[GJM] Fw: [globalnetnews-summary] what's wrong with this picture?

[mary rose]

The answer to the problem could well be to change the type of
food we raise and eat now.  According to Paul Hawken, et al,
in "Natural Capitalism" the change from wheat and corn, and
other crops that are raised continually year after year on the
same "tilled" land, to "no till" crops such as amaranth, buckwheat
and other "long grains," would better serve our needs. Much
consideration should also be given to how much of the present
grain crop is used to feed cattle for market.  Millions more
people could be fed if grain were not cycled through cattle first,
a highly inefficient way of calorie distribution.

Much of the developed world "lives to eat" instead of "eating to
live" -- a practice that severely deprives those in the developing
world from getting the calories they need.  We need to break
this addiction pattern so that ALL may be fed.

Also, since we have been talking about "subtle energy vibrations,"
the book:  "Secrets of the Soil - New Solutions for Restoring  Our
Planet," by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird, the authors write
as to how these vibrations can harmlessly be used as pest control
devices in farmland.  There are also indications that these subtle energy
vibrations may also be used to enhance the growth of plants and
eliminate the need for fertilizer.  Published in 1998, this book is full
of excellent alternative ideas on how to move away from problems
and into viable solutions.  One reviewer wrote on this book:  "Anyone
seriously concerned with human survival and environmental health will
find this book required reading."

Among other things, this book includes a chapter on research into
water and its connection to longevity, entitled "Vortex of Life".This
chapter of the book details the research of Dr. Patrick Flanagan.

BTW, did you know that turning on the radio and putting on some
relaxing music has benefits for your plants?  They have been found
to grow more rapidly and luxuriously.

So, we know we have the ability to raise food safely and produce
excellent water using "appropriate" and safe technology to do so.
We really do not need the chemical companies whose main focus is on
profit without concern for safety, do we? .

mary rose .

   . .


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "GlobalCirclenet" <webmaster at globalcircle.net>
To: <globalnetnews-summary at lists.riseup.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:03 AM
Subject: [globalnetnews-summary] what's wrong with this picture?



(To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to
http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary)

June 5, 2008
Monsanto Plans to Boost Food Supply
By ANDREW POLLACK
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/worldbusiness/05crop.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Monsanto, the leader in agricultural biotechnology, pledged Wednesday to 
develop seeds that would double the yields of corn, soybeans and cotton by 
2030 and would require 30 percent less water, land and energy to grow.

The announcement, coming as world leaders are meeting in Rome to discuss 
rising food prices and growing food shortages, appears to be aimed at least 
in part at winning acceptance of genetically modified crops by showing that 
they can play a major role in feeding the world.

Much of what is in the commitment are things the company was doing anyway, 
though it now becomes a formal goal.

Monsanto said it had developed its new commitment after consulting farmers, 
political leaders, academics and advocacy groups as to what needed to be 
done to increase food production to cope with a rising population and the 
demand for biofuels without converting more forests into farmland.

"In short, the world needs to produce more while conserving more," the 
company's chief executive, Hugh Grant, said in a statement.

How much genetic engineering, which involves adding bacterial or other 
foreign genes to the DNA of plants, could contribute to improving output is 
a matter of debate.

A recent review of agricultural technology, sponsored by the United Nations 
and the World Bank, saw a very limited role. But in Rome on Tuesday, United 
States Secretary of Agriculture Edward T. Schafer said biotechnology would 
be essential if the world was to increase food supply by 2030 to meet rising 
demand.

Genetically modified soybeans, corn and cotton, genetically engineered to 
provide herbicide tolerance, insect resistance or both, are widely grown in 
the United States and several other countries. But they are largely shunned 
in Europe and some other areas because of concerns about potential 
environmental and health effects.

Perhaps seeking to avoid controversy, Monsanto's announcement did not 
mention the term "genetic engineering." It referred instead to "other 
technologies" beyond breeding.

Monsanto's goal of doubling yields by 2030 over levels in 2000 might require 
a sharp acceleration in the rate by which agricultural productivity has been 
increasing. James E. Specht, a soybean genetics expert at the University of 
Nebraska, said he doubted it could be done.

"The hype-to-reality ratio of that one is essentially infinity," Mr. Specht 
said. "Seeing an exponential change in the yield curve is unlikely."

Mr. Specht said that on irrigated farms in Nebraska, soybean yields have 
been increasing by about 0.6 bushels an acre every year. At that rate it 
would take 83 years for yields to double from the 50 bushels an acre 
recorded in 2000.

But Monsanto executives say that a new technique called marker-assisted 
selection could double the rate of gain made from breeding. That technique 
does not involve altering crops by putting in foreign genes. Rather it uses 
genetic tests to help choose which plants to use in conventional 
cross-breeding, vastly speeding up the process and improving its efficiency.

But Monsanto executives say genetic engineering could provide additional 
increases in output beyond that. The company's insect-resistant crops 
already help protect corn and cotton. And Monsanto scientists are working on 
genetically engineered crops that would grow better with less water and 
fertilizer.

Moreover, the company is not talking about the United States alone. Its said 
its commitment was to double the weighted average yield of all countries 
with access to the company's seeds and modern agriculture production 
techniques, particularly Argentina and Brazil, in addition to the United 
States.

Brazil, for instance, produces only 58 bushels of corn an acre compared to 
157 bushels in the United States. So big gains might be made by bringing 
Brazil to American levels, without having to vastly accelerate yield 
improvements in Nebraska.

Some critics of biotechnology say that genetic engineering so far has not 
been shown to improve yields, though it may provide more convenience for 
farmers. They also have said that the biotech crops developed so far have 
mainly been aimed at feeding livestock in wealthy countries, not improving 
the staple crops grown by small farmers in poor countries.

As part of its announcement Wednesday, Monsanto said it would work to 
improve the lives of farmers, including poor ones, including sharing its 
technology. It recently announced a project with some other organizations to 
develop drought-tolerant corn for Africa, with Monsanto forgoing the 
collection of royalties for use of its technology.

Also yesterday, Monsanto said it would donate $10 million over five years to 
public-sector programs aimed at improving yields of wheat and rice, which 
are not a primary focus of the company's efforts. Much of the breeding of 
those two food staples are performed by governments and universities.

Monsanto's stock was trading at $134.76 mid-morning Wednesday, up about 1 
percent. The stock has more than doubled in the last year, in part because 
of soaring crop prices. Besides being a leader in genetic engineering, 
Monsanto is one of the largest suppliers of seeds in the world. It also 
sells the widely used herbicide Roundup, use of which has grown with the 
adoption of genetically engineered crops resistant to Roundup.