[GJM] #852, Steve Consilvio On The just war theory
Steve Consilvio
steve at behappyandfree.com
Tue Jan 8 09:08:37 MST 2008
There is nothing particularly Catholic about "just war theory," it is
simply an expression of fear. In fact, all legal agreements are
based on fear. If you go back and look at the treaties between the
colonies in Massachusetts and Rhode Island that were made by the
Puritans, for example, they are based on the fear of the Native
Americans. They were too self-righteous to live together, but they
found common ground in their fears of the "savages." Implied by the
treaty is that it is "just" to defend yourself and kill your
attacker. This, of course, is the exact opposite of Jesus' teaching
of "turn the other cheek." These treaties were well reasoned, and
not made under duress. While it is understandable that somebody may
react to violence with violence in the heat of the moment, these
"learned" expressions (treaties generally) are the best examples of
the propaganda of hypocrisy. The unwise and powerful are always
documenting their fears.
A better way to understand this is that the fears of the individuals
become the laws of public policy. People want the government to
"protect them," so they can avoid doing the dirty work themselves.
Of course, this doesn't end the dirty work, it just attempts to
sucker somebody else into doing it (the young males.) Every society
always has the same group as their warriors. Parents lie to their
kids by teaching them their own fears as truth. The same would have
occurred in the society of "barbarians." Every society is the same.
The colonists attacked the natives, the natives attacked the
colonists. New neighbors or old, fear and mistrust always finds the
same expression. Those who fear the same thing form a group to
protect themselves against the other group.
In other word, Just War Theory is an expression of groupthink, but it
is based on the fears that individuals have. Because they fear
losing their life and property, they are willing to risk their life
and property to defend it. This is the dividing point between the
spiritually dead and the spiritually alive. You cannot tell the
difference by looking at a person, but the struggle can be exposed in
what they say. Every society has this fault line, and even every
family. (The story of Pocahontas, for example, and her father the
chief who simply wanted to kill John Smith.) There are many stories
of those who seek to kill and those who seek peace in every society.
The dividing point is fear. Those who love their enemy have no
enemies, whereas those who fear their enemies never run out of
enemies to fear. The contrast could not be more greater, and this
contrast seeps into everything.
The Declaration of Independence, and Osama's lettter to America, are
both expressions of just war theory. They all come down to "it is
better for you to die and for me to live." Just war was also the
intellectual bedrock of Hitler's Final Solution.
Every war is the same; it is two fascist's fighting one another.
Both believe in just war. They are actually battling their mirror,
not their opposite. It is important to realize that it is not
countries, groups, parties, races or religions that go to war, it is
simply individuals who are afraid acting in unison.
Fear forms all public policy, which is why Libertarians seem so crazy
to the status quo of Democrats and Republicans. Liberals and
Conservatives have codified all their fears into laws, whereas
Libertarians fear the laws themselves. (A funny story: I once
attended the state party convention for the Libertarian Party. They
confiscated my hand-outs and spent most of their time talking about
by-laws and taking pledges. I never appreciated Orwell so much as on
that day. Doublethink, groupthink and paranoia are the occupational
hazards of all public endeavors, even of this group. It is very hard
to create a community of free-thinkers, who lack fear, and who have a
consensus. Even Jesus couldn't do it with the Apostles. They locked
themselves into a room after He was crucified.
All the locks and security in the world cannot keep out fear. People
carry fear within themselves, and there is no escape except letting
it go. Compounding the problem is pride. People are proud of
defeating their fears, which reinforces that what they fear should be
feared. Americans, for example, are proud of defeating the English,
slave-holders, the Germans and the Japanese, but look at what it took
to do so. Now everybody is a slave of the federal government, we are
the colonizing imperialists, and we were more ruthless than the
Germans and the Japanese. They only way to defeat somebody
militarily is to be more ruthless than them. Hitler was an
inefficient killer, that is why he lost. We are experts at it; we
drop a nuke and do in seconds what he needed years to accomplish.
The victor should be aghast at what he was capable of doing, but
instead he is proud of what he did. Men like the Swift Boat Morons
are petrified of their mirror, and so are afraid of any criticism of
the Vietnam War. They don't want to see themselves as they really
are (invaders,) they want to keep the fiction alive that they are
heroes, just like their mommies and daddies told them before they
left. We need to love our parents, but not the lies they taught us.
They make mistakes just like we do.
The only good thing about war is that the ones who survive are given
a second chance. Every war ends because the ability to wage war is
eventually destroyed. Only the rich wage war, because they have both
the means and the motive to do so. The tighter they try to hold onto
their fears, the more they eventually lose. A closed fist is like a
closed heart. It is important to recognize that the wealth people
accumulate was first also a reflection of their fear. (The rich fear
to be poor, the poor fear to stay poor.) The king lives well while
the peasants struggle. Every war is a civil war, and it spreads as
other nations get involved. The disparity in wealth is an economic
phenomenon, but its roots are in fear and legal contracts. The Earth
belongs to God or to all men, yet men write deeds that claim they
have authority over men and land. They use force to make the claim,
and they use force to defend the claim. How insane is it to use
force to defend a peace treaty? Yet that is how the world works.
There is nobody to "enforce" a peace treaty. The UN is an attempt to
have a government that watches over all governments, but then who
will watch the UN? The paper trail just keeps growing to new heights
of absurdity.
Without virtuous men, there can be no virtuous society. The wise do
not need to be governed, and the unwise cannot be governed.
Religions, governments and businesses are all based on the same chain
of authority, and the authority is based directly or indirectly on
fear and pride. Just War theory is not just Catholic, or just
applied to war. It finds its way into politics as democratic theory
(the majority rules) and in economic theory (right to property and
profit.) All are similarly based on "what is good for me is best."
It is, afterall, a pretty crazy idea to turn the other cheek in
business or politics or war. "What will stop the fear, pride and
greed of men if I don't use my strength to overpower them?" The 10
Commandments are rules of personal behavior. Men will either follow
them or not, but we need to be most concerned with if we follow
them. The public laws of men are all written as exemptions from the
commandments, just as just war theory is a philosophical exemption.
It is legal to kill men, kill babies, print money, make profit,
charge interest, evict families, imprison people, pollute, and
confiscate (tax,) under every legal system. All of these things
have their root in trade and in the concepts of money and value. The
rules of war are the same as the rules of trade: Kill first and
protect yourself. While some Catholics may be enslaved by this
thinking, there is nothing uniquely Catholic about it. Ideas rule
the world, and the same ideas (good and bad) are on many tongues,
regardless of age, position, culture, possessions, etc. We are all
imperfect men living in an immoral world. Bad ideas always arrive as
good ideas, by virtue of their being new (to us,) but eventually they
fail.
The commandments really do represent all the wisdom man has ever
known, or needed. It is impossible to improve on perfection, but it
is easy to deny anything. Just War Theory denies the commandments.
In fact, it denies the very purpose of religion, which is for men to
live in peace and plenty. To love your enemy is the test for
salvation, but it is also good policy. God doesn't want to spend
eternity with a bunch of frightened self-righteous hypocrites. He
didn't tell His Son to be a warrior, and to kill other sons. And
when God took the eldest from every family in Egypt, he was just
trying to make a point. The Jews were probably hated, and respected,
as a result. (Their God was real, not just a rock.) Jews don't
follow the commandments any better than the Christians or the
Muslims, deists or atheists. Everybody has a just war theory, and
none of them are true.
We all reap what we sow. So I try to sow love and forgiveness and
mercy, because I want it for myself, too, and for everyone.
FYI: I am not saying anything new.
"If you are willing and obedient, you will eat the best from the land;
but if you resist and rebel, you will be devoured by the sword."
For the mouth of the Lord has spoken. - Isaiah 1:19-20
Utopia awaits our acceptance. We are in the Garden of Eden, but many
cannot see it. We continuously re-enact Cain slaying Abel instead.
The more righteous a man is, the more jealous others are. It was no
accident that Jesus and Socrates were condemned by a government.
Governments (ie, the people that control them) are as afraid of
virtue as they are afraid of hypocrites like themselves. Between the
two, there is always an apostate or heretic or barbarian or demon to
"justly" kill, with a government celebration sure to follow. The
last war always provides a justification for the next war.
peace,
Steve Consilvio
www.behappyandfree.com
On TuesdayJan 8, 2008, at 6:46 AM, discussion-
request at globaljusticemovement.net wrote:
>> Thanks again Steve. Please send your comments
>> also on the role of Catholic Social Theory in forming US public
>> policy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://globaljusticemovement.net/pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20080108/439c5663/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list