[GJM] #23 Stephen A. Engelking On The Inner Structure Of The Optimum Policy (TOP)

[wesburt at juno.com]

Good Day Old Friends,

My sincere thanks to Stephen A. Engelking for his introductory post to
list Worldcit at googlegroups.com  which invited us to visit the The Hugh &
Helene Schonfield World Service Trust web site.  

At www.schonfield.org we read the goal of that World Service Trust:

"to create, by the will of God, as an instrument for the promotion of
world peace and justice, a free nation, pervasive and universal,
dedicated to the service of humanity, to the function of international
mediation, and to the demonstration of a pattern of nationhood."

If I read our oldest history book correctly, it seems that the authors of
that book thought they had created just such an instrument in the
Biblical Nation of Israel.  Surly the Jewish remnant, that returned with
Ezra from exile in Babylon, believed they had recreated that nation, but
then lost it to the Greeks and Romans.  The next time we heard such
language about "service of humanity" was from the founders of the USA,
who built an agrarian version of such a nation but lost it to
industrialization and globalization.  Now we must choose between two
options:

1, The politically correct option invites us to establish some form of
democratic global governance capable of enforcing the Rule of Law on
existing sovereign nation states.  No body dares to ask: Whose Rule of
Law?  This is the imperial option of the Dominator Paradigm which dates
from the Folly of Rehoboam, B.C. 975, in our oldest history book.

2, A politically incorrect option invites us to complete the intended
development of the United States; as perfectly for an industrial society,
as the founders perfected it for an agrarian society by invoking "The
Laws Of Nature and of Nature's God."  The optimum policy for an
industrial society imposes only one additional requirement on the optimum
policy for an agrarian society. That is, the obvious requirement for our
governments to capitalize (socialize) the pre-production expense of human
development (education, subsistence, and medical care) as completely as
our corporations capitalize (socialize) the expense of capital
development.

As I said in #22, John Gelles on TOP:
"We are now a century and a half beyond the industrial revolution and we
have not yet even begun to discuss the benefits of capitalizing the other
half of the necessary investment in human development."

Please consider the lower (new) section of attached file, Figure 6c.gif. 
It shows how the economic playing field is tilted to favor larger
suppliers at the expense of small suppliers, when the fixed cost of
developing the next generation is not fully capitalized.  This condition
is not allowed in the US private sector. Can any one make the case for
enforcing this condition, since the 1890s, in the US public sector?

Kind regards

Wes Burt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

               TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
                Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web site at:
       <http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
                 TOP is GOOD --- TWP is EVIL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070108/e4d282aa/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 14224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070108/e4d282aa/attachment-0001.gif