[GJM] Philip Stott is ecologically imbecile and dangerous

[Muhammad Mukhtar Alam]

Dear Robert,
   
  Greeting for peace,
   
  I will be grateful if you could spell my name correctly..it is Mukhtar not Muktar..
   
  I just checked Phillip Scott wikipedia..He is ecologically dangernous in calling for dropping of Kyoto Protocol...I just wrote to John Bunzl with copy for director of Millennium Camapign for its modication in terms of getting simultarnour reduction globally though inculding countries such as India and China.I have have called for dropping the principle of differentiation while defining the binding targets for GHG emissions
   
  More of my arguments can be seen at www2.worldbank.org/hm/hmethics
   
  I had also challenged the call of Kofi Annan in calling for higher growths while not understanding the demands of ecolgical sustaianbility of the growth,consumption,production patterns..
   
   
  Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam
  Ashok Viihar-III. Delhi

robert searle <dharao4 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
  Dear All,

I see Muktar has taken a strong stand against Philip Stott. But, I do feel his ideas do warrant some further consideration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Stott



Regards,

R.Searle

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion at globaljusticemovement.net
http://globaljusticemovement.net/mailman/listinfo/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net


 
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20061128/dd63eb1e/attachment.html