[GJM] Replying to Peter Challen
Steve Consilvio
steve at behappyandfree.com
Wed Jan 16 12:47:33 MST 2008
Rodney wrote these comments (this is edited.) While they were not
directed at me, I thought I would chime in.
On WednesdayJan 16, 2008, at 1:09 PM, discussion-
request at globaljusticemovement.net wrote:
> 1. Where is the whopper when I say the banking system creates
> money out of
> nothing and you say exactly the same?
No whopper. It's true, just not limited to the banking system.
>
> 2. Where is the whopper when I say that the banks do not create
> enough
> money for the repayment of interest?
Not a whopper per say, but unclear. First you suggest that they
create money out of thin air, but then you state they don't create
enough to cover the interest. So now you know WHY they create more
money! There is never enough money because they are always
reacting. Like the police, they show up after the crime, except in
this case it is people doing "business." If the businesses don't
have enough money, then they create more so that the status quo is
maintained. This is Ben Franklin 101, and the belief that paper
money would solve the specific problem that a lack of currency creates.
> I am sure that you can explain where
> in the process the banks create the money for the interest.
easy. 2+2=5 If you need to repay the 5, then you use 2+2=6 with your
customers instead. If you have to repay the 6, then you use 2+2=7
with your customers instead, and so on. Everybody is both a buyer
and a seller, so they shift everything forward. Buy low, sell high.
The bank pays interest to its depositors, so therefore it must charge
interest to the borrowers. Isn't the WHERE obvious? It is the WHY
that is strange.
>
> 3. Please display your expertise further in explaining your
> statement that,
> when interest is repaid, it is cancelled.
The debt is cancelled, but the interest continues to exist as a
number (value) added into the economy. The values are never
subtracted as they shift , they grow progressively and geometrically
eventually. This is why more money is constantly needed, the cause
and effect are both the same. Creating money (income) out of thin
air (it doesn't matter who does it) requires creating more money out
of thin air to pay for it. One man's profit is another man's expense.
>
> 4. Please also explain how banks pay their employees etc if the
> interest
> the banks receive is cancelled.
The interest isn't cancelled, it's collected. Huge difference. They
pay their employees with the interest they collected, which is that
pay plus the amount of interest they pay to depositors. The banks
are not evil. They are stuck in the middle, the same as everyone else.
Think of the economy as a hole in the ground. The more you dig, the
deeper the hole gets, but also the pile of dirt gets taller, too.
People like John Stossell are always writing about how "good"
capitalism is, because he looks only at what was built (the pile of
dirt being roads, buildings, etc) and he refuses to look at the huge
hole that people fall into. When people fall in, the usual advice is
to dig. Then they will have a pile that they can stand on, and maybe
get out of the first hole, but that just leaves a deeper hole for
someone else. And so it goes over generations. The values keep
getting bigger. The cost of living gets higher BECAUSE we work so
hard. We gain efficiency by using bigger shovels, but that just
makes the holes deeper faster too. The piles of dirt are ALWAYS
directly related to the size of the hole. Zero interest and low
profits will keep the values close (a pricing equilibrium,) high
interest and high profits will create a large amount of inflation.
Nobody can outpace inflation, and the more transactions in the
economy (the more shovelfuls) the greater the problem becomes. Yet,
we can't live without shoveling, either. That is why an equilibrium
is preferable to both inflation or deflation.
200 years ago, making a profit of 50% would have seen you tarred and
feathered, today we think of that as "normal." The same cultural
change has occurred with the semantics between interest and usury.
Today usury (using other's definitions) is charging 50% interest, but
18% is "normal." But if you go back in history, at one time 6%
interest was considered "usury," and interest was 2%. As all the
values shift upward, the system becomes increasingly insane, but it
has always been the same insanity. Imperialism and the search for
more gold and silver was a result of this mathematical phenomenon.
They could never have enough money in the system because the value of
the goods changed too rapidly. Now we have paper money, but the
mathematical phenomenon is still the same. Land that cost 16 beads
200 years ago costs millions per parcel today. (Hoarding acerbates
the problem, but inflation would be present even without hoarding and
with a zero interest rate. For-profit transactions are enough to
imbalance the system initially.)
It isn't the money that is the root of the problem, it is the value
that we assign to goods as we "trade." 2+2=5 grows into 2
+2=trillions. Every transaction adds to the imbalance, one shovelful
at a time. The great irony of doublehink is that we call this
"trade" when in fact it is not a trade at all. One side wins and the
other loses. Buy low, sell high. There is no even trading (which is
why planes fly into the "Trade Center," too.) The red states
(farmers) and the blue states (factories) and the black states (oil)
don't trade fairly with one another. Everyone is to blame equally,
and everyone is equally a victim, too.
David Hacket Fischer's book The Great Wave documents the social
effects of inflation (unrest) and pricing equilibriums
(renaissance's) excellently. Of course, he does not understand the
underlying economics, but he tells the narrative wonderfully. We are
re-experiencing an old story. I would suggest everyone taking the
time to read it.
Math has no mercy, only people do.
peace,
steve consilvio
www.behappyandfree.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://globaljusticemovement.net/pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20080116/b077f2df/attachment.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list