[GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
Peter Hogwood
p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 2 10:52:42 MDT 2008
In other words, my paranoid little ignoramus, magic that you can't explain is the difference. Tee hee hee.
Peter
--- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 10:33 AM
> Dear Peter Hogwood aka William Ryan aka Ashen Politicus (or
> whatever) aka
> Mc Gunningle....et cetera.........
>
>
>
> We have been through all this before! So, I think it is a
> waste of time repeating myself. But ofcourse you are going
> to reply with something daft notably that I do not have the
> answers....(which even an ignoramus would realize that I do
> have if they went to the p2p foundation entry)
>
> As I understand it Zimbabwe was largely churning out PAPER
> MONEY. As such it cannot be directly controlled unlike the
> electronic inflation controls of TFE....thats the
> difference.
>
> Moreover, I have never ever said I was a genius per se!!
>
>
>
>
> R.Searle
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 2/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE
> AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A
> LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > Date: Wednesday, 2 July, 2008, 3:00 PM
> > It's not a mental complex, my paranoid little
> fellow,
> > but the patent absurdity of a proposal that can be
> summed
> > up in one sentence: Let the government just spend and
> stop
> > collecting taxes. That is the policy of Zimbabwe,
> with the
> > world's highest inflation rate, officially 195,000
> > percent, but in reality some four million percent.
> And you
> > pompously prance about with the claims of genius, when
> in
> > actuality you are a stupid ignoramus. Unread in even
> the
> > most basic literature of economics. Lacking even
> common
> > sense.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle
> > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > Subject: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR
> THE
> > AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY
> A
> > LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 4:45 AM
> > > Dear Mr. Hogwood,and Hi to your Alter Egos!
> > >
> > > Obviously, you have a MENTAL COMPLEX
> about my
> > > work. I have explained it before to you. If you
> cannot
> > > fully understand English then that is your
> problem.
> > >
> > > But at least TFE is not as"nonsensical"
> as
> > Social
> > > Credit your pet subject though the concept is
> fine as
> > far as
> > > it goes. Yet, it does not involve electronic
> > super-flexible
> > > controls over inflation, and is thus suspect
> > unfortunately.
> > > To be fair, Major Douglas cannot be totally
> blamed for
> > not
> > > introducing this profound innovation as he lived
> > before the
> > > present Computer Age.
> > >
> > > Incidently in TFE, governments do NOT create the
> new
> > money,
> > > and there is as such NO LUMP SUM TO DRAW UPON
> unlike
> > now.
> > > This process is ideally done through a private,
> or
> > > independent public body. It would have genuine
> legal
> > teeth
> > > to ensure that any governmental order for the
> creation
> > of
> > > new non-repayable capital is for the public good.
>
> > >
> > > The legal framework of such a structure would
> have to
> > be
> > > ultimately decided by policy-makers at the time
> of
> > > introduction of TFE into the world economy. Yet,
> when
> > > introduced this whole process of money creation
> will
> > > require little if any bureaucracy as such.
> > >
> > > It is best to leave the subject of TFE otherwise
> you
> > will
> > > just show yourself up again.
> > >
> > > R.Searle
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 1/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics? And
> > Paula
> > > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > Date: Tuesday, 1 July, 2008, 2:25 PM
> > > > You don't have to reply, my paranoid
> little
> > > fellow.
> > > > Your proposition to just let the government
> spend
> > and
> > > stop
> > > > collecting taxes is ridiculous on its face.
> > > There's no
> > > > way to defend such nonsense, which explains
> why
> > you
> > > > don't even try.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- On Tue, 7/1/08, robert searle
> > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: robert searle
> > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> Economics? And
> > > Paula
> > > > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > > > To:
> discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 4:47 AM
> > > > > Dear Peter Hogwood, Zack Johnson, Clark
> > Kent,
> > > Ashen
> > > > > Politicus (or whatever), McGunnigle,
> William
> > > > > Ryan............et al...
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not going to waste time
> repeating
> > > myself
> > > > with
> > > > > someone like you who exists in multiple
> > > personality
> > > > land
> > > > > with a string of aliases. I might as
> well
> > talk to
> > > a
> > > > brick
> > > > > wall. Perhaps I would get some better
> sense
> > that
> > > way!
> > > > >
> > > > > Another person who appears to be
> suffering
> > from
> > > > somekind of
> > > > > "multiple personality
> disorder" is
> > > Paula
> > > > Gloria.
> > > > > Admitedly, I was perhaps unkind to her
> when
> > I
> > > > suggested
> > > > > that her videos were somewhat
> > > "amateurish"
> > > > on the
> > > > > comment section of one of her You Tube
> > Delights!
> > > > >
> > > > > She, herself, did not respond but
> someone
> > called
> > > Paula
> > > > > Tsakona did (her alter ego
> probably)with
> > some
> > > spite,
> > > > and
> > > > > some deluded comment on me! Indeed,
> there is
> > even
> > > a
> > > > Paula
> > > > > Puja if I recall correctly. This I
> suspect
> > is
> > > another
> > > > of
> > > > > PGs aliases because the word Puja means
> > worship
> > > in
> > > > > Sanskrit. I know ofcourse she has a
> strong
> > > connection
> > > > with
> > > > > Indian mysticism. Obviously,PGs
> "own
> > > name"
> > > > is
> > > > > probably fake,and a just a stage name
> to
> > protect
> > > > herself
> > > > > from any "undesirables".....
> > > > >
> > > > > On the internet you can be anything,
> and
> > anyone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, enough said!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R.Searle
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R.Searle
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Mon, 30/6/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> > Economics?
> > > > > > To:
> > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > Date: Monday, 30 June, 2008, 5:20
> PM
> > > > > > Except it would be a going back to
> the
> > Stone
> > > Age
> > > > type
> > > > > of
> > > > > > "innovation." And your
> let
> > the
> > > > government
> > > > > just
> > > > > > spend and stop taxation is a nut
> house
> > > > > > "innovation."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peter
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- On Mon, 6/30/08, robert searle
> > > > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: robert searle
> > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > > > Subject: [GJM] Innovation
> > Economics?
> > > > > > > To:
> > > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > > Date: Monday, June 30, 2008,
> 4:30
> > AM
> > > > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This link may be of
> > interest.
> > > > Perhaps we
> > > > > could
> > > > > > > suggest interest free loans
> could
> > be a
> > > good
> > > > > economic
> > > > > > > innovation!!!???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_Economics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Not happy with your email address?.
> Get the one you really want - millions of new email
> addresses available now at Yahoo!
> http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
More information about the Discussion
mailing list