[GJM] #31, The Lost Draft Of #10 On The Inner Structure Of The US Economy
E. Crockett
echojurist at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 27 07:00:42 MST 2007
--- wesburt at juno.com wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This post will attempt to complete a thought
> that should have been completed in October
> of 2006. The Draft Of #10 below was lost
> when I wrote #10 to John Gelles on 23
> October 2006. Every so often my JUNO
> software fixes a defect in my mail folders
> by removing all files, after a certain date,
> from all folders, and placing the whole mess
> in a folder named: "Restored, 02//24/07 (2769
> unread)." The lost draft of #10 was at the top
> of the 2769 restored files and looked like a
> much needed introduction to the attached
> Fig4&8, Macro and Micro model of money
> flow through any industrial economy.
>
> I say "much needed" because the Media and
> Internet place all attention on the Financial
> Transactions which are more
> than an order of magnitude larger than the GDP of
> the real
> economy which supports our standard of living
> but is totally neglected by the Media and the
> Internet. The Macro model, Figure 4, shows
> how each national economy is connected to
> the global economy by four measures of money
> flow, two inward flows and two outward flows.
>
> Since money is cheap, and can be produced
> in any amount by a key stroke, many faults
> and defects may be covered up by issuing
> more money, instead of correcting the faults
> and defects. In 2003, for example, the
> neglected real economy generated a $10,000
> Billion/year GDP by circulating only $385
> billion (M1c-A) to produce C. H. Douglas' A flow
> through the work force and by circulating only
> $288 Billion (M1c-B) to produce C. H. Douglas'
> B flow within the private (Corporate) sector;
> thereby leaving $527 Billion, of the $1,200
> Billion M1 money supply, for reserves in the
> accounts of businesses and households or for
> speculation in the financial sector. Figure 4
> will be of interest only to those folks who
> worry about how money is divided between
> production in the real economy and
> speculation in the financial sector.
> Figure 8, on the other hand will interest folks
> who want to correct the defects and faults
> which keep the US economy in its century
> old mode of:
> 1, sustained rates of inflation, 2.3%/year and up.
> 2, rates of unemployment, no less than 4.0%.
> 3, the growing purchasing power gap which
> separates the middle from the upper class.
> Much is written about the growing strength
> of governments and corporations and their
> drives to monopolize wealth and power.
> Who would expect such human institutions
> to do anything else when the economy
> exhibits a net shortage of purchasing
> power which diminishes effective
> demand for local production and diminishes
> opportunities for profitable investments in
> the local economy? The faults and defects
> in our economy are not caused by too much
> wealth and power, but by too little purchasing
> power in the parenting households. Since
> most parenting is done in the early, low
> income, years of our working careers, the
> S. S. Payroll tax structure and the lack of a
> subsistence allowance for dependent
> children combine to create a depressed
> working class. The only virtue I can see
> in this thirty centuries old wrong policy
> (TWP) is that it makes debtors out of
> parents and carpet bagging Shylocks out
> of folks with money to lend that cannot be
> profitably invested in the capital plant.
>
> The lost draft below approaches this
> imbalance between rich and poor from
> nine different view points. Since there is
> only one fault or defect in the US economy
> that controls the destiny of 300 million
> Americans, the nine points of view are
> simply redundant. Any point of view would
> be sufficient if it starts the public debate.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Wes Burt
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~ Begin Lost Draft Of #10 ~~~~~~~~~~
> From: wesburt at juno.com>
> Subject: #10 On The Inner Structure Of The US
> Economy
>
> Good day to friends on nine mail lists,
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >From #1 On The Inner Structure, 17 Sep 2006 :
> By all means, print the attached visual-aid Fig17a
> to complement your reading of this message. The
> shaded section of the private sector chart shows
> the "expense of management" as Adam Smith
> described it in his "First Maxim Of Taxation," 1776.
>
> The smaller shaded section of the public sector
> chart
> shows how little of the "expense of government" the
> US presently invests in developing its human assets.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >From #2 On The Inner Structure, 18 Sep 2006
> I have argued since 1994, in Fig7-9.gif that three
> tithes are commanded in the Bible:
>
> *The First, in B.C. 1913, (Genesis 14.20) was for
> local
> government and a school for teaching the knowledge
> of God. Similar to the local property tax in the
> USA,
> and many other nations.
>
> *The Second, in B.C. 1471, (Numbers 18.21) was for
> National government by the Thirteenth Tribe (the
> Levites). Similar to the 1913 income tax amendment
> in the USA.
>
> *The Third Tithe, B.C. 1451, (Deut. 14.22--29) was
> to
> be consumed at the feasts and shared with the poor.
> Similar to "community building," plus Zakat,
> Charity,
> and Welfare as defined by the
> Judeo-Christian-Muslim-
> Protestant-Humanist principle of "Subsidiarity."
>
> Since the "Folly of Rehoboam," in B.C. 975, (I Kings
> 12),
> as I read it in our oldest and most widely
> distributed
> history book, the second tithe has always been fully
>
> collected by armed force and the people are always
> generous with the
> third tithe, if they are not depressed.
> So the First Tithe is; WHAT Rehoboam withheld 2981
> years ago, WHAT was restored by the US founding
> fathers for an agrarian society, and WHAT was lost
> again when the US became a wealthy industrial
> nation of propertyless employees in the 1890s.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >From #3 On The Inner Structure, 21 Sep 2006:
> So Pope John Paul II has marked the shift of
> Catholic Social Teaching from "Subsidiarity" to
> "The Optimum policy (TOP) which was customary;
> when Abraham paid the first tithe to Melchizedek,
> the King-Priest (GEN. 14.20 B.C. 1913), and lost
> by the folly of Rehoboam in B.C. 975. My heart
> goes out to B16 who has one foot in our Judeo,
> Catholic, Muslim, Protestant, Humanist Principle
> of Subsidiarity (TWP); and his other foot in
> RERUM NOVARUM (TOP). The two are moving
> apart. Which way will he jump to preserve the
> future of the Mother Church?
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >From #4 On The Inner Structure, 24 Sep 2006 :
> A few weeks ago Bill Ellis introduced me to John
> Watkins' Simple Society Forum where I became
> acquainted with a whole stable of John Perkins'
> Economic Hit Men whom I had not met before on
> my favorite lists. They all parade as expert
> problem
> solvers, consultants, but refuse to acknowledge
> any solutions they did not invent. There must be
> millions of them out there, and yet The Wrong Policy
>
> (TWP) has been the prevailing paradigm for thirty
> centuries. So solutions proliferate but the
> single
> systemic defect of omission in our Judeo, Catholic,
> Muslim, Protestant tradition of the last thirty
> centuries bids fair to remain hidden from the public
>
> for another century. Meanwhile the 3919 year
> practice of TOP by Kings, Bishops, Priests, CEOs,
> and WHIPs on their private affairs and corporations
> continues as ever to their very great advantage.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >From #5 On The Inner Structure, 24 Sep 2006:
> You (Bill Ellis) describe two systems of education.
>
>
=== message truncated ===>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070227/a4b7580e/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list