chemicals like unlimited amounts of wildly dangerous pesticides into the food supply, mandating irradiation and a host of other highly damaging requirements for international trade of food benefits the pharmaceutical industry. Codex was founded when former World War II war criminals whose backgrounds were in the pharmaceutical industry left prison after the Nuremberg War Tribunals sentenced them went back to their previous jobs and then proposed that the UN take over the world's supply of food. Codex was the result of that intervention. People who want to read more about Codex and other health freedom threats are invited to visit the Natural Solutions Foundation, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org, and sign up for the free and secure Health Freedom eAlerts.
The more this information is disseminated, and people become empowered to take back their impact and free expression of their truths, the better. I congratulate you on steadily disseminating this vitally important information.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:23 PM, mary rose <maryrose333 at att.net> wrote:
Co-learner's - this is a response to Stephanie Sutton's post entitled: "I must respond to "Another really good perspective on the elimination of human births in order to reduce human population" Thank you Steph for your input
I spent quite a bit of time pulling this information together, and feel I have covered most areas, but when it comes to pollution and toxins we seem to be literally inundated with them. And the risks of cancer from these agents appear great. So, while chemtrails may be harmful, the first line of questioning IMHO should be which area should we tackle first? what is the most deadly? It seems we should prioritize this, but then, since we have permitted all of the below to happen with little protest, do we have the will to protest chemtrails? With the Dept. of Mental Health providing the figures that over 29 percent of the population is legally mentally ill; and with the highest rate of drug use (legal or illegal) in the world, not to mention the number of alcoholics among us, how many of us are left to address these issues after one eliminates parents and others that are working two to three jobs in order to keep roof over head and food in mouth, and the senior retired population that sits in front of the TV every day, many of them unable to do anything else. While Richard Heinberg writes about "ostriches" with their heads in the sand,.one really has to ask how many people in the U.S. are capable of making an intelligent decision on anything? . .
Since this effort at "extermination" is happening on such a broad scale whether intended or unintended, we must look at the whole dynamic of this and see if we can figure it out.
So, let's list the ways in which we are poisoning ourselves.
Dioxin concentrated in the fatty tissue of animal products.
1) Over the past several decades, possibly since World War I, and probably more prolifically since World War II, we have distributed a tremendous amount of chemicals into the environment, most of them untested as to their toxicity. So this has resulted in a cocktail now known as "dioxin" which is the most potent chemical known to humankind. (EPA National Environmental Research Center) Dioxin has become so prevalent that it is now found in the breast milk of almost all women. And, since it finds its way into both the bodies of humans as well as other mammals and concentrates in the fatty tissue, it is found in beef and dairy products in high concentration amounts.
Let me quote from John Robbins' book: The Food Revolution. "So great is the contamination of animal products today with dioxin that even those meat and dairy companies that are trying to offer healthier products find it nerly impossible to provide pure foods. Ben and Jerry's, for example, seeks to be environmentally aware and to use milk from family farms. The company's promotional literature and website states that "dioxin is known to cause cancer, genetic and reproductive defects and lerning disabilities. . . .The only safe level of dioxin is no exposure at all. Yet so pervasive is dioxin in dairy, meat and fish products today that in November 1999, a level of dioxin 200 times greater than the "virtually safe (daily) dose, determined by the EPA was found in Ben and Jerry's Vanilla Ice Cream" In fact, a study presented at the "Dioxins 2000" conference in August 2000, found "levels of dioxin 2,200 times greater than the level of dioxin allowed in a serving of wastewater discharged into San Francisco Bay from the Tosco Refinery." Robbins continues to write: "In view of findings like this, thre is one question the meat, dairy, and chemical companies do not want people to ask. It is a question, however, that I find important. How much less cancer and suffering would there be if people were spreading information about true prevention with the same passion and zeal with which they are telling women to get mammograms and raising money for chemotherapy research?" The incidence of breast cancer in the United States began climbing steadily in the early 1970s, and is now the highest ever seen in human history. Nearly 50,000 American women die of the disease every year, with research showing that genetics accounts for only 5% of the reported cases."
Yet, in spite of this information, Ben and Jerry's, along with many other ice cream companies continue to make and sell ice cream; and, much of the population continues to eat it along with mass amounts of beef and dairy products known to also contain dioxin. And, in spite of warning labels on cigarettes, millions of Americans, and others around the world, continue to smoke cigarettes and use other tobacco products.
Another case is the McLibel counterlawsuit, filed in England by Helen Steel and Dave Morris, against McDonald's for among other things, the poor nutritional value of the food served. Steel and Morris won this case, and among the things brought out at the trial was the promotion and underwriting of the Ronald Mcdonald House for Children, by the fast food giant, designed to promote the idea that McDonald's really cared about children and the quality of food served in their facilities, when, it is known that beef is considered by many researchers and doctors to be a cancer-causing agent. http://www.mcspotlight.org/case/index.html.
An interesting article entitled "Our Stolen Future" may be found here: http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NEWSCIENCE/synergy/mixtures.htm
Then, here's a post that just came in from Global Net News. The interesting part of this is how many of us live in homes that are built in areas where there is underlying granite rock which produces radon in the homes and Uranium-238 in the water supply. I live in an area such as this, and while the cancer rate has not been measured here since there is no funding to do so , it has come up in community meetings that the cancer rate in this area does seem to be abnormally high. Information on natural occurring radon may be found here: http://www.envirochex.com/Contaminants/Chemicals_Radon.htm
Information on Uranium in drinking water may be found here: http://www.waterfilters.net/Uranium_ep_173-1.html
BLIGHTED HOMELAND
A peril that dwelt among the Navajos
During the Cold War, uranium mines left contaminated waste scattered around the Indians. Homes built with the material silently pulsed with radiation. People developed cancer. And the U.S. did little to help.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-navajo19nov19,0,1645689.storyNovember 19, 2006
Oljato, Utah -- Mary and Billy Boy Holiday bought their one-room house from a medicine man in 1967. They gave him $50, a sheep and a canvas tent.
For the most part, they were happy with the purchase. Their Navajo hogan was situated well, between a desert mesa and the trading-post road. The eight-sided dwelling proved stout and snug, with walls of stone and wood, and a green-shingle roof.
The single drawback was the bare dirt underfoot. So three years after moving in, the Holidays jumped at the chance to get a real floor. A federally funded program would pay for installation if they bought the materials. The Holidays couldn't afford to, but the contractor, a friend of theirs, had an idea.
He would use sand and crushed rock that had washed down from an old uranium mine in the mesa, one of hundreds throughout the Navajo reservation that once supplied the nation's nuclear weapons program. The waste material wouldn't cost a cent. "He said it made good concrete," Mary Holiday recalled.
As promised, the 6-inch slab was so smooth that the Holidays could lay their mattresses directly on it and enjoy a good night's sleep.
They didn't know their fine new floor was radioactive.
Fifty years ago, cancer rates on the reservation were so low that a medical journal published an article titled "Cancer immunity in the Navajo."
Back then, the contamination of the tribal homeland was just beginning. Mining companies were digging into one of the world's richest uranium deposits, in a reservation spanning parts of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah.
From 1944 to 1986, 3.9 million tons of uranium ore were chiseled and blasted from the mountains and plains. The mines provided uranium for the Manhattan Project, the top-secret effort to develop an atomic bomb, and for the weapons stockpile built up during the arms race with the Soviet Union.
Private companies operated the mines, but the U.S. government was the sole customer. The boom lasted through the early '60s. As the Cold War threat gradually diminished over the next two decades, more than 1,000 mines and four processing mills on tribal land shut down.
The companies often left behind radioactive waste piles and open tunnels and pits. Few bothered to fence the properties or post warning signs. Federal inspectors seldom intervened.
Over the decades, Navajos inhaled radioactive dust from the waste piles, borne aloft by fierce desert winds.
They drank contaminated water from abandoned pit mines that filled with rain. They watered their herds there, then butchered the animals and ate the meat.
Their children dug caves in piles of mill tailings and played in the spent mines.
And like the Holidays, many lived in homes silently pulsing with radiation.
Today, there is no talk of cancer immunity in the Navajos.
The cancer death rate on the reservation - historically much lower than that of the general U.S. population - doubled from the early 1970s to the late 1990s, according to Indian Health Service data. The overall U.S. cancer death rate declined slightly over the same period.
Though no definitive link has been established, researchers say exposure to mining byproducts in the soil, air and water almost certainly contributed to the increase in Navajo cancer mortality.
The government has never conducted a comprehensive study of the health effects of uranium mining on the reservation. But individual scientists working on their own have documented sharply elevated cancer rates near old mines and mills. High concentrations of uranium, arsenic and other heavy metals have been found in one out of five drinking-water sources sampled.
Particularly toxic were the "hot" houses built with radioactive debris.
rest of series go to http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-navajo19nov19,0,1645689.story
Depleted uranium used in weapons of war by the U.S. military:
Here is an article on how DU has, and continues to affect people in Iraq and Afghanistan, among them U.S. milirary personnel exposed to DU. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=2374
Several times over the past couple years, I have posted information regarding the seriousness of DU and the attempts by Leuren Moret to publicize this information via DVDs. Yet no one on the list ever commented on these shocking posts.
There is no doubt that the use of DU by the U.S. military is a grave crime against humanity. Please read this article by Leuren Moret: http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0809-33.htm and I urge you to do further research on this subject which reveal more of how returning veteran's spouses have been effected and how the crime is repeated over and over again through children horribly deformed by this monstrous and unthinkable act. If there is one single thing that can be pointed out to show that we are a society gone mad, then this is it. And, DU is not contained in Iraq and Afghanistan alone as the dust has been shown to blow across the Atlantic and blanket the U.S. as well.
Affect of accumulation of pesticides and other chemicals on the oceans.
Worldwide, there are 147 areas of "dead sea" where chemicals used to fertilize plants and repel insects, along with sewage, have washed into the oceans. The largest area being the one off of the coast of Texas which is as large as the state of Louisiana.
http://www.newint.org/features/2007/01/01/introduction/
Radio and Micro Waves
http://www.encyclopedia.com/beta/doc/1G1-132796748.html
This is difficult to search. While I have read a lot of different opinions on the dangers of these waves, controversy reins.
Use of Plastic, Teflon cooking utensils, and microwave ovens.
Plastic appears to biodegrade into food products. And teflon-lined cooking utensils appear to give off fumes that are toxic. Dr. Mercola warns against the use of microwave ovens as well.
Cleaning agents
There are many cleaning agents that appear to be toxic when the fumes are inhaled. Using things like "borax, baking soda, vinegar, and lemon juice may be as effective as other agents and much safer to use.
Auto Exhaust Fumes:
http://www.nutramed.com/environment/carschemicals.htm
:
.
. . . .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://globaljusticemovement.net/pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20080520/d6f5a737/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list