[GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.

robert searle dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 2 09:33:13 MDT 2008 

Dear Peter Hogwood aka William Ryan aka Ashen Politicus (or whatever) aka 
Mc Gunningle....et cetera.........



We have been through all this before! So, I think it is a waste of time repeating myself. But ofcourse you are going to reply with something daft notably that I do not have the answers....(which even an ignoramus would realize that I do have if they went to the p2p foundation entry)

As I understand it Zimbabwe was largely churning out PAPER MONEY. As such it cannot be directly controlled unlike the electronic inflation controls of TFE....thats the difference. 

Moreover, I have never ever said I was a genius per se!! 




R.Searle






--- On Wed, 2/7/08, Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> Date: Wednesday, 2 July, 2008, 3:00 PM
> It's not a mental complex, my paranoid little fellow,
> but the patent absurdity of a proposal that can be summed
> up in one sentence: Let the government just spend and stop
> collecting taxes.  That is the policy of Zimbabwe, with the
> world's highest inflation rate, officially 195,000
> percent, but in reality some four million percent.  And you
> pompously prance about with the claims of genius, when in
> actuality you are a stupid ignoramus.  Unread in even the
> most basic literature of economics.  Lacking even common
> sense.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 7/2/08, robert searle
> <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > Subject: [GJM] CHECKED GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS FOR THE
> AUTHORIZED TRANSMISSION OF NEW NON-REPAYABLE MONEY BY A
> LEGAL INDEPENDENT ENTITY (OR ENTITIES) /JULY 2008.
> > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 4:45 AM
> > Dear Mr. Hogwood,and Hi to your Alter Egos!
> > 
> >          Obviously, you have a MENTAL COMPLEX about my
> > work. I have explained it before to you. If you cannot
> > fully understand English then that is your problem.
> > 
> > But at least TFE is not as"nonsensical" as
> Social
> > Credit your pet subject though the concept is fine as
> far as
> > it goes. Yet, it does not involve electronic
> super-flexible
> > controls over inflation, and is thus suspect
> unfortunately.
> > To be fair, Major Douglas cannot be totally blamed for
> not
> > introducing this profound innovation as he lived
> before the
> > present Computer Age.
> > 
> > Incidently in TFE, governments do NOT create the new
> money,
> > and there is as such NO LUMP SUM TO DRAW UPON unlike
> now.
> > This process is ideally done through a private, or
> > independent public body. It would have genuine legal
> teeth
> > to ensure that any governmental order for the creation
> of
> > new non-repayable capital is for the public good. 
> > 
> > The legal framework of such a structure would have to
> be
> > ultimately decided by policy-makers at the time of
> > introduction of TFE into the world economy. Yet, when
> > introduced this whole process of money creation will
> > require little if any bureaucracy as such.
> > 
> > It is best to leave the subject of TFE otherwise you
> will
> > just show yourself up again.
> > 
> >  R.Searle
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Tue, 1/7/08, Peter Hogwood
> > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Peter Hogwood <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics? And
> Paula
> > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > Date: Tuesday, 1 July, 2008, 2:25 PM
> > > You don't have to reply, my paranoid little
> > fellow. 
> > > Your proposition to just let the government spend
> and
> > stop
> > > collecting taxes is ridiculous on its face. 
> > There's no
> > > way to defend such nonsense, which explains why
> you
> > > don't even try.
> > > 
> > > Peter
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- On Tue, 7/1/08, robert searle
> > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: robert searle
> <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation Economics? And
> > Paula
> > > Gloria doing a "William Ryan?"
> > > > To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 4:47 AM
> > > > Dear Peter Hogwood, Zack Johnson, Clark
> Kent,
> > Ashen
> > > > Politicus (or whatever), McGunnigle, William
> > > > Ryan............et al...
> > > > 
> > > >      I am not going to waste time repeating
> > myself
> > > with
> > > > someone like you who exists in multiple
> > personality
> > > land
> > > > with a string of aliases. I might as well
> talk to
> > a
> > > brick
> > > > wall. Perhaps I would get some better sense
> that
> > way!
> > > > 
> > > > Another person who appears to be suffering
> from
> > > somekind of
> > > > "multiple personality disorder" is
> > Paula
> > > Gloria.
> > > > Admitedly, I was perhaps unkind to her when
> I
> > > suggested
> > > > that her videos were somewhat
> > "amateurish"
> > > on the
> > > > comment section of one of her You Tube
> Delights! 
> > > > 
> > > > She, herself, did not respond but someone
> called
> > Paula
> > > > Tsakona did (her alter ego probably)with
> some
> > spite,
> > > and
> > > > some deluded comment on me! Indeed, there is
> even
> > a
> > > Paula
> > > > Puja if I recall correctly. This I suspect
> is
> > another
> > > of
> > > > PGs aliases because the word Puja means
> worship
> > in
> > > > Sanskrit. I know ofcourse she has a strong
> > connection
> > > with
> > > > Indian mysticism. Obviously,PGs "own
> > name"
> > > is
> > > > probably fake,and a just a stage name to
> protect
> > > herself
> > > > from any "undesirables".....
> > > > 
> > > > On the internet you can be anything, and
> anyone. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Anyway, enough said!
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > R.Searle
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > R.Searle
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- On Mon, 30/6/08, Peter Hogwood
> > > > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > From: Peter Hogwood
> > <p_t_hogwood at yahoo.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [GJM] Innovation
> Economics?
> > > > > To:
> discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > Date: Monday, 30 June, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > > > Except it would be a going back to the
> Stone
> > Age
> > > type
> > > > of
> > > > > "innovation."  And your let
> the
> > > government
> > > > just
> > > > > spend and stop taxation is a nut house
> > > > > "innovation."
> > > > > 
> > > > > Peter
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- On Mon, 6/30/08, robert searle
> > > > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > From: robert searle
> > > <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > > > > > Subject: [GJM] Innovation
> Economics?
> > > > > > To:
> > discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> > > > > > Date: Monday, June 30, 2008, 4:30
> AM
> > > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >         This link may be of
> interest.
> > > Perhaps we
> > > > could
> > > > > > suggest interest free loans could
> be a
> > good
> > > > economic
> > > > > > innovation!!!???
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   
> > > > > >    
> > > >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innovation_Economics
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > R.Searle
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >


      __________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html

More information about the Discussion mailing list