[GJM] Comments for Dr.Alam (Marguerite; Please exapnd the reading List) (Muhammad Mukhtar Alam)

[robert searle]

Dear All,

        I do recall a long time ago the book by
Maurice Bucaille. It is worth reading because it shows
how certain statements in the Koran were "proven" by
science....long before it existed!!

Such evidence as can be found in the Bucaille book
adds some credibility to the possible divine origin of
the Muslim faith. 

Marguerite should get a copy of it if she can. It may
even be online if one does a word check on the
computer.


Regards,


Robert Searle 



--- marguerite hampton <ecopilgrim at aabol.com> wrote:

> Dr. Alam wrote in part:  
> 
> 
> 
> Your search is like the search for "theory of
> everything".. I recall
> StepheBibleking ..I wished you to 
> 
> see a book by Maurice Bucaulle on Quran,Bible and
> Sceince before you go
> ahead with your work. 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Dr. Alam.  Yes, in a way the Sacred Quest is a
> search for "the theory
> of everything" -- however, 
> 
> while others have used different criteria for their
> search, I am focusing on
> "human biology".for my 
> 
> thesis as to how the mind-field emmanates.  
> 
> 
> 
> Could we agree that there are several dimensions of
> consciousness: (1)
> individual (2) cosmological;
> 
> (3) physiological/biological  (4) collective: (5)
> social/cultural, and (6)
> spiritual, but that at the bottom 
> 
> of all fields of consciousness lies the human
> biological field.   
> 
> 
> 
> I also feel, Dr. Alam, that you are well read and
> extremely intelligent. 
> Our differences and 
> 
> communication gaps appear to be mainly cultural in
> nature and could we but
> develop a 
> 
> common language which unites our two views, could
> largely overcome any
> differences IMHO. 
> 
> 
> 
> As to the book you mention: by Maurice Bucaulle on
> Quran, Bible and Science,
> I feel it could
> 
> be very helpful since you indicate here that it
> approaches each from a
> scientific view.  Is there 
> 
> a way you can provide me with a copy of the book?  
> 
> 
> 
> As for the Quran or the Bible, I do not wish to
> either include or preclude
> them at this point as 
> 
> there is no specific scientific point of view
> brought out in either of them.
>  However, that does 
> 
> not mean that some of the mythology in them does not
> have basis in science,
> but I feel this is 
> 
> exactly what we want to carefully reveal. I have
> included two books
> involving Buddhism which demonstrate its basis from
> a scientific point of
> view.  In "The Universe In an Atom" the Dalai 
> 
> Lama compares Buddhism to Quantum Physics.  And in
> "The Quantum and The
> Lotus". 
> 
> Mattheiu Ricard, a molecular biologist and now a
> Buddhist Monk and 
> translator for The Dalai 
> 
> Lama, discusses Buddhism and Quantum Physics with
> acclaimed astrophysicist:
> Trinh Xuan
> 
> Than, who was born into a Buddhist family in Viet
> Nam.  When they first met,
> they began to 
> 
> compare the things Buddhism and science have in
> common, and in this book,
> they continue 
> 
> this dialog.  It would be very interesting to do
> this with regard to the
> Quran. 
> 
> 
> 
> However, I would like to make it clear that I am not
> interested in going
> into issues related to 
> 
> morality -- and you seem very much oriented to that
> viewpoint. Since I am
> authoring this book, 
> 
> I ask that your respect my views on this and that we
> stick to what science
> can prove in the field of 
> 
> human biology and consciousness as we search for new
> meaning together. 
> 
> 
> 
> marguerite 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Robert and Marquerite ,
> 
>  
> 
> Greetings for peace,
> 
>  
> 
> I noted some typographical mistake in my post dated
> 1 September, 2006. I am
> correcting the same in the quoted post of mine..2
> 
>  
> 
> With best wishes and regards
> 
>  
> 
> Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam
> 
>  
> 
> robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> 
> From: robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk>
> 
> To: mukhtaralam2000 at yahoo.com
> 
> Sent: Friday, 1 September, 2006 9:10:00 AM
> 
> Subject: Re: [GJM] Comments for Dr.Alam (Marguerite;
> Please exapnd the
> reading List)
> 
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> Without a fuller understanding of esoteric knowledge
> as indicated in
> Multi-Dimensional Science "New Age" ideas based on
> advanced physics will
> always be very limited. Yet, they are a step in the
> right direction but like
> Holodynamics (et al) will remain essentially
> incomplete though their
> proponents would ofcourse state otherwise.
> 
>  
> 
> Moreover, MDS offers literally for the first time a
> system in which the
> non-physical could arguably be proven indirectly via
> controlled experiments.
> This too is a step in the right direction as far as
> humanity is concerned.
> It has never been done like this before. With a more
> objective, and 
> scientific" comprehension of the Unseen many
> existing forms of meditation,
> or spiritual technologies (eg Holodynamics ofcourse
> in this case) would be
> dramatically ENHANCED.
> 
=== message truncated ===



		
___________________________________________________________ 
The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html