[GJM] Fwd: CONSPIRACY THEORY OR CONSPIRACY FACT - BILDERBERG WORLD GOVERNMENT?
robert searle
dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Nov 6 09:06:50 MST 2007
Rather than just writing about this stuff what
PRACTICAL PLAN DO YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT IF
IT IS TRUE TO SOME EXTENT??
R.Searle.
--- "E. Crockett" <echojurist at yahoo.com> wrote:
> see prisonplanet.com
> infowars.com
> Bilderberg faciss include: Henry Kissinger, illary
> Cliniton, Vernon Jordon, David Rockefeller, Richard
> Holbroke, Lawrence summers., George Stephanopolous,
> Late Peter Jenings, Tom Brokaw, Leslie Stahl, Diane
> Feinistein, Bill Richardson, Jonk Kerry, Rudolph
> Guiliani, John Warner, John A;lito, John Robertsw,
> Antoni0 Scalia, Rothscild Banking Interests, Ben
> Bernanke, Club of Rome Directors, Council Foreign
> Relations Directors, Trilateral Commmission members,
> et al. Do your research and try to attend the
> secret
> meetings, security for wich you [pay wit your tax
> dollars.
> --- "Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam"
> <mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > david pidcock <david_pidcock2 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:32:52 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: david pidcock <david_pidcock2 at yahoo.co.uk>
> > Subject: CONSPIRACY THEORY OR CONSPIRACY FACT -
> > BILDERBERG WORLD GOVERNMENT?
> > To: jitendra k sharma <drsharmajk at gmail.com>
> > CC: "Y.Liwei Professor" <zz2001 at sh163.net>,
> > Muhamed Catic <dininono at emirates.net.ae>,
> > ken palmerton <kenpalmerton at cix.co.uk>
> >
> >
> > In 1799, U.S. President Thomas Jefferson gave
> the
> > following warning, which has been ignored, along
> > with all his other good advice right up to the
> > present day:
> >
> > "Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the
> > accidental opinion of a day, but a series of
> > oppressions, begun at a distinguished period,
> > unalterable through every change of ministers, too
> > plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of
> > reducing us to slavery."
> >
> > Subsequently referred to as: "the conspiracy
> > theory". DMP – 4/11/07
> >
> >
> > Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 14, Number
> 5
> > (August - September 2007) PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld
> > 4560 Australia. <>>editor at nexusmagazine.com
> > Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442
> > 9381
> >
> > From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com by
> > Daniel Estulin © 2007 Email:
> > <>>daniel at danielestulin.com
> > http://www.danielestulin.com ----------
> >
> > The Sun has set on Bilderberg 2007 in Istanbul,
> > Turkey. After a sumptuous lunch on this warm and
> > sunny 3rd June, most Bilderbergers returned to
> their
> > countries of choice, freshly armed with precise
> > instructions from the Steering Committee on how to
> > proceed in covertly expanding the powers of One
> > World Government. Amongst this year's luminaries
> in
> > attendance were: Henry Kissinger; Henry Kravis of
> > KKR; Marie-Josée Kravis of Hudson Institute;
> Vernon
> > Jordan; Etienne Davignon, Bilderberg Group
> > President; Her Majesty Queen Beatrix of The
> > Netherlands, daughter of one of the founders,
> Prince
> > Bernhard; and the King and Queen of Spain. As a
> > rhetorical question, can someone please explain to
> > me how it is that progressive liberals such as
> John
> > Edwards and Hillary Clinton as well as do-gooder
> > humanitarians with multiple social projects on the
> > go, such as David Rockefeller and every Royal
> House
> > in Europe, can perennially attend Bilderberg
> > meetings knowing that the final objective of
> > this despicable group of hoodlums is a fascist
> One
> > World Empire? How could it be orchestrated? The
> idea
> > is to give to each country a political
> constitution
> > and an appropriate national economic structure,
> > organised for the following purposes: (1) to place
> > political power into the hands of chosen people
> and
> > eliminate all intermediaries; (2) to establish a
> > maximum concentration of industries and suppress
> all
> > unwarranted competition; (3) to establish absolute
> > control of prices of all goods and raw materials
> > (Bilderbergers make it possible through their
> > iron-grip control of The World Bank, the
> > International Monetary Fund and the World Trade
> > Organization); and (4) to create judicial and
> social
> > institutions that would prevent all extremes of
> > action.
> >
> > NOT PRIVATE, BUT SECRET Although participants
> > emphatically attest that they attend the Club's
> > annual meeting as private citizens and not in
> their
> > official government capacity, that affirmation is
> > dubious-particularly when you compare the Chatham
> > House Rule with the Logan Act in the United
> States,
> > where it is absolutely illegal for elected
> officials
> > to meet in private with influential business
> > executives to debate and design public policy.
> > Bilderberg meetings follow a traditional protocol
> > founded in 1919, in the wake of the Paris Peace
> > Conference held at Versailles, by the Royal
> > Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) based at
> > Chatham House in London. While the name Chatham
> > House is commonly used to refer to the Institute
> > itself, the Royal Institute of International
> Affairs
> > is the foreign policy executive arm of the British
> > monarchy. According to RIIA procedures: "When a
> > meeting, or part thereof, is held under the
> Chatham
> > House Rule, participants are free to use the
> > information received, but neither the identity
> nor
> > the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any
> > other participant, may be revealed; nor may it be
> > mentioned that the information was received at a
> > meeting of the Institute."
> >
> > The Logan Act was intended to prohibit United
> > States citizens without authority from interfering
> > in relations between the United States and foreign
> > governments. However, there have been a number of
> > judicial references to the Act, and it is not
> > uncommon for it to be used as a political weapon.
> > Those who have attended Bilderberg Group meetings
> > over the years and flouted the Logan Act include:
> > Allen Dulles (CIA); Senator William J. Fulbright
> > (from Arkansas, a Rhodes Scholar); Dean Acheson
> > (Secretary of State under President Truman);
> Nelson
> > Rockefeller and Laurance Rockefeller; former
> > President Gerald Ford; Henry J. Heinz II (former
> > CEO, H. J. Heinz Co.); Thomas L. Hughes (former
> > President of the Carnegie Endowment for
> > International Peace); Robert S. McNamara
> (President
> > Kennedy's Secretary of Defense and former
> President
> > of the World Bank); William P. Bundy (former
> > President of the Ford Foundation, and former
> editor
> > of the Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign
> Affairs
> > journal); John J. McCloy (former President of
> Chase
> > Manhattan Bank); George F. Kennan (former US
> > Ambassador to the Soviet Union); Paul H. Nitze
> > (former representative of Schroeder Bank; Nitze
> > played a very prominent role in matters of arms
> > control agreements, which have always been under
> the
> > direction of the RIIA); Robert O. Anderson (former
> > Chairman, Atlantic Richfield Co., and Chairman,
> > Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies); John D.
> > Rockefeller IV (former Governor of West Virginia,
> > now US Senator); Cyrus Vance (Secretary of State
> > under President Carter); Eugene Black (former
> > President of the World Bank); Joseph Johnson
> (former
> > President, Carnegie Endowment for International
> > Peace); Gen. Andrew J. Goodpaster (former Supreme
> > Allied Commander in Europe, and later
> Superintendent
> > of West Point Academy); Zbigniew Brzezinski
> > (National Security Adviser to President Carter,
> > co-founder of the Trilateral Commission); General
> > Alexander Haig (once European NATO Commander,
> former
> > assistant to Henry Kissinger, and later Secretary
> > of State under President Reagan); James S.
> > Rockefeller (former President and Chairman, First
> > National City Bank, now Citibank).
> >
> > BILDERBERG 2007 CONCLUSIONS Thanks to our inside
> > sources at the conference, we have compiled what
> we
> > believe to be an accurate and a credible model of
> > the Bilderberg 2007 conclusions. Following is a
>
=== message truncated ===
---------------------------------
The world in the palm of their hands: Bilderberg
2005Michael Schiavo pleads case on CNN
0&parent.frames.length) {
d=parent.frames[n.substring(p+1)].document;
n=n.substring(0,p);} if(!(x=d[n])&d.all) x=d.all[n];
for (i=0;!x&i 2) { if ((img = MM_findObj(args[2]))
!= null & !img.MM_init) { img.MM_init = true;
img.MM_up = args[3]; img.MM_dn = img.src; if
((nbArr = document[grpName]) == null) nbArr =
document[grpName] = new Array();
nbArr[nbArr.length] = img; for (i=4; i
The world in the palm of their hands: Bilderberg 2005
Online Journal | May 24, 2005
By Daniel Estulin
The annual secret meeting of the Bilderberg group
determines many of the headlines and news developments
you will read about in the coming months. But the
Establishment media completely black it out. With the
exception of half-a-dozen high-ranking members of the
press who are sworn to secrecy, few have ever heard of
the exclusive and secretive group called The
Bilderbergers.
Mainstream news organizations boastful about their
no-holds barred investigative exploits, have been
strangely reluctant to lift the blackout curtain
hiding a major event: the Bilderberg group's secret
annual meeting for the world's most powerful
financiers, industrialists, and political figures.
Two thousand-five was a bad year for Bilderberg and
its future looks gloomy. Herculean efforts to keep
their meetings secret in Rottach-Egern failed
miserably. Bilderberg's grief is the free
world´s glory—and hope for further
restraining the power grabbers in the dawn of a new
millennium.
One certainty is that although the Bilderberg Group
has lost some of its past luster, it is meeting under
its usual secrecy that makes freemasonry look like a
playgroup. Staff at the hotel are photographed and put
through special clearance. From porters to senior
managers, the employees are warned (under the threat
of never working in the country again) about the
consequences of revealing any details of the guests to
the press.
International and national media are said to be
welcome only when an oath of silence has been taken,
news editors are held responsible if any of their
journalists 'inadvertently' report on what takes
place.
While Clinton, Blair, Chirac, Berlusconi and Company
attended the G8 summits of the world's foremost
democratically elected leaders, they were accompanied
by the massed ranks of the world media. In stark
contrast, the comings and goings at Bilderberg take
place under cover of a virtual publicity blackout.
The discussions they will engage in this year, from
deciding how the world should deal with
European-American relations, the Middle East powder
keg, the Iraq war, the global economy and how to stave
off war in Iran, and the consensus they reach, will
influence the course of Western civilization and the
future of the entire planet. This meeting takes place
behind closed doors in total secrecy, protected by a
phalanx of armed guards.
What Was on Bilderberg´s 2005 Agenda?
After three straight years of open hostilities and
tension amongst the European, British and American
Bilderbergers caused by the war in Iraq, the aura of
complete congeniality amongst them has returned.
Bilderbergers have reaffirmed and remain united in
their long-term goal to strengthen the role the UN
plays in regulating global conflicts and relations.
However, it is important to understand that Americans
are no more the "Hawks" than the European
Bilderbergers the "Doves." Europeans joined in
supporting the 1991 invasion of Iraq by President
George W. Bush's father, celebrating, in the words of
one notable Bilderberg hunter the end of "America's
Vietnam syndrome." Europeans also supported former
President Bill Clinton's invasion of Yugoslavia,
bringing NATO into the operation.
A much-discussed subject in 2005 at Rottach-Egern was
the concept of imposing a direct UN tax on people
worldwide through a direct tax on oil at the wellhead.
This, in fact, sets a precedent. If enacted, it will
be the first time, when a non-governmental agency,
read the United Nations, directly benefits from a tax
on citizens of free and enslaved nations.
Bilderberger proposal calls for a tiny UN levy at the
outset, which the consumer would hardly notice. Jim
Tucker of the court-killed Spotlight magazine years
ago wrote "establishing the principle that the UN can
directly tax citizens of the world is important to
Bilderberg. It is another giant step toward world
government. Bilderbergers know that publicly promoting
a UN tax on all people on Earth would meet with
outrage. But they are patient; it first proposed a
direct world tax years ago and celebrates the fact
that it is now in the public dialogue with little
public attention or concern."
Bilderberg wants "tax harmonization" so high-tax
countries could compete with more tax-friendly
nations—including the United States—for
foreign investment. They would "harmonize" taxes by
forcing the rate in the United States and other
countries to rise so that socialist Sweden's
58-percent level would be "competitive."
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
Then there is the rise of the NGOs, a development
former President Clinton suddenly (one day after it
was discussed at Rottach-Egern) calls one of "the most
remarkable things that have happened since the fall of
the Berlin Wall." Ironically, Clinton's statement was
picked up by The Wall Street Journal, a paper always
represented at the Bilderberg meetings by Robert L.
Bartley, its vice president and Paul Gigot, editorial
page editor.
The Bilderbergers have been vigorously debating
giving, for the first time, nonelected,
self-appointed, environmental activists a position of
governmental authority on the governing board of the
agency which controls the use of atmosphere, outer
space, the oceans, and, for all practical purposes,
biodiversity. This invitation for "civil society" to
participate in global governance is described as
expanding democracy.
According to sources within Bilderberg, the status of
NGOs would be elevated even further in the future. The
NGO activity would include agitation at the local
level, lobbying at the national level, producing
studies to justify global taxation through UN
organizations such as Global Plan, one of
Bilderberg´s pet projects for over a decade. The
strategy to advance the global governance agenda
specifically includes programs to discredit
individuals and organizations that generate "internal
political pressure" or "populist action" that fails to
support the new global ethic. The ultimate objective,
according to the source, being to suppress democracy.
The United Nations Environment Programme, along with
all the environmental treaties under its jurisdiction,
would ultimately be governed by a special body of
environmental activists, chosen only from accredited
NGOs appointed by delegates to the General Assembly
who are themselves appointed by the president of the
United States, who is controlled by the
Rockefeller-CFR-Bilderberg interlocking leadership
This new mechanism would provide a direct route from
the local, "on-the-ground" NGO affiliates of national
and international NGOs to the highest levels of global
governance. For example: The Greater Yellowstone
Coalition, a group of affiliated NGOs, recently
petitioned the World Heritage Committee of UNESCO
asking for intervention in the plans of a private
company to mine gold on private land near Yellowstone
Park. The UNESCO Committee did intervene, and
immediately listed Yellowstone as a "World Heritage
Site in Danger." Under the terms of the World Heritage
Convention, the United States is required to protect
the park, even beyond the borders of the park, and
onto private lands if necessary.
The ideas being discussed, if implemented, will bring
all the people of the world into a global
neighbourhood managed by a worldwide bureaucracy,
under the direct authority of a minute handful of
appointed individuals, and policed by thousands of
individuals, paid by accredited NGOs, certified to
support a belief system, which to many people is
unbelievable and unacceptable.
Elections in Britain
Bilderbergers are celebrating the result it wanted.
The return of a much humbled Tony Blair to 10 Downing
Street with a much-reduced parliamentary majority.
European Bilderbergers are still angry at him for
supporting America´s war in Iraq. While teaching
Blair a useful lesson in international politics,
Bilderbergers feel he is a far safer candidate to
continue on the path of European integration than his
conservative rival Michael Howard.
Neoconservative Agenda
In full force was that faction known as the so-called
"neoconservatives"—those who have determined
that Israel's security should come at the expense of
the safety to the United States and be central to all
U.S. foreign policy decisions.
Most notable among this group is the alleged Israeli
spy, Richard Perle, who was investigated by the FBI
for espionage on behalf of Israel. Perle played the
critical role in pushing the United States into the
war against Iraq. He was forced to resign from the
Pentagon´s Defense Policy Board, on March 27,
2003, after it was learned that he had been advising
Goldman Sachs International, a habitual Bilderberg
attendee, on how it might profit from the war in Iraq.
Another neoconservative figure on hand was Michael A.
Ledeen, an "intellectual´s intellectual." Ledeen
serves for the American Enterprise Institute, a
think-tank founded in 1943, with which Richard Perle
has long been associated. AEI and the Brookings
Institution operate a Joint Center for Regulatory
Studies (JCRS) with the purpose of holding lawmakers
and regulators "accountable for their decisions by
providing thoughtful, objective analyses of existing
regulatory programs and new regulatory proposals." The
JCRS pushes for cost-benefit analysis of regulations,
which fits with AEI's (and Bilderberger) ultimate goal
of deregulation.
These neoconservatives were also joined this year at
Bilderberg by a handful of other top former Washington
policy makers and publicists known for their
sympathies for Israel, including former State
Department official Richard N. Haas, president of the
CFR; former Assistant Secretary of State and "father"
of the Dayton accord, Richard Holbrooke; and Dennis
Ross of the pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near
East Policy, effectively an offshoot of the America
Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and JINSA
(Jewish Institute for National Security Affaris), as
well as the newly chosen World Bank president Paul
Wolfowitz.
Dennis Ross, Richard N. Perle, and company are itching
to "transfer"—translation: to ethnically
cleanse—as many Palestinians from the West Bank
and Gaza as possible. "Israel should have exploited
the repression of the demonstrations in China, when
world attention focused on that country, to carry out
mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories,"
former Prime Minister Netanyahu told students at
Bar-Ilan University in 1989. The residents of the
European Community may be clueless about the
intentions of Zionists toward the Palestinians, but in
Israel, to my astonishment, ethnic cleansing is a
popular subject of discussion. Fifty percent or more
of Israelis think ethnic cleansing is a good idea.
This from a nation that supposedly remembers the
Holocaust. Fiction is indeed stranger than the truth.
Energy
An American Bilderberger expressed concern over the
skyrocketing price of oil. One oil industry insider at
the meeting remarked that growth is not possible
without energy and that, according to all indicators,
the world's energy supply is coming to an end much
faster than the world leaders have anticipated.
According to sources, Bilderbergers estimate the
extractable world's oil supply to be at a maximum of
35 years under current economic development and
population. However, one of the representatives of an
oil cartel remarked that we must factor into the
equation, both the population explosion and economic
growth and demand for oil in China and India. Under
the revised conditions, there is apparently only
enough oil to last for 20 years. No oil spells the end
of the world's financial system. So much has already
been acknowledged by The Wall Street Journal and the
Financial Times, two periodicals who are regularly
present at the annual Bilderberg conference.
Conclusion: Expect a severe downturn in the world's
economy over the next two years as Bilderbergers try
to safeguard the remaining oil supply by taking money
out of people's hands. In a recession or, at worst, a
depression, the population will be forced to
dramatically cut down their spending habits, thus
ensuring a longer supply of oil to the world's rich as
they try to figure out what to do.
During the afternoon cocktail, European Bilderberger
noted that there is no plausible alternative to
hydrocarbon energy. One American insider stated that
currently the world uses between four and six barrels
of oil for every new barrel it finds and that the
prospects for a short-term breakthrough are slim, at
best.
Someone asked for an estimate of the world´s
accessible conventional oil supply. The amount was
quoted at approximately one trillion barrels. As a
side note of interest, the planet consumes a billion
barrels of oil every 11.5 days.
Another Bilderberger asked about hydrogen alternative
to the oil supply. The US government official agreed,
gloomily, that hydrogen salvation to the world´s
imminent energy crisis is a fantasy.
This confirms public statement made in 2003 by HIS,
the world´s most respected consulting firm
cataloguing oil reserves and discoveries, that for the
first time since the 1920s there was not a single
discovery of an oil field in excess of 500 million
barrels.
The oil industry at the 2005 Bilderberg conference was
represented by John Browne, BP´s chief executive
officer; John Kerr, director Royal Dutch Shell; Peter
D. Sutherland, BP chairman and Jeroen van der Veer,
chairman of the Committee of Managing Directors of
Royal Dutch Shell.
It should be remembered that in late 2003, oil giant
Royal Dutch Shell, announced that it had overstated
its reserved by as much as 20 percent. Queen Beatrix
of Holland, Royal Dutch Shell´s principal
shareholder is a full-fledged member of the
Bilderbergers. Her father, prince Bernhard was one of
the founders of the group back in 1954. The Los
Angeles Times reported that "For petroleum firms,
reserves amount to nothing less than ´the value
of the company.'" In fact, Shell cut its reserve
estimates not once, but three times, prompting the
resignation of its co-chairman. At Rottach-Egern, in
May 2005, industry's top executives tried to figure
out how to keep the truth about diminishing oil
reserves from reaching the public. Public knowledge of
the diminishing reserves directly translates into
lower share prices, which could destroy financial
markets, leading to a collapse of the world economy.
EU Referendum in France
The first day of secret meetings at Bilderberg 2005
was dominated by talk of the EU Constitution
referendum in France and whether Chirac can persuade
France to vote yes on May 29. A yes vote, according to
sources within Bilderberg would put a lot of pressure
on Tony Blair to finally deliver Britain into the
waiting arms of the New World Order through their own
referendum on the treaty scheduled for 2006. Matthias
Nass wondered out loud that a no vote in France could
undoubtedly cause political turmoil in Europe and
overshadow Britain's six-month EU presidency starting
on July 1.
Bilderbergers, hope that Blair and Chirac, whose, at
times, open animosity has spilled into a public arena
on more than one occasion, can work together for
mutual benefit and political survival. Another
European Bilderberger added that both leaders must put
behind them as quickly as possible all past disputes
on such topics as Iraq, the liberalization of
Europe´s economy and the future of the budget
rebate Britain receives from the EU and work towards
complete European integration, which could
disintegrate if France´s often "hard-headed and
obstinate people," in the words of a British
Bilderberger, do not do the right thing, meaning give
up voluntarily their independence for the "greater
good" of a Federal European super state!
A German Bilderberger insider said that France´s
yes vote is in trouble because of the "outsourcing of
jobs. Jobs in Germany and France are going to Asia and
Ukraine," [to take advantage of cheap labour.] Ukraine
is one of the former Soviet republics that have been
admitted to the European Union bringing the total
membership to 25 nations. A German politician wondered
out loud how Tony Blair should go about convincing
Britons to embrace the European Constitution when due
to the outsourcing of jobs, both Germany and France
are suffering a 10 percent unemployment rate while
Britain is doing well economically.
USA Criminals
A US law, called the Logan Act, states explicitly that
it is against the law for federal officials to attend
secret meetings with private citizens to develop
public policies. Although Bilderberg 2005 was missing
one of its luminaries, US State Department official
John Bolton who was testifying before the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, the American government
was well represented in Rottach-Egern by Alan Hubbard,
assistant to the president for economic policy and
director of the National Economic Council; William
Luti, deputy under secretary of defence; James
Wolfensohn, outgoing president of the World Bank and
Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of state, an
ideologue of the Iraq war and incoming president of
the World Bank. By attending Bilderberg 2005 meeting,
these people are breaking federal laws of the United
States.
Auna Telecomunicaciones
At a Saturday night cocktail party (May 7) at the
luxurious Dorint Sofitel Seehotel Überfahrt in
Rottach-Egern, Bavaria, Munich, several Bilderbergers
sharing the standing bar with Queen Beatrix of Holland
and Donald Graham, the Washington Post´s CEO,
were discussing the up-coming sale of Spanish
telecommunications and cable giant Auna.
Auna operates fixed line telephone services, a
mobile-phone network, and a cable television system,
and is also an Internet provider. One of the
Bilderbergers familiar with the matter [believed to be
Henry Kravis, based on the physical description of the
source at the meeting] stated that Auna´s mobile
operations could bring in some 10 billion euros
including debt, while another Bilderberger, a tall man
with a receding hairline added that its fixed-line
assets could fetch some 2.6 billion euros. Sources
close to the Bilderbergers have stated off-the-record
that Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co, a private-equity
firm is interested in buying all of Auna. An abundance
of cheap credit and low interest rates have made Auna
an appetising target for private-equity buyers.
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co was represented at the
Bilderberg meetings by its luminary billionaire Henry
Kravis and his small town Quebec-born wife, Marie
Joseé Kravis, a senior fellow at the
neoconservative Hudson Institute.
Conclusions: Expect favourable coverage and support
for Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co from Grupo Prisa
whose Consejero Delegado Juan Luis Cebrian always
attends super secret Bilderberg meetings. In case
Kravis fails to put together a competitive bid, then
expect the same favourable coverage for Goldman Sachs
Group, whose Martin Taylor is Bilderberg's honorary
secretary general and whose other Bilderberger, Peter
Sutherland, is Goldman Sachs´ chairman as well
as the Trilateral Commission´s European
chairman.
In the past, exposing Bilderberg meetings has provided
advance warning—months ahead of the mainstream
media—of the US Iraqi invasion, tax increases,
and the downfall of Margaret Thatcher as prime
minister of Britain.
Indonesia-Malaysia Standoff
A political and military confrontation between these
two nations in the petroleum-rich Sulawesi Sea (both
claim the oil-rich area of Ambalat as their
territorial rights) was the topic of a much-animated
discussion amongst several American and European
Bilderbergers during an afternoon cocktail hour. An
American Bilderberger waving his cigar suggested using
the UN to "further a peace policy in the region." In
fact, Bilderbergers at the lounge table all agreed
that such a conflict might well give them an excuse to
garrison the disputed area with UN "Peacekeepers" and
thus ensure their ultimate control over the
exploitation of this treasure, meaning untapped oil
reserves.
China
European and American Bilderbergers realising the most
urgent of needs to expand into developing markets in
order to help sustain the illusion of endless growth
have agreed to name Pascal Lamy, a French Socialist
and a fanatical supporter of a European super state as
the next World Trade Organization (WTO) president. It
will be remembered that Washington gave a conditional
support to Lamy´s nomination in exchange for
European support of Paul Wolfowitz as head of the
World Bank.
According to insider sources within the Bilderberger
group, Lamy was chosen to help steer the global
trading system through a time of rising protectionist
sentiment in rich countries such as France and
Germany, both reeling from high unemployment and
averse to increasingly muscular demands for market
assess from emerging economies. Third World states,
for example, are insisting on cuts to EU and US farm
subsidies. The WTO liberalization drive collapsed in
acrimony in Seattle in 1999 and again in Cancun in
2003.
The Bilderbergers have secretly agreed on the need to
force the poor countries into a globalized market for
cheap goods while simultaneously forcing the poor into
becoming customers. The current rift with China is a
good example, as the Chinese have flooded the Western
countries with cheap goods, amongst them textiles,
driving down prices. As a trade off, the Bilderbergers
have entered into an emerging market ripe and
vulnerable to superior western know-how. Similar
developing countries are slowly acquiring more
purchasing power and the industrialized world is
gaining a foothold in their domestic economies by
targeting them for cheap exports.
One can't help but wonder when the Bilderberg
organisers, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Queen
Beatrix and the rest, have completed their project of
enclosing all global goods and services into their own
hands, what then?
Francisco Goya´s Plate 79 of Disasters of War
shows the fair maid of Liberty flat on her back, bosom
exposed. Ghostly figures play about the corpse while
monks dig her grave. Truth has died. Murió la
verdad. How is that for an alternative? Forewarned is
forearmed. We will never find the right answers if we
can't ask the proper questions.
Click here for List of Participants
E-MAIL THIS LINK
Enter recipient's e-mail:
[input]
[input]
var good;function
checkEmailAddress(field) {// the following expression
must be all on one line...var goodEmail =
field.value.match(/\b(^(\S+@).+((\.com)|(\.net)|(\.edu)|(\.mil)|(\.gov)|(\.org)|(\..{2,2}))$)\b/gi);if
(goodEmail){ good = true} else { alert('Please
enter a valid e-mail address.') field.focus()
field.select() good = false }}u =
window.location;m = "I thought this might interest
you...";function mailThisUrl(){ good = false
checkEmailAddress(document.eMailer.address) if
(good){ // the following expression must be all
on one line... window.location =
"mailto:"+document.eMailer.address.value+"?subject="+m+"&body="+document.title+"
"+u; }}
<< HOME
HOME
ALEX
JONES
911
VIDEOS
AUDIO
PHOTOS
POLICE STATE
>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
More information about the Discussion
mailing list