[GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.

[Peter Hogwood]

It's not a mental complex, my paranoid little fellow, but the patent absurdity of a proposal that can be summed up in one sentence: Let the government just spend and stop collecting taxes.  That is the policy of Zimbabwe, with the world's highest inflation rate, officially 195,000 percent, but in reality some four million percent.  And you pompously prance about with the claims of genius, when in actuality you are a stupid ignoramus.  Unread in even the most basic literature of economics.  Lacking even common sense.

Peter


--- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> Subject: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 4:45 AM
> Dear Mr. Hogwood,and Hi to your Alter Egos!
> 
>          Obviously, you have a MENTAL COMPLEX about my
> work. I have explained it before to you. If you cannot
> fully understand English then that is your problem.
> 
> But at least TFE is not as"nonsensical" as Social
> Credit your pet subject though the concept is fine as far as
> it goes. Yet, it does not involve electronic super-flexible
> controls over inflation, and is thus suspect unfortunately.
> To be fair, Major Douglas cannot be totally blamed for not
> introducing this profound innovation as he lived before the
> present Computer Age.
> 
> Incidently in TFE, governments do NOT create the new money,
> and there is as such NO LUMP SUM TO DRAW UPON unlike now.
> This process is ideally done through a private, or
> independent public body. It would have genuine legal teeth
> to ensure that any governmental order for the creation of
> new non-repayable capital is for the public good. 
> 
> The legal framework of such a structure would have to be
> ultimately decided by policy-makers at the time of
> introduction of TFE into the world economy. Yet, when
> introduced this whole process of money creation will
> require little if any bureaucracy as such.
> 
> It is best to leave the subject of TFE otherwise you will
> just show yourself up again.
> 
>  R.Searle
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 1/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics? And Paula
> Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > Date: Tuesday, 1 July, 2008, 2:25 PM
> > You don't have to reply, my paranoid little
> fellow. 
> > Your proposition to just let the government spend and
> stop
> > collecting taxes is ridiculous on its face. 
> There's no
> > way to defend such nonsense, which explains why you
> > don't even try.
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Tue, 7/1/08, robert searle
> > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics? And
> Paula
> > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 4:47 AM
> > > Dear Peter Hogwood, Zack Johnson, Clark Kent,
> Ashen
> > > Politicus (or whatever), McGunnigle, William
> > > Ryan............et al...
> > > 
> > >      I am not going to waste time repeating
> myself
> > with
> > > someone like you who exists in multiple
> personality
> > land
> > > with a string of aliases. I might as well talk to
> a
> > brick
> > > wall. Perhaps I would get some better sense that
> way!
> > > 
> > > Another person who appears to be suffering from
> > somekind of
> > > "multiple personality disorder" is
> Paula
> > Gloria.
> > > Admitedly, I was perhaps unkind to her when I
> > suggested
> > > that her videos were somewhat
> "amateurish"
> > on the
> > > comment section of one of her You Tube Delights! 
> > > 
> > > She, herself, did not respond but someone called
> Paula
> > > Tsakona did (her alter ego probably)with some
> spite,
> > and
> > > some deluded comment on me! Indeed, there is even
> a
> > Paula
> > > Puja if I recall correctly. This I suspect is
> another
> > of
> > > PGs aliases because the word Puja means worship
> in
> > > Sanskrit. I know ofcourse she has a strong
> connection
> > with
> > > Indian mysticism. Obviously,PGs "own
> name"
> > is
> > > probably fake,and a just a stage name to protect
> > herself
> > > from any "undesirables".....
> > > 
> > > On the internet you can be anything, and anyone. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Anyway, enough said!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > R.Searle
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > R.Searle
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- On Mon, 30/6/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics?
> > > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > Date: Monday, 30 June, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > > Except it would be a going back to the Stone
> Age
> > type
> > > of
> > > > "innovation."  And your let the
> > government
> > > just
> > > > spend and stop taxation is a nut house
> > > > "innovation."
> > > > 
> > > > Peter
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- On Mon, 6/30/08, robert searle
> > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > From: robert searle
> > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > Subject: [GJM] Innovation Economics?
> > > > > To:
> discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > Date: Monday, June 30, 2008, 4:30 AM
> > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > 
> > > > >         This link may be of interest.
> > Perhaps we
> > > could
> > > > > suggest interest free loans could be a
> good
> > > economic
> > > > > innovation!!!???
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >   
> > > > >    
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_Economics
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >