[GJM] #23 Stephen A. Engelking On The Inner Structure Of The Optimum Policy (TOP)

[E. Crockett]

--- wesburt at juno.com wrote:

> 
> Good Day Old Friends,
> 
> My sincere thanks to Stephen A. Engelking for his
> introductory post to
> list Worldcit at googlegroups.com  which invited us to
> visit the The Hugh &
> Helene Schonfield World Service Trust web site.  
> 
> At www.schonfield.org we read the goal of that World
> Service Trust:
> 
> "to create, by the will of God, as an instrument for
> the promotion of
> world peace and justice, a free nation, pervasive
> and universal,
> dedicated to the service of humanity, to the
> function of international
> mediation, and to the demonstration of a pattern of
> nationhood."
> 
> If I read our oldest history book correctly, it
> seems that the authors of
> that book thought they had created just such an
> instrument in the
> Biblical Nation of Israel.  Surly the Jewish
> remnant, that returned with
> Ezra from exile in Babylon, believed they had
> recreated that nation, but
> then lost it to the Greeks and Romans.  The next
> time we heard such
> language about "service of humanity" was from the
> founders of the USA,
> who built an agrarian version of such a nation but
> lost it to
> industrialization and globalization.  Now we must
> choose between two
> options:
> 
> 1, The politically correct option invites us to
> establish some form of
> democratic global governance capable of enforcing
> the Rule of Law on
> existing sovereign nation states.  No body dares to
> ask: Whose Rule of
> Law?  This is the imperial option of the Dominator
> Paradigm which dates
> from the Folly of Rehoboam, B.C. 975, in our oldest
> history book.
> 
> 2, A politically incorrect option invites us to
> complete the intended
> development of the United States; as perfectly for
> an industrial society,
> as the founders perfected it for an agrarian society
> by invoking "The
> Laws Of Nature and of Nature's God."  The optimum
> policy for an
> industrial society imposes only one additional
> requirement on the optimum
> policy for an agrarian society. That is, the obvious
> requirement for our
> governments to capitalize (socialize) the
> pre-production expense of human
> development (education, subsistence, and medical
> care) as completely as
> our corporations capitalize (socialize) the expense
> of capital
> development.
> 
> As I said in #22, John Gelles on TOP:
> "We are now a century and a half beyond the
> industrial revolution and we
> have not yet even begun to discuss the benefits of
> capitalizing the other
> half of the necessary investment in human
> development."
> 
> Please consider the lower (new) section of attached
> file, Figure 6c.gif. 
> It shows how the economic playing field is tilted to
> favor larger
> suppliers at the expense of small suppliers, when
> the fixed cost of
> developing the next generation is not fully
> capitalized.  This condition
> is not allowed in the US private sector. Can any one
> make the case for
> enforcing this condition, since the 1890s, in the US
> public sector?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Wes Burt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
>                TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
>                 Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web site at:
>        <http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
>                  TOP is GOOD --- TWP is EVIL>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
> 


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile.  Get started!
http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070110/e8555ad3/attachment-0001.html