[GJM] What is the SP alternative for the Hizbollah - Israel conflict?
wesburt at juno.com
wesburt at juno.com
Fri Aug 11 09:07:55 MDT 2006
Many thanks to John Watkins, Frank Legge, and Victor Gunasekara
for their provocative comments on this subject. I am much obliged
to Frank and Victor for giving Doug Everingham some extra exposure
to my post of 8/9/06 on John L. Perkins' Council of Austrian Humanists
list.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:04:39 -0400 John Watkins <johnw at simsoc.org>
writes:
> Wes, you keep sending me these messages and they contain a lot of
> verbiage but they have failed as yet to help me understand TOP. I
> think you may have a psychological need not to be understood. For
> example, your use of the word "cognoscible."
>
> My main message is that, to the extent this is true, you're wasting
> people's time by sending them such lengthy and opaque messages.
> Eventually, they'll tune out and either tell you to stop--or simply
> stop reading them.
>
> So, here's a challenge. In fifty words or less, just what is TOP.
>
> If you can't give an understandable and definitive top (no pun
> intended) view, you'll never get your message across.
> --
> Simply,
>
> John
> http://simsoc.org
> 603-889-0111
>
> Thank you for you!
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John, thanks for the kind thoughts and the challenge: In fifty words or
less, just what is TOP? Shortly before joining your list I posted what I
thought was a definitive definition of TOP. It read as follows:
So what, exactly, is the technical content
of the several visual-aids hosted on Dr. W.
Curtiss Priest's web site below? The several
visual-aids simply expand the content of
Adam Smith's First Maxim of Taxation which
equates; the expense of government for the
citizens of a great nation, to, the expense of
management for the joint tenants of a great
estate or corporation. (T. W. O. N., 1776, Pg. 777)
This First Maxim declares that corporations
and governments should perform the same
service for their respective kind of reproducible
productive assets, product lines and people.
That service is, to distribute the nonrecurring
expense of developing the next generation of
productive assets over the income of, or value-
added by, those assets currently in production.
This method of funding works as well for developing
infrastructure as it does for developing capital or
human productive assets, and the funding is
"interest free," "debt free," and "inflation free."
~~~~~~~~~~~ End a long definition of TOP ~~~~~~~~~~~
Clearly, that definition was much too long. But since we
are defining "the optimum policy" (TOP) that policy may
look different to each of the millions of households or
product lines to which TOP is applied. So I have added
variety to brevity and composed the tabulation below,
in appreciation of your challenge:
(27 words) TOP is the financial practice in which the
nonrecurring costs of acquiring a productive asset
are charged uniformly over the lifetime sales revenue
of the productive asset.
(23 words) TOP is the practice of recovering the expense
of acquiring a productive asset uniformly over the lifetime
sales revenue of the productive asset.
(23 words) TOP adds 3% of GDP to our taxes in place of a
3% of GDP shortage of purchasing power in the work force.
(17 words) TOP assures each supplier in a free market
the same ratio of discretionary income to earned income.
(17 words) TOP since colonial days, has collected 2.8%
of GDP to invest in educating the US work force.
(14 words) TOP would also collect 3% of GDP to invest in
developing the work force.
(13 words) TOP is the proprietary secrete of every nation's
Emperors, Kings, Priests, and WHIPs.
(11 words) TOP at 50% is optimum for keeping the public
in debt.
(10 words) TOP will relieve destructive global competition
by expanding local markets.
(8 words) TOP enables perfect competition in a free market.
(8 words) TOP at 50% is the SOP of Empires,
(8 words) TOP is the One Law that Cicero cited.
~~~~~~~~~~~ End Twelve brief descriptions of TOP ~~~~~~~~~
There is a magic in the number Twelve which is missing
from the number Ten, as when speaking of Commandments.
Surely, one or more of these short definitions should put
at rest the mind of any one who is still reading my posts.
When you live in Ireland like Richard K. Moore, in France
with Bill Bonner, or in Australia with Frank Legge it is
easy to talk tough about a second Civil War in the US to
get George W. Bush and his NeoCons out of the White House.
When you live ten miles from the White House and one mile
from the CIA Headquarters better solutions come easily
to mind, without even raising one's consciousness.
When the Establishment changes its mind, as it must,
we need to have in place an informed public opinion
about TOP (the optimum policy) for every industrial
society. 100% of TOP in the US private sector made the
US a 20th century Global Empire. 50% of TOP in the US
public sector erected a 3% of GDP obstacle to the full
development of US human resources in the 21st century.
That obstacle (about the size of the DOD budget) has been
taboo in our schools, taboo in our Media, taboo in our
public policy debates, and unfunded in our social science
research since the onset of industrialization in the US.
The Establishment will need all the help it can get to make a
better policy choice than King Rehoboam and his NeoCons
made in B.C. 975, (I Kings 12). That policy choice continued
in force until the Great Repunlic was founded in 1776, and
abandoned little more than one hundred years later.
Now, John Watkins, I have a challenge for you: In 50 words
or less, convince me that you are not one of John Perkins'
"Economic Hit Men."
Kind regards,
Wes Burt
TOP and TWP are cognoscible on
[but not easily understood on]
Dr. W. Curtiss Priest's web site at:
<http://www.epie.org/cyber-soc/default.htm>
Where do you stand on the continuum between
TOP (The Optimum Policy) and TWP (The Wrong Policy)?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discussion_globaljusticemovement.net/attachments/20060811/e27972ff/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list