[GJM] Fw: Public apology

Janos abel at lightnet.co.uk
Thu Sep 7 08:05:11 MDT 2006


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Janos 
To: John Hermann 
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:51 PM
Subject: [GJM] Public apology


Abject and public apologies from the GJM co-moderator.

Dear John Herman,

Under pressure of time, I failed to modify the automatic message that gives the reason a post may sometimes be rejected.

The post in question is a duplicate of the one posted by Yaseen two days ago (apart from your comment about the peculiar nature of the collapse, which does deserve serious consideration).

Please accept my apology for failing to make this clear in the reject message.

I trust that you can reconsider your request to be unsubscribed from the list in the light of this explanation.

Janos Abel
  ----- part of Original Message ----- 
  From: John Hermann 
  To: discussion-owner at globaljusticemovement.net 
  Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:56 PM
  Subject: Re: [GJM] FWD: INVITATION TO WAS 9/11 AN INSIDE JOB?



  The following short item was censored by the GJM moderator. The reason given for its rejection being that it was considered "inappropriate". 
  If my comments are inappropriate, then I would suggest that - as a matter of consistency - so are the comments expressed in the original article "Was 9/11 an Inside Job?". I could add that my extensive training in the physical sciences well qualifies me to comment on this matter. However I'm not overly keen to remain subscribed to an email list which practices arbitrary censorship for no justifiable reason. Please unsubscribe me from this list as soon as practicable.    -- JH

  It is interesting that many well-informed people have independently arrived at this conclusion. The only known way in which a large steel-reinforced building can collapse symmetrically onto its own footprint at free-fall speed is by controlled demolition. -- JH
  ...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20060907/d7ce8fdb/attachment.html 


More information about the Discussion mailing list