[GJM] Article 101 Maastricht Treaty

[E. Crockett]

FROM:  Prof. Ulysses S. Crockett, Jr., J.D. '71 Boalt
Hall University California Berkeley;  LL.M. '73
Columbia University Law School (Federal TaxationO 
See:  Ulysses S. Crockett, Jr., Federal Taxation Of
Interest On Indebtedness, 10 INDIANA LAW REVIEW 419
(1976), in particular, Conclusion and recommendations
for reform.

To:  Rodney Shakespeare

1.  Very important notice about so-called Central Bank
practices of printing money respresented by absolutely
no valuable assets.  The Bilderberg group privately
owned U.S. Federal Reserve "Bank" utilizes this
illegal practice all the time creating profits for its
private shareholders.  In addition to Maastricht
Treaty Article 101 violations it is posited that such
practices also violate certain provisions of the World
Trade Organization protocols.  the similar practices
by the privately owned Bilderberg U.S. Federal Reserve
"Central Bank" blatantly violate the U.S.
Constitution, such violation continually permitted by
the U.S. Congress and the Federalist Society
dominiated U.S. Supreme Court (five Court Justices
members of Federalist Society) and federal judiciary.

    2.  Scholars are asked to familiarize themselves
with the writings of Catherine Austin Fitts, former
U.S. Housing and Urban Development Deputy fiinancial
official who notes the U.S. is not a sovereign country
since its entire financial administrationis government
by private unelected individuals and entities. 

   3.  Crockett observes the United States is a
Bilderberg-Council On Foreign Relations military
dictatorship since:

        a.  Eighty percent of the 16 agency
Intelligence budget is secret and does not account to
any government oversight entity;
        b.  The Pentagon routinely does not account
for its expenditures as required by Congressional
legislation. In 2006-7, as a mnatter of public record,
$3 Trillion dollars of Pentagon monies are simply
missing with no explanation;
        c.  Vladimir Putin was an official in the KGB
when the Carter Bilderberg cabinet members and Council
On Foreign Relations planned and executed the
overthrow of the Soviet leaning Afghanistan
governmenet in a successful effort to draw Russia into
a Russian government bankruptcy war with Afghanistan. 
In cooperation with China, Russia has encouraged the
purchase of U.S. Treasury notes to finance the U.S.
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with full knowledge the
U.S. can never repay the borrowned monies.  Zebignew
Brezhenski's book sets forth facts supporting this
process predicting that the first U.S. attack would be
Iraq.  When Russia and China wish to call in its loans
to U.S., all is necessary is to demand payment in
currency other than dollars, such as Euros and the
entire financial structure of the United State will
collapse.

    4.  Unfortunately, the forementioned world
financial processes are sufficiently in place that
there is probably no alternative processs which can be
executed.

    5.  All are requested to review the research and
writings of Chalmers Johnson with respect to the world
finance status set forth above.


--- Rodney Shakespeare
<rodney.shakespeare1 at btinternet.com> wrote:

> Dear All,
> I wrote to the Governor of the Bank of England
> asking about where the Bank's money for Northern
> Rock came from, and was it created out of nothing.  
> 
> The reply (from an acolyte of the Governor -- the
> Bank cunningly uses this device so that, if
> necessary, it can say the response was not really
> authoritative) claims the money comes from "
> 'reserve balances which is money held by the banking
> system in accounts at the Bank....".
> 
> I suspect that this sentence is in effect a lie but,
>  in any case, the next sentence from the acolyte
> starts like this:-- "These balances are a form of
> 'central bank money' and the Bank has taken steps to
> offset the creation of central bank money by lending
> less in its regular market operations than it would
> otherwise have done."
> 
> So, all in all, there is an admission that the money
> was created by the Bank and the fun really will come
> if the money gets lost by Northern Rock because I
> happen to know that somebody has written to the Bank
> asking how that loss would be written in the Bank's
> accounts..........Watch this space....--- but I
> expect that the Bank will never answer that
> question.
> 
> Anyway,  in response to another question the acolyte
> says that Article 101 of the Maastricht Treaty makes
> it illegal for central banks to provide loans to
> governments.
> 
> Er hem -- except when it's Northern Rock, of course.
> 
> But I asked about lending to the government in the
> context of loans to governments for public capital
> projects (thereby halving or more the cost of the
> projects).  So you can see how the banking system
> has worked to stitch up everything so that all
> lending is always done at interest -- even lending
> for hospitals.
> 
> And, of course,  the acolyte, said that lending to a
> government "could be inflationary".  NB  The Bank
> does not think that banking system lending at
> interest is inflationary -- oh no -- and it does not
> occur to the Bank that if the banking system is
> restricted in its lending (the lending which is
> causing the present global financial crisis) it
> could then open up a supply of interest-free loans
> for the development and spreading of productive (and
> the associated consuming) capacity. 
> 
> The Bank's letter is,  in practice, an expositon of
> the mainstream economics definition of endogenous
> money which, it claims, always has to be
> bank-created interest-bearing money, such money, it
> is claimed, always being allocated for the
> efficiency purposes of a market economy.   
> 
> Rodney Shakespeare.
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Zack Johnson 
>   To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net 
>   Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:45 PM
>   Subject: Re: [GJM] MORE CLEARER INFORMATION ON
> INFLATION CONTROLS IN TRANSFINANCIAL ECONOMICS (FEB
> 2008)
> 
> 
>   Robert, you again fail to explain how, in a modern
> industrial economy, where government spending is
> approaching half of all spending, if government
> stops taxing, but continues to spend, how the
> economy would not rapidly devolve into inflationary
> chaos.
> 
>   Your apparent belief in magic is not ameliorated
> by this insipid little essay.
> 
>   Zack
> 
> 
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: "robert searle" 
>     To: discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>     Subject: [GJM] MORE CLEARER INFORMATION ON
> INFLATION CONTROLS IN TRANSFINANCIAL ECONOMICS (FEB
> 2008)
>     Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:53:21 +0000 (GMT)
> 
> 
>     Dear All,
> 
>     The following comes from my present essay
>     (changed yet again to include more on inflation
>     data)on Transfinancial Economics. It is to do
> with
>     more light on super-flexible controls to control
>     inflation levels, and valuation of currency. I
> also
>     exclude from the data below my old idea of part
>     registration of products, and services which was
> the
>     outcome of woolley thinking unfortunately!!!
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>     Robert Searle
> 
> 
>     3.Advanced Computer Programming for the Direct
>     Super-Flexible Controls over Inflation.
> 
> 
>     In TFE there is the realization for the need to
>     develop advanced computer programming to
> directly
>     control levels in inflation. It is not our
> intention
>     to go into too much detail as this can be a
> somewhat
>     technical subject.
> 
>     It must also be stressed that we are not
> discussing a
>     command economy but rather a capitalist one in
> which
>     there is little government intervention. What
> follows
>     is essentially "simplistic", and is only a brief
>     presentation on super-flexible electronic
> controls
>     over inflation.
> 
>     Since money in the main exists as electronic
> data
>     transmitted from one bank account to another it
> can be
>     tracked, and controlled. This concept is central
> to
>     the proper understanding of Transfinancial
> Economics.
> 
> 
>     A.Mandatory Registration for Businesses instead
> of
>     Income Tax Declarations.
> 
> 
>     Most products,services, and indeed, "fixed"
> incomes
>     could be subjected to a mandatory super-flexible
> price
>     registration which is notably indexed linked
>     electronically to inflation for businesses. In
> other
>     words, most people running large, or small
> commercial
>     enterprises would have to declare the trade
> costs, and
>     retail prices of their products.Details about
> their
>     profits, and other sources of income would be
>     unnecessary unlike the present income tax
> regime.
> 
>     The data concerned ofcourse goes onto authorized
>     computer systems that simultaneously deal with
>     transactions. Such work could be undertaken by
> banks,
>     or some other commercial body. Alternatively, an
>     independent public authority could be created
> possibly
>     working with the private sector. The tax
> authorities
>     themselves though could be replaced by a
> National
>     Inflation Control Authority.
> 
>     Unlike the present income tax system there is no
> huge
>     bureaucracy, or much form filling (or online
>     registration ofcourse)and compliance on
> inflation
>     legislation using electronic techniques could be
>     directly used to ensure efficiency.
> 
> 
> 
>     B.Comprehensive Electronic Price Index.
> 
> 
>     Anyway,a special comprehensive electronic
> National
>     Inflation Price Index (NIPI)notably listing the
>     average prices of cars, phones, books,and the
> like
> 
=== message truncated ===>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs