[GJM] #29 Three Politically Correct Replies to #27 On The Optimum Policy (TOP)
wesburt at juno.com
wesburt at juno.com
Fri Feb 16 18:05:46 MST 2007
Dear old and new friends,
The three replies to #27 exhibited varying degrees
of PC (political correctness). In declining order of PC:
d.j.bezemer at rug.nl on list Gang8 did not reply.
msroz at buffalo.edu from Lew Rockwell's list wrote,
"Thanks for posting me," followed by a full copy of
#27 without comment. And John Gelles on list
FixGov came closest to political incorrectness and
TOP when he offered his opinion that education
should be both universal and funded from the public
revenue.
I thank John Gelles for opening the back door to a
discussion of the optimum policy (TOP). As we all
know, TOP is the politically incorrect US policy for
bringing parenting households, at any income level;
to parity of aftertax spending power with households
of gay men, lesbian women, or celibate priests at the
same income level.
Everyone, Wes Burt included, Wants A Good
Start for All Children. Wealthy families provide
such a good start as a matter of course. At lower
levels of income, the $5,000/year expense of
subsistence for each dependent is equivalent to
a head tax of $5,000 per year per dependent,
from which households of gay men, lesbian
women, celibate priests, and all other non parenting
households are exempt. They laugh all the way to
the bank, where they deposit and invest the earned
income they saved by not raising children. The gay
community's mindless agitation, for the same tax
benefits that Congress allowed for parenting families,
would win more support if they also promoted The
Optimum Policy (TOP) to level the economic playing
field for parenting families in every society.
Let's give credit where it is due. Celibate priests in
Europe, beginning in 1891 with RERUM NOVARUM
and subsequent encyclical letters of the Roman
Church, have championed TOP in their "Catholic
Social Teaching." In 1891 they proposed that TOP
should be funded by employers. That proposal was
repeated in 1931, on the 40th anniversary of Rerum
Novarum, and again ignored by European employers.
Not until 1981, in encyclical letter Laborem Exercens,
did the late John Paul II approve of TOP being funded
from the public revenue, as Thomas Paine had proposed
in 1792 and most Western European nations had done
after WW II to enable their three decade economic
miracles. Such a low level of "diligence" in promoting
TOP would not get an application accepted by the US
Patent Office. Perhaps the Europeans want TOP in
Europe, maybe, and TWP (The Wrong Policy) in the
United States, for sure.
The systemic defect of omission in our Judeo-Christian
culture is our failure to satisfy the essential financial
requirement that both the expense of developing our
human assets and the expense of developing our
capital assets should be equally well capitalized. By well
capitalized I mean, the asset is brought into production
debt free and fully competitive with those assets already
in production.
Figure 17i, attached to #27 and also this post, illustrates
how our private sector corporations have perfected
capitalism for developing US productive capital assets
while allowing only 50% capitalism for the development
of US productive human assets. The public and the
Media remain oblivious of this 50% capitalism
(TWP) in the public sector because parenting
families proudly pay $5,000/year for seventeen
years of subsistence for each dependent, while
expecting the public revenue to pay $6,500/year
for twelve years of education for each of their
children.
The second attached file, Fig10c.gif, US CPI Profile
1785 to date, shows that the systemic defect of
omission became perceptible in the late 1800s,
and had it been corrected at that time, the USA
would have continued to be the example of sound
Republican government for the world. Now I ask
you Dirk J. Bezemer, Michael S Rozeff, John Gelles,
and other old friends on my copy list; is the "not invented
here" syndrome going to withhold this simple and obvious
solution for ever?
Or is it as my old friend Wally Klinck writes to
Marguerite Hampton on the global justice movement list:
"Only humans, it seems can be so utterly stupid--
so damnably bottomlessly mindless! We are a
strange lot--having the capacity to work absolute
wonders of creativity and noble action-- only to
turn right around and destroy the good we have
wrought. Are we genetically programmed to self
destruct? (Of course I don't really believe this--
we, "A" and "B", have just been cunningly
programmed psychologically unconsciously to
think and act perversely in the interests of "C.")
What can be done to break this general state
of hypnosis?"
~~~~~~~~~~ End Wallace Klinck ~~~~~~~~~
It might help to read the Five Books Of Moses, that is where I first
found the Whole Divine Law documented. General Motors under Sloan in the
1920s, Electric Power grids in the 1930s, and General Electric in the
1940s were johnny come latelys, but they got it right.
Kind regards,
Wes Burt
TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web site at:
<http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
TOP is GOOD --- TWP is EVIL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070216/c05ba1f9/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070216/c05ba1f9/attachment-0001.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 20450 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070216/c05ba1f9/attachment-0002.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 12009 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070216/c05ba1f9/attachment-0003.gif
More information about the Discussion
mailing list