[GJM] Sutainable Banking!
robert searle
dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Oct 8 03:25:08 MDT 2007
I think we should give banks, and corporations the
benefit of the doubt. I am sure there must be a few
top business people who take "sustainability"
seriously. It cannot all be "greewash."
R.Searle.
--- Steve Consilvio <steve at behappyandfree.com> wrote:
> Sustainable is a fancy word for making it sound like
> you are doing
> something new, but in fact are trying to preserve
> the status quo. It
> is a response to a failing system, by suggesting
> that the best fix is
> to keep the failing system running. (God forbid you
> change
> something, eh?) If all the debtors go broke, then
> the banks will go
> broke with them. Which is to say, that if they blow
> all the savings
> that people gave them to hold, then nobody will
> trust them anymore.
> They need to sustain their middle-man role in the
> predator-prey
> relationship, which means everybody else must
> sustain theirs.
>
> Ironically, Robert Morris was right when he set up
> this ponzi scheme
> 200+ years ago. There should only be one bank.
> Competing banks
> multiply the problems with currency and destroy its
> value
> (inflation,) since now everyone is involved in
> manipulating their
> currency, rather than actually using it. Of course,
> how we use the
> currency is still the real problem. Banks have no
> interest in
> reform, the current system suits them just fine.
> There is no easier
> way to get rich than massaging the numbers, and
> using other people's
> money to do so. Similarly, a capitalist believes
> that goods can only
> flow if a currency is attached to it, and the
> accounting system we
> use is as unalterable as the sunrise. :-) Both
> believe that the
> world would end if the government did not issue
> currency. And most
> (all) reformers share a similar belief about money.
>
> We would think it insane if medical researchers
> spent their time
> trying to perfect a disease, but not so with
> economists. Instead of
> lead they use numbers, but the alchemy is the same
> as it always was.
> People do not "own" money; it is a government
> created and regulated
> commodity.
>
> -steve
>
>
> On Oct 6, 2007, at 2:00 PM, discussion-
> request at globaljusticemovement.net wrote:
>
> > It appears that certain banks take a
> "serious"
> > interest in sustainability. Presumably, they must
> > benefit from it in some way.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
More information about the Discussion
mailing list