[GJM] Problems with the official version of 9/11
John Hermann
hermann at picknowl.com.au
Fri Sep 8 21:19:15 MDT 2006
There has been much discussion and debate about the mechanisms
contributing to the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2, however far less
discussion has been devoted to the complete collapse of WTC 7 (which was
not impacted by any aircraft, and suffered only relatively small fire
damage). The U.S. administration's earlier commissioned report simply
ignored the collapse of WTC 7 altogether. Perhaps that should not be too
surprising, since it's far harder to explain via any hypothesis other than
controlled demolition. The following has been extracted from the "Scholars
for 9/11 Truth" web-site:
" WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM/ET ... it
displayed all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions,
including complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own footprint,
where the floors are all falling at the same time, at about the speed of
free fall (6.6 seconds compared to 6.0), an event so embarrassing to the
official account it is not even mentioned in THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT. If
NIST is doing more, that is because its original studies are clearly
inadequate as, indeed, has been demonstrated by the comments made here
about its 'answers'. "
I might add that the WTC 7 collapse was completely symmetrical (this can be
seen by viewing recorded videos of the event), unlike the collapse of WTC 1
and 2 - which displayed some asymmetry.
-- JH
More information about the Discussion
mailing list