[GJM] Discussion Digest, Vol 36, Issue 31/FREEDOM TO FACISM - AARON RUSSO FILM

Sun Sep 17 15:36:41 MDT 2006

From:  Dr. Ulysses S. Crockett, Jr., J.D., LL.M.
    www.blogigo.com/ulyssesecojurist
See:  prisonplanet.com
         inforwars.com


--- discussion-request at globaljusticemovement.net
wrote:

> Send Discussion mailing list submissions to
> 	discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 
>
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	discussion-request at globaljusticemovement.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	discussion-owner at globaljusticemovement.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Discussion digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. The Inner Structure Of TOP (The Optimum
> Policy) (wesburt at juno.com)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:02:08 -0400
> From: wesburt at juno.com
> Subject: [GJM] The Inner Structure Of TOP (The
> Optimum Policy)
> To:
>
Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net,FixGov at yahoogroups.com,
> 	worldcit at googlegroups.com
> Message-ID:
> <20060917.160210.-399073.0.wesburt at juno.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Good day to friends on nine mail lists,
> 
> By all means, print the attached visual-aid to 
> complement your reading of this message.  The 
> shaded section of the private sector chart shows 
> the "expense of management" as Adam Smith 
> described it in his "First Maxim Of Taxation," 1776.
>  
> The smaller shaded section of the ppublic sector
> chart 
> shows how little of the "expense of government" the 
> US presently invests in developing its human assets.
> 
> After spending a week at Franconia Notch, New 
> Hampshire, watching our "Best and Brightest" 
> debate the current issues on C-Span and C-Span II, 
> I am convinced that the "Common Cause" of wealthy, 
> healthy, intelligent, and powerful Americans (our 
> WHIPs) is the defense of the status quo, and the 
> destruction of the US Empire as a consequence. 
> As Frederic Bastiat said about this problem in his 
> book, The Law, 1850:
> 
>         "It is as if it were necessary, before a
> reign of 
>         justice appears, for everyone to suffer a
> cruel 
>         retribution --- some for their evilness, and
> some 
>         for their lack of understanding."
> 
> The only cure for "evilness" is Law and Order  But a
> 
> "lack of understanding" can be cured by Antonio 
> Rossin's Dialectic Education (not a policy) if the 
> teaching covers the reproductive processes of a 
> binary economy. This knowledge is presently the 
> proprietary secret of Kings, Priests, and WHIPs.
> 
> If you recall, my macro model, Fig4, showed Adam 
> Smith's "great wheel of commerce" rotating about 
> a vertical axis with wealth flowing to the left and 
> money (M1c) flowing to the right.  The attached
> Fig17 
> shows the same "wheel" rotating about a horizontal 
> axis with wealth flowing upward from the Earth and 
> money flowing downward: from the world market, to
> the 
> productive capital assets, through the labor market,
> 
> to the productive human assets, and back to the 
> world market.  The circular flow of money (M1c-A) 
> is C. H. Douglas' "A" flow which measures the wealth
> 
> produced and delivered to the human population as 
> the Gross Domestic Product.  C. H. Douglas' "B" flow
> 
> (M!c-B) which measures transactions between capital 
> assets does not add to, nor subtract from, the
> circular 
> "A" flows of money and wealth.  This new orientation
> 
> of the macro model provides space to show the
> typical 
> life cycle of capital and human assets, with
> historical 
> time as the horizontal scale. 
> 
> But notice the two reproductive processes (RP) in 
> every binary economy as shown on Fig17, which  
> are seldom mentioned by Monetarists, Humanists, 
> Austrians, Libertarians, and WHIPs who seem to be 
> more concerned with the affairs of consenting
> adults.  
> One RP replenishes the population of capital assets 
> now in production.  The other RP replenishes the 
> population of human assets now in production.  
> Humans, you may recall, are also the only market 
> for the wealth produced by our human and capital 
> assets operating in tandem.  Humans cannot exist 
> without the economy which supports them.  They 
> should care about how it's inner structure works.
> 
> Our WHIPs are the masters of both reproductive 
> processes, which start the life cycle of capital 
> assets and human assets alike.  But since the 
> abolishment of slavery, WHIPs can own only capital 
> assets.  So to save 3% of GDP on their total tax 
> rate, the WHIPs quite naturally elect to impair the 
> reproductive process of other people's assets by 
> withholding the biological feedback that completes 
> the reproductive process.  And this act of folly has
> 
> destroyed every Empire since the King of Judah, 
> Rehoboam, Son of Solomon, destroyed his father's 
> Empire, Biblical Israel, in (I Kings 12) B.C. 1913. 
> The timeless mechanism (TWP) of destruction 
> sinks the nation's young parenting families in debt 
> and usury.  The only source of debt free and
> interest 
> free money is the public revenue, as Thomas Paine 
> informed us in "Agrarian Justice," 1792. 
> 
> Thirty-eight hundred and sixteen years of the wrong 
> policy (TWP) then elapsed before American WHIPs 
> voted in A.D. 1913; for the Income Tax Amendment and
> 
> for the Federal Reserve System, in order to satisfy
> the 
> technical requirements of the optimum Policy (TOP). 
> Unfortunately, today's American WHIPs don't know 
> TOP from TWP because they do not hold, in common, 
> a valid conceptual model of an economy.  So US WHIPs
> 
> are now ninety-three years late in opening a
> discussion 
> of TOP, which Pope Leo X III opened in 1891 with his
> 
> Encyclical Letter "On The Condition of Labor" (Rerum
> 
> Novarum).  Japan and the Euro nations abandoned 
> TWP (as defined by "Subsidiarity") and adopted TOP 
> in 1946, under the direction of Douglas MacArthur 
> and John J. McCloy, respectively.  So there is still
> 
> an urgent need for a valid conceptual model of an
> economy that will be cognoscible by Doug Everingham 
> as well as by the public in every nation.  I believe
> 
> Fig17 meets that need.
> 
> A week of quiet reflection in New Hampshire resulted
> 
> in Fig17a, a one page presentation of TOP.  Please 
> let me know if I have solved the cognosciblity
> problem 
> and followed John Watkin's teaching toward a simpler
> 
> illustration of "The Optimum Policy" (TOP).
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Wes Burt
> 
>                      TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
>                       Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web
> site at:
>             
> <http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>         
>        
>  
>            Where do you stand on the continuum
> between 
>    TOP (The Optimum Policy) and TWP (The Wrong
> Policy)?
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 17675 bytes
> Desc: not available
> 
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20060917/d5f84a80/attachment.html