[GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
robert searle
dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 2 12:04:03 MDT 2008
I do not know why you are showing yourself up again! If you read the p2p foundation piece the basics of possible electronic inflation controls are explained. But it does require a little INTELLIGENCE, AND VISION to understand. You do not have a BSc, or Phd in economics!!
R.Searle
--- On Wed, 2/7/08, Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> Date: Wednesday, 2 July, 2008, 5:52 PM
> In other words, my paranoid little ignoramus, magic that you
> can't explain is the difference. Tee hee hee.
>
> Peter
>
>
> --- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle
> <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE
> AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A
> LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 10:33 AM
> > Dear Peter Hogwood aka William Ryan aka Ashen
> Politicus (or
> > whatever) aka
> > Mc Gunningle....et cetera.........
> >
> >
> >
> > We have been through all this before! So, I think it
> is a
> > waste of time repeating myself. But ofcourse you are
> going
> > to reply with something daft notably that I do not
> have the
> > answers....(which even an ignoramus would realize that
> I do
> > have if they went to the p2p foundation entry)
> >
> > As I understand it Zimbabwe was largely churning out
> PAPER
> > MONEY. As such it cannot be directly controlled unlike
> the
> > electronic inflation controls of TFE....thats the
> > difference.
> >
> > Moreover, I have never ever said I was a genius per
> se!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > R.Searle
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 2/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS
> FOR THE
> > AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY
> A
> > LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > Date: Wednesday, 2 July, 2008, 3:00 PM
> > > It's not a mental complex, my paranoid little
> > fellow,
> > > but the patent absurdity of a proposal that can
> be
> > summed
> > > up in one sentence: Let the government just spend
> and
> > stop
> > > collecting taxes. That is the policy of
> Zimbabwe,
> > with the
> > > world's highest inflation rate, officially
> 195,000
> > > percent, but in reality some four million
> percent.
> > And you
> > > pompously prance about with the claims of genius,
> when
> > in
> > > actuality you are a stupid ignoramus. Unread in
> even
> > the
> > > most basic literature of economics. Lacking even
> > common
> > > sense.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle
> > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: robert searle
> <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > Subject: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS
> FOR
> > THE
> > > AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE
> MONEY BY
> > A
> > > LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY
> 2008.
> > > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 4:45 AM
> > > > Dear Mr. Hogwood,and Hi to your Alter Egos!
> > > >
> > > > Obviously, you have a MENTAL
> COMPLEX
> > about my
> > > > work. I have explained it before to you. If
> you
> > cannot
> > > > fully understand English then that is your
> > problem.
> > > >
> > > > But at least TFE is not
> as"nonsensical"
> > as
> > > Social
> > > > Credit your pet subject though the concept
> is
> > fine as
> > > far as
> > > > it goes. Yet, it does not involve electronic
> > > super-flexible
> > > > controls over inflation, and is thus suspect
> > > unfortunately.
> > > > To be fair, Major Douglas cannot be totally
> > blamed for
> > > not
> > > > introducing this profound innovation as he
> lived
> > > before the
> > > > present Computer Age.
> > > >
> > > > Incidently in TFE, governments do NOT create
> the
> > new
> > > money,
> > > > and there is as such NO LUMP SUM TO DRAW
> UPON
> > unlike
> > > now.
> > > > This process is ideally done through a
> private,
> > or
> > > > independent public body. It would have
> genuine
> > legal
> > > teeth
> > > > to ensure that any governmental order for
> the
> > creation
> > > of
> > > > new non-repayable capital is for the public
> good.
> >
> > > >
> > > > The legal framework of such a structure
> would
> > have to
> > > be
> > > > ultimately decided by policy-makers at the
> time
> > of
> > > > introduction of TFE into the world economy.
> Yet,
> > when
> > > > introduced this whole process of money
> creation
> > will
> > > > require little if any bureaucracy as such.
> > > >
> > > > It is best to leave the subject of TFE
> otherwise
> > you
> > > will
> > > > just show yourself up again.
> > > >
> > > > R.Searle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Tue, 1/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> Economics? And
> > > Paula
> > > > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > > > To:
> discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, 1 July, 2008, 2:25 PM
> > > > > You don't have to reply, my
> paranoid
> > little
> > > > fellow.
> > > > > Your proposition to just let the
> government
> > spend
> > > and
> > > > stop
> > > > > collecting taxes is ridiculous on its
> face.
> > > > There's no
> > > > > way to defend such nonsense, which
> explains
> > why
> > > you
> > > > > don't even try.
> > > > >
> > > > > Peter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Tue, 7/1/08, robert searle
> > > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: robert searle
> > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> > Economics? And
> > > > Paula
> > > > > Gloria doing a "William
> Ryan?"
> > > > > > To:
> > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 4:47
> AM
> > > > > > Dear Peter Hogwood, Zack Johnson,
> Clark
> > > Kent,
> > > > Ashen
> > > > > > Politicus (or whatever),
> McGunnigle,
> > William
> > > > > > Ryan............et al...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not going to waste time
> > repeating
> > > > myself
> > > > > with
> > > > > > someone like you who exists in
> multiple
> > > > personality
> > > > > land
> > > > > > with a string of aliases. I might
> as
> > well
> > > talk to
> > > > a
> > > > > brick
> > > > > > wall. Perhaps I would get some
> better
> > sense
> > > that
> > > > way!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another person who appears to be
> > suffering
> > > from
> > > > > somekind of
> > > > > > "multiple personality
> > disorder" is
> > > > Paula
> > > > > Gloria.
> > > > > > Admitedly, I was perhaps unkind to
> her
> > when
> > > I
> > > > > suggested
> > > > > > that her videos were somewhat
> > > > "amateurish"
> > > > > on the
> > > > > > comment section of one of her You
> Tube
> > > Delights!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > She, herself, did not respond but
> > someone
> > > called
> > > > Paula
> > > > > > Tsakona did (her alter ego
> > probably)with
> > > some
> > > > spite,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > some deluded comment on me!
> Indeed,
> > there is
> > > even
> > > > a
> > > > > Paula
> > > > > > Puja if I recall correctly. This I
> > suspect
> > > is
> > > > another
> > > > > of
> > > > > > PGs aliases because the word Puja
> means
> > > worship
> > > > in
> > > > > > Sanskrit. I know ofcourse she has
> a
> > strong
> > > > connection
> > > > > with
> > > > > > Indian mysticism. Obviously,PGs
> > "own
> > > > name"
> > > > > is
> > > > > > probably fake,and a just a stage
> name
> > to
> > > protect
> > > > > herself
> > > > > > from any
> "undesirables".....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On the internet you can be
> anything,
> > and
> > > anyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, enough said!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- On Mon, 30/6/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > > > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> > > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> > > Economics?
> > > > > > > To:
> > > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > > Date: Monday, 30 June, 2008,
> 5:20
> > PM
> > > > > > > Except it would be a going
> back to
> > the
> > > Stone
> > > > Age
> > > > > type
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > "innovation." And
> your
> > let
> > > the
> > > > > government
> > > > > > just
> > > > > > > spend and stop taxation is a
> nut
> > house
> > > > > > > "innovation."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Peter
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- On Mon, 6/30/08, robert
> searle
> > > > > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: robert searle
> > > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > > > > Subject: [GJM]
> Innovation
> > > Economics?
> > > > > > > > To:
> > > > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > > > Date: Monday, June 30,
> 2008,
> > 4:30
> > > AM
> > > > > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This link may be
> of
> > > interest.
> > > > > Perhaps we
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > suggest interest free
> loans
> > could
> > > be a
> > > > good
> > > > > > economic
> > > > > > > > innovation!!!???
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_Economics
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> > Not happy with your email address?.
> > Get the one you really want - millions of new email
> > addresses available now at Yahoo!
> > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discussion mailing list
> > Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> >
> http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list