[GJM] Request to mailing list Discussion rejected

robert searle dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 10 13:03:21 MDT 2008


Tav,

    Yes, I like your "open system". It looks holistic,
and enticing. I hope you will expand more upon this
multi-disciplinary approach. 

I think you will find the Discussion Group of great
interest. If you look at the past posts you may find
lots of interesting stuff to keep a keen mind like
yours intrigued. 

As far as I am concerned a new understanding of money
is at the BASIS of global justice. You would obviously
agree...

Anyway, let us hope we will hear more from you in the
goodness of time. 

Robert Searle

--- tav <tav at espians.com> wrote:

> >  It is Janos here. Yes, the whole message seemed
> to be gibberish.
> 
> Hey Janos!
> 
> By the way, my thanks again for your £100 cheque all
> those years ago
> -- it really helped us keep the wtf/ud wiki going.
> 
> As for the message, I guess I should avoid sending
> mails to the list
> from the blackberry again.
> 
> >  About the other question, all new subscribers go
> on moderation as a default,
> >  it seems, but I sm going to switch yours off.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Now, to briefly answer your question again Robert, I
> am very much in
> favour of monetary reform.
> 
> As the internet opens up certain aspects of our
> lives to an economy of
> abundance instead of scarcity and as more and more
> people become
> conscious of the ecological impact of our actions, I
> believe there is
> a great window of opportunity to rapidly bring about
> such reform.
> 
> Like many people I have my own set of perspectives
> on what
> specifically needs to be done. Whilst it's probably
> not fully
> explanatory on its own,
> http://tav.espians.com/espra/toman_ecology.png
> might give a general overview.
> 
> It is currently a mix of: gift economy + eco-economy
> + reputation
> economy + prediction economy + multi-party bartering
> backed by a
> global reference currency + confluence of the social
> body. All of this
> effectively nurtures the three commons: cultural,
> natural and
> temporal. And the yield from the natural commons
> serves as a
> pseudo-citizen's income, &c.
> 
> However, unlike most people, I am very open to
> differing perspectives =)
> 
> Hope the above makes some sense and answers your
> question at least
> semi-satisfactorily.
> 
> -- 
> love, tav
> founder and ceo, esp metanational llp
> 
> plex:espians/tav | tav at espians.com | +44 (0) 7809
> 569 369
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
> 



      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
The World's Favourite Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html



More information about the Discussion mailing list