[GJM] #37, TOP For The Imperial Clerisy, TWP For The Rest Of US

Tue Apr 17 03:01:48 MDT 2007

Dear Wes,

  I would like to note my points on reference to Jewish IQ..that I consider is non-IQ as simple faith based analysis tells us that men and women guided to understand the world and creation have been endowed with the capacity to do several things . There is nothing special about the Jewish IQ..Muslims had been leaders in 16-17 century in the field of science..This is quite well acknowledged..I would rather like to see faith based analysis for the resistence to the commands of Allah/God/.. in economic matters..

  We have been in dialogue for so many years. We are preparing for an international seminar on transforming policy and finance institutions. We need to address the issues for getting rid of resistance to reverent change. We need monotheistic ideals to govern the economic,social,cultural policy and we need to do that even for saving US alongwith the rest as usurious finance system coupled with Satanic and sinful approprations of several consumption and production processes will create lots of suffering for lots of people.

  Please also relate to the Muslims..who are force in redefining the order of things 

  With warm regards

  Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam

wesburt at juno.com wrote:
      Dear friends and enemies,  
  I am deep in debt to Bruce Eggum, to Dan Parker, to Charles Murray, and to Dr. W. Curtiss Priest for their respective comments and insights on the subject imbalance between the Imperial Clerisy and the rest of us.
  ~~~~~~~ 1,
  Bruce wrote on the Worldcit list, in part:
  I believe Pogo said " we have met the enemy and it is US."

~~~~~~~ 2,

Dan wrote on the globaljusticemovement list, with becoming brevity:

The job as I see it is to spread clerisy.

~~~~~~~ 3,
  Charles, on Lew Rockwell's list, presented a scholarly analysis of the topic that has fascinated all of us since we first read the books and commentary of Dr. J. H. Hertz, C.H., Late Chief Rabbi Of The British Empire: 
  Jewish Accomplishments, Jewish IQs
Charles Murray on a taboo subject.
  The whole article is available at:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/viewArticle.aip?id=10855&page=all

I cannot do Charles justice in the space of this e-mail.  He has covered in a previous book "Losing Ground" and in this article much of what America has lost since the AEA, at its 1898 annual meeting, abandoned both its founding principles and the work of Henry Carter Adams.
  ~~~~~~ 4, 
  The closest approach to a PIC (politically incorrect) response to this challenge arrived on 4/11/07 from W. Curtiss Priest when he wrote on list cyber-soc a provocative commentary on the subject: "Should Study of the Destruction of American Society Remain a Fringe Activity?"  

~~~~~~~ End four comments from  Bruce, Dan, Charles, and Curtiss.

  Bruce's comment registered right away.  Dan's comment took a little longer.  But is it not obvious, that a public disclosure of the Imperial Clerisy's exclusive proprietary secrets can only be made by the Imperial Clerisy, in their own good time?  The public cannot hear or read anyone except members of the Clerisy.  That is why I use graphical visual-aids, the public understands graphical presentations of simple subjects like the effect of mixing fixed and variable costs in competitive bidding for human services.

  Charles' article covered several avenues and periods dating back to Moses in which the Jews may have developed their prominent standing in the global Clerisy.  Each approach implied that the superiority achieved by the Jews involved raising their mean IQ to 110 when the mean IQ of the whole national population is normalized to 100.  Charles was not persuaded that any of the several avenues he described could produce that result.  His many readers, and certainly this one, will agree with Charles on that opinion.  So Charles concluded his article as follows: "At this point, I take sanctuary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable. The Jews are God’s chosen people".  So Charles' article, on the whole, remains politically correct.  And I remain politically incorrect for believing that the twelve tribes of Israel were the chosen people, but the ten northern tribes were lost to history, or were they?

  Dr. Priest, on the other hand, reviewed the interaction of several vocabulary virtuosos at the Boston Globe, M. I. T., and the University Of Maryland who are each politically correct, in that what they disclose to the public is cognoscible only by those members of the Clerisy who already know and practice TOP, i.e., the Imperial Clerisy.   The rest of us are taught TWP (the wrong policy) and must live on 50% capitalism.  So the study, by the politically correct folks, of the Destruction of American Society has remained a fringe activity, not just since 1898, but since the "Folly Of Rehoboam" (I Kings 12) in B.C. 975, according to the K.J.V. of our oldest history book, the Old Testament of your Bible.  Dr. James Cumes, in his new book, called this fringe activity America's Suicidal Statecraft.  "Genocide Done Slowly" would have been an equally appropriate name for this fringe activity, and just as politically correct.

  ~~~~~~~~~ End Burt's comment on the comments.

  Is it not feasible to suppose: that since there is no general agreement on how to raise the mean IQ of chosen people above the natural potential IQ of the global population, we might find instead general agreement that the IQ of the rest of the global population, who were not chosen, has been depressed below their natural IQ by thirty centuries of the wrong policy (TWP)?  

  To explore this alternate explanation of our present condition, let me refresh your memory; by quoting two of my favorite experts on how markets work, or don't work, and by introducing an improved Figure 9 to show two modes of market operation with TOP in the private sector and a third mode of market operation with TWP (the wrong policy) in the public sector.  Recall, for this exploration, that corporations do for the private sector of each national economy what local government should do for the public sector of each national economy.  Adam Smith said so in his First Maxim Of Taxation, Page 777, The Wealth Of Nations, 1776.  US local governments, for the last 109 years, have done only about half of what they should have done, i.e., 50% capitalism for the US public sector while the US private sector enjoyed 100% capitalism.

    1, Works Of Spinoza,   Unabridged Elwes Translation
  A Theological-Political Treatise
  CHAP. XVI. Page 203
  Of the Foundation Of A State 

  "That is, everyone will, of two goods choose that which he thinks the greatest; and, of two evils, that which he thinks the least.  I say advisedly that which he thinks the greatest or the least, for it does not necessarily follow that he judges right.  This law is so deeply implanted in the human mind that it aught to be counted among eternal truths and axioms."

   2, Closer to home we have Henry Carter Adams, 1887,     Relation Of The State To Industrial Action. 

  "The important thought in this connection is, that where the law of increasing returns works with any degree of intensity, the principle of free competition is powerless to exercise a healthy regulating influence." 

  Nothing has been added to our understanding of how people make decisions in our most Democratic institutions, our markets, since 1670 when Spinoza stated the law which we all obey.  Adams, on the other hand described three classes of industrial suppliers: with decreasing, constant, and increasing returns to scale.  He concluded that the first two classes would be properly regulated by the competitive action of a free market.  The third class, however, would corrupt a market economy by making it: 
  1, unable to purchase its own production, 
  2, unable to employ all who are willing to work, 
  3, unable to preserve the value of its money, and 
  4, unable to moderate its production rate to conserve 
limited national resources.  

  Now you have no excuse for not knowing how we arrived at our present condition after living for 109 years under such a corrupt market economy.  Such an economy is like the biology experiment which makes a small reduction in the food and living space of a colony of laboratory rats, it over loads the weaker rats and brings out the worst in the stronger rats.

  Attached Fig. 9 TWP & TOP.gif shows a system of six power plants, A to F, with A being the newest lowest cost plant and F being the oldest highest cost plant still needed to supply peak demand for electric power, which cannot be stored.  With either manual or automatic dispatching of production, the optimum policy for meeting the demand with a minimum input of fuel is quite obvious.  Plant A runs all of the time.  As demand increases, the price index moves up and  each successively higher cost plant is brought into production until peak demand is past and then their output is reduced in reverse order as demand recedes.  Over each 24 hour demand cycle, the price index for power might range from 30% to 90% of installed capacity.  This is a demand exercise that other industries experience only weekly, monthly, annually, or over the life cycle of a product. 

  In contrast, if the six plants were manufacturing commodities which could be stored, with a similar variation of demand, the price index would move up to set production at the average level of demand.  Excess production during low demand would be stored and peak demand would be supplied from storage.  High cost plants would be retired, and competition would bring new plants into production at or below the cost of plant A.  All this is simple and straight forward, not nearly as complicated as economics 101.

  Now that we are all agreed on the two modes of market operation under TOP in the private sector of any national economy, let us take a closer look at our third mode of market operation under the wrong policy (TWP) in the public sector of the USA or any other national economy.  Here the individual source of production is the family unit or the household with one or more persons actively participating in the economy.  A free market assures that all such suppliers will be paid at a common rate of pay expressed as $/(unit of value added), with a standard deviation in the order of plus or minus 5%.  On fig. 9 the whole work force would be located along the prevailing labor price index. Bill Gates and Warren Buffet would be far out to the right of Fig. 9, with the public free to debate whether Bill or Warren has contributed the greater amount of value added.  

  Only the Imperial Clerisy will be beyond the right edge of fig. 9.  The Democratic Clerisy and the rest of us will form an approximately normal distribution (Bell Curve) around the mid point of the Output Scale on Fig. 9.  If our earned incomes were plotted, as on Fig. 8, the plot would be a straight "earned income line" from the origin of the chart at a 45 degree angle, provided our output was measured at (0ne Dollar)/(unit of VA).  Notice how miserly the 5%  standard deviation becomes as you consider the lower ranges of output.  But that is not our concern when exploring the root cause of our present condition.

  If the US had added an adequate children's allowance early in the twentieth century, as Germany and Japan did after WW II to enable their "economic miracles," the family of curves on fig. 9, 2X through nX, would have vanished and left the whole work force located along curve 1X.  That is to say, each productive worker would have to support only one dependent, him/her self, and the cost of this children's allowance would be about 3% on the total tax rate.  But the imperial Clerisy of John D, Rockefeller's day received from P. T. Barnum the same policy proposal that King Rehoboam (I Kings 12) received from his young advisors 2982 years ago.  As Barnum put it: "Never give the suckers an even break.  If you do, they will multiply like rabbits and eat you out of house and home,"  This is the fear that addles the brains of the Clerisy and makes them act like the three monkeys who see no evil, speak no evil, and hear no evil.  So the Clerisy answers YES to the question: "Should
 Study of the Destruction of American Society Remain a Fringe Activity?"  

  Kind regards,

  Wes Burt

               TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
                Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web site at:
       <http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
                 TOP is GOOD --- TWP is EVIL

_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net

---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20070417/546f9b35/attachment.html 