Dear Richard Foley,
Thank you for interesting piece. If I recall
rightly I failed to mention that the radio broadcast
seemed to clearly indicate that America wanted to
understandably end the legal dimension concerning land
ownership at the time of the American War of
Independence. Technically speaking, it all belonged to
King George III(ie. the Crown).
It is also interesting to add here as a side issue
that the American War of Independence was funded
without raising taxes but this ofcourse lead to
hyperinflation...and inevitably towards the
introduction of a new currency, and stricter rulings
within the economic system of the time.
R.Searle.
--- Richard Foley <rerailer at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Robert, you have stumbled across a truth that few
> know anything
> about. However, there are a couple of hundred
> million people in the
> US who would dispute the argument that this law
> still applied to the
> U.S. Nevertheless, you are very near a core truth
> about the reasons
> why certain things were done in the US that were
> very different
> regarding the owning of land.
>
> I am sure that I will misspell this term "aloadial
> title." This is a
> title which an individual receives from the Federal
> Beau. of Land
> Management (or what ever it was called in the
> previous centuries.)
> and yes there are still a few of them around which
> have not been
> superseded by other types of titles. That is why it
> is necessary
> that a "title search" be done on every home mortgage
> and why it is
> necessary that "title insurance" is part of every
> home purchase.
>
> If you read enough American history you will come
> across the early
> struggle between those who wanted to institute land
> sales by
> mortgage, and those who opposed this kind of
> finance. Daniel Boone
> was another famous American frontiersman who at
> various times owned
> vast tracks of land. In the end he lost all his (?)
> land in law suits.
>
> Under an aloadial title you truly own your land as a
> sovereign
> citizen. Your land can not be taxed away from you.
> Local and state
> government can not tell you what you can do or build
> or not build on
> your land.
>
> In the US at various times titles to land could be
> asserted in a
> variety of ways with different types of titles.
> George Washington
> certainly before the revolt against King George of
> England, was one
> of the largest land title holders in all of the 13
> Colonies. This
> was by virtue of "tomahawk titles" in the area north
> of the Ohio
> River and west of Fort Pitt (now Pittsburgh, PA.
> Certain men were
> hired to cross into the Shawnee lands and chop marks
> on trees which
> served to meet the necessary legal requirement for a
> claim of title.
> Of course the Shawnees would chop off the heads of
> all those they
> could catch doing such marking.
>
> All land in the borders of the U.S. came into the
> possession of the
> U.S. by virtue of treaty. Treaty Law is superior to
> all other law,
> even constitutional law. The American Rebellion of
> 1776 was ended by
> a treaty between the English Crown and the U.S. but
> like most laws
> and most treaties some just can't resist trying to
> break them.
>
> For example, the U.S. as the colonies before it,
> practiced breaking
> every treaty ever made with native peoples. And
> yes, I do agree that
> what happened after 1865 was nothing less than a
> Genocidal War Policy
> of the U.S. against the native peoples of the West,
> in which every
> treaty was systematically broken. The same players
> in the War
> Between the States carried out this genocide, and
> were as proud of it
> as were some of the Nazis in Germany were about
> their genocide
> against the inferior races of Jews, Gypsies,
> Hungarians, Poles,
> Russians etc.etc. But, that is another subject.
>
> Richard Foley
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 9:41 AM, E. Crockett wrote:
>
> >
> > --- robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> On TalkSport I happened to hear a
> somewhat
> >> short interview with Kevin Cahill who has
> research,
> >> and published material concerning who owns the
> >> world.
> >> Incredible as it seems Queen Elizabeth II owns
> most
> >> of
> >> it (including the former colonies ofcourse!!)This
> is
> >> due to a legal arrangement, and appears in what
> is
> >> called The Land Registry Act which is "medieval"
> in
> >> character, and originates from that time.
> >> Apparently,
> >> there was an attempt to "repeal" it in 1875 but
> >> later
> >> in 1925 it was put back on the statute book
> without
> >> any real consultation with Parliament.
> >>
> >> When people "own" property "freehold"in England,
> and
> >> in the former colonies presumably they do so only
> as
> >> TENANTS to the Crown!! Most people know next to
> >> nothing about this! The danger of this (in
> theory)is
> >> that Her Majestys Government can take away any
> >> property from anyone without much (if any) legal
> >> redress.
> >>
> >> Indeed, one caller to TalkSport claimed that they
> >> had
> >> a compulsory purchase order which they took to
> the
> >> European Court of Human Rights. However, it is
> >> expensive to do this.
> >>
> >> It must be remembered too that the UK has no
> written
> >> constitution, and people are seen as "subjects"
> (or
> >> "serfs" to the Crown!!)as opposed to "citizens".
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.whoownstheworld.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> Robert Searle
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
___________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint?
> Visit
> >> Yahoo! For Good
> >>
> >
>
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discussion mailing list
> >> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> >>
> > http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/
>
> > discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
______________________________________________________________________
>
> > ______________
> > Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo!
> Small Business gives
> > you all the tools to get online.
> > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
> >
> >
> > Next Chapter: The Council on Foreign Relations and
> the Trilateral
> > Commission
> >
> > Previous Chapter: The New Age
> > The Systems Method
> >
>
=== message truncated ===>
_______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
>
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html