[GJM] #850, To Correct Three Omissions in #849, And Include The Two Missing Figures
E. Crockett
echojurist at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 28 09:36:25 MST 2007
--- wesburt at juno.com wrote:
> Resend, address error on original.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Hi Folks,
>
> While waiting for Gunnar to venture a comment,
> Lurban Kohler wrote, in part, about #849:
>
> "Well I'm embroiled, daily in the drama of
> this
> analysis and attempt at explanation, and
> constantly seek the writings & wisdom of
> others
> grappling with the same problem: how to
> clarify
> and define the problem well enough to be
> understood, & in time to turn that
> understanding
> to action, to re-establish the once
> promising
> enlightened human stewardship of planet
> earth.
>
> It may not be possible, who knows, but it's
> more
> fun trying than it is giving up"
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ End Mr. Kohler ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
>
> Urban, it is my firm conviction, and perhaps yours
> also,
> that human nature has remained unchanged forever;
> but has adapted easily to either the optimum policy
> or the wrong policy. The relative performance of
> individual nations in "Our World Of Nations"
> confirms
> the truth of our convictions. From "The Folly Of
> Rehoboam in B.C. 875 through the American and
> French Revolutions the wrong policy created only
> "third World Nations,"as we call them today, with a
> few wealthy and the many poor, In 1776, the USA
> found the optimum policy for an agrarian society,
> that served us well until "The Great Transformation"
>
> in 1895, which Karl Polanyi explained in a 1944
> book of that title, without mentioning the 30% G&A
> rate of corporations had been withheld by local
> governments.
>
> Our "present condition," since the advent of
> industrialization, has evolved rather differently
> in our public and private sectors.Hopefully,
> the correction of three omissions (large fonts)
> in the two paragraphs below and the attachment
> of the two figures missing from #849 will allow
> Left, Right, & Middle to find their common cause
> in doing what I asked K. Graham, D. P. Moynihan,
> Peter G. Peterson, and other members of Pratt
> House and Chatham House to do in 1994.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~ Begin Two Corrected Paragraphs
> ~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> A one page monetary history of this system is
> presented
> on attached Figure 2-3g.gif, "U.S. Money Supply M1."
>
> The heavy line on Figure 2-3g begins in colonial
> times
> with a sustained 1.2%/year increase in the value of
> the
> US dollar. This mode ended when the USA changed:
> from
> a nation of "productive-property" owning farmers and
> small
> business men, to, a nation of corporate employees
> whose
> property most often consists of a house burdened by
> a mortgage and local real-estate taxes.
>
> That is to say, the USA changed in 1895: from an
> agrarian society, to, an industrial society. From
> that point on, the corporations in our private
> sector developed in full compliance with Louis
> Blanc's "Governing Principle Of the State,"
>
> "From each according to his/its ability,"
> while in production.
> "To each according to his/its needs,"
> while in development or disabled.
>
> while the local governments in our
> public sector developed in full compliance with
> the thirty centuries old "Principle Of Subsidiarity"
>
> as taught in our public schools, church schools,
> and universities. Both principles and the tsunami
> of public debate which keeps the public innocent
> of these principles are illustrated on Figure 4 &
> 8e.gif
> and attached Figure 12o.gif.
> ~~~~~~~~~~ End Two Corrected Paragraphs ~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Again, Urban and other friends of "the once
> promising
> enlightened human stewardship of planet earth," the
> people who broke that promise in 1895 are long dead.
>
> The promise was re-established in Japan by MacArthur
>
> and in Germany by John J. McCloy after WW II with a
> three decade miracle, now being copied by Russia,
> China, and other former "Third World Nations.
>
> Remember, the systemic defect, a continuously
> increasing "Natural Inflation Rate" (NIR), has no
> natural limit but system failure. What US taxpayer
> would vote against the optimum policy if Ron Paul's
> minions added TOP to their other Libertarian
> virtues?
>
> Time flies when you are having fun with sixth
> graders,
>
> Wes Burt
>
> TOP and TWP are cognoscible by sixth graders from
> Fig. 7-9.gif on Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web
> site:
>
> <http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
> TOP = 100% Capitalism --- TWP = 0 to 50%
Capitalism>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://globaljusticemovement.net/pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20071228/1f9eb43b/attachment-0003.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list