[GJM] Paula Gloria and Robert Ashford!!
Zack Johnson
zackjohnson at louisiana.usa.com
Wed Jan 9 12:40:44 MST 2008
All I can say is that takes a real bird-brain to compare the economic
activity of humans to the activity of birds.
And what kind of bird-brained logic is this?:
"Land, however, does not grow. The Earth is the same size as it has
always been. If the Earth is physically a zero sum economy, and we are
of the Earth, then how can we not have a zero sum economy?"
The Earth is however not an economy but a factor of production.
Zack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Consilvio"
To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
Subject: Re: [GJM] Paula Gloria and Robert Ashford!!
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:37:42 -0500
Zack,
Can you explain to me why the new high school in my town cost more
than the Louisiana purchase?
The mosquitoes of "a zero sum economy" bite people the same way from
generation to generation, but man has an odd habit of putting numbers
on things. Numbers are not a zero-sum economy, they grow, rather
wildly. (aka inflation) Land, however, does not grow. The Earth is
the same size as it has always been. If the Earth is physically a
zero sum economy, and we are of the Earth, then how can we not have a
zero sum economy?
You may think you created "furniture," but it is still just a tree,
with some labor added, and you cannot create the tree, you can only
harvest it. Birds build nests. So should we say that birds make
"stuff exist" through economic activity?
How is it possible that birds can engage in so much "economic
activity" without the need for deeds, money or inflation? If we are
smarter than them, then why do we have problems that they do not? If
we are so good at "civilization," then what is the purpose of trying
to fix "global justice?" According to you, nothing is broken. We
live in the best of all possible world, we are "civilized."
My quote of Ashford is the same as what you said he said. There is
no difference between "capital creates capital," and "acquiring
capital with the earnings of capital." Nor did I say it was wrong, I
simply said that the addition of computers was not significant. You
perhaps think computers are the hallmark of civilization. I think
your historical benchmarks are in error, just as his are. We only
need computers because we are so stupid, and have an odd fear and
fascination numbers.
Smell the coffee. Coffee is the stuff of nature, not civilization.
We need the Earth, the Earth does not need us, nor our numbers. We
don't need the numbers either, but if we are going to use them,
2+2=4.
peace,steve consilviowww.behappyandfree.com
On TuesdayJan 8, 2008, at 3:39 PM,
discussion-request at globaljusticemovement.net wrote:
Steve, you write:
"Robert Ashford states that 'once you understand that capital
creates its
own capital'..."
You really are a goosey little fellow, aren't you? Ashford never
said
the words you attribute to him, not anything even close. It's
just
something you, not Ashford, dreamed up. What he talks repeatedly
of is
"the right to acquire capital with the earnings of capital."
And your continual rants are just laughable. For example, the
ludicrous
point about the economy being a "zero sum game."
Just look around you my friend. Smell the coffee. Wake up. See
all the
stuff that exists, the furniture in your room, the streets
outside, the
buildings, factories and farms all around you. That stuff exists,
and
was created through economic activity. It is the stuff of
civilization.
A "zero sum" economy is the economy of mosquitoes, not conscious
human
beings who build from generation to generation.
Zack
--
Are we headed for a recession? Read more on the Money Portal
Mail.com Money - http://www.mail.com/Money.aspx?cat=money
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://globaljusticemovement.net/pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20080109/b87919a2/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list