[GJM] Fw: Re: Fw: "Science and the Akashic Field" - book report
marguerite hampton
ecopilgrim at aabol.com
Fri Jan 26 12:08:16 MST 2007
Co-learner's FYI
-------Original Message-------
From: Brian O'Leary
Date: 01/26/07 07:08:48
To: marguerite hampton
Cc: prez at usa-exile.org
Subject: Re: Fw: "Science and the Akashic Field" - book report
Hi Marguerite, Richard et al,
Thanks for this. What stands out in this discussion
is that we must place observation above theory. We're
now struggling with U.S. Congress and their scientific
gatekeepers re. our draft of the Energy Innovation Act
of 2007, because they deny the reality of ZPE, cold
fusion and other valid observations because they
"violate" their treasured theories--and so it's
endless loop time. We must break through that, and
we're working on it--to get our "leaders" to look
through the telescope (or appoint new ones), before
it's too late.
The IPCC report on human intervention in cllmate change
will be out next week, and the news will be
"shocking". Next month, it's off to Korea to keynote
an international energy conference with this urgent
message to leave no stone unturned in our quest for
clean energy.
Ad astra per aspera!
Best,
Brian O'L
www.brianoleary.com
--- marguerite hampton <ecopilgrim at aabol.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard and all Co-Learner's
>
> Much appreciation for this. What appears to me is
> that the Akashic-Field
> is composed of "attractor fields" or "morphogenic
> fields" (Rupert Sheldrake)
> within which all intelligence is encoded in such a
> way a to make up the
> whole'. These fields tend to aggragate as "patterns
> of life" or "lifeforms'. . . .
>
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Richard Moore
> Date: 01/25/07 09:52:19
> To: cj at cyberjournal.org;
> renaissance-network at cyberjournal.org
> Cc: newslog at cyberjournal.org
> Subject: "Science and the Akashic Field" - book
> report
>
______________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070126/23d568ef/attachment.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list